Grafting Explained

Grafting or graftage[1] is a horticultural technique whereby tissues of plants are joined so as to continue their growth together. The upper part of the combined plant is called the scion while the lower part is called the rootstock. The success of this joining requires that the vascular tissues grow together. The natural equivalent of this process is inosculation. The technique is most commonly used in asexual propagation of commercially grown plants for the horticultural and agricultural trades. The scion is typically joined to the rootstock at the soil line; however, top work grafting may occur far above this line, leaving an understock consisting of the lower part of the trunk and the root system.

In most cases, the stock or rootstock is selected for its roots and the scion is selected for its stems, leaves, flowers, or fruits.[1] The scion contains the desired genes to be duplicated in future production by the grafted plant.

In stem grafting, a common grafting method, a shoot of a selected, desired plant cultivar is grafted onto the stock of another type. In another common form called bud grafting, a dormant side bud is grafted onto the stem of another stock plant, and when it has inosculated successfully, it is encouraged to grow by pruning off the stem of the stock plant just above the newly grafted bud.

For successful grafting to take place, the vascular cambium tissues of the stock and scion plants must be placed in contact with each other. Both tissues must be kept alive until the graft has "taken", usually a period of a few weeks. Successful grafting only requires that a vascular connection take place between the grafted tissues. Research conducted in Arabidopsis thaliana hypocotyls has shown that the connection of phloem takes place after three days of initial grafting, whereas the connection of xylem can take up to seven days.[2] Joints formed by grafting are not as strong as naturally formed joints, so a physical weak point often still occurs at the graft because only the newly formed tissues inosculate with each other. The existing structural tissue (or wood) of the stock plant does not fuse.

Advantages

Factors for successful graft

Tools

Techniques

Approach

Approach grafting or inarching is used to join together plants that are otherwise difficult to join. The plants are grown close together, and then joined so that each plant has roots below and growth above the point of union.[6] Both scion and stock retain their respective parents that may or may not be removed after joining. Also used in pleaching. The graft can be successfully accomplished any time of year.[7]

Bud

Bud grafting (also called chip budding or shield budding) uses a bud instead of a twig.[8] Grafting roses is the most common example of bud grafting. In this method a bud is removed from the parent plant, and the base of the bud is inserted beneath the bark of the stem of the stock plant from which the rest of the shoot has been cut. Any extra bud that starts growing from the stem of the stock plant is removed. Examples: roses and fruit trees like peaches.

Budwood is a stick with several buds on it that can be cut out and used for bud grafting. It is a common method of propagation for citrus trees.[9] [10] [11]

Cleft

In cleft grafting a small cut is made in the stock and then the pointed end of the scion is inserted in the stock. This is best done in the early spring and is useful for joining a thin scion about 1frac=8NaNfrac=8 diameter to a thicker branch or stock. It is best if the former has 3–5 buds and the latter is 2- in diameter. The branch or stock should be split carefully down the middle to form a cleft about 3frac=8NaNfrac=8 deep. If it is a branch that is not vertical then the cleft should be cut horizontally. The end of the scion should be cut cleanly to a long shallow wedge, preferably with a single cut for each wedge surface, and not whittled. A third cut may be made across the end of the wedge to make it straight across.

Slide the wedge into the cleft so that it is at the edge of the stock and the centre of the wedge faces are against the cambium layer between the bark and the wood. It is preferable if a second scion is inserted in a similar way into the other side of the cleft. This helps to seal off the cleft. Tape around the top of the stock to hold the scion in place and cover with grafting wax or sealing compound. This stops the cambium layers from drying out and also prevents the ingress of water into the cleft.

Whip

In whip grafting the scion and the stock are cut slanting and then joined. The grafted point is then bound with tape and covered with a soft sealant to prevent dehydration and infection by germs. The common variation is a whip and tongue graft, which is considered the most difficult to master but has the highest rate of success as it offers the most cambium contact between the scion and the stock. It is the most common graft used in preparing commercial fruit trees. It is generally used with stock less than 1.25frac=8NaNfrac=8 diameter, with the ideal diameter closer to 1frac=8NaNfrac=8 and the scion should be of roughly the same diameter as the stock.

