Gunshot wound explained

Gunshot wound
Field:Trauma surgery
Symptoms:Pain, deformity, bleeding
Complications:PTSD, lead poisoning, nerve injury,[1] wound infection, sepsis, brain damage, gangrene, disability, amputation[2]
Causes:Guns
Risks:Illegal drug trade, ignorance of firearm safety, substance misuse, alcohol abuse, poor mental health, firearm laws, social and economic differences, some occupations, war
Prevention:Firearm safety, crime prevention
Treatment:Trauma care
Frequency:1 million (interpersonal violence in 2015)[3]
Deaths:251,000 (2016)

A gunshot wound (GSW) is a penetrating injury caused by a projectile (e.g. a bullet) from a gun (typically firearm or air gun).[4] [5] Damage may include bleeding, bone fractures, organ damage, wound infection, loss of the ability to move part of the body, and in severe cases, death. Damage depends on the part of the body hit, the path the bullet follows through the body, and the type and speed of the bullet.[5] Long-term complications can include bowel obstruction, failure to thrive, neurogenic bladder and paralysis, recurrent cardiorespiratory distress and pneumothorax, hypoxic brain injury leading to early dementia, amputations, chronic pain and pain with light touch (hyperalgesia), deep venous thrombosis with pulmonary embolus, limb swelling and debility, and lead poisoning.[6] [7]

Factors that determine rates of gun violence vary by country. These factors may include the illegal drug trade, easy access to firearms, substance misuse including alcohol, mental health problems, firearm laws, social attitudes, economic differences, and occupations such as being a police officer.[8] Where guns are more common, altercations more often end in death.[9]

Before management begins, the area must be verified as safe. This is followed by stopping major bleeding, then assessing and supporting the airway, breathing, and circulation.[10] Firearm laws, particularly background checks and permit to purchase, decrease the risk of death from firearms.[11] Safer firearm storage may decrease the risk of firearm-related deaths in children.[12]

In 2015, about a million gunshot wounds occurred from interpersonal violence.[3] In 2016, firearms resulted in 251,000 deaths globally, up from 209,000 in 1990.[13] Of these deaths, 161,000 (64%) were the result of assault, 67,500 (27%) were the result of suicide, and 23,000 (9%) were accidents.[13] In the United States, guns resulted in about 40,000 deaths in 2017.[14] Firearm-related deaths are most common in males between the ages of 20 and 24 years.[13] Economic costs due to gunshot wounds have been estimated at $140 billion a year in the United States.[15]

Signs and symptoms

Trauma from a gunshot wound varies widely based on the bullet, velocity, mass, entry point, trajectory, affected anatomy, and exit point. Gunshot wounds can be particularly devastating compared to other penetrating injuries because the trajectory and fragmentation of bullets can be unpredictable after entry. Moreover, gunshot wounds typically involve a large degree of nearby tissue disruption and destruction caused by the physical effects of the projectile correlated with the bullet velocity classification.[16]

The immediate damaging effect of a gunshot wound is typically severe bleeding with the potential for hypovolemic shock, a condition characterized by inadequate delivery of oxygen to vital organs. In the case of traumatic hypovolemic shock, this failure of adequate oxygen delivery is due to blood loss, as blood is the means of delivering oxygen to the body's constituent parts. Devastating effects can result when a bullet strikes a vital organ such as the heart, lungs, or liver, or damages a component of the central nervous system such as the spinal cord or brain.

Common causes of death following gunshot injury include bleeding, low oxygen caused by pneumothorax, catastrophic injury to the heart and major blood vessels, and damage to the brain or central nervous system. Non-fatal gunshot wounds frequently have mild to severe long-lasting effects, typically some form of major disfigurement such as amputation because of a severe bone fracture and may cause permanent disability. A sudden blood gush may take effect immediately from a gunshot wound if a bullet directly damages larger blood vessels, especially arteries.

Pathophysiology

The degree of tissue disruption caused by a projectile is related to the cavitation the projectile creates as it passes through tissue. A bullet with sufficient energy will have a cavitation effect in addition to the penetrating track injury. As the bullet passes through the tissue, initially crushing then lacerating, the space left forms a cavity; this is called the permanent cavity. Higher-velocity bullets create a pressure wave that forces the tissues away, creating not only a permanent cavity the size of the caliber of the bullet but a temporary cavity or secondary cavity, which is often many times larger than the bullet itself. The temporary cavity is the radial stretching of tissue around the bullet's wound track, which momentarily leaves an empty space caused by high pressures surrounding the projectile that accelerate material away from its path. The extent of cavitation, in turn, is related to the following characteristics of the projectile:

KE = 1/2mv2 (where m is mass and v is velocity). This helps to explain why wounds produced by projectiles of higher mass and/or higher velocity produce greater tissue disruption than projectiles of lower mass and velocity. The velocity of the bullet is a more important determinant of tissue injury. Although both mass and velocity contribute to the overall energy of the projectile, the energy is proportional to the mass while proportional to the square of its velocity. As a result, for constant velocity, if the mass is doubled, the energy is doubled; however, if the velocity of the bullet is doubled, the energy increases four times. The initial velocity of a bullet is largely dependent on the firearm. The US military commonly uses 5.56-mm bullets, which have a relatively low mass as compared with other bullets; however, the speed of these bullets is relatively fast. As a result, they produce a larger amount of kinetic energy, which is transmitted to the tissues of the target.[17] The size of the temporary cavity is approximately proportional to the kinetic energy of the bullet and depends on the resistance of the tissue to stress.[18] Muzzle energy, which is based on muzzle velocity, is often used for ease of comparison.

Handgun bullets will generally travel in a relatively straight line or make one turn if a bone is hit. Upon travel through deeper tissue, high-energy rounds may become unstable as they decelerate, and may tumble (pitch and yaw) as the energy of the projectile is absorbed, causing stretching and tearing of the surrounding tissue.

Most commonly, bullets do not fragment, and secondary damage from fragments of shattered bone is a more common complication than bullet fragments.

Diagnosis

Classification

Gunshot wounds are classified according to the speed of the projectile using the Gustilo open fracture classification:

Low velocity wounds are typical of small caliber handguns. They do not usually cause extensive soft tissue damage, and in the Gustilo open fracture classification are classified as Type 1 or 2 wounds.

These are more typical of shotgun blasts or higher caliber handguns like magnums. The risk of infection from these types of wounds can vary depending on the type and pattern of bullets fired as well as the distance from the firearm.

Usually caused by powerful assault or hunting rifles and usually cause Gustilo Type 3 wounds. The risk of infection is especially high due to the large area of injury and destroyed tissue.[19]

Bullets from handguns are sometimes less than but with modern pistol loads, they usually are slightly above, while bullets from most modern rifles exceed . One recently developed class of firearm projectiles is the hyper-velocity bullet, such cartridges are usually made for achieving such high speed, purpose-built in factories or made by amateurs. Examples of hyper velocity cartridges include the .220 Swift, .17 Remington and .17 Mach IV cartridges. The US military commonly uses 5.56mm bullets, which have a relatively low mass as compared with other bullets (40-62 grains); however, the speed of these bullets is relatively fast (approximately, placing them in the high velocity category). As a result, they produce a larger amount of kinetic energy, which is transmitted to the tissues of the target.[20] High energy transfer results in more tissue disruption, which plays a role in incapacitation, but other factors such as wound size and shot placement are also important.

Kronlein shot

The "Kronlein shot" (German: Krönleinschuss) is a distinctive type of headshot wound that can only be created by a high velocity rifle bullet or shotgun slug.[21] In a Kronlein shot, the intact brain is ejected from the skull and deposited some distance from the victim's body.[22] This type of wound is believed to be caused by a hydrodynamic effect. Hydraulic pressure generated within the skull by a high velocity bullet leads to the explosive ejection of the brain from the fractured skull.[23]

Prevention

Medical organizations in the United States recommend a criminal background check being held before a person buys a gun and that a person who has convictions for crimes of violence should not be permitted to buy a gun.[14] Safe storage of firearms is recommended, as well as better mental health care and removal of guns from those at risk of suicide.[14] In an effort to prevent mass shootings, greater regulations on guns that can rapidly fire many bullets is recommended.[14]

Management

Initial assessment for a gunshot wound is approached in the same way as other acute trauma using the advanced trauma life support (ATLS) protocol.[24] These include:

Depending on the extent of injury, management can range from urgent surgical intervention to observation. As such, any history from the scene such as gun type, shots fired, shot direction and distance, blood loss on scene, and pre-hospital vitals signs can be very helpful in directing management. Unstable people with signs of bleeding that cannot be controlled during the initial evaluation require immediate surgical exploration in the operating room. Otherwise, management protocols are generally dictated by anatomic entry point and anticipated trajectory.

