Geologic time scale explained

The geologic time scale or geological time scale (GTS) is a representation of time based on the rock record of Earth. It is a system of chronological dating that uses chronostratigraphy (the process of relating strata to time) and geochronology (a scientific branch of geology that aims to determine the age of rocks). It is used primarily by Earth scientists (including geologists, paleontologists, geophysicists, geochemists, and paleoclimatologists) to describe the timing and relationships of events in geologic history. The time scale has been developed through the study of rock layers and the observation of their relationships and identifying features such as lithologies, paleomagnetic properties, and fossils. The definition of standardised international units of geologic time is the responsibility of the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS), a constituent body of the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS), whose primary objective[1] is to precisely define global chronostratigraphic units of the International Chronostratigraphic Chart (ICC)[2] that are used to define divisions of geologic time. The chronostratigraphic divisions are in turn used to define geochronologic units.

While some regional terms are still in use, the table of geologic time conforms to the nomenclature, ages, and colour codes set forth by the ICS.[3]

Principles

See also: Age of Earth, History of Earth and Geological history of Earth. The geologic time scale is a way of representing deep time based on events that have occurred throughout Earth's history, a time span of about 4.54 ± 0.05 Ga (4.54 billion years).[4] It chronologically organises strata, and subsequently time, by observing fundamental changes in stratigraphy that correspond to major geological or paleontological events. For example, the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event, marks the lower boundary of the Paleogene System/Period and thus the boundary between the Cretaceous and Paleogene systems/periods. For divisions prior to the Cryogenian, arbitrary numeric boundary definitions (Global Standard Stratigraphic Ages, GSSAs) are used to divide geologic time. Proposals have been made to better reconcile these divisions with the rock record.[5]

Historically, regional geologic time scales were used due to the litho- and biostratigraphic differences around the world in time equivalent rocks. The ICS has long worked to reconcile conflicting terminology by standardising globally significant and identifiable stratigraphic horizons that can be used to define the lower boundaries of chronostratigraphic units. Defining chronostratigraphic units in such a manner allows for the use of global, standardised nomenclature. The ICC represents this ongoing effort.

The relative relationships of rocks for determining their chronostratigraphic positions use the overriding principles of:[6]

Terminology

See also: Stratigraphy, Chronostratigraphy, Biostratigraphy, Magnetostratigraphy, Lithostratigraphy and Geochronology. The GTS is divided into chronostratigraphic units and their corresponding geochronologic units. These are represented on the ICC published by the ICS; however, regional terms are still in use in some areas.

is the element of stratigraphy that deals with the relation between rock bodies and the relative measurement of geological time.[7] It is the process where distinct strata between defined stratigraphic horizons are assigned to represent a relative interval of geologic time.

A is a body of rock, layered or unlayered, that is defined between specified stratigraphic horizons which represent specified intervals of geologic time. They include all rocks representative of a specific interval of geologic time, and only this time span.[7] Eonothem, erathem, system, series, subseries, stage, and substage are the hierarchical chronostratigraphic units.[7] is the scientific branch of geology that aims to determine the age of rocks, fossils, and sediments either through absolute (e.g., radiometric dating) or relative means (e.g., stratigraphic position, paleomagnetism, stable isotope ratios).[8]

A is a subdivision of geologic time. It is a numeric representation of an intangible property (time). Eon, era, period, epoch, subepoch, age, and subage are the hierarchical geochronologic units. is the field of geochronology that numerically quantifies geologic time.

A (GSSP) is an internationally agreed upon reference point on a stratigraphic section which defines the lower boundaries of stages on the geologic time scale.[9] (Recently this has been used to define the base of a system)[10]

A (GSSA)[11] is a numeric only, chronologic reference point used to define the base of geochronologic units prior to the Cryogenian. These points are arbitrarily defined.[7] They are used where GSSPs have not yet been established. Research is ongoing to define GSSPs for the base of all units that are currently defined by GSSAs.

The numeric (geochronometric) representation of a geochronologic unit can, and is more often subject to change when geochronology refines the geochronometry, while the equivalent chronostratigraphic unit remains the same, and their revision is less common. For example, in early 2022 the boundary between the Ediacaran and Cambrian periods (geochronologic units) was revised from 541 Ma to 538.8 Ma but the rock definition of the boundary (GSSP) at the base of the Cambrian, and thus the boundary between the Ediacaran and Cambrian systems (chronostratigraphic units) has not changed, merely the geochronometry has been refined.

The numeric values on the ICC are represented by the unit Ma (megaannum) 'million years', i.e., Ma, the lower boundary of the Jurassic Period, is defined as 201,400,000 years old with an uncertainty of 200,000 years. Other SI prefix units commonly used by geologists are Ga (gigaannum, billion years), and ka (kiloannum, thousand years), with the latter often represented in calibrated units (before present).

Divisions of geologic time

The and subdivisions are used as the geochronologic equivalents of the chronostratigraphic and, e.g., Early Triassic Period (geochronologic unit) is used in place of Lower Triassic Series (chronostratigraphic unit).

Rocks representing a given chronostratigraphic unit are that chronostratigraphic unit, and the time they were laid down in is the geochronologic unit, i.e., the rocks that represent the Silurian Series the Silurian Series and they were deposited the Silurian Period.

Formal, hierarchical units of the geologic time scale (largest to smallest)!Chronostratigraphic unit (strata)!Geochronologic unit (time)!Time span
EonothemEonSeveral hundred million years to two billion years
ErathemEraTens to hundreds of millions of years
SystemPeriodMillions of years to tens of millions of years
SeriesEpochHundreds of thousands of years to tens of millions of years
SubseriesSubepochThousands of years to millions of years
StageAgeThousands of years to millions of years

Naming of geologic time

The names of geologic time units are defined for chronostratigraphic units with the corresponding geochronologic unit sharing the same name with a change to the latter (e.g. Phanerozoic Eonothem becomes the Phanerozoic Eon). Names of erathems in the Phanerozoic were chosen to reflect major changes in the history of life on Earth: Paleozoic (old life), Mesozoic (middle life), and Cenozoic (new life). Names of systems are diverse in origin, with some indicating chronologic position (e.g., Paleogene), while others are named for lithology (e.g., Cretaceous), geography (e.g., Permian), or are tribal (e.g., Ordovician) in origin. Most currently recognised series and subseries are named for their position within a system/series (early/middle/late); however, the ICS advocates for all new series and subseries to be named for a geographic feature in the vicinity of its stratotype or type locality. The name of stages should also be derived from a geographic feature in the locality of its stratotype or type locality.

Informally, the time before the Cambrian is often referred to as the Precambrian or pre-Cambrian (Supereon).