The stock is cut through on one side only at a shallow angle with a sharp knife. (If the stock is a branch and not the main trunk of the rootstock then the cut surface should face outward from the centre of the tree.) The scion is similarly sliced through at an equal angle starting just below a bud, so that the bud is at the top of the cut and on the other side than the cut face.

In the whip and tongue variation, a notch is cut downwards into the sliced face of the stock and a similar cut upwards into the face of the scion cut. These act as the tongues and it requires some skill to make the cuts so that the scion and the stock marry up neatly. The elongated "Z" shape adds strength, removing the need for a companion rod in the first season (see illustration).

The joint is then taped around and treated with tree-sealing compound or grafting wax. A whip graft without a tongue is less stable and may need added support.

Stub

Stub grafting is a technique that requires less stock than cleft grafting, and retains the shape of a tree. Also scions are generally of 6–8 buds in this process.

An incision is made into the branch 1frac=8NaNfrac=8 long, then the scion is wedged and forced into the branch. The scion should be at an angle of at most 35° to the parent tree so that the crotch remains strong. The graft is covered with grafting compound.

After the graft has taken, the branch is removed and treated a few centimeters above the graft, to be fully removed when the graft is strong.

Four-flap

The four-flap graft (also called banana graft) is commonly used for pecans, and first became popular with this species in Oklahoma in 1975.[12] It is heralded for maximum cambium overlap, but is a complex graft. It requires similarly sized diameters for the rootstock and scion. The bark of the rootstock is sliced and peeled back in four flaps, and the hardwood is removed, looking somewhat like a peeled banana. It is a difficult graft to learn.

Awl

Awl grafting takes the least resources and the least time. It is best done by an experienced grafter, as it is possible to accidentally drive the tool too far into the stock, reducing the scion's chance of survival. Awl grafting can be done by using a screwdriver to make a slit in the bark, not penetrating the cambium layer completely. Then inset the wedged scion into the incision.

Veneer

Veneer grafting, or inlay grafting, is a method used for stock larger than 2.5cm (01inches) in diameter.[13] The scion is recommended to be about as thick as a pencil. Clefts are made of the same size as the scion on the side of the branch, not on top. The scion end is shaped as a wedge, inserted, and wrapped with tape to the scaffolding branches to give it more strength.

sRind (also called bark)

Rind grafting involves grafting a small scion onto the end of a thick stock. The thick stock is sawn off, and a ~4 cm long bark-deep cut is made parallel to the stock, from the sawn-off end down, and the bark is separated from the wood on one or both sides. The scion is shaped as a wedge, exposing cambium on both sides, and is pushed in under the back of the stock, with a flat side against the wood.

Natural grafting

Tree branches and more often roots of the same species will sometimes naturally graft; this is called inosculation. The bark of the tree may be stripped away when the roots make physical contact with each other, exposing the vascular cambium and allowing the roots to graft together. A group of trees can share water and mineral nutrients via root grafts, which may be advantageous to weaker trees, and may also form a larger rootmass as an adaptation to promote fire resistance and regeneration as exemplified by the California black oak (Quercus kelloggii).[14] Additionally, grafting may protect the group from wind damages as a result of the increased mechanical stability provided by the grafting.[15] Albino redwoods use root grafting as a form of plant parasitism of normal redwoods.

A problem with root grafts is that they allow transmission of certain pathogens, such as Dutch elm disease. Inosculation also sometimes occurs where two stems on the same tree, shrub or vine make contact with each other. This is common in plants such as strawberries and potato.

Natural grafting is rarely seen in herbaceous plants as those types of plants generally have short-lived roots with little to no secondary growth in the vascular cambium.

