Hyporheic zone explained

The hyporheic zone is the region of sediment and porous space beneath and alongside a stream bed, where there is mixing of shallow groundwater and surface water. The flow dynamics and behavior in this zone (termed hyporheic flow or underflow) is recognized to be important for surface water/groundwater interactions, as well as fish spawning, among other processes.[1] As an innovative urban water management practice, the hyporheic zone can be designed by engineers and actively managed for improvements in both water quality and riparian habitat.[2]

The assemblages of organisms that inhabits this zone are called .

The term hyporheic was originally coined by Traian Orghidan[3] in 1959 by combining two Greek words: (below) and (flow).

Hyporheic zone and hydrology

The hyporheic zone is the area of rapid exchange, where water is moved into and out of the stream bed and carries dissolved gas and solutes, contaminants, microorganisms and particles with it.[4] Depending on the underlying geology and topography, the hyporheic zone can be only several centimeters deep, or extend up to tens of meters laterally or deep.

The conceptual framework of the hyporheic zone as both a mixing and storage zone are integral to the study of hydrology. The first key concept related to the hyporheic zone is that of residence time; water in the channel moves at a much faster rate compared to the hyporheic zone, so this flow of slower water effectively increases the water residence time within the stream channel. Water residence times influence nutrient and carbon processing rates. Longer residence times promote dissolved solute retention, which can be later released back into the channel, delaying or attenuating the signals produced by the stream channel.[5]

The other key concept is that of hyporheic exchange,[6] or the speed at which water enters or leaves the subsurface zone. Stream water enters the hyporheic zone temporarily, but eventually the stream water reenters the surface channel or contributes to groundwater storage. The rate of hyporheic exchange is influenced by streambed structure, with shorter water flow paths created by streambed roughness.[7] [8] Longer flowpaths are induced by geomorphic features, such as stream meander patterns, pool-riffle sequences, large woody debris dams, and other features.

The hyporheic zone and its interactions influence the volume of stream water that is moved downstream. Gaining reaches indicate that groundwater is discharged into the stream as water moves downstream, so that the volume of water in the main channel increases from upstream to downstream. Conversely, when surface water infiltrates into the groundwater zone (thereby resulting in a net loss of surface water), then that stream reach is considered to be "losing" water.

The hyporheic zone provides a variety of ecological benefits. Examples include:[9]

Studying the hyporheic zone

A stream or river ecosystem is more than just the flowing water that can be seen on the surface: rivers are connected to the adjacent riparian areas.[10] Therefore, streams and rivers include the dynamic hyporheic zone that lies below and lateral to the main channel. Because the hyporheic zone lies underneath the surface water, it can be difficult to identify, quantify, and observe. However, the hyporheic zone is a zone of biological and physical activity, and therefore has functional significance for stream and river ecosystems.[11] Researchers use tools such as wells and piezometers, conservative and reactive tracers,[12] and transport models that account for advection and dispersion of water in both the stream channel and the subsurface.[13] These tools can be used independently to study water movement through the hyporheic zone and to the stream channel, but are often complementary for a more accurate picture of water dynamics in the channel as a whole.

Biogeochemical significance

The hyporheic zone is an ecotone between the stream and subsurface: it is a dynamic area of mixing between surface water and groundwater at the sediment-water interface. From a biogeochemical perspective, groundwater is often low in dissolved oxygen but carries dissolved nutrients. Conversely, stream water from the main channel contains higher dissolved oxygen and lower nutrients. This creates a biogeochemical gradient, which can exist at varying depths depending on the extent of the hyporheic zone. Often, the hyporheic zone is dominated by heterotrophic microorganisms that process the dissolved nutrients exchanged at this interface.

Hyporheic zone: main characteristics and causes of the hyporheic exchange

The main differences between the surface water and groundwater concern the oxygen concentration, the temperature and the pH.[14] As interface region between the main stream and the groundwater the hyporheic zone is subjected to physic-chemical gradients generating biochemical reactions able to regulate the behavior of the chemical compounds and the aquatic organisms within the exchange area.[15] The hyporheic zone provides an important contribution to the attenuation of contaminants dissolved in the channel water[16] and to the cycle of energy, nutrients and organic compounds.[17] Moreover, it exhibits a significant control on the transport of pollutants across the river basin.[18]

The main factors affecting the hyporheic exchange are:[19]