Time span and etymology of ICS eonothem/eon names!Name!Time span!Duration (million years)!Etymology of name
PhanerozoicFrom Greek φανερός (phanerós) 'visible' or 'abundant' and ζωή (zoē) 'life'.
ProterozoicFrom Greek πρότερος (próteros) 'former' or 'earlier' and ζωή (zoē) 'life'.
ArcheanFrom Greek ἀρχή (archē) 'beginning, origin'.
HadeanFrom Hades, Greek, Ancient (to 1453);: ᾍδης|Háidēs, the god of the underworld (hell, the inferno) in Greek mythology.
Time span and etymology of ICS erathem/era names!Name!Time span!Duration (million years)!Etymology of name
CenozoicFrom Greek καινός (kainós) 'new' and ζωή (zōḗ) 'life'.
MesozoicFrom Greek μέσο (méso) 'middle' and ζωή (zōḗ) 'life'.
PaleozoicFrom Greek παλιός (palaiós) 'old' and ζωή (zōḗ) 'life'.
NeoproterozoicFrom Greek νέος (néos) 'new' or 'young', πρότερος (próteros) 'former' or 'earlier', and ζωή (zōḗ) 'life'.
MesoproterozoicFrom Greek μέσο (méso) 'middle', πρότερος (próteros) 'former' or 'earlier', and ζωή (zōḗ) 'life'.
PaleoproterozoicFrom Greek παλιός (palaiós) 'old', πρότερος (próteros) 'former' or 'earlier', and ζωή (zōḗ) 'life'.
NeoarcheanFrom Greek νέος (néos) 'new' or 'young' and ἀρχαῖος (arkhaîos) 'ancient'.
MesoarcheanFrom Greek μέσο (méso) 'middle' and ἀρχαῖος (arkhaîos) 'ancient'.
PaleoarcheanFrom Greek παλιός (palaiós) 'old' and ἀρχαῖος (arkhaîos) 'ancient'.
EoarcheanFrom Greek ἠώς (ēōs) 'dawn' and ἀρχαῖος (arkhaîos) 'ancient'.
Time span and etymology of ICS system/period names!Name!Time span!Duration (million years)!Etymology of name
QuaternaryFirst introduced by Jules Desnoyers in 1829 for sediments in France's Seine Basin that appeared to be younger than Tertiary rocks.[14]
NeogeneDerived from Greek νέος (néos) 'new' and γενεά (geneá) 'genesis' or 'birth'.
PaleogeneDerived from Greek παλιός (palaiós) 'old' and γενεά (geneá) 'genesis' or 'birth'.
Cretaceous~~Derived from Terrain Crétacé used in 1822 by Jean d'Omalius d'Halloy in reference to extensive beds of chalk within the Paris Basin.[15] Ultimately derived from Latin crēta 'chalk'.
Jurassic~Named after the Jura Mountains. Originally used by Alexander von Humboldt as 'Jura Kalkstein' (Jura limestone) in 1799.[16] Alexandre Brongniart was the first to publish the term Jurassic in 1829.[17]
TriassicFrom the Trias of Friedrich August von Alberti in reference to a trio of formations widespread in southern Germany
PermianNamed after the historical region of Perm, Russian Empire.[18]
CarboniferousMeans 'coal-bearing', from the Latin carbō (coal) and ferō (to bear, carry).[19]
DevonianNamed after Devon, England.[20]
SilurianNamed after the Celtic tribe, the Silures.[21]
OrdovicianNamed after the Celtic tribe, Ordovices.[22] [23]
CambrianNamed for Cambria, a latinised form of the Welsh name for Wales, Cymru.[24]
Ediacaran~Named for the Ediacara Hills. Ediacara is possibly a corruption of Kuyani 'Yata Takarra' 'hard or stony ground'.[25] [26]
Cryogenian~From Greek κρύος (krýos) 'cold' and γένεσις (génesis) 'birth'.
Tonian~From Greek τόνος (tónos) 'stretch'.
StenianFrom Greek στενός (stenós) 'narrow'.
EctasianFrom Greek ἔκτᾰσῐς (éktasis) 'extension'.
CalymmianFrom Greek κάλυμμᾰ (kálumma) 'cover'.
StatherianFrom Greek σταθερός (statherós) 'stable'.
OrosirianFrom Greek ὀροσειρά (oroseirá) 'mountain range'.
RhyacianFrom Greek ῥύαξ (rhýax) 'stream of lava'.
SiderianFrom Greek σίδηρος (sídēros) 'iron'.
Time span and etymology of ICS series/epoch names!Name!Time span!Duration (million years)!Etymology of name
HoloceneFrom Greek ὅλος (hólos) 'whole' and καινός (kainós) 'new'
PleistoceneCoined in the early 1830s from Greek πλεῖστος (pleîstos) 'most' and καινός (kainós) 'new'
PlioceneCoined in the early 1830s from Greek πλείων (pleíōn) 'more' and καινός (kainós) 'new'
MioceneCoined in the early 1830s from Greek μείων (meíōn) 'less' and καινός (kainós) 'new'
OligoceneCoined in the 1850s from Greek ὀλίγος (olígos) 'few' and καινός (kainós) 'new'
EoceneCoined in the early 1830s from Greek ἠώς (ēōs) 'dawn' and καινός (kainós) 'new', referring to the dawn of modern life during this epoch
PaleoceneCoined by Wilhelm Philippe Schimper in 1874 as a portmanteau of paleo- + Eocene, but on the surface from Greek παλαιός (palaios) 'old' and καινός (kainós) 'new'
Upper CretaceousSee Cretaceous
Lower Cretaceous
Upper Jurassic
See Jurassic
Middle Jurassic
Lower Jurassic
Upper TriassicSee Triassic
Middle Triassic
Lower Triassic
LopingianNamed for Loping, China, an anglicization of Mandarin 乐平 (lèpíng) 'peaceful music'
GuadalupianNamed for the Guadalupe Mountains of the American Southwest, ultimately from Arabic وَادِي ٱل (wādī al) 'valley of the' and Latin lupus 'wolf' via Spanish
CisuralianFrom Latin cis- (before) + Russian Урал (Ural), referring to the western slopes of the Ural Mountains
Upper PennsylvanianNamed for the US state of Pennsylvania, from William Penn + Latin silvanus (forest) + -ia by analogy to Transylvania
Middle Pennsylvanian
Lower Pennsylvanian
Upper MississippianNamed for the Mississippi River, from Ojibwe ᒥᐦᓯᓰᐱ (misi-ziibi) 'great river'
Middle Mississippian
Lower Mississippian
Upper DevonianSee Devonian
Middle Devonian
Lower Devonian
PridoliNamed for the Homolka a Přídolí nature reserve near Prague, Czechia
LudlowNamed after Ludlow, England
WenlockNamed for the Wenlock Edge in Shropshire, England
LlandoveryNamed after Llandovery, Wales
Upper OrdovicianSee Ordovician
Middle Ordovician
Lower Ordovician
FurongianFrom Mandarin 芙蓉 (fúróng) 'lotus', referring to the state symbol of Hunan
MiaolingianNamed for the mountains of Guizhou, Mandarin for 'sprouting peaks'
Cambrian Series 2 (informal)See Cambrian
TerreneuvianNamed for Terre-Neuve, a French calque of Newfoundland

History of the geologic time scale

See also: History of geology and History of paleontology.

Early history

While a modern geological time scale was not formulated until 1911[27] by Arthur Holmes, the broader concept that rocks and time are related can be traced back to (at least) the philosophers of Ancient Greece. Xenophanes of Colophon (c. 570–487 BCE) observed rock beds with fossils of shells located above the sea-level, viewed them as once living organisms, and used this to imply an unstable relationship in which the sea had at times transgressed over the land and at other times had regressed.[28] This view was shared by a few of Xenophanes' contemporaries and those that followed, including Aristotle (384–322 BCE) who (with additional observations) reasoned that the positions of land and sea had changed over long periods of time. The concept of deep time was also recognised by Chinese naturalist Shen Kuo[29] (1031–1095) and Islamic scientist-philosophers, notably the Brothers of Purity, who wrote on the processes of stratification over the passage of time in their treatises. Their work likely inspired that of the 11th-century Persian polymath Avicenna (Ibn Sînâ, 980–1037) who wrote in The Book of Healing (1027) on the concept of stratification and superposition, pre-dating Nicolas Steno by more than six centuries. Avicenna also recognised fossils as "petrifications of the bodies of plants and animals",[30] with the 13th-century Dominican bishop Albertus Magnus (c. 1200–1280) extending this into a theory of a petrifying fluid.[31] These works appeared to have little influence on scholars in Medieval Europe who looked to the Bible to explain the origins of fossils and sea-level changes, often attributing these to the 'Deluge', including Ristoro d'Arezzo in 1282. It was not until the Italian Renaissance when Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519) would reinvigorate the relationships between stratification, relative sea-level change, and time, denouncing attribution of fossils to the 'Deluge':[32]

These views of da Vinci remained unpublished, and thus lacked influence at the time; however, questions of fossils and their significance were pursued and, while views against Genesis were not readily accepted and dissent from religious doctrine was in some places unwise, scholars such as Girolamo Fracastoro shared da Vinci's views, and found the attribution of fossils to the 'Deluge' absurd.

Establishment of primary principles

Niels Stensen, more commonly known as Nicolas Steno (1638–1686), is credited with establishing four of the guiding principles of stratigraphy. In De solido intra solidum naturaliter contento dissertationis prodromus Steno states:[33]

Respectively, these are the principles of superposition, original horizontality, lateral continuity, and cross-cutting relationships. From this Steno reasoned that strata were laid down in succession and inferred relative time (in Steno's belief, time from Creation). While Steno's principles were simple and attracted much attention, applying them proved challenging. These basic principles, albeit with improved and more nuanced interpretations, still form the foundational principles of determining the correlation of strata relative to geologic time.

