Group B streptococcal infection explained

Group B Streptococcal infection
Synonyms:Group B streptococcal disease

Group B streptococcal infection, also known as Group B streptococcal disease or just Group B strep infection, is the infectious disease caused by the bacterium Streptococcus agalactiae. Streptococcus agalactiae is the most common human pathogen belonging to group B of the Lancefield classification of streptococci—hence the name of group B stretococcal (GBS). Infection with GBS can cause serious illness and sometimes death, especially in newborns, the elderly, and people with compromised immune systems.The most severe form of group B streptococcal disease is neonatal meningitis in infants, which is frequently lethal and can cause permanent neuro-cognitive impairment.S. agalactiae was recognized as a pathogen in cattle by Edmond Nocard and Mollereau in the late 1880s. It can cause bovine mastitis (inflammation of the udder) in dairy cows. The species name "agalactiae" meaning "no milk", alludes to this.Its significance as a human pathogen was first described in 1938,[1] and in the early 1960s, GBS came to be recognized as a major cause of infections in newborns.[2] In most people, Streptococcus agalactiae is a harmless commensal bacterium that is part of the normal human microbiota colonizing the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts. Up to 30% of healthy human adults are asymptomatic carriers of GBS.[3] [4]

Laboratory identification of Group B streptococcus

As mentioned, S. agalactiae is a Gram-positive coccus with a tendency to form chains, beta-haemolytic, catalase-negative, and facultative anaerobe (anaerobic organism). GBS grows readily on blood agar plates as microbial colonies surrounded by a narrow zone of β-haemolysis.

GBS is characterized by the presence in the cell wall of the group B antigen of the Lancefield classification (Lancefield grouping) that can be detected directly in intact bacteria using latex agglutination tests.[5] [6] [7] [8] The CAMP test is also another important test for the identification of GBS. The CAMP factor acts synergistically with the staphylococcal β-haemolysin inducing enhanced haemolysis of sheep or bovine erythrocytes.GBS is also able to hydrolyze hippurate, and this test can also be used to identify GBS.Hemolytic GBS strains, when cultivated on granada medium after 24-48h at 35-37 °C, produce (granadaene) and develop as orange-brick or red colonies that allow its straightforward and unequivocal identification.[9] Identification of GBS could also be carried out easily using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry.[10] [11] and Nucleic acid tests (NAATs).Additionally, GBS colonies can be tentatively identified after their appearance in chromogenic agar media.[12] [13] Nevertheless, GBS-like colonies that develop in chromogenic media should be confirmed as GBS using additional reliable tests (e.g.latex agglutination or the CAMP test) to avoid potential misidentification.A summary of the laboratory techniques for GBS identification is depicted in Ref.

GBS Colonization versus GBS infection

GBS is found in the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tract, and oropharynx of humans. GBS is also a normal component of the intestinal and vaginal microbiota in some women.[14] [15] In different studies, GBS vaginal colonization rate ranges from 4 to 36%, with most studies reporting rates over 20%, with an estimation for maternal GBS colonization worldwide of 18% with large variations among countries (11%–35%).[16] Vaginal or rectal GBS colonization may be intermittent, transitory, or persistent. These variations in the reported prevalence of asymptomatic (presenting no symptoms of disease) colonization could be related to the different detection methods used, and differences in populations studied.[17] [18] Though GBS is an asymptomatic and harmless colonizer of the gastrointestinal human tract in up to 30% of otherwise healthy adults, including pregnant women. This opportunistic harmless bacterium can, in some circumstances, cause severe invasive infections (opportunistic infection).

GBS and Pregnancy

Though GBS colonization is asymptomatic and, in general, does not cause problems, it can sometimes cause serious illness for the mother and the baby during gestation and after delivery. GBS infections in the mother can cause chorioamnionitis (intra-amniotic infection or severe infection of the placental tissues) infrequently, postpartum infections (after birth) and it had been related to prematurity and fetal death.[19] GBS urinary tract infections, more than 100.000 CFU (colony forming units) /mL, may induce labour in pregnant women and cause premature delivery (preterm birth) and miscarriage and requires antibiotic treatment. The presence of GBS in the urine in any colony count is a marker of heavy GBS colonization and an indication for Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis.[20]

GBS and newborns

In the western world, GBS (in the absence of effective prevention measures) is the main cause of bacterial infections in newborns, such as sepsis, pneumonia, and meningitis, which can lead to death or long-term after effects.[21] [22] [23] GBS infections in newborns are separated into two clinical types, early-onset disease (GBS-EOD) and late-onset disease (GBS-LOD). GBS-EOD manifests from 0 to 7 living days in the newborn, with most of the cases of EOD being apparent within 24 h from birth. GBS-LOD starts between 7 and 90 days after birth.Roughly 50% of newborns of GBS-colonized mothers are also GBS-colonized and (without prevention measures) 1-2% of these newborns will develop GBS-EOD.[24] The most common clinical syndromes of GBS-EOD are sepsis, pneumonia, and (less commonly) meningitis. Pneumonia and sepsis are frequently seen together or sequentially. Neonates with meningitis often present similarly to those with other syndromes, before progressing to symptoms of meningitis. Examination of the infant's cerebrospinal fluid is often necessary to rule out meningitis.[25] [26] A minority of infants with S. agalactiae sepsis have a coinfection, with one or more other species of bacteria also contributing to the septic disease. The most common of these organisms is Staphylococcus aureus.Colonization with GBS during labor is the primary risk factor for the development of GBS-EOD. GBS-EOD is acquired vertically (vertical transmission), through exposure of the fetus or the baby to GBS from the vagina of a colonized woman, either in utero (because of ascending infection) or during birth, after rupture of membranes. Infants can also be infected during passage through the birth canal; however, newborns who acquire GBS through this route can only become colonized, and these colonized infants usually do not develop GBS-EOD.[27]

Though maternal GBS colonization is the key determinant for GBS-EOD, other factors also increase the risk. These factors are:

Nevertheless, most babies who develop GBS-EOD are born to colonized mothers without any of these risk factors.Heavy GBS vaginal colonization may be associated with a higher risk for GBS-EOD. Women who had one of these risk factors but who were not GBS colonized during labor are at low risk for GBS-EOD compared to women who were colonized prenatally, but had none of the aforementioned risk factors.The presence of low levels of anticapsular antibodies against GBS in the mother is also of great importance for the development of GBS-EOD.[29] [30] Because of that, a previous sibling with GBS-EOD is also an important risk factor for the development of the infection in subsequent deliveries, probably reflecting the lack of protective antibodies in the mother.Overall, the case fatality rates from GBS-EOD have declined, from 50% observed in studies from the 1970s to between 2 and 10% in recent years, mainly as a consequence of improvements in therapy and management. Fatal neonatal infections by GBS are more frequent among premature infants.[31] Today, the mortality associated with GBS EOD in the US is 2.1% among term newborns and 19.2% among preterm newborns.[32]

GBS-LOD affects infants from 7 days to 3 months of age and has a lower case fatality rate (1%-6%) than GBS-EOD. Clinical syndromes of GBS-LOD are bacteremia without a focus (65%), meningitis (25%), cellulitis, osteoarthritis, and pneumonia.Prematurity has been reported to be the main risk factor. Each week of decreasing gestation increases the risk by a factor of 1.34 for developing GBS-LOD.[33]

A heightened risk of GBS-LOD is also related in addition to prematurity, with low birth weight, maternal colonization, and multiple-gestation pregnancies.[34] GBS-LOD can not only be acquired through vertical transmission during delivery; it can also be acquired later from the mother from breast milk, or throat or from environmental, nosocomial, and community sources.GBS-LOD commonly shows nonspecific signs, and diagnosis should be made by obtaining blood cultures in febrile newborns. S.agalactiae neonatal meningitis does not present with the hallmark sign of adult meningitis, a stiff neck. Instead, it presents with nonspecific symptoms, such as fever, vomiting, and irritability, and can consequently lead to a late diagnosis. Hearing loss and mental impairment can be a long-term consequence of GBS meningitis.[21]

Prevention of GBS neonatal infection- Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis (IAP)

Currently, the only reliable way to prevent GBS-EOD is the administration of intrapartum intravenous (IV) antibiotics before delivery. That is to say, intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP). IAP interrupts vertical transmission of GBS from the mother to the newborn and decreases the incidence of GBS-EOD.[35] Administration of intravenous (IV) antibiotics during labor. Intravenous penicillin or ampicillin given to GBS-colonized women at the onset of labor and then again every four hours until delivery have been proven to be very effective at preventing vertical transmission of GBS from mother to baby and GBS-EOD. Penicillin G, 5 million units IV initial dose, then 3 million units every 4 hours until delivery or ampicillin, 2 g IV initial dose, then 1 g IV every 4 hours until delivery.Appropriate IAP in GBS colonized women should start as soon as possible once labour starts or the waters have broken. When the first dose is given at least 4 hours before delivery, the risk of neonatal infection is very small; moreover, when given between 2–4 hours before delivery the risk is only partially reduced.[36] [37] [38]

Penicillin-allergic women without a history of anaphylaxis (angioedema, respiratory distress, or urticaria) following administration of a penicillin or a cephalosporin (low risk of anaphylaxis) could receive cefazolin (2 g IV initial dose, then 1 g IV every 8 hours until delivery) instead of penicillin or ampicillin.If the woman has a severe allergy to beta-lactams and the GBS isolated is susceptible to clindamycin then clindamycin is the recommended alternative.For women with a high-risk penicillin allergy and whose GBS isolate is not susceptible to clindamycin intravenous vancomycin (20 mg/kg intravenously every 8 hours, with a maximum of 2 gm per single dose) is the only valid option.[39] In women at high risk of anaphylaxis to penicillin the use of Erythromycin is not recommended today because the high proportion of GBS resistance to erythromycin (up to 44.8%). Testing for penicillin allergy can be helpful for all GBS-carrying pregnant women and will cancel the frequent use of other antibiotics for IAP. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of GBS isolates is crucial for appropriate antibiotic selection for IAP in penicillin-allergic women, because resistance to clindamycin, the most common agent used (in penicillin-allergic women), is increasing among GBS isolates.Appropriate methodologies (including inducible clindamycin resistance) for testing antibiotic susceptibility are important because resistance to clyndamicin (antimicrobial resistance) can occur in some GBS strains that appear susceptible (antibiotic sensitivity) to clyndamicin in certain susceptibility tests.For women who are at risk of penicillin allergy, the laboratory requisitions should indicate clearly this circumstance to ensure that the laboratory is aware for the need to test GBS isolates for clindamycin susceptibility.True penicillin allergy is rare with an estimated frequency of anaphylaxis of one to five episodes per 10,000 cases of penicillin therapy.[40] [41] Penicillin administered to a woman with no history of β-lactam allergy has a risk of anaphylaxis of 0.04 to 4 per 100,000. Maternal anaphylaxis associated with GBS IAP occurs, but any morbidity associated with anaphylaxis is offset greatly by reductions in the incidence of GBS-EOD.