Neck

A gunshot wound to the neck can be particularly dangerous because of the high number of vital anatomical structures contained within a small space. The neck contains the larynx, trachea, pharynx, esophagus, vasculature (carotid, subclavian, and vertebral arteries; jugular, brachiocephalic, and vertebral veins; thyroid vessels), and nervous system anatomy (spinal cord, cranial nerves, peripheral nerves, sympathetic chain, brachial plexus). Gunshots to the neck can thus cause severe bleeding, airway compromise, and nervous system injury.[25]

Initial assessment of a gunshot wound to the neck involves non-probing inspection of whether the injury is a penetrating neck injury (PNI), classified by violation of the platysma muscle. If the platysma is intact, the wound is considered superficial and only requires local wound care. If the injury is a PNI, surgery should be consulted immediately while the case is being managed. Of note, wounds should not be explored on the field or in the emergency department given the risk of exacerbating the wound.

Due to the advances in diagnostic imaging, management of PNI has been shifting from a "zone-based" approach, which uses anatomical site of injury to guide decisions, to a "no-zone" approach which uses a symptom-based algorithm.[26] The no-zone approach uses a hard signs and imaging system to guide next steps. Hard signs include airway compromise, unresponsive shock, diminished pulses, uncontrolled bleeding, expanding hematoma, bruits/thrill, air bubbling from wound or extensive subcutaneous air, stridor/hoarseness, neurological deficits. If any hard signs are present, immediate surgical exploration and repair is pursued alongside airway and bleeding control. If there are no hard signs, the person receives a multi-detector CT angiography for better diagnosis. A directed angiography or endoscopy may be warranted in a high-risk trajectory for the gunshot. A positive finding on CT leads to operative exploration. If negative, the person may be observed with local wound care.

Chest

Important anatomy in the chest includes the chest wall, ribs, spine, spinal cord, intercostal neurovascular bundles, lungs, bronchi, heart, aorta, major vessels, esophagus, thoracic duct, and diaphragm. Gunshots to the chest can thus cause severe bleeding (hemothorax), respiratory compromise (pneumothorax, hemothorax, pulmonary contusion, tracheobronchial injury), cardiac injury (pericardial tamponade), esophageal injury, and nervous system injury.[27]

Initial workup as outlined in the Workup section is particularly important with gunshot wounds to the chest because of the high risk for direct injury to the lungs, heart, and major vessels. Important notes for the initial workup specific for chest injuries are as follows. In people with pericardial tamponade or tension pneumothorax, the chest should be evacuated or decompressed if possible prior to attempting tracheal intubation because the positive pressure ventilation can cause hypotention or cardiovascular collapse.[28] Those with signs of a tension pneumothorax (asymmetric breathing, unstable blood flow, respiratory distress) should immediately receive a chest tube (> French 36) or needle decompression if chest tube placement is delayed. FAST exam should include extended views into the chest to evaluate for hemopericardium, pneumothorax, hemothorax, and peritoneal fluid.

Those with cardiac tamponade, uncontrolled bleeding, or a persistent air leak from a chest tube all require surgery.[29] Cardiac tamponade can be identified on FAST exam. Blood loss warranting surgery is 1–1.5 L of immediate chest tube drainage or ongoing bleeding of 200-300 mL/hr.[30] Persistent air leak is suggestive of tracheobronchial injury which will not heal without surgical intervention. Depending on the severity of the person's condition and if cardiac arrest is recent or imminent, the person may require surgical intervention in the emergency department, otherwise known as an emergency department thoracotomy (EDT).[31]

However, not all gunshot to the chest require surgery. Asymptomatic people with a normal chest X-ray can be observed with a repeat exam and imaging after 6 hours to ensure no delayed development of pneumothorax or hemothorax. If a person only has a pneumothorax or hemothorax, a chest tube is usually sufficient for management unless there is large volume bleeding or persistent air leak as noted above. Additional imaging after initial chest X-ray and ultrasound can be useful in guiding next steps for stable people. Common imaging modalities include chest CT, formal echocardiography, angiography, esophagoscopy, esophagography, and bronchoscopy depending on the signs and symptoms.[32]

Abdomen

Important anatomy in the abdomen includes the stomach, small bowel, colon, liver, spleen, pancreas, kidneys, spine, diaphragm, descending aorta, and other abdominal vessels and nerves. Gunshots to the abdomen can thus cause severe bleeding, release of bowel contents, peritonitis, organ rupture, respiratory compromise, and neurological deficits.

The most important initial evaluation of a gunshot wound to the abdomen is whether there is uncontrolled bleeding, inflammation of the peritoneum, or spillage of bowel contents. If any of these are present, the person should be transferred immediately to the operating room for laparotomy.[33] If it is difficult to evaluate for those indications because the person is unresponsive or incomprehensible, it is up to the surgeon's discretion whether to pursue laparotomy, exploratory laparoscopy, or alternative investigative tools.