Over the course of the 18th-century geologists realised that:

Formulation of a modern geologic time scale

The apparent, earliest formal division of the geologic record with respect to time was introduced by Thomas Burnet who applied a two-fold terminology to mountains by identifying "montes primarii" for rock formed at the time of the 'Deluge', and younger "monticulos secundarios" formed later from the debris of the "primarii".[34] This attribution to the 'Deluge', while questioned earlier by the likes of da Vinci, was the foundation of Abraham Gottlob Werner's (1749–1817) Neptunism theory in which all rocks precipitated out of a single flood.[35] A competing theory, Plutonism, was developed by Anton Moro (1687–1784) and also used primary and secondary divisions for rock units.[36] In this early version of the Plutonism theory, the interior of Earth was seen as hot, and this drove the creation of primary igneous and metamorphic rocks and secondary rocks formed contorted and fossiliferous sediments. These primary and secondary divisions were expanded on by Giovanni Targioni Tozzetti (1712–1783) and Giovanni Arduino (1713–1795) to include tertiary and quaternary divisions. These divisions were used to describe both the time during which the rocks were laid down, and the collection of rocks themselves (i.e., it was correct to say Tertiary rocks, and Tertiary Period). Only the Quaternary division is retained in the modern geologic time scale, while the Tertiary division was in use until the early 21st century. The Neptunism and Plutonism theories would compete into the early 19th century with a key driver for resolution of this debate being the work of James Hutton (1726–1797), in particular his Theory of the Earth, first presented before the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 1785.[37] [38] [39] Hutton's theory would later become known as uniformitarianism, popularised by John Playfair[40] (1748–1819) and later Charles Lyell (1797–1875) in his Principles of Geology.[41] [42] [43] Their theories strongly contested the 6,000 year age of the Earth as suggested determined by James Ussher via Biblical chronology that was accepted at the time by western religion. Instead, using geological evidence, they contested Earth to be much older, cementing the concept of deep time.

During the early 19th century William Smith, Georges Cuvier, Jean d'Omalius d'Halloy, and Alexandre Brongniart pioneered the systematic division of rocks by stratigraphy and fossil assemblages. These geologists began to use the local names given to rock units in a wider sense, correlating strata across national and continental boundaries based on their similarity to each other. Many of the names below erathem/era rank in use on the modern ICC/GTS were determined during the early to mid-19th century.

The advent of geochronometry

During the 19th century, the debate regarding Earth's age was renewed, with geologists estimating ages based on denudation rates and sedimentary thicknesses or ocean chemistry, and physicists determining ages for the cooling of the Earth or the Sun using basic thermodynamics or orbital physics. These estimations varied from 15,000 million years to 0.075 million years depending on method and author, but the estimations of Lord Kelvin and Clarence King were held in high regard at the time due to their pre-eminence in physics and geology. All of these early geochronometric determinations would later prove to be incorrect.

The discovery of radioactive decay by Henri Becquerel, Marie Curie, and Pierre Curie laid the ground work for radiometric dating, but the knowledge and tools required for accurate determination of radiometric ages would not be in place until the mid-1950s. Early attempts at determining ages of uranium minerals and rocks by Ernest Rutherford, Bertram Boltwood, Robert Strutt, and Arthur Holmes, would culminate in what are considered the first international geological time scales by Holmes in 1911 and 1913.[44] [45] The discovery of isotopes in 1913[46] by Frederick Soddy, and the developments in mass spectrometry pioneered by Francis William Aston, Arthur Jeffrey Dempster, and Alfred O. C. Nier during the early to mid-20th century would finally allow for the accurate determination of radiometric ages, with Holmes publishing several revisions to his geological time-scale with his final version in 1960.[47] [48]

Modern international geologic time scale

The establishment of the IUGS in 1961[49] and acceptance of the Commission on Stratigraphy (applied in 1965)[50] to become a member commission of IUGS led to the founding of the ICS. One of the primary objectives of the ICS is "the establishment, publication and revision of the ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart which is the standard, reference global Geological Time Scale to include the ratified Commission decisions".

Following on from Holmes, several A Geological Time Scale books were published in 1982,[51] 1989,[52] 2004,[53] 2008,[54] 2012,[55] 2016,[56] and 2020.[57] However, since 2013, the ICS has taken responsibility for producing and distributing the ICC citing the commercial nature, independent creation, and lack of oversight by the ICS on the prior published GTS versions (GTS books prior to 2013) although these versions were published in close association with the ICS. Subsequent Geologic Time Scale books (2016 and 2020[57]) are commercial publications with no oversight from the ICS, and do not entirely conform to the chart produced by the ICS. The ICS produced GTS charts are versioned (year/month) beginning at v2013/01. At least one new version is published each year incorporating any changes ratified by the ICS since the prior version.

Major proposed revisions to the ICC

Proposed Anthropocene Series/Epoch

See main article: Anthropocene. First suggested in 2000, the Anthropocene is a proposed epoch/series for the most recent time in Earth's history. While still informal, it is a widely used term to denote the present geologic time interval, in which many conditions and processes on Earth are profoundly altered by human impact.[58] the Anthropocene has not been ratified by the ICS; however, in May 2019 the Anthropocene Working Group voted in favour of submitting a formal proposal to the ICS for the establishment of the Anthropocene Series/Epoch.[59] Nevertheless, the definition of the Anthropocene as a geologic time period rather than a geologic event remains controversial and difficult.[60] [61] [62] [63]

Proposals for revisions to pre-Cryogenian timeline

Shields et al. 2021

An international working group of the ICS on pre-Cryogenian chronostratigraphic subdivision have outlined a template to improve the pre-Cryogenian geologic time scale based on the rock record to bring it in line with the post-Tonian geologic time scale. This work assessed the geologic history of the currently defined eons and eras of the pre-Cambrian, and the proposals in the "Geological Time Scale" books 2004, 2012, and 2020. Their recommend revisions of the pre-Cryogenian geologic time scale were (changes from the current scale [v2023/09] are italicised):