IAP has been considered to be associated with the emergence of resistant bacterial strains and with an increase in the incidence of early-onset infections caused by other pathogens, mainly Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli. Nevertheless, most studies have not found an increased rate of non-GBS early-onset sepsis related to the widespread use of IAP.[42] [43] [44] Neither oral nor intramuscular antibiotics are effective in reducing the risk GBS-EOD.

Other strategies to prevent GBS-EOD have been studied, and chlorhexidine intrapartum vaginal cleansing has been proposed to help preventing GBS-EOD, nevertheless no evidence has been shown for the effectiveness of this approach.[45] [46] Nevertheless, at present, there is no suitable approach for the prevention of late-onset GBS neonatal disease.

Identifying candidates to receive IAP

Two ways are used to select female candidates to IAP: the culture-based screening approach and the risk-based approach.[47] The culture-based screening approach identifies candidates using lower vaginal and rectal cultures obtained between 35 and 37 weeks of gestation (or 36–37), and IAP is administered to all GBS colonized women. The risk-based strategy identifies candidates to receive IAP by the aforementioned risk factors known to increase the probability of GBS-EOD without considering if the mother is or is not a GBS carrier.[48] IAP is also recommended for women with intrapartum risk factors if their GBS carrier status is not known at the time of delivery, for women with GBS bacteriuria (in any colony count) during their pregnancy and for women who have had an infant with GBS-EOD previously.The risk-based approach is, in general, less effective than the culture-based approach,[49] because in most cases, GBS-EOD develops among newborns who have been born to mothers without risk factors.[50]

IAP is not required for women undergoing planned cesarean section in the absence of labour and with intact membranes, irrespective of the known GBS carriage status. ACOG recommendations state, "Women with a positive prenatal GBS culture result who undergo a cesarean birth before the onset of labor and with intact membranes do not require IAP".This recommendation is based on the fact that infants delivered via pre-labor cesarean section have less exposure to GBS in the vagina and have lower rates of GBS infection. Hence, despite the recommended universal recto-vaginal screening of all pregnant women at 36 0/7 to 37 6/7 weeks, women who undergo pre-labor cesarean sections do not need IAP, regardless of the screening test results.[51]

Routine screening of pregnant women is performed in most developed countries such as the United States, France, Spain, Belgium and Canada, and data have shown falling incidences of GBS-EOD following the introduction of screening-based measures to prevent GBS-EOD.[52] [53]

The risk-based strategy is advocated, among other countries, in the United Kingdom and the Netherland.

The issue of cost-effectiveness of both strategies for identifying candidates for IAP is less clear-cut, and some studies have indicated that testing low risk women, plus IAP administered to high-risk women, and to those found to carry GBS is more cost-effective than the current UK practice (risk-based approach).[54] Other evaluations have also found the culture-based approach to be more cost-effective than the risk-based approach for the prevention of GBS-EOD.[55] [56]

It has been reported that IAP does not prevent all cases of GBS-EOD; its efficacy is estimated at 80%. The risk-based prevention strategy does not prevent about 33% of cases with no risk factors.[57] Up to 90% of cases of GBS-EOD would be preventable if IAP were offered to all GBS carriers identified by universal screening late in pregnancy, plus to the mothers in higher risk situations.[58] Where insufficient intravenous antibiotics are given before delivery, the baby may be given antibiotics immediately after birth, although evidence is inconclusive as to whether this practice is effective or not.[59] [60] [61]

Screening for GBS colonization in pregnant women

Approximately 10–30% of women are colonized with GBS during pregnancy. Nevertheless, during pregnancy, colonization can be temporary, intermittent, or continual. Because of this the GBS colonization status of women can change during pregnancy, only cultures carried out ≤5 weeks before delivery and predict quite accurately the GBS carrier status at delivery.[62]

In contrast, if the prenatal culture is carried out more than 5 weeks before delivery, it is unreliable for accurately predicting the GBS carrier status at delivery. Because of that, testing for GBS colonization in pregnant women is today recommended by the ACOG at 36–37 weeks of gestation.[63] It is important to note that the ACOG now recommends performing universal GBS screening between 36 and 37 weeks of gestation instead of at 35–37 as previously recommended by the CDC. This new recommendation provides a 5-week window for valid culture results that includes births that occur up to a gestational age of at least 41 weeks.

The clinical samples recommended for culture of GBS are swabs collected from the lower vagina and rectum through the external anal sphincter. Vaginal-rectal samples should be collected using a flocked swabs preferably. Compared with fiber swabs, these swabs release samples and microorganisms more efficiently than conventional fiber swabs.The sample should be collected swabbing the lower vagina (vaginal introitus) followed by the rectum (i.e., inserting the swab through the anal sphincter) using the same swab or two different swabs. Cervical, perianal, perirectal, or perineal specimens are not acceptable, and a speculum should not be used for sample collection.Samples (swabs) can be taken by healthcare professionals, or self-collected by the mother accurately after appropriate instruction.[64] [65] [66] [67] These swabs should be placed into a non-nutritive transport medium. When feasible, specimens should be refrigerated and sent to the laboratory as soon as possible.Appropriate transport systems are commercially available, and in these transport media, GBS can remain viable for several days at room temperature. However, the recovery of GBS declines over one to four days, especially at elevated temperatures, which can lead to false-negative results.[68]

Culture methods to detect GBS colonization in pregnant women

Samples (vaginal, rectal, or vaginorectal swabs) should be inoculated into a selective enrichment broth, (Todd Hewitt broth with selective antibiotics), enrichment culture. This involves growing the samples in a selective enriched broth medium to improve the viability of the GBS and simultaneously impairing the growth of other naturally occurring bacteria. Appropriate enrichment broths, commercially available, are Todd-Hewitt with gentamicin and nalidixic acid (Baker broth), or with colistin and nalidixic acid (Lim broth).After incubation (18–24 hours, 35-37 °C), the enrichment broth is subcultured overnight in blood agar plates and GBS-like colonies (big colonies, 3-4 millimeters diameter, surrounded by narrow zone of hemolysis) are identified by the CAMP test or using latex agglutination with GBS antiserum or MALDI-TOF.

In the UK, this is the method described by the Public Health England's UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations[69]

After incubation the enrichment broth can also be subcultured to granada medium agar where GBS grows as pinkish-red colonies, and further identification tests are not required[70] [71] After incubation the enrichment broth can also be subcultured to chromogenic agars, where GBS grows as coloured colonies.Nevertheless, GBS-like colonies that develop in chromogenic media should be confirmed as GBS using additional reliable tests to avoid mis-identification.

Inoculating directly the vaginal and rectal swabs or the vaginorectal swab in a plate of an appropriate culture medium (blood agar, granada medium or chromogenic media) is possible. However, this method (bypassing the selective enrichment broth step) can lead to some false-negative results, and this approach should be taken only in addition to, and not instead of, inoculation into selective broth.

Detection of GBS colonization in the UK

Today, in the UK, the detection of GBS colonization using the enrichment broth technique is not offered from most laboratories serving the NHS. However, the implementation of this test seems to be a viable option. At present, culture for GBS (using an enriched culture medium) at 35–37 weeks to define an at-risk group of women appears to be the most cost-effective strategy.[55] [56] The charitable organization Group B Strep Support has published a list of hospitals in the UK that offer the detection of GBS using the enrichment broth culture method (enrichment culture medium, ECM).[72] This test is also available privately from around £35 per test for a home-testing pack, and it is offered by private clinics. The test is also available privately, for a UK-wide postal service.[73] [74]

Point-of-care testing, POCT

No current culture-based test is accurate enough and fast enough to be recommended for detecting GBS once labour starts. Plating of swab samples requires time for the bacteria to grow, meaning that this is unsuitable to be used as an intrapartum point-of-care test (POCT or bedside testing).

Alternative methods to detect GBS in clinical samples (as vaginorectal swabs) rapidly have been developed, such are the methods based on nucleic acid amplification tests, (NAAT) such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, and DNA hybridization probes. These tests can also be used to detect GBS directly from broth media, after the enrichment step, avoiding the subculture of the incubated enrichment broth to an appropriate agar plate.[75]

Testing women for GBS colonization using vaginal or rectal swabs and culturing them in an enriched media is not as rapid as a PCR test that would check whether the pregnant woman is carrying GBS at delivery. NAAT tests would allow starting IAP on admission to the labour ward in those women for whom it is not known if they are GBS carriers.NAAT for detecting GBS carriage could perhaps, in the future, be sufficiently accurate to guide IAP.Nevertheless, this technology to detect GBS must be improved and simplified to make the method cost-effective and fully useful as a point-of-care test.

Because of this these tests still cannot replace antenatal culture for the accurate detection of GBS.[76] [77] POCT for detection of GBS carriers requires additionally that maternity units should provide 24/7 laboratory means required to perform rapid testing.However, point-of-care testing may be used for women who present in labor with an unknown GBS status and without risk factors for ascertaining the use of IAP.

GBS Bacteriuria in pregnancy

The US Preventive Services Task Force and ACOG recommend routine urine screening for all pregnant women early in their pregnancies, even in the absence of urinary symptoms, in order to detect asymptomatic bacteriuria.As with UTIs, any asymptomatic bacteriuria (not just GBS) cases with high CFU/mL values have also been shown to induce pyelonephritis, low birth weight, and preterm deliveries.[78] Therefore, treatment of these asymptomatic cases of bacteriuria with antibiotics at the time of diagnosis is just as important as treating symptomatic UTIs in pregnancy in order to reduce these risks.In addition to cases of GBS UTI and asymptomatic GBS bacteriuria with high CFU/mL, pregnant women with asymptomatic GBS bacteriuria, even with low CFU/mL counts at any time during the pregnancy, should receive IAP to protect the newborn; regardless of the results of the recto-vaginal screen later in pregnancy.This is because GBS bacteriuria, even asymptomatic, at any CFU/mL is an indication of heavy ano-genital colonization.[79]

Missed opportunities for prevention of GBS neonatal infections

The important factors for successful prevention of GBS-EOD using IAP and the universal screening approach are:[80]

Most cases of GBS-EOD occur in term infants born to mothers who screened negative for GBS coloniztion and in preterm infants born to mothers who were not screened, though some false-negative results observed in the GBS screening tests can be due to the test limitations, and to the acquisition of GBS between the time of screening and delivery.This shows that improvements in specimen collection and processing methods for detecting GBS are still necessary in some settings. False-negative screening test, along with failure to receive IAP in women delivering preterm with unknown GBS colonization status, and the administration of inappropriate IAP agents to penicillin-allergic women account for most missed opportunities for prevention of cases of GBS-EOD.GBS-EOD infections presented in infants whose mothers had been screened as GBS culture-negative are particularly worrying, and may be caused by incorrect sample collection, delay in processing the samples, incorrect laboratory techniques, recent antibiotic use, or GBS colonization after the screening was carried out.[80] [81] [82] [83]

