Generalized inverse explained
.
A matrix
is a generalized inverse of a matrix
if
A generalized inverse exists for an arbitrary matrix, and when a matrix has a regular inverse, this inverse is its unique generalized inverse.
Motivation
Consider the linear system
where
is an
matrix and
the
column space of
. If
is
nonsingular (which implies
) then
will be the solution of the system. Note that, if
is nonsingular, then
Now suppose
is rectangular (
), or square and singular. Then we need a right candidate
of order
such that for all
That is,
is a solution of the linear system
. Equivalently, we need a matrix
of order
such that
Hence we can define the generalized inverse as follows: Given an
matrix
, an
matrix
is said to be a generalized inverse of
if
The matrix
has been termed a
regular inverse of
by some authors.
Types
Important types of generalized inverse include:
- One-sided inverse (right inverse or left inverse)
- Right inverse: If the matrix
has dimensions
and
, then there exists an
matrix
called the
right inverse of
such that
, where
is the
identity matrix.
- Left inverse: If the matrix
has dimensions
and
, then there exists an
matrix
called the
left inverse of
such that
, where
is the
identity matrix.
Some generalized inverses are defined and classified based on the Penrose conditions:
where
denotes conjugate transpose. If
satisfies the first condition, then it is a
generalized inverse of
. If it satisfies the first two conditions, then it is a
reflexive generalized inverse of
. If it satisfies all four conditions, then it is the
pseudoinverse of
, which is denoted by
and also known as the
Moore–Penrose inverse, after the pioneering works by
E. H. Moore and
Roger Penrose. It is convenient to define an
-inverse of
as an inverse that satisfies the subset
of the Penrose conditions listed above. Relations, such as
, can be established between these different classes of
-inverses.
When
is non-singular, any generalized inverse
and is therefore unique. For a singular
, some generalised inverses, such as the Drazin inverse and the Moore–Penrose inverse, are unique, while others are not necessarily uniquely defined.
Examples
Reflexive generalized inverse
Let
A=\begin{bmatrix}
1&2&3\\
4&5&6\\
7&8&9
\end{bmatrix}, G=\begin{bmatrix}
-
&
&0\\[4pt]
&-
&0\\[4pt]
0&0&0
\end{bmatrix}.
Since
,
is singular and has no regular inverse. However,
and
satisfy Penrose conditions (1) and (2), but not (3) or (4). Hence,
is a reflexive generalized inverse of
.
One-sided inverse
Let
A=\begin{bmatrix}
1&2&3\\
4&5&6
\end{bmatrix},
=\begin{bmatrix}
-
&
\\[4pt]
-
&
\\[4pt]
&-
\end{bmatrix}.
Since
is not square,
has no regular inverse. However,
is a right inverse of
. The matrix
has no left inverse.
Inverse of other semigroups (or rings)
The element b is a generalized inverse of an element a if and only if
, in any semigroup (or
ring, since the
multiplication function in any ring is a semigroup).
The generalized inverses of the element 3 in the ring
are 3, 7, and 11, since in the ring
:
The generalized inverses of the element 4 in the ring
are 1, 4, 7, and 10, since in the ring
:
If an element a in a semigroup (or ring) has an inverse, the inverse must be the only generalized inverse of this element, like the elements 1, 5, 7, and 11 in the ring
.
In the ring
, any element is a generalized inverse of 0, however, 2 has no generalized inverse, since there is no
b in
such that
.
Construction
The following characterizations are easy to verify:
is given by
=A\intercal\left(AA\intercal\right)-1
, provided
has full row rank.
- A left inverse of a non-square matrix
is given by
=\left(A\intercalA\right)-1A\intercal
, provided
has full column rank.
is a
rank factorization, then
is a g-inverse of
, where
is a right inverse of
and
is left inverse of
.
A=P\begin{bmatrix}Ir&0\ 0&0\end{bmatrix}Q
for any non-singular matrices
and
, then
G=Q-1\begin{bmatrix}Ir&U\ W&V\end{bmatrix}P-1
is a generalized inverse of
for arbitrary
and
.
be of rank
. Without loss of generality, let
where
is the non-singular submatrix of
. Then,
is a generalized inverse of
if and only if
.
Uses
Any generalized inverse can be used to determine whether a system of linear equations has any solutions, and if so to give all of them. If any solutions exist for the n × m linear system
,
with vector
of unknowns and vector
of constants, all solutions are given by
x=Agb+\left[I-AgA\right]w
,
parametric on the arbitrary vector
, where
is any generalized inverse of
. Solutions exist if and only if
is a solution, that is, if and only if
. If
A has full column rank, the bracketed expression in this equation is the zero matrix and so the solution is unique.
Generalized inverses of matrices
The generalized inverses of matrices can be characterized as follows. Let
, and
be its singular-value decomposition. Then for any generalized inverse
, there exist matrices
,
, and
such that
Conversely, any choice of
,
, and
for matrix of this form is a generalized inverse of
. The
-inverses are exactly those for which
, the
-inverses are exactly those for which
, and the
-inverses are exactly those for which
. In particular, the pseudoinverse is given by
:
Transformation consistency properties
In practical applications it is necessary to identify the class of matrix transformations that must be preserved by a generalized inverse. For example, the Moore–Penrose inverse,
satisfies the following definition of consistency with respect to transformations involving unitary matrices
U and
V:
.
The Drazin inverse,
satisfies the following definition of consistency with respect to similarity transformations involving a nonsingular matrix
S:
\left(SAS-1\right)D=SADS-1
.
The unit-consistent (UC) inverse,
satisfies the following definition of consistency with respect to transformations involving nonsingular diagonal matrices
D and
E:
.
The fact that the Moore–Penrose inverse provides consistency with respect to rotations (which are orthonormal transformations) explains its widespread use in physics and other applications in which Euclidean distances must be preserved. The UC inverse, by contrast, is applicable when system behavior is expected to be invariant with respect to the choice of units on different state variables, e.g., miles versus kilometers.
See also
Sources
Textbook
- Book: Adi. Ben-Israel. Thomas Nall Eden. Greville . Generalized Inverses: Theory and Applications. 2nd. New York, NY. Springer. 2003. 978-0-387-00293-4 . 10.1007/b97366. Thomas N. E. Greville. Adi Ben-Israel.
- Book: Stephen L.. Campbell. Carl D.. Meyer. Generalized Inverses of Linear Transformations. registration. Dover. 1991. 978-0-486-66693-8.
- Book: Horn. Roger Alan. Matrix Analysis. 1985. Cambridge University Press. 978-0-521-38632-6. Johnson. Charles Royal. Roger Horn. Charles Royal Johnson.
- Book: Nakamura, Yoshihiko. Advanced Robotics: Redundancy and Optimization. Addison-Wesley. 1991. 978-0201151985.
- Book: C. Radhakrishna. Rao. Sujit Kumar. Mitra. Generalized Inverse of Matrices and its Applications. registration. John Wiley & Sons. New York. 1971. 240. 978-0-471-70821-6 .
Publication