Proposed pre-Cambrian timeline (Shield et al. 2021, ICS working group on pre-Cryogenian chronostratigraphy), shown to scale:ImageSize = width:1300 height:100PlotArea = left:80 right:20 bottom:20 top:5AlignBars = justifyColors = id:proterozoic value:rgb(0.968,0.207,0.388) id:neoproterozoic value:rgb(0.996,0.701,0.258) id:ediacaran value:rgb(0.996,0.85,0.415) id:cryogenian value:rgb(0.996,0.8,0.36) id:tonian value:rgb(0.996,0.75,0.305) id:kleisian value:rgb(0.996,0.773,0.431) id:mesoproterozoic value:rgb(0.996,0.705,0.384) id:stenian value:rgb(0.996,0.85,0.604) id:ectasian value:rgb(0.996,0.8,0.541) id:calymmian value:rgb(0.996,0.75,0.478) id:paleoproterozoic value:rgb(0.968,0.263,0.44) id:skourian value:rgb(0.949,0.439,0.545) id:statherian value:rgb(0.968,0.459,0.655) id:orosirian value:rgb(0.968,0.408,0.596) id:rhyacian value:rgb(0.968,0.357,0.537) id:archean value:rgb(0.996,0.157,0.498) id:neoarchean value:rgb(0.976,0.608,0.757) id:mesoarchean value:rgb(0.968,0.408,0.662) id:paleoarchean value:rgb(0.96,0.266,0.624) id:hadean value:rgb(0.717,0,0.494) id:black value:black id:white value:whitePeriod = from:-4600 till:-538.8TimeAxis = orientation:horizontalScaleMajor = unit:year increment:500 start:-4500ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:100 start:-4500PlotData = align:center textcolor:black fontsize:8 mark:(line,black) width:25 shift:(0,-5) bar:Eonothem/Eon from: -2450 till: -538.8 text:Proterozoic color:proterozoic from: -4000 till: -2450 text:Archean color:archean from: start till: -4000 text:Hadean color:hadean bar:Erathem/Era from: -1000 till: -538.8 text:Neoproterozoic color:neoproterozoic from: -1800 till: -1000 text:Mesoproterozoic color:mesoproterozoic from: -2450 till: -1800 text:Paleoproterozoic color:paleoproterozoic from: -3000 till: -2450 text:Neoarchean color:neoarchean from: -3300 till: -3000 text:Mesoarchean color:mesoarchean from: -4000 till: -3300 text:Paleoarchean color:paleoarchean from: start till: -4000 color:white bar:System/Period fontsize:7 from: -635 till: -538.8 text:Ed. color:ediacaran from: -720 till: -635 text:Cr. color:cryogenian from: -800 till: -720 text:Tonian color:tonian from: -1000 till: -800 text:?kleisian color:kleisian from: -1200 till: -1000 text:Stenian color:stenian from: -1400 till: -1200 text:Ectasian color:ectasian from: -1600 till: -1400 text:Calymmian color:calymmian from: -1800 till: -1600 text:Statherian color:statherian from: -2050 till: -1800 text:Orosirian color:orosirian from: -2300 till: -2050 text:Rhyacian color:rhyacian from: -2450 till: -2300 text:?Skourian color:skourian from: -2700 till: -2450 text:Siderian color:neoarchean from: -3000 till: -2700 text:?Kratian color:neoarchean from: start till: -3000 color:whiteCurrent ICC pre-Cambrian timeline (v2023/09), shown to scale:ImageSize = width:1300 height:100PlotArea = left:80 right:20 bottom:20 top:5AlignBars = justifyColors = id:proterozoic value:rgb(0.968,0.207,0.388) id:neoproterozoic value:rgb(0.996,0.701,0.258) id:ediacaran value:rgb(0.996,0.85,0.415) id:cryogenian value:rgb(0.996,0.8,0.36) id:tonian value:rgb(0.996,0.75,0.305) id:mesoproterozoic value:rgb(0.996,0.705,0.384) id:stenian value:rgb(0.996,0.85,0.604) id:ectasian value:rgb(0.996,0.8,0.541) id:calymmian value:rgb(0.996,0.75,0.478) id:paleoproterozoic value:rgb(0.968,0.263,0.44) id:statherian value:rgb(0.968,0.459,0.655) id:orosirian value:rgb(0.968,0.408,0.596) id:rhyacian value:rgb(0.968,0.357,0.537) id:siderian value:rgb(0.968,0.306,0.478) id:archean value:rgb(0.996,0.157,0.498) id:neoarchean value:rgb(0.976,0.608,0.757) id:mesoarchean value:rgb(0.968,0.408,0.662) id:paleoarchean value:rgb(0.96,0.266,0.624) id:eoarchean value:rgb(0.902,0.114,0.549) id:hadean value:rgb(0.717,0,0.494) id:black value:black id:white value:whitePeriod = from:-4600 till:-538.8TimeAxis = orientation:horizontalScaleMajor = unit:year increment:500 start:-4500ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:100 start:-4500PlotData = align:center textcolor:black fontsize:8 mark:(line,black) width:25 shift:(0,-5) bar:Eonothem/Eon from: -2500 till: -538.8 text:Proterozoic color:proterozoic from: -4031 till: -2500 text:Archean color:archean from: start till: -4031 text:Hadean color:hadean bar:Erathem/Era from: -1000 till: -538.8 text:Neoproterozoic color:neoproterozoic from: -1600 till: -1000 text:Mesoproterozoic color:mesoproterozoic from: -2500 till: -1600 text:Paleoproterozoic color:paleoproterozoic from: -2800 till: -2500 text:Neoarchean color:neoarchean from: -3200 till: -2800 text:Mesoarchean color:mesoarchean from: -3600 till: -3200 text:Paleoarchean color:paleoarchean from: -4031 till: -3600 text:Eoarchean color:eoarchean from: start till: -4031 color:white bar:Sytem/Period fontsize:7 from: -635 till: -538.8 text:Ed. color:ediacaran from: -720 till: -635 text:Cr. color:cryogenian from: -1000 till: -720 text:Tonian color:tonian from: -1200 till: -1000 text:Stenian color:stenian from: -1400 till: -1200 text:Ectasian color:ectasian from: -1600 till: -1400 text:Calymmian color:calymmian from: -1800 till: -1600 text:Statherian color:statherian from: -2050 till: -1800 text:Orosirian color:orosirian from: -2300 till: -2050 text:Rhyacian color:rhyacian from: -2500 till: -2300 text:Siderian color:siderian from: start till: -2500 color:white

Van Kranendonk et al. 2012 (GTS2012)

The book, Geologic Time Scale 2012, was the last commercial publication of an international chronostratigraphic chart that was closely associated with the ICS. It included a proposal to substantially revise the pre-Cryogenian time scale to reflect important events such as the formation of the Solar System and the Great Oxidation Event, among others, while at the same time maintaining most of the previous chronostratigraphic nomenclature for the pertinent time span.[64] these proposed changes have not been accepted by the ICS. The proposed changes (changes from the current scale [v2023/09]) are italicised:

Proposed pre-Cambrian timeline (GTS2012), shown to scale:ImageSize = width:1200 height:100PlotArea = left:80 right:20 bottom:20 top:5AlignBars = justifyColors = id:proterozoic value:rgb(0.968,0.207,0.388) id:neoproterozoic value:rgb(0.996,0.701,0.258) id:ediacaran value:rgb(0.996,0.85,0.415) id:cryogenian value:rgb(0.996,0.8,0.36) id:tonian value:rgb(0.996,0.75,0.305) id:mesoproterozoic value:rgb(0.996,0.705,0.384) id:rodinian value:rgb(0.996,0.75,0.478) id:paleoproterozoic value:rgb(0.968,0.263,0.44) id:columbian value:rgb(0.968,0.459,0.655) id:eukaryian value:rgb(0.968,0.408,0.596) id:oxygenian value:rgb(0.968,0.357,0.537) id:archean value:rgb(0.996,0.157,0.498) id:neoarchean value:rgb(0.976,0.608,0.757) id:siderian value:rgb(0.976,0.7,0.85) id:methanian value:rgb(0.976,0.65,0.8) id:mesoarchean value:rgb(0.968,0.408,0.662) id:pongolan value:rgb(0.968,0.5,0.75) id:vaalbaran value:rgb(0.968,0.45,0.7) id:paleoarchean value:rgb(0.96,0.266,0.624) id:isuan value:rgb(0.96,0.35,0.65) id:acastan value:rgb(0.96,0.3,0.6) id:hadean value:rgb(0.717,0,0.494) id:zirconian value:rgb(0.902,0.114,0.549) id:chaotian value:rgb(0.8,0.05,0.5) id:black value:black id:white value:whitePeriod = from:-4567.3 till:-538.8TimeAxis = orientation:horizontalScaleMajor = unit:year increment:500 start:-4500ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:100 start:-4500PlotData = align:center textcolor:black fontsize:8 mark:(line,black) width:25 shift:(0,-5) bar:Eonothem/Eon from: -2420 till: -541 text:Proterozoic color:proterozoic from: -4030 till: -2420 text:Archean color:archean from: -4567 till: -4030 text:Hadean color:hadean from: start till: -4567 color:white bar:Erathem/Era from: -850 till: -541 text:Neoproterozoic color:neoproterozoic from: -1780 till: -850 text:Mesoproterozoic color:mesoproterozoic from: -2420 till: -1780 text:Paleoproterozoic color:paleoproterozoic from: -2780 till: -2420 text:Neoarchean color:neoarchean from: -3490 till: -2780 text:Mesoarchean color:mesoarchean from: -4030 till: -3490 text:Paleoarchean color:paleoarchean from: -4404 till: -4030 text:Zirconian color:zirconian from: -4567 till: -4404 text:Chaotian color:chaotian from: start till: -4567 color:white bar:System/Period fontsize:7 from: -630 till: -541 text:Ediacaran color:ediacaran from: -850 till: -630 text:Cryogenian color:cryogenian from: -1780 till: -850 text:Rodinian color:rodinian from: -2060 till: -1780 text:Columbian color:columbian from: -2250 till: -2060 text:Eukaryian color:eukaryian from: -2420 till: -2250 text:Oxygenian color:oxygenian from: -2630 till: -2420 text:Siderian color:siderian from: -2780 till: -2630 text:Methanian color:methanian from: -3020 till: -2780 text:Pongolan color:pongolan from: -3490 till: -3020 text:Vaalbaran color:vaalbaran from: -3810 till: -3490 text:Isuan color:isuan from: -4030 till: -3810 text:Acastan color:acastan from: start till: -4030 color:white