Home births and water birth

Home births are becoming increasingly popular in the UK and elsewhere.[84] [85] Recommendations for preventing GBS infections in newborns are the same for home births as for hospital births. Around 25% of women having home births probably carry GBS in their vaginas at delivery without knowing, and it could be difficult to follow correctly the recommendations of IAP and to deal with the risk of a severe allergic reaction to the antibiotics outside of a hospital setting.[86] The RCOG and the ACOG guidelines suggest that birth in a pool is not contraindicated for GBS carriers who have been offered the appropriate IAP if no other contraindications to water immersion are present[87]

Epidemiology of GBS neonatal infection

It has been estimated that 19.7 million pregnant women had rectovaginal colonization with GBS worldwide in 2020. And 400.000 children presented GBS neonatal disease, causing 232.000 GBS-EOD, 162. 000 GBS-LOD, and 37.100 children developed neurodevelopmental impairment. 90,000 newborn deaths were calculated to occur, most of them in Sub-Saharan countries[88] [89]

In 2000–2001, the reported overall incidence of GBS infection in newborn babies in the UK was 0.72 per 1,000 live births, 0.47 per 1,000 for GBS-EOD and 0.25 per 1,000 for GBS-LOD. Very marked variations were observed, the incidence in Scotland was 0.42 per 1,000, whilst in Northern Ireland, it was 0.9 per 1,000 live births.[90] [91] Nevertheless, it may be a serious underestimation of the real incidence of GBS infections in newborns. A plausible explanation of this is that a considerable number of infants with probable GBS-EOD had negative cultures as a result of a previous maternal antibiotic treatment that inhibits the growth of GBS in blood and cerebrospinal fluid cultures, but does not mask clinical symptoms.[92] [93] Data collected prospectively for neonates that required a septic screen in the first 72 hrs. of life in the UK in 2003, indicated a combined rate of definite and probable GBS-EOD infection of 3.6 per 1,000 live births.[94] Another study on the epidemiology of invasive GBS infections in England and Wales reported a rise in the incidence of GBS-EOD between 2000 and 2010 from 0.28 to 0.41 per 1,000 live births. Rates of GBS-LOD also increased between 1991 and 2010 from 0.11 to 0.29 per 1,000 live births in England and Wales.[95] In the past, the incidence of GBS-EOD ranged from 0.7 to 3.7 per thousand live births in the US, and from 0.2 to 3.25 per thousand in Europe.In 2008, after widespread use of antenatal screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States reported an incidence of 0.28 cases of GBS-EOD per thousand live births in the US.From 2006 to 2015 the incidence of GBS EOD decreased from 0.37 to 0.23 per thousand live births in the US.[96] In contrast with GBS-EOD, the incidence of GBS-LOD has remained stable in the US at 0.31 per 1000 live births from 2006 to 2015.In 2021, in the United States the CDC reported an incidence of 0.21per 1,000 live births of GBS-EOD and of 0.23 per thousand live births of GBS-LOD. In 2021 had been estimated a total of 1970 deaths ((0.59/100,000 population) in the US caused by GBS neonatal infections.In 2021, it was estimated that 226 infants (49 per 100,000) in the United States had a clinically significant GBS infection, and that approximately 11 (2.4%) of those cases resulted in death.[97]

In Spain, the incidence of GBS vertical sepsis declined by 73.6%, from 1.25/1,000 live births in 1996 to 0.33/1,000 in 2008.[98] In Spain in the Barcelona area between 2004 and 2010, the incidence of GBS-EOD was 0.29 per thousand living newborns, with no significant differences along the years. The mortality rate was 8.16%.[50] [99] The "Grupo de Hospitales Fundación Castrillo"has also reported in 2018 in Spain an incidence of GBS-EOD of 0.17/1000 live births and 0,05/1000 of GBS LOD.[100]

In France since 2001, a rapid decrease in the incidence of the neonatal GBS infections has also been reported after widespread use of IAP, from 0.7 to 0.2 per 1,000 births between 1997 and 2006. The incidence of GBS-EOD infections has been reported to be 0.2 per 1000 live births in 2011.[101] [102]

Since 2012 the incidence of neonatal GBS infection has been estimated as 0.53 per 1,000 births in the European region, 0.67 in America, and 0.15 in Australasia. Countries reporting no use of IAP had a 2.2-fold higher incidence of GBS-EOD compared with those reporting any use of IAP.[91]

Estimates of the incidence of GBS-EOD per 1,000 births differ among countries, Japan 0.09, Panama 0,58, Hong Kong 0,76, and 2.35 in the Dominican Republic. Overall, rates are highest in Africa and lowest in Asia. The estimate of the global incidence of GBS LOD is 0.26 cases per 1,000 live births.[103]

It has been appraised that GBS infections cause at least 409.000 maternal/fetal/infant cases and 147.000 stillbirths and infant deaths worldwide annually.[104]

The following are estimates of the chances that a baby will be infected with a GBS neonatal infection if no preventive measures are taken and no other risk factors are present:[105]

If a woman who carries GBS is given IAP during labor, the baby's risk is reduced significantly:

Guidelines to prevent GBS neonatal infections

United Kingdom

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG)

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) first issued their Green Top Guideline No 36 "Prevention of early onset neonatal Group B streptococcal disease" in 2003.This guideline clearly stated: "Routine bacteriological screening of all pregnant women for antenatal GBS carriage is not recommended, and vaginal swabs should not be taken during pregnancy unless there is a clinical indication to do so." But, "Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis should be offered if GBS is detected on a vaginal swab in the current pregnancy."The 2003 RCOG guideline was reviewed in September 2017 without substantial changes.[39] In the UK, the RCOG still does not recommend bacteriological screening of all pregnant women for antenatal GBS carriage in its 2017 guidelines, although it does state that women who tested positive in a previous pregnancy and the baby was well should be offered the option of testing and being offered intrapartum antimicrobial prophylaxis or having the IAP without testing.Nevertheless, it is stated that if GBS carriage is detected incidentally or by intentional testing, women should be offered IAP. And that all pregnant women should be provided with an appropriate information leaflet about GBS and pregnancy (published in December 2017).[106] Instead, women are treated according to their risk in labor. IAP is offered to women in labor where GBS has been found from their urine or vaginal/rectal swabs taken during the pregnancy, and to women who have previously had a baby with GBS disease. Immediate induction of labor and IAP should be offered to all women with prelabor rupture of membranes at 37 weeks of gestation or more, to women whose membranes are ruptured more than 18 hours and to those who have fever in labor. Women who are pyrexial in labor should be offered broad-spectrum antibiotics including an antibiotic appropriate for preventing EOD-GBS.Testing pregnant women to detect GBS carriers and giving IAP to those carrying GBS and to high-risk women has also been proposed and this approach is significantly more cost-effective than the use of the risk-factor approach. One research paper calculated an expected net benefit to the UK government of such an approach of around £37 million a year, compared with the current RCOG approach.[54] [55]

NICE guidelines

The UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) does not recommend routine testing for GBS, stating: "Pregnant women should not be offered routine antenatal screening for group B streptococcus because evidence of its clinical and cost-effectiveness remains uncertain."[107]

This guideline was updated in 2021 nevertheless screening and testing for GBS was outside of this new guideline's sphere. However, the guideline states that "At the first antenatal (booking) appointment (and later if appropriate), discuss and give information on .... infections that can impact on the baby in pregnancy or during birth (such as group B streptococcus, herpes simplex, and cytomegalovirus)"[108] Nevertheless, the NICE Neonatal Infection guideline states: "Offer antibiotics during labor to women who:

National Screening Committee

The UK National Screening Committee's current policy position on GBS is: "screening should not be offered to all pregnant women.[110] This decision was strongly criticized by the charity Group B Strep Support as ignoring both the wishes of the public and the rising incidence rates of GBS infection in the UK.[111]

United States

Recommendations for IAP to prevent perinatal GBS disease were issued in 1996 by the CDC. In these guidelines, the use of one of two prevention methods was recommended: either a risk-based approach or a culture-based screening approach. The CDC issued updated guidelines in 2002; these guidelines recommended the universal culture-based screening of all pregnant women at 35–37 weeks' gestation to optimize the identification of women who must receive IAP. CDC also recommended that women with unknown GBS colonization status at the time of delivery be managed according to the presence of intrapartum risk factors. Because of this strategy, the US has seen a major reduction in the incidence of GBS-EOD.[112]

The CDC issued updated guidelines again in 2010, however, the foundations of prevention in the CDC's 2010 guidelines remained unchanged. The following were the main additions in the 2010 guidelines:

In 2018, the task of revising and updating the GBS prophylaxis guidelines was transferred from the CDC to ACOG, to the American Academy of Pediatrics, AAP and to the American Society for Microbiology, ASM.[113] The ACOG committee issued an updated document on Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Early-Onset Disease in Newborns in 2019.ACOG's guidance replaced the 2010 guidelines published by CDC. This document does not introduce important changes from the CDC guidelines. The key measures necessary for preventing neonatal GBS early onset disease continue to be universal prenatal screening by culture of GBS from swabs collected from the lower vagina and rectum, correct collection and microbiological processing of the samples, and proper implementation of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. It is also important to note that the ACOG recommended performing universal GBS screening between 36 and 37 weeks of gestation. This new recommendation provides a 5-week window for valid culture results that includes births that occur up to a gestational age of at least 41 weeks.In 2019, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) published a new clinical report—Management of Infants at Risk for GBS neonatal disease. This AAP's Clinical Report replaces the 2010 guidelines published by CDC.The American Society for Microbiology (ASM) published in 2021 updated guidelinesfor laboratory procedures for detection and identidication of GB. In this new ASM guidelines culture continues to be the main point to GBS detection. Considering that a reliable screening test is more important than a rapid and less accurate result.ASM also states that it is acceptable to use NAAT-based identification of GBS from an enrichment broth (after 18-24-hour incubation) with high sensitivity, and that FDA-cleared commercial assays are available to perform the test.

However, direct-from-specimen NAATs is not recommended due to low sensitivity with high rates of false negative results. ACOG has a favorable view of the use of NAATs and states that NAATs from enrichment broth testing is reasonable, has higher sensitivity for detecting GBS than culture, and, therefore, a possibly better test.This recommendation is based on data proving the valuable utility of the test.[114] ACOG also allows for the use of NAATs without the enrichment broth, despite the high false negative rate, as a rapid POCT (point-of-care) test for women who present in labor with unknown GBS status. However, both ASM and ACOG acknowledge that NAAT-based testing does not have the capability to provide the antibiotic susceptibility needed to identify the IAP regimen needed for women with a penicillin allergy.

Other guidelines

National guidelines in most countries advocate the use of universal screening of pregnant women late in pregnancy to detect GBS carriage and use of IAP in all colonized mothers. e.g. Canada,[115] Spain,[116] Switzerland,[117] Germany,[118] Poland,[119] Czech Republic,[120] France,[121] Belgium,[122] Argentina[123] and Colombia[124]

In contrast, risk factor-based guidelines were issued (in addition to the UK) in the Netherlands,[125] The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists recommends that all maternity units should have an established plan for the prevention of neonatal GBS disease. Nevertheless, it is not recommended clearly one prevention strategy.[126]

GBS infection in adults

GBS is also an important infectious agent able to cause invasive infections in adults. Serious life-threatening invasive GBS infections are increasingly recognized in the elderly and in individuals compromised by underlying diseases such as diabetes, cirrhosis and cancer.[127] GBS infections in adults include urinary tract infection, skin and soft-tissue infection (skin and skin structure infection) bacteremia without focus, osteomyelitis, meningitis and endocarditis.GBS infection in adults can be serious, and mortality is higher among adults than among neonates.