Graft chimera

Occasionally, a so-called "graft hybrid" or more accurately graft chimera can occur where the tissues of the stock continue to grow within the scion. Such a plant can produce flowers and foliage typical of both plants as well as shoots intermediate between the two. The best-known example this is probably +Laburnocytisus 'Adamii', a graft hybrid between Laburnum and Cytisus, which originated in a nursery near Paris, France, in 1825. This small tree bears yellow flowers typical of Laburnum anagyroides, purple flowers typical of Cytisus purpureus and curious coppery-pink flowers that show characteristics of both "parents". Many species of cactus can also produce graft chimeras under the right conditions although they are often created unintentionally and such results are often hard to replicate.

Scientific uses

Grafting has been important in flowering research. Leaves or shoots from plants induced to flower can be grafted onto uninduced plants and transmit a floral stimulus that induces them to flower.[16]

The transmission of plant viruses has been studied using grafting. Virus indexing involves grafting a symptomless plant that is suspected of carrying a virus onto an indicator plant that is very susceptible to the virus.

Grafting can transfer chloroplasts (plant organelles that can conduct photosynthesis), mitochondrial DNA and the entire cell nucleus containing the genome to potentially make a new species making grafting a form of natural genetic engineering.[17]

Examples

White Spruce

White spruce can be grafted with consistent success by using 8- scions of current growth on thrifty 4- to 5-year-old rootstock (Nienstaedt and Teich 1972).[18] Before greenhouse grafting, rootstocks should be potted in late spring, allowed to make seasonal growth, then subjected to a period of chilling outdoors, or for about 8 weeks in a cool room at 2 °C (Nienstaedt 1966).[19]

A method of grafting white spruce of seed-bearing age during the time of seed harvest in the fall was developed by Nienstaedt et al. (1958).[20] Scions of white spruce of 2 ages of wood from 30- to 60-year-old trees were collected in the fall and grafted by 3 methods on potted stock to which different day-length treatments had been applied prior to grafting. The grafted stock were given long-day and natural-day treatments. Survival was 70% to 100% and showed effects of rootstock and post-grafting treatments in only a few cases. Photoperiod and temperature treatments after grafting, however, had considerable effect on scion activity and total growth. The best post-grafting treatment was 4 weeks of long-day treatment followed by 2 weeks of short-day treatment, then 8 weeks of chilling, and finally long-day treatment.

Since grafts of white spruce put on relatively little growth in the 2 years after grafting, techniques for accelerating the early growth were studied by Greenwood (1988)[21] and others. The cultural regimes used to promote one additional growth cycle in one year involve manipulation of day length and the use of cold storage to satisfy chilling requirements. Greenwood took dormant potted grafts into the greenhouse in early January then gradually raised the temperature during the course of a week until the minimum temperature rose to 15 °C. Photoperiod was increased to 18 hours using incandescent lighting. In this technique, grafts are grown until elongation has been completed, normally by mid-March. Soluble 10-52-10 fertilizer is applied at both ends of the growth cycle and 20-20-20 during the cycle, with irrigation as needed. When growth elongation is complete, day length is reduced to 8 hours using a blackout curtain. Budset follows, and the grafts are held in the greenhouse until mid-May. Grafts are then moved into a cooler at 4 °C for 1000 hours, after which they are moved to a shade frame where they grow normally, with applications of fertilizer and irrigation as in the first cycle. Grafts are moved into cold frames or unheated greenhouse in September until January. Flower induction treatments are begun on grafts that have reached a minimum length of 1.0 m. Repotting from an initial pot size of 4.5 litre to 16 litre containers with a 2:1:1 soil mix of peat moss, loam, and aggregate.

In one of the first accelerated growth experiments, white spruce grafts made in January and February that would normally elongate shortly after grafting, set bud, and remain in that condition until the following spring, were refrigerated for 500, 1000, or 1500 hours beginning in mid-July, and a non-refrigerated control was held in the nursery. After completion of the cold treatment, the grafts were moved into the greenhouse with an 18-hour photoperiod until late October. Height increment was significantly (P 0.01) influenced by cold treatment. Best results were given by the 1000-hour treatment.

