\{pn(z)\}
K(z,w)=A(w)\Psi(zg(w))=
infty | |
\sum | |
n=0 |
pn(z)wn
K(z,w)
A(w)=
infty | |
\sum | |
n=0 |
anwn
a0\ne0
and
\Psi(t)=
infty | |
\sum | |
n=0 |
\Psintn
\Psin\ne0
and
g(w)=
infty | |
\sum | |
n=1 |
gnwn
g1\ne0.
Given the above, it is not hard to show that
pn(z)
n
Boas–Buck polynomials are a slightly more general class of polynomials.
g(w)=w
\Psi(t)=et
g(w)=w
\Psi(t)=et
The generalized Appell polynomials have the explicit representation
pn(z)=
n | |
\sum | |
k=0 |
zk\Psikhk.
The constant is
hk=\sumP
a | |
j0 |
g | |
j1 |
g | |
j2 |
…
g | |
jk |
where this sum extends over all compositions of
n
k+1
\{j\}
j0+j1+ … +jk=n.
For the Appell polynomials, this becomes the formula
pn(z)=
n | |
\sum | |
k=0 |
an-kzk | |
k! |
.
Equivalently, a necessary and sufficient condition that the kernel
K(z,w)
A(w)\Psi(zg(w))
g1=1
\partialK(z,w) | |
\partialw |
=c(w)K(z,w)+
zb(w) | |
w |
\partialK(z,w) | |
\partialz |
where
b(w)
c(w)
b(w)=
w | |
g(w) |
d | |
dw |
g(w) =1+
infty | |
\sum | |
n=1 |
bnwn
and
c(w)=
1 | |
A(w) |
d | |
dw |
A(w) =
infty | |
\sum | |
n=0 |
cnwn.
Substituting
K(z,w)=
infty | |
\sum | |
n=0 |
pn(z)wn
immediately gives the recursion relation
zn+1
d | |
dz |
\left[
pn(z) | |
zn |
\right]=
n-1 | |
-\sum | |
k=0 |
cn-k-1pk(z)-z
n-1 | |
\sum | |
k=1 |
bn-k
d | |
dz |
pk(z).
For the special case of the Brenke polynomials, one has
g(w)=w
bn=0