In general, penicillin is the antibiotic of choice for the treatment of GBS infections. Erythromycin or clindamycin should not be used for treatment in penicillin-allergic patients unless susceptibility of the infecting GBS isolate to these agents is documented. Gentamicin plus penicillin (for antibiotic synergy) in patients with life-threatening GBS infections may be used.[128] [129]

Invasive GBS infections in non-pregnant adults convey a rising hardship in most developed countries. Vaccination to prevent GBS infection could be a crucial approach to prevent GBS disease in adults.[130] [131]

Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is an acute multisystem life-threatening disease resulting in multiple organ failure. The severity of this disease frequently warrants immediate medical treatment. TSS is caused primarily by some strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes that produce exotoxins. Nevertheless, invasive GBS infection can be complicated, though quite infrequently, by streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome (STLS).[132]

Vaccines to prevent GBS infections

Though the introduction of national guidelines to screen pregnant women for GBS carriage and the use of IAP has significantly reduced the burden of GBS-EOD disease, it has had no effect on preventing either GBS-LOD in infants or GBS infections in adults.[133] Because of this, if an effective vaccine against GBS were available, it would be an effective means of controlling not only GBS disease in infants, but also infections in adults.

There are a number of problems with giving antibiotics to women in labor. Such antibiotic exposure risks included severe allergic reactions and difficulties screening pregnant women for GBS. If pregnant women could be given a vaccine against GBS, this could potentially prevent most cases of GBS without the need for antibiotics or screening.Vaccination is considered an ideal solution to prevent not only early- and late-onset disease but also GBS infections in adults at risk.[134]

Development of GBS vaccines for maternal immunization has been identified as a priority by the World Health Organization on the basis of high unmet need.[135] [136] A GBS-effective maternal vaccine could have a great effect on newborn morbidity and mortality. It has been estimated that this vaccine could prevent about 127,000 cases of GBS-EOD, 87,000 of GBS-LOD, 31,000 deaths, and 18,000 cases of neuro-developmental impairment.[137] As early as 1976, low levels of maternal antibodies against the GBS capsular polysaccharide were shown to be correlated with susceptibility to GBS-EOD and GBS-LOD. Maternal-specific antibodies, transferred from the mother to the newborn, were able to confer protection to babies against GBS infection.[138] The capsular polysaccharide of GBS, which is an important virulence factor, is also an excellent candidate for the development of an effective vaccine.[138] [139]

GBS protein-based vaccines are also in development and are greatly promising as they will be able to protect against GBS infection of any serotype.[140] [141] [142] [143]

At present, the licensing of GBS vaccines is difficult because of the challenge in conducting clinical trials in humans due to the low incidence of GBS neonatal diseases.[144] [145] Nevertheless, though research and clinical trials for the development of an effective vaccine to prevent GBS infections are underway, no vaccine is available as of 2023.[146] [147] [148] [149] [150]

As of Winter 2023, there are two clinical development stage vaccines for the prevention of GBS invasive disease. Pfizer's hexavalent GBS vaccine [PF-06760805], GBS6 is a CRM197 conjugated polysaccharide approach containing the 6 most prominent GBS serotypes worldwide.[151] The vaccine which is currently undergoing Phase 3 planning, may offer meaningful protection against invasive disease in newborns and young infants on the basis of its immunogenicity results in the Phase 2 study [NCT03765073] which were published in the New England Journal of Medicine.Danish-based MinervaX ApS is also developing a protein-based GBS vaccine (GBS-NN/NN2) designed using fusions of highly immunogenic and protective protein domains from selected surface proteins of GBS (the Alpha-like protein family).[152] The vaccine, which has been shown to be safe and immunogenic in maternal populations, is also undergoing preparations for Phase 3 planning. MinervaX has also completed enrolment of its Phase 1 adult trial [NCT05782179] with first immunological readouts anticipated in Q4 2023. A recent global demand analysis for GBS vaccines estimated the potential market for maternal and adult GBS immunization to be $798m/yr. and $2,023m/yr. in 2034 respectively.[153] Other preclinical GBS vaccine programs are being pursued by the US-based biotech, Omniose and Inventprise.

Society and culture

July has been recognised as Group B Strep International Awareness Month,[154] a time when information about group B Strep aimed at families and health professionals is shared, predominantly in the UK and the US. In the UK, this is led by Group B Strep Support.[155]

Nonhuman GBS infections

GBS has been found in many mammals and other animals such as camels, dogs, cats, seals, dolphins, and crocodiles.[156]

Cattle

In cattle, GBS causes mastitis, an infection of the udder. It can produce an acute febrile disease or a subacute, more chronic disease. Both lead to diminishing milk production (hence its name: agalactiae meaning "no milk").[157] GBS can survive and persist in the mammary glands of cows, by forming biofilms.[158] Mastitis associated with GBS can have an important effect on the quantity and quality of milk produced and is also associated with elevated somatic cell count and total bacteria count in the milk.[159] Outbreaks in herds are common, and this is of major significance for the dairy industry.[160] Programs to reduce the impact of GBS have been enforced in many countriesSuch programs led to near-removal of bovine GBS mastitis in the UK, Northern Europe, and Canada.  Nevertheless, in recent years,re-emergence of GBS cattle mastitis has been observed in Northern Europe, suggesting the introduction of human lineages into the cattle population owing to reverse zoonotic transmission.[161]

Fish

GBS it is also an important pathogen in a diversity of fish species, leading to serious economic losses in many species of fish worldwide. GBS causes severe epidemics in farmed fish, causing sepsis and external and internal hemorrhages. GBS infection has been reported from wild and captive fish and has been involved in epizootics in many countries.[162] [163] [164] Outbreaks of GBS in tilapia aquaculture can result in serious disease with mortalities of up to 80%.[163] It has also been reported a human foodborne outbreak of invasive disease caused by the consumption of GBS-infected tilapia Vaccines to protect fish against GBS infections are under development.[165] [166] [167]