Current ICC pre-Cambrian timeline (v2023/09), shown to scale:ImageSize = width:1200 height:100PlotArea = left:80 right:20 bottom:20 top:5AlignBars = justifyColors = id:proterozoic value:rgb(0.968,0.207,0.388) id:neoproterozoic value:rgb(0.996,0.701,0.258) id:ediacaran value:rgb(0.996,0.85,0.415) id:cryogenian value:rgb(0.996,0.8,0.36) id:tonian value:rgb(0.996,0.75,0.305) id:mesoproterozoic value:rgb(0.996,0.705,0.384) id:stenian value:rgb(0.996,0.85,0.604) id:ectasian value:rgb(0.996,0.8,0.541) id:calymmian value:rgb(0.996,0.75,0.478) id:paleoproterozoic value:rgb(0.968,0.263,0.44) id:statherian value:rgb(0.968,0.459,0.655) id:orosirian value:rgb(0.968,0.408,0.596) id:rhyacian value:rgb(0.968,0.357,0.537) id:siderian value:rgb(0.968,0.306,0.478) id:archean value:rgb(0.996,0.157,0.498) id:neoarchean value:rgb(0.976,0.608,0.757) id:mesoarchean value:rgb(0.968,0.408,0.662) id:paleoarchean value:rgb(0.96,0.266,0.624) id:eoarchean value:rgb(0.902,0.114,0.549) id:hadean value:rgb(0.717,0,0.494) id:black value:black id:white value:whitePeriod = from:-4567.3 till:-538.8TimeAxis = orientation:horizontalScaleMajor = unit:year increment:500 start:-4500ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:100 start:-4500PlotData = align:center textcolor:black fontsize:8 mark:(line,black) width:25 shift:(0,-5) bar:Eonothem/Eon from: -2500 till: -538.8 text:Proterozoic color:proterozoic from: -4031 till: -2500 text:Archean color:archean from: start till: -4031 text:Hadean color:hadean bar:Erathem/Era from: -1000 till: -538.8 text:Neoproterozoic color:neoproterozoic from: -1600 till: -1000 text:Mesoproterozoic color:mesoproterozoic from: -2500 till: -1600 text:Paleoproterozoic color:paleoproterozoic from: -2800 till: -2500 text:Neoarchean color:neoarchean from: -3200 till: -2800 text:Mesoarchean color:mesoarchean from: -3600 till: -3200 text:Paleoarchean color:paleoarchean from: -4031 till: -3600 text:Eoarchean color:eoarchean from: start till: -4031 color:white bar:System/Period fontsize:7 from: -635 till: -538.8 text:Ediacaran color:ediacaran from: -720 till: -635 text:Cryogenian color:cryogenian from: -1000 till: -720 text:Tonian color:tonian from: -1200 till: -1000 text:Stenian color:stenian from: -1400 till: -1200 text:Ectasian color:ectasian from: -1600 till: -1400 text:Calymmian color:calymmian from: -1800 till: -1600 text:Statherian color:statherian from: -2050 till: -1800 text:Orosirian color:orosirian from: -2300 till: -2050 text:Rhyacian color:rhyacian from: -2500 till: -2300 text:Siderian color:siderian from: start till: -2500 color:white

Table of geologic time

The following table summarises the major events and characteristics of the divisions making up the geologic time scale of Earth. This table is arranged with the most recent geologic periods at the top, and the oldest at the bottom. The height of each table entry does not correspond to the duration of each subdivision of time. As such, this table is not to scale and does not accurately represent the relative time-spans of each geochronologic unit. While the Phanerozoic Eon looks longer than the rest, it merely spans ~539 million years (~12% of Earth's history), whilst the previous three eons collectively span ~3,461 million years (~76% of Earth's history). This bias toward the most recent eon is in part due to the relative lack of information about events that occurred during the first three eons compared to the current eon (the Phanerozoic).[69] The use of subseries/subepochs has been ratified by the ICS.[13]

The content of the table is based on the official ICC produced and maintained by the ICS who also provide an online interactive version of this chart. The interactive version is based on a service delivering a machine-readable Resource Description Framework/Web Ontology Language representation of the time scale, which is available through the Commission for the Management and Application of Geoscience Information GeoSciML project as a service[70] and at a SPARQL end-point.[71] [72]

Non-Earth based geologic time scales

See main article: Lunar geologic timescale, Martian geologic timescale and Geology of Venus. Some other planets and satellites in the Solar System have sufficiently rigid structures to have preserved records of their own histories, for example, Venus, Mars and the Earth's Moon. Dominantly fluid planets, such as the giant planets, do not comparably preserve their history. Apart from the Late Heavy Bombardment, events on other planets probably had little direct influence on the Earth, and events on Earth had correspondingly little effect on those planets. Construction of a time scale that links the planets is, therefore, of only limited relevance to the Earth's time scale, except in a Solar System context. The existence, timing, and terrestrial effects of the Late Heavy Bombardment are still a matter of debate.

Lunar (selenological) time scale

The geologic history of Earth's Moon has been divided into a time scale based on geomorphological markers, namely impact cratering, volcanism, and erosion. This process of dividing the Moon's history in this manner means that the time scale boundaries do not imply fundamental changes in geological processes, unlike Earth's geologic time scale. Five geologic systems/periods (Pre-Nectarian, Nectarian, Imbrian, Eratosthenian, Copernican), with the Imbrian divided into two series/epochs (Early and Late) were defined in the latest Lunar geologic time scale.[88] The Moon is unique in the Solar System in that it is the only other body from which humans have rock samples with a known geological context.

Martian geologic time scale

The geological history of Mars has been divided into two alternate time scales. The first time scale for Mars was developed by studying the impact crater densities on the Martian surface. Through this method four periods have been defined, the Pre-Noachian (~4,500–4,100 Ma), Noachian (~4,100–3,700 Ma), Hesperian (~3,700–3,000 Ma), and Amazonian (~3,000 Ma to present).[89] [90] A second time scale based on mineral alteration observed by the OMEGA spectrometer on board the Mars Express. Using this method, three periods were defined, the Phyllocian (~4,500–4,000 Ma), Theiikian (~4,000–3,500 Ma), and Siderikian (~3,500 Ma to present).[91] ImageSize = width:800 height:50PlotArea = left:15 right:15 bottom:20 top:5AlignBars = early

Period = from:-4500 till:0TimeAxis = orientation:horizontalScaleMajor = unit:year increment:500 start:-4500ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:100 start:-4500

Colors = id:sidericol value:rgb(1,0.4,0.3) id:theiicol value:rgb(1,0.2,0.5) id:phyllocol value:rgb(0.7,0.4,1)

PlotData= align:center textcolor:black fontsize:8 mark:(line,black) width:25 shift:(0,-5)

text:Siderikan from:-3500 till:0 color:sidericol text:Theiikian from:-4000 till:-3500 color:theiicol text:Phyllocian from:start till:-4000 color:phyllocol