The refrigeration (cold treatment) phase was subsequently shown to be effective when applied 2 months earlier with proper handling and use of blackout curtains, which allows the second growth cycle to be completed in time to satisfy dormancy requirements before January (Greenwood et al. 1988).

Herbaceous grafting

Grafting is often done for non-woody and vegetable plants (tomato, cucumber, eggplant and watermelon).[22] Tomato grafting is very popular in Asia and Europe, and is gaining popularity in the United States. The main advantage of grafting is for disease-resistant rootstocks. Researchers in Japan developed automated processes using grafting robots as early as 1987.[23] [24] [25] Plastic tubing can be used to prevent desiccation and support the healing at the graft/scion interface.[26]

History, society and culture

Fertile Crescent

As humans began to domesticate plants and animals, horticultural techniques that could reliably propagate the desired qualities of long-lived woody plants needed to be developed. Although grafting is not specifically mentioned in the Hebrew Bible, it is claimed that ancient Biblical text hints at the practice of grafting. For example, Leviticus 19:19 states "[the Hebrew people] shalt not sow their field with mingled seed..." (King James Bible). Some scholars believe the phrase mingled seeds includes grafting, although this interpretation remains contentious among scholars.

Grafting is also mentioned in the New Testament. In Romans 11, starting at verse 17, there is a discussion about the grafting of wild olive trees concerning the relationship between Jews and Gentiles.[27] [28]

By 500 BCE grafting was well established and practiced in the region as the Mishna describes grafting as a commonplace technique used to grow grapevines.[29]

China

According to recent research: "grafting technology had been practiced in China before 2000 BC".[30] Additional evidence for grafting in China is found in Jia Sixie's 6th century CE agricultural treatise Qimin Yaoshu (Essential Skills for the Common People).[31] It discusses grafting pear twigs onto crab apple, jujube and pomegranate stock (domesticated apples had not yet arrived in China), as well as grafting persimmons. The Qimin yaoshu refers to older texts that referred to grafting, but those works are missing. Nonetheless, given the sophistication of the methods discussed, and the long history of arboriculture in the region, grafting must have already been practiced for centuries by this time.

Greece and Rome, and Islamic Golden Age

In Greece, a medical record written in 424 BCE contains the first direct reference to grafting. The title of the work is On the Nature of the Child and is thought to be written by a follower of Hippocrates. The language of the author suggests that grafting appeared centuries before this period.

In Rome, Marcus Porcius Cato wrote the oldest surviving Latin text in 160 BCE. The book is called De Agri Cultura (On Farming Agriculture) and outlines several grafting methods. Other authors in the region would write about grafting in the following years, however, the publications often featured fallacious scion-stock combinations.

During the European Dark Ages, Arabic regions were experiencing an Islamic Golden Age of scientific, technological, and cultural advancement. Creating lavishly flourished gardens would be a common form of competition among Islamic leaders at the time. Because the region would receive an influx of foreign ornamentals to decorate these gardens, grafting was used much during this period.

Europe and the United States

After the fall of the Roman Empire, grafting survived in the Christian monasteries of Europe until it regained popular appeal during the Renaissance. The invention of the printing press inspired a number of authors to publish books on gardening that included information on grafting. One example, A New Orchard and Garden: Or, the Best Way for Planting, Graffing, and to Make Any Ground Good for a Rich Orchard, Particularly in the North, was written by William Lawson in 1618. While the book contains practical grafting techniques, some even still used today, it suffers from exaggerated claims of scion-stock compatibility typical of this period.

While grafting continued to grow in Europe during the eighteenth century, it was considered unnecessary in the United States as the produce from fruit trees was largely used either to make cider or feed hogs.