Although all people with abdominal gunshot wounds were taken to the operating room in the past, practice has shifted in recent years with the advances in imaging to non-operative approaches in more stable people.[34] If the person's vital signs are stable without indication for immediate surgery, imaging is done to determine the extent of injury. Ultrasound (FAST) and help identify intra-abdominal bleeding and X-rays can help determine bullet trajectory and fragmentation. However, the best and preferred mode of imaging is high-resolution multi-detector CT (MDCT) with IV, oral, and sometimes rectal contrast. Severity of injury found on imaging will determine whether the surgeon takes an operative or close observational approach.

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) has become largely obsolete with the advances in MDCT, with use limited to centers without access to CT to guide requirement for urgent transfer for operation.

Extremities

The four main components of extremities are bones, vessels, nerves, and soft tissues. Gunshot wounds can thus cause severe bleeding, fractures, nerve deficits, and soft tissue damage. The Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) is used to classify the severity of injury and evaluates for severity of skeletal and/or soft tissue injury, limb ischemia, shock, and age.[35] Depending on the extent of injury, management can range from superficial wound care to limb amputation.

Vital sign stability and vascular assessment are the most important determinants of management in extremity injuries. As with other traumatic cases, those with uncontrolled bleeding require immediate surgical intervention. If surgical intervention is not readily available and direct pressure is insufficient to control bleeding, tourniquets or direct clamping of visible vessels may be used temporarily to slow active bleeding.[36] People with hard signs of vascular injury also require immediate surgical intervention. Hard signs include active bleeding, expanding or pulsatile hematoma, bruit/thrill, absent distal pulses and signs of extremity ischemia.[37]

For stable people without hard signs of vascular injury, an injured extremity index (IEI) should be calculated by comparing the blood pressure in the injured limb compared to an uninjured limb in order to further evaluate for potential vascular injury.[38] If the IEI or clinical signs are suggestive of vascular injury, the person may undergo surgery or receive further imaging including CT angiography or conventional arteriography.

In addition to vascular management, people must be evaluated for bone, soft tissue, and nerve injury. Plain films can be used for fractures alongside CTs for soft tissue assessment. Fractures must be debrided and stabilized, nerves repaired when possible, and soft tissue debrided and covered.[39] This process can often require multiple procedures over time depending on the severity of injury.

Epidemiology

In 2015, about a million gunshot wounds occurred from interpersonal violence.[3] Firearms, globally in 2016, resulted in 251,000 deaths up from 209,000 in 1990.[13] Of these deaths 161,000 (64%) were the result of assault, 67,500 (27%) were the result of suicide, and 23,000 were accidents.[13] Firearm related deaths are most common in males between the ages of 20 to 24 years.[13]

The countries with the greatest number of deaths from firearms are Brazil, United States, Mexico, Colombia, Venezuela, Guatemala, Bahamas and South Africa which make up just over half the total.[13] In the United States in 2015, about half of the 44,000 people who died by suicide did so with a gun.[40]

As of 2016, the countries with the highest rates of gun violence per capita were El Salvador, Venezuela, and Guatemala with 40.3, 34.8, and 26.8 violent gun deaths per 100,000 people respectively.[41] The countries with the lowest rates of were Singapore, Japan, and South Korea with 0.03, 0.04, and 0.05 violent gun deaths per 100,000 people respectively.

Canada

In 2016, about 893 people died due to gunshot wounds in Canada (2.1 per 100,000).[13] About 80% were suicides, 12% were assaults, and 4% percent were accidents.[42]

United States

In 2017, there were 39,773 deaths in the United States as a result gunshot wounds.[14] Of these 60% were suicides, 37% were homicides, 1.4% were by law enforcement, 1.2% were accidents, and 0.9% were from an unknown cause.[14] This is up from 37,200 deaths in 2016 due to a gunshot wound (10.6 per 100,000).[13] With respect to those that pertain to interpersonal violence, it had the 31st highest rate in the world with 3.85 deaths per 100,000 people in 2016. The majority of all homicides and suicides are firearm-related, and the majority of firearm-related deaths are the result of murder and suicide.[43] When sorted by GDP, however, the United States has a much higher violent gun death rate compared to other developed countries, with over 10 times the number of firearms assault deaths than the next four highest GDP countries combined.[44] Gunshot violence is the third most costly cause of injury and the fourth most expensive form of hospitalization in the United States.[45]

History

Until the 1880s, the standard practice for treating a gunshot wound called for physicians to insert their unsterilized fingers into the wound to probe and locate the path of the bullet.[46] Standard surgical theory such as opening abdominal cavities to repair gunshot wounds,[47] germ theory, and Joseph Lister's technique for antiseptic surgery using diluted carbolic acid, had not yet been accepted as standard practice. For example, sixteen doctors attended to President James A. Garfield after he was shot in 1881, and most probed the wound with their fingers or dirty instruments.[48] Historians agree that massive infection was a significant factor in Garfield's death.[49]