External links

Notes and References

  1. Fry RM . Fatal infections by haemolytic streptococcus group B.. The Lancet. 1938. 231 . 5969. 199–201. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)93202-1.
  2. Eickhoff TC, Klein JO, Daly AK, Ingall D, Finland M . Neonatal Sepsis and Other Infections Due to Group B Beta-Hemolytic Streptococci . The New England Journal of Medicine . 271 . 24 . 1221–1228 . December 1964 . 14234266 . 10.1056/NEJM196412102712401 .
  3. Book: Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococcus). Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R (eds) Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Vol 2 . Edwards MS, Baker CJ . 2010 . Elsevier. . 978-0-443-06839-3 . 7th. . Chapter 202.
  4. Book: Group B streptococcal infections. Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant . Edwards MS, Nizet V . 2011 . Elsevier . 978-0-443-06839-3 . 7th. . 419–469.
  5. Book: Tille P . Bailey & Scott's Diagnostic Microbiology. 2014. Elsevier.. 978-0-323-08330-0. 13th..
  6. Rosa-Fraile M, Spellerberg B . Reliable Detection of Group B Streptococcus in the Clinical Laboratory . Journal of Clinical Microbiology . 55 . 9 . 2590–2598 . September 2017 . 28659318 . 5648696 . 10.1128/JCM.00582-17 .
  7. Filkins L, Hauser JR, Robinson-Dunn B, Tibbetts R, Boyanton BL, Revell P . American Society for Microbiology Provides 2020 Guidelines for Detection and Identification of Group B Streptococcus . Journal of Clinical Microbiology . 59 . 1 . December 2020 . 33115849 . 7771461 . 10.1128/JCM.01230-20 .
  8. Web site: Guidelines for the Detection and Identification of Group B Streptococcus . 2023-05-03 . ASM.org . en.
  9. Rosa-Fraile M, Rodriguez-Granger J, Cueto-Lopez M, Sampedro A, Gaye EB, Haro JM, Andreu A . Use of Granada medium to detect group B streptococcal colonization in pregnant women . Journal of Clinical Microbiology . 37 . 8 . 2674–2677 . August 1999 . 10405420 . 10.1128/JCM.37.8.2674-2677.1999 . 85311 .
  10. Binghuai L, Yanli S, Shuchen Z, Fengxia Z, Dong L, Yanchao C . Use of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for rapid identification of group B Streptococcus on chromID Strepto B agar . International Journal of Infectious Diseases . 27 . 44–48 . October 2014 . 25220051 . 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.06.023 . free .
  11. To KN, Cornwell E, Daniel R, Goonesekera S, Jauneikaite E, Chalker V, Le Doare K . Evaluation of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for the Identification of Group B Streptococcus . BMC Research Notes . 12 . 1 . 85 . February 2019 . 30764872 . 6376729 . 10.1186/s13104-019-4119-1 . free .
  12. Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ . Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease: revised guidelines from CDC . MMWR Recomm. Rep. . 2010. 59 . (RR-10) . 1–32.
  13. El Aila NA, Tency I, Claeys G, Saerens B, Cools P, Verstraelen H, Temmerman M, Verhelst R, Vaneechoutte M . 6 . Comparison of different sampling techniques and of different culture methods for detection of group B streptococcus carriage in pregnant women . BMC Infectious Diseases . 10 . 285 . September 2010 . 20920213 . 2956727 . 10.1186/1471-2334-10-285 . free .
  14. Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Early-Onset Disease in Newborns: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 797 . Obstetrics and Gynecology . 135 . 2 . e51–e72 . February 2020 . 31977795 . 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003668 . 210891255 .
  15. Roloff K, Stepanyan G, Valenzuela G . Prevalence of oropharyngeal group B Streptococcus colonization in mothers, family, and health care providers . PLOS ONE . 2018 . 13 . 9 . e0204617 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0204617 . free . 30265687 . 6161895 . 2018PLoSO..1304617R .
  16. Russell NJ, Seale AC, O'Driscoll M, O'Sullivan C, Bianchi-Jassir F, Gonzalez-Guarin J, Lawn JE, Baker CJ, Bartlett L, Cutland C, Gravett MG, Heath PT, Le Doare K, Madhi SA, Rubens CE, Schrag S, Sobanjo-Ter Meulen A, Vekemans J, Saha SK, Ip M . 6 . Maternal Colonization With Group B Streptococcus and Serotype Distribution Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses . Clinical Infectious Diseases . 65 . suppl_2 . S100–S111 . November 2017 . 29117327 . 10.1093/cid/cix658 . 5848259 .
  17. Barcaite E, Bartusevicius A, Tameliene R, Kliucinskas M, Maleckiene L, Nadisauskiene R . Prevalence of maternal group B streptococcal colonisation in European countries . Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica . 87 . 3 . 260–271 . 2008 . 18307064 . 10.1080/00016340801908759 . 25897076 .
  18. Rodriguez-Granger J, Alvargonzalez JC, Berardi A, Berner R, Kunze M, Hufnagel M, Melin P, Decheva A, Orefici G, Poyart C, Telford J, Efstratiou A, Killian M, Krizova P, Baldassarri L, Spellerberg B, Puertas A, Rosa-Fraile M . 6 . Prevention of group B streptococcal neonatal disease revisited. The DEVANI European project . European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases . 31 . 9 . 2097–2104 . September 2012 . 22314410 . 10.1007/s10096-012-1559-0 . 15588906 .
  19. Muller AE, Oostvogel PM, Steegers EA, Dörr PJ . Morbidity related to maternal group B streptococcal infections . Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica . 85 . 9 . 1027–1037 . 2016 . 16929406 . 10.1080/00016340600780508 . 11745321 . free .
  20. Book: Cunningham FG, Leveno K, Bloom S, Spong C, Dashe J, Hoffman B, Casey B, Sheffield J . Willians Obstetrics . 2014 . McGraw Hill . 978-0-07-179894-5 . 24th .
  21. Libster R, Edwards KM, Levent F, Edwards MS, Rench MA, Castagnini LA, Cooper T, Sparks RC, Baker CJ, Shah PE . 6 . Long-term outcomes of group B streptococcal meningitis . Pediatrics . 130 . 1 . e8-15 . July 2012 . 22689869 . 10.1542/peds.2011-3453 . 1013682 .
  22. Puopolo KM, Lynfield R, Cummings JJ . Management of Infants at Risk for Group B Streptococcal Disease . Pediatrics . 144 . 2 . e20191881 . August 2019 . 31285392 . 10.1542/peds.2019-1881 . 195843897 . free .
  23. Raabe . Vanessa N. . Shane . Andi L. . March 2019 . Group B Streptococcus (Streptococcus agalactiae) . Microbiology Spectrum . 7 . 2 . 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3–0007–2018 . 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0007-2018 . 2165-0497 . 6432937 . 30900541.
  24. Book: Boyer KM, Gotoff SP . Strategies for chemoprophylaxis of GBS early-onset infections. 1985. 35. 267–280. 10.1159/000410380. 3931544. Antibiotics and Chemotherapy. 978-3-8055-3953-1. Strategies for Chemoprophylaxis of GBS Early-Onset Infections1.
  25. Polin RA . Management of neonates with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis . Pediatrics . 129 . 5 . 1006–1015 . May 2012 . 22547779 . 10.1542/peds.2012-0541 . 230591 . free .
  26. Martinez E, Mintegi S, Vilar B, Martinez MJ, Lopez A, Catediano E, Gomez B . Prevalence and predictors of bacterial meningitis in young infants with fever without a source . The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal . 34 . 5 . 494–498 . May 2015 . 25461476 . 10.1097/inf.0000000000000629 . 43717212 .
  27. Russell NJ, Seale AC, O'Sullivan C, Le Doare K, Heath PT, Lawn JE, et al . Risk of Early-Onset Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Disease With Maternal Colonization Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses . Clinical Infectious Diseases . 65 . suppl_2 . S152–S159 . November 2017 . 5850448 . 10.1093/cid/cix655 . 29117325 .
  28. Dauby N, Chamekh M, Melin P, Slogrove AL, Goetghebuer T . Increased Risk of Group B Streptococcus Invasive Infection in HIV-Exposed but Uninfected Infants: A Review of the Evidence and Possible Mechanisms . Frontiers in Immunology . 7 . 505 . 2016 . 27899925 . 5110531 . 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00505 . free .
  29. Baker CJ, Kasper DL . Correlation of maternal antibody deficiency with susceptibility to neonatal group B streptococcal infection . The New England Journal of Medicine . 294 . 14 . 753–756 . April 1976 . 768760 . 10.1056/nejm197604012941404 .
  30. Baker CJ, Edwards MS, Kasper DL . Role of antibody to native type III polysaccharide of group B Streptococcus in infant infection . Pediatrics . 68 . 4 . 544–549 . October 1981 . 7033911 . 10.1542/peds.68.4.544 . 38905874 .
  31. Edmond KM, Kortsalioudaki C, Scott S, Schrag SJ, Zaidi AK, Cousens S, Heath PT . Group B streptococcal disease in infants aged younger than 3 months: systematic review and meta-analysis . Lancet . 379 . 9815 . 547–556 . February 2012 . 22226047 . 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61651-6 . 15438484 .
  32. Nanduri SA, Petit S, Smelser C, Apostol M, Alden NB, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Vagnone PS, Burzlaff K, Spina NL, Dufort EM, Schaffner W, Thomas AR, Farley MM, Jain JH, Pondo T, McGee L, Beall BW, Schrag SJ . 6 . Epidemiology of Invasive Early-Onset and Late-Onset Group B Streptococcal Disease in the United States, 2006 to 2015: Multistate Laboratory and Population-Based Surveillance . JAMA Pediatrics . 173 . 3 . 224–233 . March 2019 . 30640366 . 6439883 . 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4826 .
  33. Lin FY, Weisman LE, Troendle J, Adams K . Prematurity is the major risk factor for late-onset group B streptococcus disease . The Journal of Infectious Diseases . 188 . 2 . 267–271 . July 2003 . 12854082 . 10.1086/376457 . free .
  34. Karampatsas K, Davies H, Mynarek M, Andrews N, Heath PT, Le Doare K. . Clinical Risk Factors Associated With Late-Onset Invasive Group B Streptococcal Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses . Clin Infect Dis . 2022 . 75 . 7 . 1255–1264 . 10.1093/cid/ciac206 . 35275986 . 9525091 .
  35. Boyer KM, Gadzala CA, Kelly PD, Gotoff SP . Selective intrapartum chemoprophylaxis of neonatal group B streptococcal early-onset disease. III. Interruption of mother-to-infant transmission . The Journal of Infectious Diseases . 148 . 5 . 810–816 . November 1983 . 6355318 . 10.1093/infdis/148.5.810 .
  36. Lin FY, Brenner RA, Johnson YR, Azimi PH, Philips JB, Regan JA, Clark P, Weisman LE, Rhoads GG, Kong F, Clemens JD . 6 . The effectiveness of risk-based intrapartum chemoprophylaxis for the prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease . American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology . 184 . 6 . 1204–1210 . May 2001 . 11349189 . 10.1067/mob.2001.113875 .
  37. de Cueto M, Sanchez MJ, Sampedro A, Miranda JA, Herruzo AJ, Rosa-Fraile M . Timing of intrapartum ampicillin and prevention of vertical transmission of group B streptococcus . Obstetrics and Gynecology . 91 . 1 . 112–114 . January 1998 . 9464732 . 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00587-5 . 43765652 .
  38. Berardi A, Rossi C, Biasini A, Minniti S, Venturelli C, Ferrari F, Facchinetti F . Efficacy of intrapartum chemoprophylaxis less than 4 hours duration . The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine . 24 . 4 . 619–625 . April 2011 . 20828241 . 10.3109/14767058.2010.511347 . 6697604 .
  39. Prevention of Early-onset Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Disease: Green-top Guideline No. 36 . BJOG . 124 . 12 . e280–e305 . November 2017 . 28901693 . 10.1111/1471-0528.14821 . 32700635 . free .
  40. Desai SH, Kaplan MS, Chen Q, Macy EM . Morbidity in Pregnant Women Associated with Unverified Penicillin Allergies, Antibiotic Use, and Group B Streptococcus Infections . The Permanente Journal . 21 . 16–080 . 2017 . 28333608 . 10.7812/TPP/16-080 . 5363897 .