French Wine Pandemic

Beginning in 1864, and without warning, grapevines across France began to sharply decline. Thanks to the efforts of scientists such as C. V. Riley and J. E. Planchon, the culprit was identified to be phylloxera, an insect that infests the roots of vines and causes fungal infections. Initially, farmers unsuccessfully attempted to contain the pest by removing and burning affected vines. When it was discovered that phylloxera was an invasive species introduced from North America, some suggested importing rootstock from the region as the North American vines were resistant to the pest. Others, opposed to the idea, argued that American rootstocks would imbue the French grapes with an undesirable taste; they instead preferred to inject the soil with expensive pesticides. Ultimately, grafting French vines onto American rootstocks became prevalent throughout the region, creating new grafting techniques and machines. American rootstocks had trouble adapting to the high soil pH value of some regions in France so the final solution to the pandemic was to hybridize the American and French variants.

Cultivated plants propagated by grafting

Apple – grafting

Avocado – grafting

Conifer - stem cuttings, grafting

Citrus (lemon, orange, grapefruit, Tangerine, dayap) – grafting

Grapes – stem cuttings, grafting, aerial layering

Kumquat – stem cutting, grafting

Mango- grafting, budding

Maple – stem cuttings, grafting

Nut crops (walnut, pecan) – grafting

Peach – grafting

Pear – grafting

Rubber Plant - bud grafting

Rose - grafting

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Book: Hottes, A.C. . 1925 . Practical plant propagation: an exposition of the art and science of increasing plants as practiced by the nurseryman, florist and gardener . A.T. De La Mare . New York.
  2. Melnyk. Charles W.. Schuster. Christoph. Leyser. Ottoline. Meyerowitz. Elliot M.. May 2015. A Developmental Framework for Graft Formation and Vascular Reconnection in Arabidopsis thaliana. Current Biology. 25. 10. 1306–1318. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.03.032. 4798781. 25891401. 2015CBio...25.1306M .
  3. Web site: Kumar . G. . 2011 . Propagation of Plants by Grafting and Budding . Pacific Northwest Extension . 3–5.
  4. Book: Hartmann . H.T. . Kester . D. . Davies . F. . Geneve . R. . 2001 . Plant Propagation: Principals and Practices . Prentice Hall . 7th . 978-0-136-79235-2 . registration .
  5. Book: Garner . R. . 1958 . Grafter's Handbook . 79–100 . Oxford University Press . New York.
  6. Book: Nelson, Alexander . Principles of Agricultural Botany . 101 . Read Books . United Kingdom . 2007 . 978-1-4067-4662-4.
  7. Book: Garner . R. . 1988 . Grafter's Handbook . 131 . Cassell Illustrated . 978-0-304-32172-8.
  8. Web site: Budding Plant Propagation Technique . plantpropagation.org . 2022-10-31 . 2023-06-02 . https://web.archive.org/web/20230602014212/https://plantpropagation.org/budding/ . dead .
  9. Web site: Terms and Conditions of Supply of Budwood by CCPP . . Citrus Clonal Protection Program . University of California, Riverside . 13 September 2017.
  10. Web site: Citrus Budwood Program . . Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services . 13 September 2017 . 22 October 2017 . https://web.archive.org/web/20171022214529/http://www.freshfromflorida.com/Divisions-Offices/Plant-Industry/Agriculture-Industry/Citrus-Health-Response-Program/Citrus-Budwood-Program . dead .
  11. Web site: Citrus Budwood Cerfication Program . . September 29, 2015 . Texas A&M University - Kingsville Citrus Center . 13 September 2017 . 27 October 2017 . https://web.archive.org/web/20171027065441/http://kcc-weslaco.tamu.edu/budwood.html . dead .
  12. Web site: 2017-02-01 . Four-Flap Grafting of Pecans - Oklahoma State University . 2024-06-08 . extension.okstate.edu . en.