At almost the same time, in Tombstone, Arizona Territory, on 13 July 1881, George E. Goodfellow performed the first laparotomy to treat an abdominal gunshot wound.[50] Goodfellow pioneered the use of sterile techniques in treating gunshot wounds,[51] washing the person's wound and his hands with lye soap or whisky, and his patient, unlike the President, recovered.[52] He became America's leading authority on gunshot wounds[53] and is credited as the United States' first civilian trauma surgeon.[54]

Mid-nineteenth-century handguns such as the Colt revolvers used during the American Civil War had muzzle velocities of just 230– /s and their powder and ball predecessors had velocities of 167 m/s or less. Unlike today's high-velocity bullets, nineteenth-century balls produced almost little or no cavitation and, being slower moving, they were liable to lodge in unusual locations at odds with their trajectory.[55]

Wilhelm Röntgen's discovery of X-rays in 1895 led to the use of radiographs to locate bullets in wounded soldiers.[56]

Survival rates for gunshot wounds improved among US military personnel during the Korean and Vietnam Wars, due in part to helicopter evacuation, along with improvements in resuscitation and battlefield medicine.[57] Similar improvements were seen in US trauma practices during the Iraq War.[58] Military health care providers who return to civilian practice sometimes disseminate military trauma care practices.[59] [60] One such practice is to transfer major trauma cases to an operating theater as soon as possible, to stop internal bleeding. Within the United States, the survival rate for gunshot wounds has increased, leading to declines in the gun death rate in states that have stable rates of gunshot hospitalizations.[61] [62] [63] [64]