  41. Bhattacharya S . The facts about penicillin allergy: a review . Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research . 1 . 1 . 11–17 . January 2010 . 10.4103/2231-4040.70513 . free . 22247826 . 3255391 .
  42. Baltimore RS, Huie SM, Meek JI, Schuchat A, O'Brien KL . Early-onset neonatal sepsis in the era of group B streptococcal prevention . Pediatrics . 108 . 5 . 1094–1098 . November 2001 . 11694686 . 10.1542/peds.108.5.1094 .
  43. Sutkin G, Krohn MA, Heine RP, Sweet RL . Antibiotic prophylaxis and non-group B streptococcal neonatal sepsis . Obstetrics and Gynecology . 105 . 3 . 581–586 . March 2005 . 15738028 . 10.1097/01.aog.0000153492.30757.2f . 22019440 .
  44. Schrag SJ, Hadler JL, Arnold KE, Martell-Cleary P, Reingold A, Schuchat A . Risk factors for invasive, early-onset Escherichia coli infections in the era of widespread intrapartum antibiotic use . Pediatrics . 118 . 2 . 570–576 . August 2006 . 16882809 . 10.1542/peds.2005-3083 . 34908773 .
  45. Cutland CL, Madhi SA, Zell ER, Kuwanda L, Laque M, Groome M, Gorwitz R, Thigpen MC, Patel R, Velaphi SC, Adrian P, Klugman K, Schuchat A, Schrag SJ . 6 . Chlorhexidine maternal-vagina, and neonate body wipes in sepsis and vertical transmission of pathogenic bacteria in South Africa: a randomised, controlled trial . Lancet . 374 . 9705 . 1909–1916 . December 2009 . 19846212 . 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61339-8 . 23418670 .
  46. Ohlsson A, Shah VS, Stade BC . Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour to prevent early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal infection . The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews . 12 . 12 . CD003520 . December 2014 . 25504106 . 10.1002/14651858.CD003520.pub3 . 11262555 .
  47. CDC. Prevention of Perinatal Group B Streptococcal Disease: A Public Health Perspective. MMWR. 1996. 45-RR7. 1–24.
  48. Clifford V, Garland SM, Grimwood K . Prevention of neonatal group B streptococcus disease in the 21st century . Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health . 48 . 9 . 808–815 . September 2012 . 22151082 . 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02203.x . 36906520 .
  49. Schrag SJ, Zell ER, Lynfield R, Roome A, Arnold KE, Craig AS, Harrison LH, Reingold A, Stefonek K, Smith G, Gamble M, Schuchat A . 6 . A population-based comparison of strategies to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease in neonates . The New England Journal of Medicine . 347 . 4 . 233–239 . July 2002 . 12140298 . 10.1056/nejmoa020205 . free .
  50. Giménez M, Sanfeliu I, Sierra M, et al.. [Group B streptococcal early-onset neonatal sepsis in the area of Barcelona (2004-2010). Analysis of missed opportunities for prevention] . Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia Clinica . 33 . 7 . 446–450 . 2015 . 25541009 . 10.1016/j.eimc.2014.10.015 . 196362631 .
  51. Håkansson S, Axemo P, Bremme K, et al. . Group B streptococcal carriage in Sweden: a national study on risk factors for mother and infant colonisation . Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica . 87 . 1 . 50–58 . January 2008 . 18158627 . 10.1080/00016340701802888 . 38090766 . free .
  52. Phares CR, Lynfield R, Farley MM, Mohle-Boetani J, Harrison LH, Petit S, Craig AS, Schaffner W, Zansky SM, Gershman K, Stefonek KR, Albanese BA, Zell ER, Schuchat A, Schrag SJ . 6 . Epidemiology of invasive group B streptococcal disease in the United States, 1999-2005 . JAMA . 299 . 17 . 2056–2065 . May 2008 . 18460666 . 10.1001/jama.299.17.2056 . free .
  53. Le Doare K, O'Driscoll M, Turner K, Seedat F. Intrapartum Antibiotic Chemoprophylaxis Policies for the Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Disease Worldwide: Systematic Review . Clin Infect Dis . 2017 . 65 . Suppl 2 . s143-151 . 10.1093/cid/cix654 . 29117324 . 5850619 .
  54. Colbourn T, Asseburg C, Bojke L, Philips Z, Claxton K, Ades AE, Gilbert RE . Prenatal screening and treatment strategies to prevent group B streptococcal and other bacterial infections in early infancy: cost-effectiveness and expected value of information analyses . Health Technology Assessment . 11 . 29 . 1–226, iii . August 2007 . 17651659 . 10.3310/hta11290 . free .
  55. Colbourn TE, Asseburg C, Bojke L, Philips Z, Welton NJ, Claxton K, Ades AE, Gilbert RE . 6 . Preventive strategies for group B streptococcal and other bacterial infections in early infancy: cost effectiveness and value of information analyses . BMJ . 335 . 7621 . 655 . September 2007 . 10.1136/bmj.39325.681806.AD . 17848402 . 1995477 .
  56. Kaambwa B, Bryan S, Gray J, Milner P, Daniels J, Khan KS, Roberts TE . Cost-effectiveness of rapid tests and other existing strategies for screening and management of early-onset group B streptococcus during labour . BJOG . 117 . 13 . 1616–1627 . December 2010 . 21078057 . 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02752.x . 25561127 . free .
  57. Vergnano S, Embleton N, Collinson A, Menson E, Russell AB, Heath P . Missed opportunities for preventing group B streptococcus infection . Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition . 95 . 1 . F72–F73 . January 2010 . 19439431 . 10.1136/adc.2009.160333 . 38297857 .
  58. Steer PJ, Plumb J . Myth: Group B streptococcal infection in pregnancy: comprehended and conquered . Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine . 16 . 5 . 254–258 . October 2011 . 21493170 . 10.1016/j.siny.2011.03.005 .
  59. Siegel JD, Cushion NB . Prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease: another look at single-dose penicillin at birth . Obstetrics and Gynecology . 87 . 5 Pt 1 . 692–698 . May 1996 . 8677068 . 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00004-x . 40716699 .
  60. Velaphi S, Siegel JD, Wendel GD, Cushion N, Eid WM, Sánchez PJ . Early-onset group B streptococcal infection after a combined maternal and neonatal group B streptococcal chemoprophylaxis strategy . Pediatrics . 111 . 3 . 541–547 . March 2003 . 12612234 . 10.1542/peds.111.3.541 .
  61. Woodgate P, Flenady V, Steer P . Intramuscular penicillin for the prevention of early onset group B streptococcal infection in newborn infants . The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews . 2004 . 3 . CD003667 . 2004 . 10.1002/14651858.CD003667.pub2 . 15266494 . 9029842 .
  62. Yancey MK, Schuchat A, Brown LK, Ventura VL, Markenson GR . The accuracy of late antenatal screening cultures in predicting genital group B streptococcal colonization at delivery . Obstetrics and Gynecology . 88 . 5 . 811–815 . November 1996 . 8885919 . 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00320-1 .
  63. Valkenburg-van den Berg AW, Houtman-Roelofsen RL, Oostvogel PM, Dekker FW, Dörr PJ, Sprij AJ . Timing of group B streptococcus screening in pregnancy: a systematic review . Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation . 69 . 3 . 174–183 . 2010 . 20016190 . 10.1159/000265942 . 26709882 .
  64. Price D, Shaw E, Howard M, Zazulak J, Waters H, Kaczorowski J . Self-sampling for group B streptococcus in women 35 to 37 weeks pregnant is accurate and acceptable: a randomized cross-over trial . Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada . 28 . 12 . 1083–1088 . December 2006 . 17169231 . 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32337-4 .
  65. Hicks P, Diaz-Perez MJ . Patient self-collection of group B streptococcal specimens during pregnancy . Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine . 22 . 2 . 136–140 . 2009 . 10.3122/jabfm.2009.02.080011. 19264936 . 2208746 .
  66. Arya A, Cryan B, O'Sullivan K, Greene RA, Higgins JR . Self-collected versus health professional-collected genital swabs to identify the prevalence of group B streptococcus: a comparison of patient preference and efficacy . European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology . 139 . 1 . 43–45 . July 2008 . 18255214 . 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.12.005 .
  67. Odubamowo K, Garcia M, Muriithi F, Ogollah R, Daniels JP, Walker KF . Self-collected versus health-care professional taken swab for identification of vaginal-rectal colonisation with group B streptococcus in late pregnancy: a systematic review. . Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol . 2023 . 286 . 95–101 . 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.027 . 37229964 . 258860996 . 27 November 2023. free .
  68. Rosa-Fraile M, Camacho-Muñoz E, Rodríguez-Granger J, Liébana-Martos C . Specimen storage in transport medium and detection of group B streptococci by culture . Journal of Clinical Microbiology . 43 . 2 . 928–930 . February 2005 . 10.1128/jcm.43.2.928-930.2005 . 15695709 . 548104 .
  69. Web site: UK Gov. . SMI B 58: detection of carriage of group B streptococci. Updated 2018 . 26 June 2018 . 28 February 2021.
  70. Gil EG, Rodríguez MC, Bartolomé R, Berjano B, Cabero L, Andreu A . Evaluation of the Granada agar plate for detection of vaginal and rectal group B streptococci in pregnant women . Journal of Clinical Microbiology . 37 . 8 . 2648–2651 . August 1999 . 85303 . 10.1128/JCM.37.8.2648-2651.1999 . 10405415 .
  71. Claeys G, Verschraegen G, Temmerman M . Modified Granada Agar Medium for the detection of group B Streptococcus carriage in pregnant women . Clinical Microbiology and Infection . 7 . 1 . 22–24 . January 2001. 11284939 . 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2001.00156.x . free .
  72. Web site: Where can I get the ECM test?. ECM Testing. Group B Strep Support. 22 November 2023.
  73. Web site: Group B Streptococcus Screening Test. Medisave UK Ltd. 20 November 2023.
  74. Web site: Testing for Group B Streptococcus. The Doctors Laboratory. 20 November 2021. 4 March 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20160304230623/http://www.tdlpathology.com/test-information/new-tests/testing-for-group-b-streptococcus. dead.
  75. Buchan BW, Faron ML, Fuller D, Davis TE, Mayne D, Ledeboer NA . Multicenter clinical evaluation of the Xpert GBS LB assay for detection of group B Streptococcus in prenatal screening specimens . Journal of Clinical Microbiology . 53 . 2 . 443–448 . February 2015 . 10.1128/jcm.02598-14 . 25411176 . 4298547 .
  76. Koliwer-Brandl H, Nil A, Birri J, Sachs M, Zimmermann R, Zbinden R, Balsyte D . Evaluation of two rapid commercial assays for detection of Streptococcus agalactiae from vaginal samples . Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand . 2023 . 102 . 4 . 450–456 . 10.1111/aogs.14519 . 36772902 . 10008276 .
  77. Daniels J, Gray J, Pattison H, Roberts T, Edwards E, Milner P, Spicer L, King E, Hills RK, Gray R, Buckley L, Magill L, Elliman N, Kaambwa B, Bryan S, Howard R, Thompson P, Khan KS . 6 . Rapid testing for group B streptococcus during labour: a test accuracy study with evaluation of acceptability and cost-effectiveness . Health Technology Assessment . 13 . 42 . 1–154, iii–iv . September 2009 . 19778493 . 10.3310/hta13420 . free .
  78. Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, Barry MJ, Cabana M, Caughey AB, et al . Screening for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement . JAMA . 322 . 12 . 1188–1194 . September 2019 . 31550038 . 10.1001/jama.2019.13069 . 202746652 . free .
  79. Smaill . Fiona M. . Vazquez . Juan C. . 2019-11-25 . Antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy . The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews . 2019 . 11 . CD000490 . 10.1002/14651858.CD000490.pub4. 31765489 . 6953361 .
  80. Pulver LS, Hopfenbeck MM, Young PC, Stoddard GJ, Korgenski K, Daly J, Byington CL . Continued early onset group B streptococcal infections in the era of intrapartum prophylaxis . Journal of Perinatology . 29 . 1 . 20–25 . January 2009 . 18704032 . 10.1038/jp.2008.115 . free .