  13. Web site: Grafting MU Extension . 2024-06-08 . extension.missouri.edu.
  14. Web site: C. Michael . Hogan . 2008 . California Black Oak Quercus kelloggii . iGoTerra . 2017-09-14 . https://web.archive.org/web/20120213134008/http://www.globaltwitcher.com/artspec_information.asp?thingid=82385 . 2012-02-13 . dead .
  15. Loehle . C. . amp . Jones . R.H. . 1998 . Adaptive Significance of Root Grafting in Trees . Functional Ecology . 4 . 2 . 268–271 . 2389347.
  16. Lang . A. . Chailakhyan . M.K. . Frolova . I.A. . 1977 . Promotion and inhibition of flower formation in a dayneutral plant in grafts with a short-day plant and a long-day plant . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA . 74 . 6 . 2412–2416 . 16592404 . 10.1073/pnas.74.6.2412 . 432182 . 1977PNAS...74.2412L . free .
  17. Web site: Farmers may have been accidentally making GMOs for millennia. Le Page. Michael. 2016-03-17. The New Scientist. 2016-07-11.
  18. Book: Nienstaedt . H. . Teich . A. . 1972 . Genetics of white spruce . USDA, Forest Service . Research Paper . WO-15.
  19. Nienstaedt . H. . 1966 . Dormancy and dormancy release in white spruce . Society of American Foresters . Forest Science . 12 . 3 . 374–384 . 2017-09-14 . https://web.archive.org/web/20170915070611/http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/saf/fs/1966/00000012/00000003/art00029?crawler=true . 2017-09-15 . dead .
  20. Nienstaedt . H. . Cech . F.C. . Mergen . F. . Wand . C. . Zak . B. . 1958 . Vegetative propagation in forest genetics research and practice . Journal of Forestry . 56 . 11 . 826–839.
  21. Greenwood . M.S. . Adams . G.W. . Gillespie . M. . 1988 . Shortening the breeding cycle of some northeastern conifers . 43–52 . Morgenstern . E.K. . Boyle . T.J.B. . Tree Improvement – Progressing Together Sympos. . Truro, NS . Aug 1987 . Proc. Part 2, 21st Meet. Can. Tree Improv. Assoc..
  22. Core . J. . 2005 . Grafting Watermelon Onto Squash or Gourd Rootstock Makes Firmer, Healthier Fruit . AgResearch Magazine . 53 . 7 . United States Department of Agriculture.
  23. A.. Onoda. Ken. Kobayashi. Masato. Suzuki. The Study of the Grafting Robot. 1992. 319. 535–540. International Symposium on Transplant Production Systems. International Society for Horticultural Science. Acta Horticulturae. 10.17660/ActaHortic.1992.319.84. 2010-06-02. 2018-10-01. https://web.archive.org/web/20181001031142/http://www.actahort.org/books/319/319_84.htm. dead.
  24. Kobayashi. Ken. Suzuki. Masato. Sasaya. Sadao . Grafting Robot. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics. 11. 3. 213–219. 1999. 10.20965/jrm.1999.p0213.
  25. Web site: Grafting. https://web.archive.org/web/20110916163614/http://www.uky.edu/Ag/HLA/Geneve/teaching/PLS%20440/lectures/grafting%20for%20web1.pdf . September 16, 2011.
  26. Web site: Matej Lexa. 29 April 1996. Herbaceous Plant Grafting Manual. 14 September 2017.
  27. Web site: Bible (King James)/Romans - Wikisource, the free online library . 2024-03-25 . en.wikisource.org . en.
  28. Web site: oremus Bible Browser : Romans 9–11 . 2024-03-25 . bible.oremus.org.
  29. Mudge . K. . Janick . J. . Scofield . S. . Goldschmidt . E. . 2009 . A History of Grafting . Horticultural Reviews . 35 . 449–475 . 10.1002/9780470593776.ch9. 9780470593776 .
  30. Meng . Chao . Xu . Dong . Son . Young-Jun . Kubota . Chieri . Simulation-based Economic Feasibility Analysis of Grafting Technology for Propagation Operation. Proceedings of the 2012 Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference . G. . Lim . amp . J.W. . Herrmann . Institute of Industrial Engineers . 2012. IIE Annual Conference . Norcross . 2012.
  31. Shih Sheng-han, A Preliminary Survey of the Book Ch'i Min Yao Shu, and Agricultural Encyclopaedia of the 6th Century 2nd ed, Beijing: Science Press, 1982