Information algebra explained

The term "information algebra" refers to mathematical techniques of information processing. Classical information theory goes back to Claude Shannon. It is a theory of information transmission, looking at communication and storage. However, it has not been considered so far that information comes from different sources and that it is therefore usually combined. It has furthermore been neglected in classical information theory that one wants to extract those parts out of a piece of information that are relevant to specific questions.

A mathematical phrasing of these operations leads to an algebra of information, describing basic modes of information processing. Such an algebra involves several formalisms of computer science, which seem to be different on the surface: relational databases, multiple systems of formal logic or numerical problems of linear algebra. It allows the development of generic procedures of information processing and thus a unification of basic methods of computer science, in particular of distributed information processing.

Information relates to precise questions, comes from different sources, must be aggregated, and can be focused on questions of interest. Starting from these considerations, information algebras are two-sorted algebras

(\Phi,D)

:

Where

\Phi

is a semigroup, representing combination or aggregation of information, and

D

is a lattice of domains (related to questions) whose partial order reflects the granularity of the domain or the question, and a mixed operation representing focusing or extraction of information.

Information and its operations

More precisely, in the two-sorted algebra

(\Phi,D)

, the following operations are defined
Combination :

:\Phi\Phi\Phi,~(\phi,\psi)\mapsto\phi\psi

Focusing :

:\PhiD\Phi,~(\phi,x)\mapsto\phi

            

Additionally, in

D

the usual lattice operations (meet and join) are defined.

Axioms and definition

The axioms of the two-sorted algebra

(\Phi,D)

, in addition to the axioms of the lattice

D

:
Semigroup :

\Phi

is a commutative semigroup under combination with a neutral element (representing vacuous information).
Distributivity of Focusing over Combination :

(\phi\psi)=\phi\psi

To focus an information on

x

combined with another information to domain

x

, one may as well first focus the second information to

x

and then combine.
Transitivity of Focusing :

(\phi)=\phi

To focus an information on

x

and

y

, one may focus it to

x\wedgey

.
Idempotency :

\phi\phi=\phi

An information combined with a part of itself gives nothing new.
Support :

\forall\phi\in\Phi,~\existsx\inD

such that

\phi=\phi

Each information refers to at least one domain (question).
            

A two-sorted algebra

(\Phi,D)

satisfying these axioms is called an Information Algebra.

Order of information

A partial order of information can be introduced by defining

\phi\leq\psi

if

\phi\psi=\psi

. This means that

\phi

is less informative than

\psi

if it adds no new information to

\psi

. The semigroup

\Phi

is a semilattice relative to this order, i.e.

\phi\psi=\phi\vee\psi

. Relative to any domain (question)

x\inD

a partial order can be introduced by defining

\phi\leqx\psi

if

\phi\leq\psi

. It represents the order of information content of

\phi

and

\psi

relative to the domain (question)

x

.

Labeled information algebra

The pairs

(\phi,x)

, where

\phi\in\Phi

and

x\inD

such that

\phi=\phi

form a labeled Information Algebra. More precisely, in the two-sorted algebra

(\Phi,D)

, the following operations are defined
Labeling :

d(\phi,x)=x

Combination :

(\phi,x)(\psi,y)=(\phi\psi,x\veey)~~~~

Projection :

(\phi,x)\downarrow=(\phi,y)fory\leqx

            

Models of information algebras

Here follows an incomplete list of instances of information algebras:

The reduct of a relational algebra with natural join as combination and the usual projection is a labeled information algebra, see Example.

Many logic systems induce information algebras . Reducts of cylindric algebras or polyadic algebras are information algebras related to predicate logic .

Worked-out example: relational algebra

Let

{lA}

be a set of symbols, called attributes (or column names). For each

\alpha\in{lA}

let

U\alpha

be a non-empty set, the set of all possible values of the attribute

\alpha

. For example, if

{lA}=\{tt{name},tt{age},tt{income}\}

, then

Utt{name

} couldbe the set of strings, whereas

Utt{age

} and

Utt{income

} are both the set of non-negative integers.

Let

x\subseteq{lA}

. An

x

-tuple
is a function

f

so that

\hbox{dom}(f)=x

and

f(\alpha)\inU\alpha

for each

\alpha\inx

The setof all

x

-tuples is denoted by

Ex

. For an

x

-tuple

f

and a subset

y\subseteqx

the restriction

f[y]

is defined to be the

y

-tuple

g

so that

g(\alpha)=f(\alpha)

for all

\alpha\iny

.

A relation

R

over

x

is a set of

x

-tuples, i.e. a subset of

Ex

.The set of attributes

x

is called the
domain of

R

and denoted by

d(R)

. For

y\subseteqd(R)

the
projection of

R

onto

y

is definedas follows:

\piy(R):=\{f[y]\midf\inR\}.

The join of a relation

R

over

x

and a relation

S

over

y

isdefined as follows:

R\bowtieS:=\{f\midf(x\cupy)\hbox{-tuple},f[x]\inR, f[y]\inS\}.

As an example, let

R

and

S

be the following relations:

R= \begin{matrix} tt{name}&tt{age}\\ tt{A}&tt{34}\\ tt{B}&tt{47}\\ \end{matrix}    S= \begin{matrix} tt{name}&tt{income}\\ tt{A}&tt{20'000}\\ tt{B}&tt{32'000}\\ \end{matrix}

Then the join of

R

and

S

is:

R\bowtieS= \begin{matrix} tt{name}&tt{age}&tt{income}\\ tt{A}&tt{34}&tt{20'000}\\ tt{B}&tt{47}&tt{32'000}\\ \end{matrix}

A relational database with natural join

\bowtie

as combination and the usual projection

\pi

is an information algebra.The operations are well defined since

d(R\bowtieS)=d(R)\cupd(S)

x\subseteqd(R)

, then

d(\pix(R))=x

.It is easy to see that relational databases satisfy the axioms of a labeledinformation algebra:
semigroup :

(R1\bowtieR2)\bowtieR3=R1\bowtie(R2\bowtieR3)

and

R\bowtieS=S\bowtieR

transitivity : If

x\subseteqy\subseteqd(R)

, then

\pix(\piy(R))=\pix(R)

.
combination : If

d(R)=x

and

d(S)=y

, then

\pix(R\bowtieS)=R\bowtie\pix\cap(S)

.
idempotency : If

x\subseteqd(R)

, then

R\bowtie\pix(R)=R

.
support : If

x=d(R)

, then

\pix(R)=R

.

Connections

Valuation algebras : Dropping the idempotency axiom leads to valuation algebras. These axioms have been introduced by to generalize local computation schemes from Bayesian networks to more general formalisms, including belief function, possibility potentials, etc. . For a book-length exposition on the topic see .
  • Domains and information systems: Compact Information Algebras are related to Scott domains and Scott information systems ;;.
  • Uncertain information : Random variables with values in information algebras represent probabilistic argumentation systems .
  • Semantic information : Information algebras introduce semantics by relating information to questions through focusing and combination ;.
  • Information flow : Information algebras are related to information flow, in particular classifications .
  • Tree decomposition : Information algebras are organized into a hierarchical tree structure, and decomposed into smaller problems.
  • Semigroup theory : ...
  • Compositional models: Such models may be defined within the framework of information algebras: https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.02587
  • Extended axiomatic foundations of information and valuation algebras: The concept of conditional independence is basic for information algebras and a new axiomatic foundation of information algebras, based on conditional independence, extending the old one (see above) is available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.02658
  • Historical Roots

    The axioms for information algebras are derived from the axiom system proposed in (Shenoy and Shafer, 1990), see also (Shafer, 1991).

    References