References

  1. Lewandowski. Jörg. 2019. Is the hyporheic zone relevant beyond the scientific community?. Water. en. 11. 11. 2230. 10.3390/w11112230. free. 20.500.11850/382125. free.
  2. Lawrence . J.E. . M. Skold . F.A. Hussain . D. Silverman . V.H. Resh . D.L. Sedlak . R.G. Luthy . J.E. McCray . Hyporheic Zone in Urban Streams: A Review and Opportunities for Enhancing Water Quality and Improving Aquatic Habitat by Active Management . Environmental Engineering Science . 47 . 8 . 480–501 . 14 August 2013 . 10.1089/ees.2012.0235.
  3. Orghidan . T. . 1959 . Ein neuer Lebensraum des unterirdischen Wassers: Der hyporheische Biotop . Archiv für Hydrobiologie . 55 . 392–414 .
  4. Bencala. Kenneth E.. 2000. Hyporheic zone hydrological processes. Hydrological Processes. en. 14. 15. 2797–2798. 10.1002/1099-1085(20001030)14:15<2797::AID-HYP402>3.0.CO;2-6. 2000HyPr...14.2797B. 1099-1085.
  5. Grimm. Nancy B.. Nancy Grimm. Fisher. Stuart G.. 40029109. 1984-04-01. Exchange between interstitial and surface water: Implications for stream metabolism and nutrient cycling. Hydrobiologia. en. 111. 3. 219–228. 10.1007/BF00007202. 1573-5117.
  6. Findlay. Stuart. 1995. Importance of surface-subsurface exchange in stream ecosystems: The hyporheic zone. Limnology and Oceanography. en. 40. 1. 159–164. 10.4319/lo.1995.40.1.0159. 1995LimOc..40..159F. 1939-5590. free.
  7. Kasahara. Tamao. Wondzell. Steven M.. 2003. Geomorphic controls on hyporheic exchange flow in mountain streams. Water Resources Research. en. 39. 1. SBH 3–1–SBH 3-14. 10.1029/2002WR001386. 2003WRR....39.1005K. 1944-7973. free.
  8. Harvey. Judson W.. Bencala. Kenneth E.. 1993. The Effect of streambed topography on surface-subsurface water exchange in mountain catchments. Water Resources Research. en. 29. 1. 89–98. 10.1029/92WR01960. 1993WRR....29...89H. 1944-7973.
  9. Book: The hyporheic handbook: a handbook on the groundwater-surface water interface and hyporheic zone for environment managers . 2009 . Environment Agency . 978-1-84911-131-7.
  10. An ecosystem perspective of alluvial rivers: connectivity and the hyporheic corridor Scinapse Academic search engine for paper. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. March 1993 . 12 . 1 . 48–60 . 10.2307/1467685 . 1467685 . en. 2019-03-15. Stanford . Jack A. . Ward . James V. . 84122703 .
  11. Boulton. Andrew J.. Findlay. Stuart. Marmonier. Pierre. Stanley. Emily H.. Valett. H. Maurice. 1998-11-01. The functional significance of the hyporheic zone in streams and rivers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 29. 1. 59–81. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.59. 0066-4162.
  12. Mulholland. Patrick J.. Tank. Jennifer L.. Jennifer Tank. Sanzone. Diane M.. Wollheim. Wilfred M.. Peterson. Bruce J.. Webster. Jackson R.. Meyer. Judy L.. 2000. Nitrogen Cycling in a Forest Stream Determined by a 15n Tracer Addition. Ecological Monographs. en. 70. 3. 471–493. 10.1890/0012-9615(2000)070[0471:NCIAFS]2.0.CO;2. 1557-7015. free. 10919/46856.
  13. Bencala. Kenneth E.. Walters. Roy A.. 1983. Simulation of solute transport in a mountain pool-and-riffle stream: A transient storage model. Water Resources Research. en. 19. 3. 718–724. 10.1029/WR019i003p00718. 1983WRR....19..718B. 1944-7973. 2027/uc1.31210024756569. free.
  14. Book: The hyporheic handbook : a handbook on the groundwater-surface water interface and hyporheic zone for environment managers . 2009 . Environment Agency . 9781849111317.
  15. Brunke . Matthias . Gonser . Tom . The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater . Freshwater Biology . 1997 . 37 . 1 . 1–33 . 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00143.x . en . 1365-2427. free . 1997FrBio..37....1B .
  16. Gandy . C. J. . Smith . J. W. N. . Jarvis . A. P. . Attenuation of mining-derived pollutants in the hyporheic zone: A review . Science of the Total Environment . 15 February 2007 . 373 . 2 . 435–446 . 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.11.004 . 17173955 . 2007ScTEn.373..435G . en . 0048-9697.
  17. White . David S. . Perspectives on Defining and Delineating Hyporheic Zones . Journal of the North American Benthological Society . 1 March 1993 . 12 . 1 . 61–69 . 10.2307/1467686 . 1467686 . 83923428 . 0887-3593.
  18. Smith . J. W. N. . Surridge . B. W. J. . Haxton . T. H. . Lerner . D. N. . Pollutant attenuation at the groundwater–surface water interface: A classification scheme and statistical analysis using national-scale nitrate data . Journal of Hydrology . 15 May 2009 . 369 . 3 . 392–402 . 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.026 . 2009JHyd..369..392S . en . 0022-1694.
  19. Harvey . F. Edwin . Lee . David R. . Rudolph . David L. . Frape . Shaun K. . Locating groundwater discharge in large lakes using bottom sediment electrical conductivity mapping . Water Resources Research . November 1997 . 33 . 11 . 2609–2615 . 10.1029/97WR01702 . 1997WRR....33.2609H . 131345414 . en.
  20. Freeze . R. Allan . Witherspoon . P. A. . Theoretical analysis of regional groundwater flow: 2. Effect of water-table configuration and subsurface permeability variation . Water Resources Research . 1967 . 3 . 2 . 623–634 . 10.1029/WR003i002p00623 . 1967WRR.....3..623F . en . 1944-7973.
  21. Winter . Thomas C. . Recent advances in understanding the interaction of groundwater and surface water . Reviews of Geophysics . 1995 . 33 . S2 . 985–994 . 10.1029/95RG00115 . 1995RvGeo..33S.985W . en . 1944-9208.
  22. Pinder . George F. . Sauer . Stanley P. . Numerical Simulation of Flood Wave Modification Due to Bank Storage Effects . Water Resources Research . 1971 . 7 . 1 . 63–70 . 10.1029/WR007i001p00063 . 1971WRR.....7...63P . en . 1944-7973.
  23. Harvey . Judson W. . Bencala . Kenneth E. . The Effect of streambed topography on surface-subsurface water exchange in mountain catchments . Water Resources Research . 1993 . 29 . 1 . 89–98 . 10.1029/92WR01960 . 1993WRR....29...89H . en . 1944-7973.
  24. Cardenas . M. Bayani . A model for lateral hyporheic flow based on valley slope and channel sinuosity . Water Resources Research . 2009 . 45 . 1 . W01501 . 10.1029/2008WR007442 . 2009WRR....45.1501C . en . 1944-7973.

External links

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Hyporheic zone".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.