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Stein . JS . Strauss . E . Gunshot wounds to the upper extremity. Evaluation and management of vascular injuries. . The Orthopedic Clinics of North America . January 1995 . 26 . 1 . 29–35 . 10.1016/S0030-5898(20)31965-9 . 7838501.
  2. Gunshot injuries of the popliteal artery - Nair - 2000 - BJS - Wiley Online Library . The British Journal of Surgery. 2000 . 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01397.x . 10792317 . Nair . R. . Abdool-Carrim . A. T. . Robbs . J. V. . 87 . 5 . 602–7 . 8418598. free .
  3. ((GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators)) . Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.. Lancet. 8 October 2016. 388. 10053. 1545–1602. 27733282. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6. 5055577.
  4. Web site: Gunshot wound definition and meaning Collins English Dictionary . www.collinsdictionary.com . 13 July 2019 . en.
  5. Web site: Gunshot Injuries; Gunshot wounds (GSW) information . patient.info . 13 July 2019 . en.
  6. Web site: Gun Shot Wounds - Trauma - Orthobullets . www.orthobullets.com . 13 July 2019.
  7. Web site: Gunshot wounds - aftercare: MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia . medlineplus.gov . 13 July 2019 . en.
  8. Branas . CC . Han . S . Wiebe . DJ . Alcohol Use and Firearm Violence . Epidemiologic Reviews . 2016 . 38 . 1 . 32–45 . 10.1093/epirev/mxv010 . 26811427. 4762248 .
  9. Cukier . W . Eagen . SA . Gun violence. . Current Opinion in Psychology . February 2018 . 19 . 109–112 . 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.008 . 29279206. 20214015 .
  10. Book: Breeze . John . Penn-Barwell . Jowan G. . Keene . Damian . O'Reilly . David . Jeyanathan . Jeyasankar . Mahoney . Peter F. . Ballistic Trauma: A Practical Guide . 2017 . Springer . 9783319613642 . 75 . 4 . en.
  11. Lee . LK . Fleegler . EW . Farrell . C . Avakame . E . Srinivasan . S . Hemenway . D . Monuteaux . MC . Firearm Laws and Firearm Homicides: A Systematic Review. . JAMA Internal Medicine . 1 January 2017 . 177 . 1 . 106–119 . 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7051 . 27842178. 205119294 .
  12. Santaella-Tenorio . J . Cerdá . M . Villaveces . A . Galea . S . What Do We Know About the Association Between Firearm Legislation and Firearm-Related Injuries? . Epidemiologic Reviews . 2016 . 38 . 1 . 140–57 . 10.1093/epirev/mxv012 . 26905895. 6283012 .
  13. Global Burden of Disease 2016 Injury Collaborators. . Naghavi . Mohsen . Marczak . Laurie . etal . Global Mortality From Firearms, 1990-2016 . JAMA . 28 August 2018 . 320 . 8 . 792–814 . 10.1001/jama.2018.10060 . 30167700. 6143020 .
  14. McLean . Robert M. . Harris . Patrice . Cullen . John . Maier . Ronald V. . Yasuda . Kyle E. . Schwartz . Bruce J. . Benjamin . Georges C. . Firearm-Related Injury and Death in the United States: A Call to Action From the Nation's Leading Physician and Public Health Professional Organizations . Annals of Internal Medicine . 7 August 2019 . 10.7326/M19-2441. 31390463 . 171 . 8 . 573–577 . free .
  15. Rhee . PM . Moore . EE . Joseph . B . Tang . A . Pandit . V . Vercruysse . G . Gunshot wounds: A review of ballistics, bullets, weapons, and myths . The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery . June 2016 . 80 . 6 . 853–67 . 10.1097/TA.0000000000001037 . 26982703.
  16. Lamb. C. M.. Garner. J. P.. April 2014. Selective non-operative management of civilian gunshot wounds to the abdomen: a systematic review of the evidence . Injury. 45. 4. 659–666. 10.1016/j.injury.2013.07.008. 1879-0267. 23895795.
  17. Firearms, bullets, and wound ballistics: An imaging primer . Tarek N. . Hanna . Waqas . Shuaib . Tatiana . Han . Ajeet . Mehta . Faisal . Khosa . . 1 July 2015 . 46 . 7 . 1186–1196 . 25724396 . Each bullet has its intrinsic mass, but the initial velocity is largely a function of the firearm. Due to short barrel length, handguns produce a low-velocity projectile that usually deposits all of its kinetic energy within the target, thus creating an entry but no exit wound. Rifles have longer barrel lengths that produce a high velocity, high-energy projectile.. 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.034 .
  18. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology . September 2009 . 5 . 3 . 204–209 . Ballistics reviews: mechanisms of bullet wound trauma . Nicholas . Maiden . 19644779 . ...the temporary cavity is the most important factor in wound ballistics of high velocity rifle bullets...the importance of the temporary cavity is recognized by all other contemporary researchers...The temporary cavity also has little or no wounding potential with handgun bullets because the amount of kinetic energy deposited in the tissue is insufficient to cause remote injuries. The size of the temporary cavity is approximately proportional to the kinetic energy of the striking bullet and also the amount of resistance the tissue has to stress.. 10.1007/s12024-009-9096-6 . 34589917 .
  19. Web site: Gun Shot Wounds - Trauma - Orthobullets. www.orthobullets.com. 2020-03-28.