See also

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Statues & Guidelines . 2022-04-05 . International Commission on Stratigraphy.
  2. Cohen . K.M. . Finney . S.C. . Gibbard . P.L. . Fan . J.-X. . 2013-09-01 . The ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart . Episodes . en . updated . 36 . 3 . 199–204 . 10.18814/epiiugs/2013/v36i3/002 . 51819600 . 0705-3797. free .
  3. Web site: International Commission on Stratigraphy . International Geological Time Scale . 5 June 2022.
  4. Dalrymple . G. Brent . 2001 . The age of the Earth in the twentieth century: a problem (mostly) solved . Special Publications, Geological Society of London . 190 . 1 . 205–221 . 2001GSLSP.190..205D . 10.1144/GSL.SP.2001.190.01.14 . 130092094.
  5. Shields . Graham A. . Strachan . Robin A. . Porter . Susannah M. . Halverson . Galen P. . Macdonald . Francis A. . Plumb . Kenneth A. . de Alvarenga . Carlos J. . Banerjee . Dhiraj M. . Bekker . Andrey . Bleeker . Wouter . Brasier . Alexander . 2022 . A template for an improved rock-based subdivision of the pre-Cryogenian timescale . Journal of the Geological Society . en . 179 . 1 . jgs2020–222 . 10.1144/jgs2020-222 . 2022JGSoc.179..222S . 236285974 . 0016-7649. free .
  6. Web site: International Commission on Stratigraphy - Stratigraphic Guide - Chapter 9. Chronostratigraphic Units . 2024-04-16 . stratigraphy.org.
  7. Web site: Chapter 9. Chronostratigraphic Units . 2022-04-02 . stratigraphy.org . International Commission on Stratigraphy.
  8. Web site: Chapter 3. Definitions and Procedures . 2022-04-02 . stratigraphy.org . International Commission on Stratigraphy.
  9. Web site: Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Points . 2022-04-02 . stratigraphy.org . International Commission on Stratigraphy.
  10. Knoll . Andrew . Walter . Malcolm . Narbonne . Guy . Christie-Blick . Nicholas . 2006 . The Ediacaran Period: a new addition to the geologic time scale . Lethaia . en . 39 . 1 . 13–30 . 10.1080/00241160500409223. 2006Letha..39...13K .
  11. Remane . Jürgen . Bassett . Michael G . Cowie . John W . Gohrbandt . Klaus H . Lane . H Richard . Michelsen . Olaf . Naiwen . Wang . the cooperation of members of ICS . 1996-09-01 . Revised guidelines for the establishment of global chronostratigraphic standards by the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) . Episodes . en . 19 . 3 . 77–81 . 10.18814/epiiugs/1996/v19i3/007 . 0705-3797. free .
  12. Book: A dictionary of geology and earth sciences . 2020 . Michael Allaby . 978-0-19-187490-1 . Fifth . Oxford . 1137380460.
  13. Aubry . Marie-Pierre . Piller . Werner E. . Gibbard . Philip L. . Harper . David A. T. . Finney . Stanley C. . 2022-03-01 . Ratification of subseries/subepochs as formal rank/units in international chronostratigraphy . Episodes . en . 45 . 1 . 97–99 . 10.18814/epiiugs/2021/021016 . 240772165 . 0705-3797. free .
  14. Desnoyers . J. . Observations sur un ensemble de dépôts marins plus récents que les terrains tertiaires du bassin de la Seine, et constituant une formation géologique distincte; précédées d'un aperçu de la nonsimultanéité des bassins tertiares . Annales des Sciences Naturelles . 1829 . 16 . 171–214, 402–491 . Observations on a set of marine deposits [that are] more recent than the tertiary terrains of the Seine basin and [that] constitute a distinct geological formation; preceded by an outline of the non-simultaneity of tertiary basins . fr. From p. 193: "Ce que je désirerais ... dont il faut également les distinguer." (What I would desire to prove above all is that the series of tertiary deposits continued – and even began in the more recent basins – for a long time, perhaps after that of the Seine had been completely filled, and that these later formations – Quaternary (1), so to say – should not retain the name of alluvial deposits any more than the true and ancient tertiary deposits, from which they must also be distinguished.) However, on the very same page, Desnoyers abandoned the use of the term "Quaternary" because the distinction between Quaternary and Tertiary deposits wasn't clear. From p. 193: "La crainte de voir mal comprise ... que ceux du bassin de la Seine." (The fear of seeing my opinion in this regard be misunderstood or exaggerated, has made me abandon the word "quaternary", which at first I had wanted to apply to all deposits more recent than those of the Seine basin.)
  15. d'Halloy, d'O., J.-J. . 1822 . Observations sur un essai de carte géologique de la France, des Pays-Bas, et des contrées voisines . Observations on a trial geological map of France, the Low Countries, and neighboring countries . Annales des Mines . 7 . 353–376 . From page 373: "La troisième, qui correspond à ce qu'on a déja appelé formation de la craie, sera désigné par le nom de terrain crétacé." (The third, which corresponds to what was already called the "chalk formation", will be designated by the name "chalky terrain".)
  16. Book: Humboldt, Alexander von . Ueber die unterirdischen Gasarten und die Mittel ihren Nachtheil zu vermindern: ein Beytrag zur Physik der praktischen Bergbaukunde . 1799 . Vieweg . de.
  17. Book: Brongniart, Alexandre (1770-1847) Auteur du texte . Tableau des terrains qui composent l'écorce du globe ou Essai sur la structure de la partie connue de la terre . Par Alexandre Brongniart,... . 1829 . fr.
  18. Book: Murchison . On the Geological Structure of the Central and Southern Regions of Russia in Europe, and of the Ural Mountains . Murchison . Sir Roderick Impey . Verneuil . Keyserling . Graf Alexander . 1842 . Print. by R. and J.E. Taylor . en.
  19. Book: Phillips, John . Illustrations of the Geology of Yorkshire: Or, A Description of the Strata and Organic Remains: Accompanied by a Geological Map, Sections and Plates of the Fossil Plants and Animals ... . 1835 . J. Murray . en.
  20. Sedgwick . A. . Murchison . R. I. . 1840-01-01 . XLIII.--On the Physical Structure of Devonshire, and on the Subdivisions and Geological Relations of its older stratified Deposits, &c. . Transactions of the Geological Society of London . en . s2-5 . 3 . 633–703 . 10.1144/transgslb.5.3.633 . 128475487 . 2042-5295.
  21. Murchison . Roderick Impey . 1835 . VII. On the silurian system of rocks . The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science . en . 7 . 37 . 46–52 . 10.1080/14786443508648654 . 1941-5966.
  22. Lapworth . Charles . 1879 . I.—On the Tripartite Classification of the Lower Palæozoic Rocks . . en . 6 . 1 . 1–15 . 10.1017/S0016756800156560 . 1879GeoM....6....1L . 129165105 . 0016-7568.
  23. Bassett . Michael G. . 100 Years of Ordovician Geology . 1979-06-01 . Episodes . en . 2 . 2 . 18–21 . 10.18814/epiiugs/1979/v2i2/003 . 0705-3797. free .
  24. Cambria.
  25. Web site: Butcher . Andy . 26 May 2004 . Re: Ediacaran . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20071023012434/http://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0405&L=australian-linguistics-l&D=1&P=264 . 23 October 2007 . 19 July 2011 . LISTSERV 16.0 - AUSTRALIAN-LINGUISTICS-L Archives.
  26. Web site: Place Details: Ediacara Fossil Site – Nilpena, Parachilna, SA, Australia . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20110603074010/http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/ahdb/search.pl?mode=place_detail;place_id=105880 . 3 June 2011 . 19 July 2011 . Australian Heritage Database . Commonwealth of Australia . Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities . dmy-all.