  81. Melin P . Neonatal group B streptococcal disease: from pathogenesis to preventive strategies . Clinical Microbiology and Infection . 17 . 9 . 1294–1303 . September 2011 . 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03576.x . 21672083 . free .
  82. Berardi A, Lugli L, Baronciani D, Rossi C, Ciccia M, Creti R, Gambini L, Mariani S, Papa I, Tridapalli E, Vagnarelli F, Ferrari F . 6 . Group B Streptococcus early-onset disease in Emilia-romagna: review after introduction of a screening-based approach . The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal . 29 . 2 . 115–121 . February 2010 . 19915512 . 10.1097/inf.0b013e3181b83cd9 . 31548613 .
  83. Schrag SJ, Verani JR . Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease: experience in the United States and implications for a potential group B streptococcal vaccine . Vaccine . 31 . Suppl 4 . D20–D26 . August 2013 . 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.056 . 23219695 .
  84. Gillen P, Bamidele O, Healy M. . Systematic review of women's experiences of planning home birth in consultation with maternity care providers in middle to high-income countries . Midwifery . 2023 . 124 . 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103733 . 37307778 . 3 July 2024.
  85. Whittington JR, Ghahremani T, Whitham M, Phillips AM, Spracher BN, Magann EF. . Alternate Birth Strategies. . Int J Womens Health . 2023 . 15 . 1151–1159 . 10.2147/IJWH.S405533 . free . 37496517 . 10368118 .
  86. Web site: GROUP B STREP SUPPORT. FAQs35. Carrying GBS and home birth?. 4 March 2021.
  87. Prevention of Early-onset Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Disease: Green-top Guideline No. 36 . BJOG . 124 . 12 . e280–e305 . November 2017 . 10.1111/1471-0528.14821. 28901693 . 32700635 . free .
  88. Gonçalves BP, Procter SR, Paul P, Chandna J, Lewin A. . Group B streptococcus infection during pregnancy and infancy: estimates of regional and global burden . Lancet Glob Health . 2022 . 10 . 6 . e807–e819 . 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00093-6 . 35490693 . 9090904 .
  89. Proma P., Goncalvez B.P., Le Doare k., Lawn E. . 20 million pregnant women with group B streptococcus carriage: consequences, challenges, and opportunities for prevention . Curr Opin Pediatr . 2023 . 35 . 2 . 223–230 . 10.1097/MOP.0000000000001223 . 36749143 . 9994794 .
  90. Heath PT, Balfour G, Weisner AM, Efstratiou A, Lamagni TL, Tighe H, O'Connell LA, Cafferkey M, Verlander NQ, Nicoll A, McCartney AC . 6 . Group B streptococcal disease in UK and Irish infants younger than 90 days . Lancet . 363 . 9405 . 292–294 . January 2004 . 14751704 . 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)15389-5 . 22371160 .
  91. Le Doare K, Heath PT . An overview of global GBS epidemiology . Vaccine . 31 . D7-12 . August 2013 . Suppl 4 . 23973349 . 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.01.009 .
  92. Brigtsen AK, Jacobsen AF, Dedi L, Melby KK, Fugelseth D, Whitelaw A . Maternal Colonization with Group B Streptococcus Is Associated with an Increased Rate of Infants Transferred to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit . Neonatology . 108 . 3 . 157–163 . 2015 . 26182960 . 10.1159/000434716 . 24711146 .
  93. Carbonell-Estrany X, Figueras-Aloy J, Salcedo-Abizanda S, de la Rosa-Fraile M . Probable early-onset group B streptococcal neonatal sepsis: a serious clinical condition related to intrauterine infection . Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition . 93 . 2 . F85–F89 . March 2008 . 17704105 . 10.1136/adc.2007.119958 . 10300571 .
  94. Luck S, Torny M, d'Agapeyeff K, Pitt A, Heath P, Breathnach A, Russell AB . Estimated early-onset group B streptococcal neonatal disease . Lancet . 361 . 9373 . 1953–1954 . June 2003 . 12801740 . 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13553-2 . 33025300 .
  95. Lamagni TL, Keshishian C, Efstratiou A, Guy R, Henderson KL, Broughton K, Sheridan E . Emerging trends in the epidemiology of invasive group B streptococcal disease in England and Wales, 1991-2010 . Clinical Infectious Diseases . 57 . 5 . 682–688 . September 2013 . 23845950 . 10.1093/cid/cit337 . free .
  96. Baker CJ . The spectrum of perinatal group B streptococcal disease . Vaccine . 31 . Suppl 4 . D3–D6 . August 2013 . 23973344 . 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.02.030 .
  97. Web site: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Report, Emerging Infections Program Network, Group B Streptococcus, 2021. . Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2021 . 17 November 2023.
  98. Lopez Sastre J, Fernandez Colomer B, Coto Cotallo Gil D . Grupo de Hospitales Castrillo . Neonatal Sepsis of Vertical Transmission. An epidemiological study from the "Grupo de Hospitales Castrillo". Early Human Development. 2009. 85. 10. S100. 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.08.049.
  99. Andreu A, Sanfeliu I, Viñas L, Barranco M, Bosch J, Dopico E, Guardia C, Juncosa T, Lite J, Matas L, Sánchez F, Sierr M . 6 . [Decreasing incidence of perinatal group B streptococcal disease (Barcelona 1994-2002). Relation with hospital prevention policies] . Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiologia Clinica . 21 . 4 . 174–179 . April 2003 . 12681128 . 10.1016/s0213-005x(03)72913-9 .
  100. Rosa-Fraile M, Alós JI. . Group B Streptococcus neonatal infections, the ongoing history. . Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin . 2022 . 40 . 7 . 349–352 . 10.1016/j.eimce.2022.01.002. 35906029 .
  101. Albouy-Llaty M, Nadeau C, Descombes E, Pierre F, Migeot V . Improving perinatal Group B streptococcus screening with process indicators . Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice . 18 . 4 . 727–733 . August 2012 . 21414110 . 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01658.x .
  102. Sikias P, Biran V, Foix-L'Hélias L, Plainvert C, Boileau P, Bonacorsi S; EOS study group. . Early-onset neonatal sepsis in the Paris area: a population-based surveillance study from 2019 to 2021 . Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal . 2022 . 108 . 2 . 114–120 . 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324080 . 35902218 . 9985718 .
  103. Raabe VN, Shane AL . Group B Streptococcus (Streptococcus agalactiae) . Microbiology Spectrum . 7 . 2 . March 2019 . 30900541 . 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0007-2018 . 6432937 .
  104. Seale AC, Bianchi-Jassir F, Russell NJ, Kohli-Lynch M, Tann CJ, Hall J, Madrid L, Blencowe H, Cousens S, Baker CJ, Bartlett L, Cutland C, Gravett MG, Heath PT, Ip M, Le Doare K, Madhi SA, Rubens CE, Saha SK, Schrag SJ, Sobanjo-Ter Meulen A, Vekemans J, Lawn JE . 6 . Estimates of the Burden of Group B Streptococcal Disease Worldwide for Pregnant Women, Stillbirths, and Children . Clinical Infectious Diseases . 65 . suppl_2 . S200–S219 . November 2017 . 29117332 . 5849940 . 10.1093/cid/cix664 .
  105. Benitz WE, Gould JB, Druzin ML . Risk factors for early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: estimation of odds ratios by critical literature review . Pediatrics . 103 . 6 . e77 . June 1999 . 10353974 . 10.1542/peds.103.6.e77 . free .
  106. Web site: RCOG-GBSS . Information for you. Group B Streptococcus (GBS) in pregnancy and newborn babies . 2 December 2023.
  107. Web site: Screening for infections.1.8.9 Group B streptococcus. Antenatal care for uncomplicated pregnancies.NICE guidelines [CG62] : March 2008]. NICE National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 26 March 2008 . 27 November 2019.
  108. Web site: Recommendations Antenatal care Guidance NICE . 2022-05-21 . www.nice.org.uk. 19 August 2021 .
  109. Web site: Recommendations Neonatal infection: antibiotics for prevention and treatment Guidance NICE . 2022-05-21 . www.nice.org.uk. 20 April 2021 .
  110. Web site: UK National Screening Committee . Current UK NSC from the UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC). . 4 March 2021.
  111. Web site: Leading baby charity devastated by decision not to introduce life saving screening of pregnant women.2012. campaign-archive2.com. 4 March 2021.
  112. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention- CDC. MMWR. Prevention of Perinatal Group B Streptococcal Disease Revised Guidelines from CDC. 2002. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2002. 51-RR11. 1–22. 4 March 2021.
  113. Web site: CDC . Prevention Guidelines. 2019 Guidelines Update. . 4 March 2021.
  114. Couturier BA, Weight T, Elmer H, Schlaberg R . Antepartum screening for group B Streptococcus by three FDA-cleared molecular tests and effect of shortened enrichment culture on molecular detection rates . Journal of Clinical Microbiology . 52 . 9 . 3429–3432 . September 2014 . 25009049 . 4313176 . 10.1128/JCM.01081-14 . Carroll KC .
  115. Money D, Allen VM . No 298 - Prévention de l'infection néonatale à streptocoques du groupe B d'apparition précoce . Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada . 40 . 8 . e675–e686 . August 2018 . 30103892 . 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.05.033 . 51980587 .
  116. Alós Cortés JI, Andreu Domingo A, Arribas Mir L, Cabero Roura L, Cueto Lopez M, López Sastre J, Melchor Marcos JC, Puertas Prieto A, de la Rosa Fraile M, Salcedo Abizanda S, Sánchez Luna M, Sánchez Pérez MJ, Torrejón Cardoso R . 6 . [Prevention of perinatal group B Streptococcal disease. Updated Spanish recommendations 2012] ]. Revista Espanola de Quimioterapia . 25 . 1 . 79–88 . March 2012 . 22488547 . 25 November 2019 .
  117. [Prevention of neonatal infection with Streptococcus Group B. Expert correspondence no. 19 of 29th December 2006] . Gynäkologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau . 47 . 2 . 103–104 . 2007 . 17440274 . 10.1159/000100342 . 77887846 . Kommission Qualitätssicherung der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe .
  118. Web site: Prophylaxe der Neugeborenensepsis - frühe Form - durch Streptokokken der Gruppe B . 25 November 2023.
  119. Kotarski J, Heczko PB, Lauterbach R, Niemiec T, Leszczyńska- Gorzelak B . Rekomendacje polskiego towarzystwa ginekologicznego dotyczące wykrywania nosicielstwa paciorkowców grupy B (GBS) u kobiet w ciąży i zapobiegania zakażeniom u noworodków . Recommendations Polish Gynecological Society for the detection of carriers of GBS in pregnant women and prevent infections in newborns. . pl . Ginekol Pol . 2008 . 79 . 221–223 .
  120. Měchurová A, Vlk R, Unzeitig V, Švihovec P, Mašata J . Diagnostika a léčba streptokoků skupiny B v těhotenství a za porodu–doporučený postup. . Diagnosis and treatment of group B streptococci during pregnancy and childbirth – recommended procedure. . Czech . Čes Gynek. . 2013 . 78 . 11–14 .
  121. Web site: Agence Nationale d'Accreditation et d'Evaluation en Santé . National Agency for Accreditation and Health Evaluation . Prévention anténatale du risque infectieux bactérien néonatal précoce . Antenatal prevention of the risk of early neonatal bacterial infection . fr . 2001 . 2 March 2021.
  122. Web site: Belgian Health Council. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal infections. Guidelines. 2003. https://web.archive.org/web/20160304104930/https://orbi.ulg.ac.be/bitstream/2268/8652/1/GBS_CSH%20english%202003.pdf . 25 November 2023. 4 March 2016 .
  123. Web site: 27 November 2023. 2008. es. Realización del examen de detección del estreptococo Grupo B Agalactiae, a todas las embarazadas con edad gestacional entre las semanas 35 y 37.