  20. 10.1097/TA.0000000000001037. 2163-0755. 80. 6. 853–867 . Peter M. Rhee . Rhee. Peter M.. Moore. Ernest E.. Joseph. Bellal. Tang. Andrew. Pandit. Viraj. Vercruysse. Gary. Gunshot wounds: A review of ballistics, bullets, weapons, and myths. . 2016-06-01. 26982703 .
  21. Geserick, Gunther & Krocker, K. & Wirth, Ingo. (2015). Krönlein shot - A literature review. Archiv fur Kriminologie. 236. 145-165.
  22. Book: Dodd, M.J. . Terminal Ballistics: A Text and Atlas of Gunshot Wounds . Taylor & Francis . 2005 . 978-1-4200-3746-3 . 3 June 2023 . 202.
  23. Book: Rost . F. . Reimann . S.P. . The Pathological Physiology of Surgical Diseases: A Basis for Diagnosis and Treatment of Surgical Affections . P. Blakiston's Son & Company . 1923 . 3 June 2023 . 412.
  24. Book: Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) Student Course Manual. American College of Surgeons. 2012. 978-1880696026. 9th.
  25. Tisherman. Samuel A.. Bokhari. Faran. Collier. Bryan. Cumming. John. Ebert. James. Holevar. Michele. Kurek. Stanley. Leon. Stuart. Rhee. Peter. 2008-05-01. Clinical Practice Guideline: Penetrating Zone II Neck Trauma. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. en. 64. 5. 1392–1405. 10.1097/ta.0b013e3181692116. 18469667. 0022-5282. free.
  26. Shiroff. Adam M.. Gale. Stephen C.. Martin. Niels D.. Marchalik. Daniel. Petrov. Dmitriy. Ahmed. Hesham M.. Rotondo. Michael F.. Gracias. Vicente H.. January 2013. Penetrating neck trauma: a review of management strategies and discussion of the 'No Zone' approach . The American Surgeon. 79. 1. 23–29. 10.1177/000313481307900113. 1555-9823. 23317595. 23436327. free.
  27. Book: Rosen's emergency medicine : concepts and clinical practice. Marx, John A.,, Hockberger, Robert S.,, Walls, Ron M.,, Biros, Michelle H.,, Danzl, Daniel F.,, Gausche-Hill, Marianne. 9781455749874. Eighth . Philadelphia, PA. 853286850. Marx. John. Walls. Ron. Hockberger. Robert. 2013-08-01.
  28. Karmy-Jones. Riyad. Namias. Nicholas. Coimbra. Raul. Moore. Ernest E.. Schreiber. Martin. McIntyre. Robert. Croce. Martin. Livingston. David H.. Sperry. Jason L.. December 2014. Western Trauma Association critical decisions in trauma: penetrating chest trauma . The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 77. 6. 994–1002. 10.1097/TA.0000000000000426. 2163-0763. 25423543. free.
  29. Meredith. J. Wayne. Hoth. J. Jason. February 2007. Thoracic trauma: when and how to intervene . The Surgical Clinics of North America. 87. 1. 95–118, vii. 10.1016/j.suc.2006.09.014. 0039-6109. 17127125.
  30. Karmy-Jones. Riyad. Jurkovich. Gregory J.. March 2004. Blunt chest trauma . Current Problems in Surgery. 41. 3. 211–380. 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2003.12.004 . 15097979.
  31. Burlew. Clay Cothren. Moore. Ernest E.. Moore. Frederick A.. Coimbra. Raul. McIntyre. Robert C.. Davis. James W.. Sperry. Jason. Biffl. Walter L.. December 2012. Western Trauma Association critical decisions in trauma: resuscitative thoracotomy . The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 73. 6. 1359–1363. 10.1097/TA.0b013e318270d2df. 2163-0763. 23188227. free.
  32. Mirvis. Stuart E.. April 2004. Diagnostic imaging of acute thoracic injury . Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI. 25. 2. 156–179 . 15160796. 10.1016/j.sult.2004.02.001.
  33. Jansen. Jan O.. Inaba. Kenji. Resnick. Shelby. Fraga. Gustavo P.. Starling. Sizenando V.. Rizoli. Sandro B.. Boffard. Kenneth D.. Demetriades. Demetrios. May 2013. Selective non-operative management of abdominal gunshot wounds: survey of practise . Injury. 44. 5. 639–644. 10.1016/j.injury.2012.01.023 . 22341771.
  34. Pryor. John P.. Reilly. Patrick M.. Dabrowski. G. Paul. Grossman. Michael D.. Schwab. C. William. March 2004. Nonoperative management of abdominal gunshot wounds . Annals of Emergency Medicine. 43. 3. 344–353. 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00815-1 . 14985662.
  35. Johansen. K.. Daines. M.. Howey. T.. Helfet. D.. Hansen. S. T.. May 1990. Objective criteria accurately predict amputation following lower extremity trauma . The Journal of Trauma. 30. 5. 568–572; discussion 572–573 . 2342140. 10.1097/00005373-199005000-00007. free.
  36. Fox. Nicole. Rajani. Ravi R.. Bokhari. Faran. Chiu. William C.. Kerwin. Andrew. Seamon. Mark J.. Skarupa. David. Frykberg. Eric. Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. November 2012. Evaluation and management of penetrating lower extremity arterial trauma: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline . The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 73. 5 Suppl 4. S315–320. 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827018e4 . 23114487. free.
  37. Web site: National Trauma Data Bank 2012 Annual Report. American College of Surgeons 8. 21 March 2018. 23 April 2015. https://web.archive.org/web/20150423162556/https://www.facs.org/~/media/files/quality%20programs/trauma/ntdb/ntdb%20annual%20report%202012.ashx. dead.
  38. Web site: WESTERN TRAUMA ASSOCIATION. westerntrauma.org. 2018-03-21. 22 September 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20180922135542/http://westerntrauma.org/algorithms/PeripheralVascularInjuryPart1/NoteE.html. dead.