  27. 1911-06-09 . The association of lead with uranium in rock-minerals, and its application to the measurement of geological time . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character . 85 . 578 . 248–256 . 10.1098/rspa.1911.0036 . 1911RSPSA..85..248H . 0950-1207. Holmes . Arthur . free .
  28. Fischer . Alfred G. . Garrison . Robert E. . 2009 . The role of the Mediterranean region in the development of sedimentary geology: a historical overview . Sedimentology . en . 56 . 1 . 3–41 . 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2008.01009.x. 2009Sedim..56....3F . 128604255 .
  29. Book: Sivin, Nathan . Science in ancient China : researches and reflections . 1995 . Variorum . 0-86078-492-4 . 956775994.
  30. Book: Adams, Frank D. . The Birth and Development of the Geological Sciences . 1938 . Williams & Wilkins . 0-486-26372-X . 165626104.
  31. Book: Rudwick, M. J. S. . The meaning of fossils : episodes in the history of palaeontology . 1985 . University of Chicago Press . 0-226-73103-0 . Chicago . 11574066.
  32. Book: McCurdy, Edward . The notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci . 1938 . Reynal & Hitchcock . New York . English . 2233803.
  33. Book: Steno, Nicolaus . Nicolai Stenonis de solido intra solidvm natvraliter contento dissertationis prodromvs ad serenissimvm Ferdinandvm II ... . 1669 . W. Junk . la.
  34. Book: Burnet, Thomas . Telluris Theoria Sacra: orbis nostri originen et mutationes generales, quasi am subiit aut olim subiturus est, complectens. Libri duo priores de Diluvio & Paradiso . G. Kettiby . 1681 . London . la.
  35. Book: Werner, Abraham Gottlob . Kurze Klassifikation und Beschreibung der verschiedenen Gebirgsarten . 1787 . Walther . Dresden . de.
  36. Book: Moro, Anton Lazzaro . De'crostacei e degli altri marini corpi che si truovano su'monti . 1740 . Appresso Stefano Monti . it.
  37. Hutton . James . 1788 . X. Theory of the Earth; or an Investigation of the Laws observable in the Composition, Dissolution, and Restoration of Land upon the Globe . . Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh . en . 1 . 2 . 209–304 . 10.1017/S0080456800029227 . 251578886 . 0080-4568.
  38. Book: Hutton, James . Theory of the Earth . 1795 . 1 . Edinburgh.
  39. Book: Hutton, James . Theory of the Earth . 1795 . 2 . Edinburgh.
  40. Book: Playfair, John . Illustrations of the Huttonian theory of the earth . 1802 . Neill & Co . Digitised by London Natural History Museum Library . Edinburgh.
  41. Book: Lyell, Sir Charles . Principles of Geology: Being an Attempt to Explain the Former Changes of the Earth's Surface, by Reference to Causes Now in Operation . 1832 . John Murray . 1 . London . en.
  42. Book: Lyell, Sir Charles . Principles of Geology: Being an Attempt to Explain the Former Changes of the Earth's Surface, by Reference to Causes Now in Operation . 1832 . John Murray . 2 . London . en.
  43. Book: Lyell, Sir Charles . Principles of Geology: Being an Inquiry how for the Former Changes of the Earth's Surface are Referrable to Causes Now in Operation . 1834 . John Murray . 3 . London . en.
  44. Book: Holmes, Arthur . The age of the earth . 1913 . London, Harper . Gerstein - University of Toronto.
  45. Lewis . Cherry L. E. . 2001 . Arthur Holmes' vision of a geological timescale . Geological Society, London, Special Publications . en . 190 . 1 . 121–138 . 10.1144/GSL.SP.2001.190.01.10 . 2001GSLSP.190..121L . 128686640 . 0305-8719.
  46. Soddy . Frederick . 1913-12-04 . Intra-atomic Charge . Nature . en . 92 . 2301 . 399–400 . 10.1038/092399c0 . 1913Natur..92..399S . 3965303 . 0028-0836.
  47. Holmes . A. . 1959-01-01 . A revised geological time-scale . Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society . en . 17 . 3 . 183–216 . 10.1144/transed.17.3.183 . 129166282 . 0371-6260.
  48. 1960 . A Revised Geological Time-Scale . Nature . en . 187 . 4731 . 27–28 . 10.1038/187027d0 . 1960Natur.187T..27. . 4179334 . 0028-0836. free .
  49. Harrison . James M. . The Roots of IUGS . 1978-03-01 . Episodes . 1 . 1 . 20–23 . 10.18814/epiiugs/1978/v1i1/005 . 0705-3797. free .
  50. Book: International Union of Geological Sciences. Commission on Stratigraphy . Guidelines and statutes of the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) . 1986 . Herausgegeben von der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft . J. W. Cowie . 3-924500-19-3 . Frankfurt a.M. . 14352783.
  51. Book: A geologic time scale . 1982 . Cambridge University Press . W. B. Harland . 0-521-24728-4 . Cambridge [England] . 8387993.
  52. Book: A geologic time scale 1989 . 1990 . Cambridge University Press . W. B. Harland . 0-521-38361-7 . Cambridge . 20930970.
  53. Book: A geologic time scale 2004 . 2004 . Cambridge University Press . F. M. Gradstein . James G. Ogg . A. Gilbert Smith . 0-511-08201-0 . Cambridge, UK . 60770922.
  54. Gradstein . Felix M. . Ogg . James G. . van Kranendonk . Martin . 2008-07-23 . On the Geologic Time Scale 2008 . Newsletters on Stratigraphy . en . 43 . 1 . 5–13 . 10.1127/0078-0421/2008/0043-0005 . 0078-0421.
  55. Book: The geologic time scale 2012. Volume 2 . 2012 . Elsevier . F. M. Gradstein . 978-0-444-59448-8 . 1st . Amsterdam . 808340848.
  56. Book: Ogg, James G. . A concise geologic time scale 2016 . 2016 . Elsevier . Gabi Ogg, F. M. Gradstein . 978-0-444-59468-6 . Amsterdam, Netherlands . 949988705.
  57. Book: Geologic time scale 2020 . 2020 . F. M. Gradstein . James G. Ogg . Mark D. Schmitz . Gabi Ogg . 978-0-12-824361-9 . Amsterdam, Netherlands . 1224105111.
  58. Web site: Working Group on the 'Anthropocene' Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy . https://web.archive.org/web/20220407193255/https://quaternary.stratigraphy.org/working-groups/anthropocene/ . 2022-04-07 . 2022-04-17 . en-US.
  59. Subramanian . Meera . 2019-05-21 . Anthropocene now: influential panel votes to recognise Earth's new epoch . Nature . en . d41586–019–01641–5 . 10.1038/d41586-019-01641-5 . 32433629 . 182238145 . 0028-0836.
  60. Gibbard . Philip L. . Bauer . Andrew M. . Edgeworth . Matthew . Ruddiman . William F. . Gill . Jacquelyn L. . Merritts . Dorothy J. . Finney . Stanley C. . Edwards . Lucy E. . Walker . Michael J. C. . Maslin . Mark . Ellis . Erle C. . 2021-11-15 . A practical solution: the Anthropocene is a geological event, not a formal epoch . Episodes . 45 . 4 . 349–357 . en . 10.18814/epiiugs/2021/021029 . 244165877 . 0705-3797. free .
  61. Head . Martin J. . Steffen . Will . Fagerlind . David . Waters . Colin N. . Poirier . Clement . Syvitski . Jaia . Zalasiewicz . Jan A. . Barnosky . Anthony D. . Cearreta . Alejandro . Jeandel . Catherine . Leinfelder . Reinhold . 2021-11-15 . The Great Acceleration is real and provides a quantitative basis for the proposed Anthropocene Series/Epoch . Episodes . 45 . 4 . 359–376 . en . 10.18814/epiiugs/2021/021031 . 244145710 . 0705-3797. free .
  62. Zalasiewicz . Jan . Waters . Colin N. . Ellis . Erle C. . Head . Martin J. . Vidas . Davor . Steffen . Will . Thomas . Julia Adeney . Horn . Eva . Summerhayes . Colin P. . Leinfelder . Reinhold . McNeill . J. R. . 2021 . The Anthropocene: Comparing Its Meaning in Geology (Chronostratigraphy) with Conceptual Approaches Arising in Other Disciplines . Earth's Future . en . 9 . 3 . 10.1029/2020EF001896 . 2021EaFut...901896Z . 233816527 . 2328-4277. free .
  63. Bauer . Andrew M. . Edgeworth . Matthew . Edwards . Lucy E. . Ellis . Erle C. . Gibbard . Philip . Merritts . Dorothy J. . 2021-09-16 . Anthropocene: event or epoch? . Nature . en . 597 . 7876 . 332 . 10.1038/d41586-021-02448-z . 34522014 . 2021Natur.597..332B . 237515330 . 0028-0836.