  124. Web site: 27 November 2023. 2018. es. Resolución 3280.
  125. Web site: Nederlandse Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecologie . Dutch Association for Obstetrics and Gynaecology . 2008 . Preventie van neonatale groep-B-streptokokkenziekte (GBS-ziekte) Versie 2.0 . Prevention of Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Disease (GBS-Disease) Version 2.0 . nl . Med-Info . 25 November 2019.
  126. Web site: Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. RANZCOG. . Streptococcus (GBS) in Pregnancy: Screening and Management. July 2019. . 25 November 2023.
  127. Skoff TH, Farley MM, Petit S, Craig AS, Schaffner W, Gershman K, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Mohle-Boetani J, Zansky S, Albanese BA, Stefonek K, Zell ER, Jackson D, Thompson T, Schrag SJ . 6 . Increasing burden of invasive group B streptococcal disease in nonpregnant adults, 1990-2007 . Clinical Infectious Diseases . 49 . 1 . 85–92 . July 2009 . 19480572 . 10.1086/599369 . free .
  128. Farley MM . Group B streptococcal disease in nonpregnant adults . Clinical Infectious Diseases . 33 . 4 . 556–561 . August 2001 . 11462195 . 10.1086/322696 . free .
  129. Edwards MS, Baker CJ . Group B streptococcal infections in elderly adults . Clinical Infectious Diseases . 41 . 6 . 839–847 . September 2005 . 16107984 . 10.1086/432804 . free .
  130. Collin SM, Shetty N, Lamagni T. . Invasive Group B Streptococcus Infections in Adults, England, 2015-2016 . Emerg Infect Dis . 2020 . 26 . 6 . 1174–1181 . 10.3201/eid2606.191141 . 32441619 . 7258460 .
  131. Graux E, Hites M, Martiny D, Maillart E, Delforge M, Melin P, Dauby N . Invasive group B Streptococcus among non-pregnant adults in Brussels-Capital Region, 2005-2019 . European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases . 40 . 3 . 515–523 . March 2021 . 10.1007/s10096-020-04041-0 . 32944894 . 7498195 .
  132. Al Akhrass F, Abdallah L, Berger S, Hanna R, Reynolds N, Thompson S, Hallit R, Schlievert PM . 6 . Streptococcus agalactiae toxic shock-like syndrome: two case reports and review of the literature . Medicine . 92 . 1 . 10–14 . January 2013 . 10.1097/MD.0b013e31827dea11 . 23263717 . 5370747 .
  133. Jordan HT, Farley MM, Craig A, Mohle-Boetani J, Harrison LH, Petit S, Lynfield R, Thomas A, Zansky S, Gershman K, Albanese BA, Schaffner W, Schrag SJ . 6 . Revisiting the need for vaccine prevention of late-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease: a multistate, population-based analysis . The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal . 27 . 12 . 1057–1064 . December 2008 . 18989238 . 10.1097/inf.0b013e318180b3b9 . 1533957 .
  134. Edwards MS, Rench MA, Rinaudo CD, Fabbrini M, Tuscano G, Buffi G, Bartolini E, Bonacci S, Baker CJ, Margarit I . 6 . Immune Responses to Invasive Group B Streptococcal Disease in Adults . Emerging Infectious Diseases . 22 . 11 . 1877–1883 . November 2016 . 10.3201/eid2211.160914 . 27767008 . 5088039 .
  135. Web site: World Health Organization . Group B streptococcus vaccine: full value of vaccine assessment. . 6 July 2024.
  136. Web site: World Health Organization . GBS vaccine research and development technical roadmap and WHO Preferred Product Characteristics . https://web.archive.org/web/20170422034607/http://www.who.int/immunization/research/development/ppc_groupb_strepvaccines/en/ . 26 November 2023. 22 April 2017 .
  137. Procter SR, Gonçalves BP, Paul P, Chandna J, Seedat F, Koukounari A, Hutubessy R, Trotter C, Lawn JE, Jit M. . Maternal immunisation against Group B Streptococcus: A global analysis of health impact and cost-effectiveness . PLOS Med. . 2023 . 20 . 3 . e1004068 . 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004068 . 36917564 . 10013922 . free .
  138. Baker CJ, Carey VJ, Rench MA, Edwards MS, Hillier SL, Kasper DL, Platt R . Maternal antibody at delivery protects neonates from early onset group B streptococcal disease . The Journal of Infectious Diseases . 209 . 5 . 781–788 . March 2014 . 10.1093/infdis/jit549 . 24133184 . 3923540 .
  139. Madhi SA, Cutland CL, Jose L, Koen A, Govender N, Wittke F, Olugbosi M, Meulen AS, Baker S, Dull PM, Narasimhan V, Slobod K . 6 . Safety and immunogenicity of an investigational maternal trivalent group B streptococcus vaccine in healthy women and their infants: a randomised phase 1b/2 trial . The Lancet. Infectious Diseases . 16 . 8 . 923–934 . August 2016 . 27139805 . 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00152-3 .
  140. Song JY, Lim JH, Lim S, Yong Z, Seo HS . Progress toward a group B streptococcal vaccine . Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics . 14 . 11 . 2669–2681 . 2018 . 10.1080/21645515.2018.1493326 . 29995578 . 6314413 .
  141. Gupalova T, Leontieva G, Kramskaya T, Grabovskaya K, Bormotova E, Korjevski D, Suvorov A . Development of experimental GBS vaccine for mucosal immunization . PLOS ONE . 13 . 5 . e0196564 . 2018 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0196564 . 29727446 . 5935385 . free . 2018PLoSO..1396564G .
  142. Carreras-Abad C, Ramkhelawon L, Heath PT, Le Doare K . A Vaccine Against Group B Streptococcus: Recent Advances . Infection and Drug Resistance . 13 . 1263–1272 . 2020 . 10.2147/IDR.S203454. 32425562 . 7196769 . 26 November 2023 . free .
  143. Dominguez K, Randis TM. . Toward the development of a protein-based group B Streptococcus vaccine. . Cell Rep Med. . 2022 . 3 . 2 . 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100536 . 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100536 . 35243427 . 8861943 .
  144. Edwards MS, Gonik B . Preventing the broad spectrum of perinatal morbidity and mortality through group B streptococcal vaccination . Vaccine . 31 . Suppl 4 . D66–D71 . August 2013 . 23200934 . 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.046 .
  145. Nuccitelli A, Rinaudo CD, Maione D . Group B Streptococcus vaccine: state of the art . Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines . 3 . 3 . 76–90 . May 2015 . 10.1177/2051013615579869. 26288735 . 4530403 .
  146. Heath PT . Status of vaccine research and development of vaccines for GBS . Vaccine . 34 . 26 . 2876–2879 . June 2016 . 26988258 . 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.12.072 . free .
  147. Davies HG, Carreras-Abad C, Le Doare K, Heath PT . Group B Streptococcus: Trials and Tribulations . The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal . 38 . 6S Suppl 1 . S72–S76 . June 2019 . 10.1097/INF.0000000000002328. 31205250 . 189943251 . 26 November 2023. free .
  148. Madhi SA . Potential for Maternally Administered Vaccines for Infant Group B Streptococcus. . New England Journal of Medicine . 389 . 3 . 215–227 . June 2023. 10.1056/NEJMoa2116045. 37467497 . 259995252 . free .
  149. Absalon J, Simon R, Radley D, Giardina PC, Koury K, Jansen KU, Anderson AS. . Advances towards licensure of a maternal vaccine for the prevention of invasive group B streptococcus disease in infants: a discussion of different approaches . Hum Vaccin Immunother. . 2022 . 18 . 1 . 2037350 . 10.1080/21645515.2022.2037350 . 35240933 . 9009955 .
  150. Trotter CL, Alderson M, Dangor Z, Ip M, Le Doare K, Nakabembe E, Procter SR, Sekikubo M, Lambach P. . Vaccine value profile for Group B streptococcus. . Vaccine . 2023 . 41 . Suppl 2:S41-S52 . 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.04.024 . 37951694 . 7 July 2024.
  151. Buurman ET . A Novel Hexavalent Capsular Polysaccharide Conjugate Vaccine (GBS6) for the Prevention of Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Infections by Maternal Immunization . J Infect Dis . 220 . 1 . 105–115 . June 2019 . 30778554 . 10.1093/infdis/jiz062 . 6548902 . free.
  152. MinervaX Corporate Website https://www.MinervaX.com/MinervaX-provides-clinical-update-on-its-maternal-gbs-vaccine/
  153. Web site: MarketVIEW: Group B Streptococcus vaccines . VacZine Analytics . 26 November 2023.
  154. Web site: Group B Strep Support (GBSS) . Home»Get Involved»Campaign»Group B Strep Awareness Month Group B Strep Awareness Month . 24 June 2019 . 23 November 2023.
  155. Web site: Home Page . Group B Strep Support .
  156. Delannoy CM, Crumlish M, Fontaine MC, Pollock J, Foster G, Dagleish MP, Turnbull JF, Zadoks RN . 6 . Human Streptococcus agalactiae strains in aquatic mammals and fish . BMC Microbiology . 13 . 41 . February 2013 . 10.1186/1471-2180-13-41. 23419028 . 3585737 . free .
  157. Keefe GP . July 1997 . Streptococcus agalactiae mastitis: a review . The Canadian Veterinary Journal . 38 . 7 . 429–437 . 1576741 . 9220132.
  158. Cheng WN, Han SG. . Bovine mastitis: risk factors, therapeutic strategies, and alternative treatments - A review . Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science . 2020 . 33 . 11 . 1699–1713 . 10.5713/ajas.20.0156 . 32777908 . 7649072 .
  159. Ruegg PL . A 100-Year Review: Mastitis detection, management, and prevention . Journal of Dairy Science . 100 . 12 . 10381–10397 . December 2017 . 10.3168/jds.2017-13023 . 29153171 . 6122209 . 26 November 2023. free .
  160. Morales-Ubaldo AL, Rivero-Perez N, Valladares-Carranza B, Velázquez-Ordoñez V, Delgadillo-Ruiz L, Zaragoza-Bastida A. . Bovine mastitis, a worldwide impact disease: Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and viable alternative approaches . Vet Anim Sci. . 2023 . 21 . 100306 . 10.1016/j.vas.2023.100306 . 37547227 . 10400929 .
  161. Crestani C, Forde TL, Lycett SJ, Holmes MA, Fasth C, Persson-Waller K, Zadoks RN. . The fall and rise of group B Streptococcus in dairy cattle: reintroduction due to human-to- cattle host jumps? . Microbial Genomics . 2021 . 7 . 9 . 000648 . 10.1099/mgen.0.000648 . free . 34486971 . 8715428 .
  162. Evans JJ, Klesius PH, Pasnik DJ, Bohnsack JF . Human Streptococcus agalactiae isolate in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) . Emerging Infectious Diseases . 15 . 5 . 774–776 . May 2009 . 10.3201/eid1505.080222. 19402966 . 2687030 .
  163. Web site: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations . RISK PROFILE Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Streptococcus agalactiae sequence type (ST) 283 in freshwater fish . 26 November 2023.
  164. Liu G, Zhang W, Lu C . Comparative genomics analysis of Streptococcus agalactiae reveals that isolates from cultured tilapia in China are closely related to the human strain A909 . BMC Genomics . 14 . 775 . November 2013 . 24215651 . 3831827 . 10.1186/1471-2164-14-775 . free .
  165. Li LP, Wang R, Liang WW, Huang T, Huang Y, Luo FG, Lei AY, Chen M, Gan X . 6 . Development of live attenuated Streptococcus agalactiae vaccine for tilapia via continuous passage in vitro . Fish & Shellfish Immunology . 45 . 2 . 955–963 . August 2015 . 26087276 . 10.1016/j.fsi.2015.06.014 . 2015FSI....45..955L .
  166. Zhang D, Gao Y, Li Q, Ke X, Liu Z, Lu M, Shi C . An effective live attenuated vaccine against Streptococcus agalactiae infection in farmed Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) . Fish & Shellfish Immunology . 98 . 853–859 . March 2020 . 31751658 . 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.11.044 . 2020FSI....98..853Z . 208226408 .
  167. Thompson KD, Rodkhum C, Bunnoy A, Thangsunan P, Kitiyodom S, Sukkarun Yostawornkul J, Yata T, Pirarat N. . Addressing Nanovaccine Strategies for Tilapia . Vaccines . 2023 . 11 . 8 . 1356 . 10.3390/vaccines11081356 . 37631924 . 10459980 . free .

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Group B streptococcal infection".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.