  39. Web site: Management of Complex Extremity Trauma. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. 21 March 2018. 29 August 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/20170829230920/https://www.facs.org/~/media/files/quality%20programs/trauma/publications/mancompexttrauma.ashx. dead.
  40. Houtsma . C . Butterworth . SE . Anestis . MD . Firearm suicide: pathways to risk and methods of prevention . Current Opinion in Psychology . August 2018 . 22 . 7–11 . 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.002 . 30122279. 52040180 .
  41. Web site: GBD Compare IHME Viz Hub. vizhub.healthdata.org. 2018-03-14.
  42. Web site: Government of Canada . Department of Justice . Firearms, Accidental Deaths, Suicides and Violent Crime: An Updated Review of the Literature with Special Reference to the Canadian Situation . www.justice.gc.ca . 13 July 2019 . 10 March 1999.
  43. Firearms and violence: A critical review. Wellford. Charles F.. Pepper. John V.. National Research Council. Petrie. Carol V.. Committee to Improve Research Information and Data on Firearms. 2005.
  44. Marczak. Laurie. O'Rourke. Kevin. Shepard. Dawn. Leach-Kemon. Katherine. Evaluation. for the Institute for Health Metrics and. 2016-12-13. Firearm Deaths in the United States and Globally, 1990-2015. JAMA. en. 316. 22. 2347. 10.1001/jama.2016.16676. 27959984. 0098-7484. free.
  45. A civilian perspective on ballistic trauma and gunshot injuries . Philipp . Lichte . Reiner . Oberbeck . Marcel . Binnebösel . Rene . Wildenauer . Hans-Christoph Pape . Hans-Christoph . Pape . Philipp . Kobbe . Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine . 18 . 35 . 35 . 17 June 2010 . 20565804 . 2898680 . 10.1186/1757-7241-18-35 . free .
  46. News: Schaffer. Amanda. 25 July 2006. A president felled by an assassin and 1880s medical care. The New York Times. New York, New York. 29 April 2016. Schaffer.
  47. Web site: Dr. Goodfellow: gunfighter's surgeon. Crane. Michael A.. 2003. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20131019153647/http://www.doc-holliday.com/article.pdf. 19 October 2013. 10 March 2013.
  48. Web site: The death of President Garfield, 1881. 11 March 2013.
  49. Book: Rutkow, Ira. James A. Garfield. Macmillan Publishers. 2006. 978-0-8050-6950-1. New York. 255885600. Rutkow.
  50. Book: Annual of the Universal Medical Sciences And Analytical Index 1888-1896. F.A. Davis Company. 1890. Charles E. Sajous. 3. Philadelphia.
  51. Web site: Come face to face with history. Cochise County. 8–9. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20130617184202/http://www.cochise100.org/wp-content/PDF/CENTENNIAL_BOOK.pdf. 17 June 2013.
  52. News: Edwards. Josh. 2 May 1980. George Goodfellow's medical treatment of stomach wounds became legendary. 3–5. The Prescott Courier.
  53. Web site: Dr. George Goodfellow. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20141220090137/http://societyoftheoldwest.ning.com/forum/topics/dr-george-goodfellow. 20 December 2014. 8 March 2013.
  54. Web site: Tombstone's doctor famous as surgeon. 12 September 1975. The Prescott Courier. 11 March 2013.
  55. Kennerk, Barry. December 2011. In Danger and Distress - Presentation of Gunshot Cases to Dublin Hospitals during the Height of Fenianism, 1866-187. Social History of Medicine. Oxford University Press. 24. 3. 588–607. 10.1093/shm/hkq094. 0951-631X.
  56. Manring MM, Hawk A, Calhoun JH, Andersen RC. 2009. Treatment of war wounds: a historical review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467. 8. 2168–91. 10.1007/s11999-009-0738-5. 2706344. 19219516.
  57. Web site: Chapter 3 - Medical Support 1965-1970. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20160606042103/http://www.history.army.mil/books/vietnam/MedSpt/chpt3.htm. 6 June 2016. 13 June 2016.
  58. Web site: Iraq War 10-year anniversary: Survival rate of wounded soldiers better than previous wars. Service. Lee Bowman, Scripps Howard News. 16 March 2013. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20180904084833/https://www.kjrh.com/news/local-news/iraq-war-10-year-anniversary-survival-rate-of-wounded-soldiers-better-than-previous-wars. 4 September 2018. 13 June 2016.
  59. Web site: Military medical techniques saving lives at home. GOV.UK.
  60. Web site: The role of the gun in the advancement of medicine. 8 January 2015. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20180106121802/http://www.gunbabygun.com/role-gun-advancement-medicine/. 6 January 2018. 13 June 2016.
  61. Jena. Anupam B.. Sun. Eric C.. Prasad. Vinay. 2014. Does the Declining Lethality of Gunshot Injuries Mask a Rising Epidemic of Gun Violence in the United States?. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 29. 7. 1065–1069. 10.1007/s11606-014-2779-z. 0884-8734. 4061370. 24452421.
  62. Web site: Lower murder rate linked to medical advance, not less violence.
  63. News: In Medical Triumph, Homicides Fall Despite Soaring Gun Violence. Fields. Gary. McWhirter. Cameron. 8 December 2012. Wall Street Journal.
  64. Web site: Murder and Medicine - The Lethality of Criminal Assault 1960-1999. www.universitychurchchicago.org. 13 June 2016. 21 October 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20161021192253/http://www.universitychurchchicago.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Murder-and-Medicine.pdf. dead.