  64. Book: Van Kranendonk, Martin J. . A Chronostratigraphic Division of the Precambrian . The geologic time scale 2012 . 2012 . Elsevier . 978-0-44-459425-9 . Felix M. Gradstein . 1st . Amsterdam . 359–365 . 10.1016/B978-0-444-59425-9.00016-0 . James G. Ogg . Mark D. Schmitz . abi M. Ogg.
  65. Goldblatt . C. . Zahnle . K. J. . Sleep . N. H. . Nisbet . E. G. . 2010 . The Eons of Chaos and Hades . Solid Earth . 1 . 1 . 1–3 . 2010SolE....1....1G . 10.5194/se-1-1-2010 . free.
  66. Chambers . John E. . July 2004 . Planetary accretion in the inner Solar System . https://web.archive.org/web/20120419024812/http://www.astro.washington.edu/courses/astro321/Chambers_EPSL_04.pdf . 2012-04-19 . live . Earth and Planetary Science Letters . 223 . 3–4 . 241–252 . 2004E&PSL.223..241C . 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.04.031.
  67. El Albani . Abderrazak . Bengtson . Stefan . Canfield . Donald E. . Riboulleau . Armelle . Rollion Bard . Claire . Macchiarelli . Roberto . etal . 2014 . The 2.1 Ga Old Francevillian Biota: Biogenicity, Taphonomy and Biodiversity . PLOS ONE . 9 . 6 . e99438 . 2014PLoSO...999438E . 10.1371/journal.pone.0099438 . 4070892 . 24963687 . free.
  68. El Albani . Abderrazak . Bengtson . Stefan . Canfield . Donald E. . Bekker . Andrey . Macchiarelli . Roberto . Mazurier . Arnaud . Hammarlund . Emma U. . etal . 2010 . Large colonial organisms with coordinated growth in oxygenated environments 2.1 Gyr ago . Nature . 466 . 7302 . 100–104 . 2010Natur.466..100A . 10.1038/nature09166 . 20596019 . 4331375.
  69. Web site: Geological time scale . January 17, 2022 . Digital Atlas of Ancient Life . Paleontological Research Institution.
  70. Web site: Geologic Timescale Elements in the International Chronostratigraphic Chart . 2014-08-03.
  71. Web site: Cox . Simon J. D. . SPARQL endpoint for CGI timescale service . dead . https://archive.today/20140806164132/http://resource.geosciml.org/sparql/isc2014 . 2014-08-06 . 2014-08-03.
  72. Cox . Simon J. D. . Richard . Stephen M. . 2014 . A geologic timescale ontology and service . Earth Science Informatics . 8 . 5–19 . 10.1007/s12145-014-0170-6 . 42345393.
  73. Hoag . Colin . Svenning . Jens-Christian . 2017-10-17 . African Environmental Change from the Pleistocene to the Anthropocene . Annual Review of Environment and Resources . en . 42 . 1 . 27–54 . 10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060653 . 1543-5938 . 5 June 2022 . 1 May 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220501144059/https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060653 . dead .
  74. Bartoli . G . Sarnthein . M . Weinelt . M . Erlenkeuser . H . Garbe-Schönberg . D . Lea . D.W . 2005 . Final closure of Panama and the onset of northern hemisphere glaciation . Earth and Planetary Science Letters . 237 . 1–2 . 33–44 . 2005E&PSL.237...33B . 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.020 . free.
  75. Web site: Tyson . Peter . October 2009 . NOVA, Aliens from Earth: Who's who in human evolution . 2009-10-08 . PBS.
  76. Gannon . Colin . 2013-04-26 . Understanding the Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum: Evaluation of Deuterium Values (δD) Related to Precipitation and Temperature . Honors Projects in Science and Technology.
  77. Royer . Dana L. . 2006 . CO2-forced climate thresholds during the Phanerozoic . dead . Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta . 70 . 23 . 5665–75 . 2006GeCoA..70.5665R . 10.1016/j.gca.2005.11.031 . https://web.archive.org/web/20190927033455/http://droyer.web.wesleyan.edu/PhanCO2%28GCA%29.pdf . 27 September 2019 . 6 August 2015.
  78. Web site: 10 August 2017 . Here's What the Last Common Ancestor of Apes and Humans Looked Like . Live Science.
  79. Nengo . Isaiah . Tafforeau . Paul . Gilbert . Christopher C. . Fleagle . John G. . Miller . Ellen R. . Feibel . Craig . Fox . David L. . Feinberg . Josh . Pugh . Kelsey D. . Berruyer . Camille . Mana . Sara . 2017 . New infant cranium from the African Miocene sheds light on ape evolution . Nature . en . 548 . 7666 . 169–174 . 10.1038/nature23456 . 28796200 . 2017Natur.548..169N . 4397839 . 0028-0836.
  80. Deconto . Robert M. . Pollard . David . 2003 . Rapid Cenozoic glaciation of Antarctica induced by declining atmospheric CO2 . Nature . 421 . 6920 . 245–249 . 2003Natur.421..245D . 10.1038/nature01290 . 12529638 . 4326971.
  81. Medlin . L. K. . Kooistra . W. H. C. F. . Gersonde . R. . Sims . P. A. . Wellbrock . U. . 1997 . Is the origin of the diatoms related to the end-Permian mass extinction? . Nova Hedwigia . 65 . 1–4 . 1–11 . 10.1127/nova.hedwigia/65/1997/1 . 10013/epic.12689.
  82. Williams . Joshua J. . Mills . Benjamin J. W. . Lenton . Timothy M. . 2019 . A tectonically driven Ediacaran oxygenation event . Nature Communications . en . 10 . 1 . 2690 . 10.1038/s41467-019-10286-x . 2041-1723 . 6584537 . 31217418. 2019NatCo..10.2690W .
  83. Naranjo-Ortiz . Miguel A. . Gabaldón . Toni . 2019-04-25 . Fungal evolution: major ecological adaptations and evolutionary transitions . . Cambridge Philosophical Society (Wiley) . 94 . 4 . 1443–1476 . 10.1111/brv.12510 . 31021528 . 6850671 . 131775942 . 1464-7931.
  84. Žárský . Jakub . Žárský . Vojtěch . Hanáček . Martin . Žárský . Viktor . 2022-01-27 . Cryogenian Glacial Habitats as a Plant Terrestrialisation Cradle – The Origin of the Anydrophytes and Zygnematophyceae Split . Frontiers in Plant Science . 12 . 735020 . 10.3389/fpls.2021.735020 . 1664-462X . 8829067 . 35154170. free .
  85. Yoon . Hwan Su . Hackett . Jeremiah D. . Ciniglia . Claudia . Pinto . Gabriele . Bhattacharya . Debashish . 2004 . A Molecular Timeline for the Origin of Photosynthetic Eukaryotes . Molecular Biology and Evolution . en . 21 . 5 . 809–818 . 10.1093/molbev/msh075 . 14963099 . 1537-1719. free .
  86. Bowring . Samuel A. . Williams . Ian S. . 1999 . Priscoan (4.00 - 4.03 Ga) orthogneisses from northwestern Canada . Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology . 134 . 1 . 3 . 1999CoMP..134....3B . 10.1007/s004100050465 . 128376754.
  87. Wilde . Simon A. . Valley . John W. . Peck . William H. . Graham . Colin M. . 2001 . Evidence from detrital zircons for the existence of continental crust and oceans on the Earth 4.4 Gyr ago . Nature . en . 409 . 6817 . 175–178 . 10.1038/35051550 . 0028-0836 . 11196637 . 4319774.
  88. Book: Wilhelms, Don E. . The geologic history of the Moon . Professional Paper . United States Geological Survey . 1987 . 10.3133/pp1348.
  89. Tanaka . Kenneth L. . 1986 . The stratigraphy of Mars . Journal of Geophysical Research . en . 91 . B13 . E139 . 10.1029/JB091iB13p0E139 . 1986JGR....91E.139T . 0148-0227.
  90. Carr . Michael H. . Head . James W. . 2010-06-01 . Geologic history of Mars . Earth and Planetary Science Letters . Mars Express after 6 Years in Orbit: Mars Geology from Three-Dimensional Mapping by the High Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC) Experiment . en . 294 . 3 . 185–203 . 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.06.042 . 2010E&PSL.294..185C . 0012-821X.
  91. Bibring . Jean-Pierre . Langevin . Yves . Mustard . John F. . Poulet . François . Arvidson . Raymond . Gendrin . Aline . Gondet . Brigitte . Mangold . Nicolas . Pinet . P. . Forget . F. . Berthé . Michel . 2006-04-21 . Global Mineralogical and Aqueous Mars History Derived from OMEGA/Mars Express Data . Science . en . 312 . 5772 . 400–404 . 10.1126/science.1122659 . 16627738 . 2006Sci...312..400B . 13968348 . 0036-8075.