Gecko feet explained

The feet of geckos have a number of specializations. Their surfaces can adhere to any type of material with the exception of Teflon (PTFE). This phenomenon can be explained with three elements:

• Foot structure
• Structure of the material to which the foot adheres
• The ability to adhere to a surface and become a part of it

Background

Geckos are members of the family Gekkonidae. They are reptiles that inhabit temperate and tropical regions. There are over 1,000 different species of geckos.^[1] They can be a variety of colors. Geckos are omnivorous, feeding on a variety of foods, including insects and worms.^[2] Most gecko species, including the crested gecko (Correlophus ciliatus),^[3] can climb walls and other surfaces.

Structure

Chemical structure

The interactions between the gecko's feet and the climbing surface are stronger than simple surface area effects. On its feet, the gecko has many microscopic hairs, or setae (singular seta), that increase the Van der Waals forces - the distance-dependent attraction between atoms or molecules - between its feet and the surface. These setae are fibrous structural proteins that protrude from the epidermis, which is made of β-keratin,^[4] Similar to α-keratin being the basic building block of human skin and finger nails.

Physical structure

The bottom surface of a gecko's foot will consist of millions of hairy structures called setae. These setae are 5 mm long and are thinner than a human hair. There are thousands of tiny structures called spatula on every seta. Geckos create Van der Waals force by making contact with the surface of materials using their spatulas. More spatulas implies more surface area. The spatulas have sharp edges, which on application of stress in a specific angle, bends and creates more contact with the surface in order to climb on them vertically. Thus, more contact with the surface creates more Van der Waals force to support the whole body of the creature. One seta can hold weights up to 20 mg using Van der Waals force. In total, with help of millions of setae, a gecko can hold about 300lb. The β-keratin bristles are approximately 5 μm in diameter. The end of each seta consists of approximately 1,000 spatulae that are shaped like an isosceles triangle. The spatulae are approximately 200 nm on one side and 10–30 nm on the other two sides.^[5] The setae are aligned parallel to each other, but not oriented normal to the toes. When the setae contact another surface, their load is supported by both lateral and vertical components. The lateral load component is limited by the peeling of the spatulae and the vertical load component is limited by shear force.

Van der Waals forces

Hamaker surface interaction

The following equation can be used to quantitatively characterize the Van der Waals forces, by approximating the interaction as being between two flat surfaces:

F =- (A _{H})/(12 \pi D ^{3}) where F is the force of interaction, A_H is the Hamaker constant, and D is the distance between the two surfaces. Gecko setae are much more complicated than a flat surface, for each foot has roughly 14,000 setae that each have about 1,000 spatulae. These surface interactions help to smooth out the surface roughness of the wall, which helps improve the gecko to wall surface interaction.

Factors affecting adhesion

Many factors affect adhesion, including:

• Surface roughness
• Adsorbed material, such as particles or moisture
• Contact surface area of the gecko's foot on the surface
• The material gradient properties (dependence of elastic modulus on the depth).^[6]

Interaction potential derivation

Van der Waals interaction

Using the combined dipole–dipole interaction potential between molecules A and B:

W _{AB =- (C _{AB})/(D ^{6})} where W_AB is the potential energy between the molecules (in joules), C_AB is the combined interaction parameter between the molecules (in J m⁶), and D is the distance between the molecules [in meters]. The potential energy of one molecule at a perpendicular distance D from the planar surface of an infinitely extending material can then be approximated as:W _{A,Plane=-\iiint\limits} _{allspace} (C _{AB \rho} _{B})/((D') ^{6}) dV where D′ is the distance between molecule A and an infinitesimal volume of material B, and ρ_B is the molecular density of material B (in molecules/m³). This integral can then be written in cylindrical coordinates with x being the perpendicular distance measured from the surface of B to the infinitesimal volume, and r being the parallel distance:\begin{align} W _{A,Plane} & = - C _{AB} \rho _{B\int} ^{inf ty} ^{0} \int ^{inf ty} _{0} (2 \pi r)/(\left((D + x) ^{2+r} ^{2\right)} ^{3}) drdx \\ & =- (\pi C _{AB} \rho _{B})/(2) \int ^{inf ty} _{0} (1)/((D + x) ^{4}) dx \\ & =- (\pi C _{AB} \rho _{B})/(6 D ^{3}) \end{align}

Modeling spatulae potential

The gecko–wall interaction can be analyzed by approximating the gecko spatula as a long cylinder with radius r_s. Then the interaction between a single spatula and a surface is:

W _{seta,plane} = - \iiint\limits _{allspace} (\pi C _{AB} \rho _{B} \rho _{A})/(6 (D') ^{6}) dV where D′ is the distance between the surface of B and an infinitesimal volume of material A and ρ_A is the molecular density of material A (in molecules/m³). Using cylindrical coordinates once again, we can find the potential between the gecko spatula and the material B then to be:\begin{align} W _{s,p} & =- (2 \pi ^{2 C} _{AB} \rho _{A} \rho _{B})/(6) \int ^{inf ty} _{0} \int ^{r _{s}} _{0} (r)/((D + x) ^{3}) drdx \\ & =- (\pi ^{2} C _{AB} \rho _{A} \rho _{B} r ^{2} _{s})/(6) \int ^{inf ty} _{0} (1)/((D + x) ^{3}) dx \\ & =- (\pi ^{2} C _{AB} \rho _{A} \rho _{B} r ^{2} _{s})/(12 D ^{2}) \\ & =- (A _{H} r ^{2} _{s})/(12 D ^{2}) \end{align} where A_H is the Hamaker constant for the materials A and B.

The Van der Waals force per spatula, F_s can then be calculated by differentiating with respect to D and we obtain:

F _{s} = - \left [ (d)/(dD) (W _{s,p)\right} ] =- (A _{H} r ^{2} _{s})/(6 D ^{3})

We can then rearrange this equation to obtain r_s as a function of A_H:

\begin{align} r _{s} & = \sqrt{ (6 D ^{3} F _{s})/(A _{H}) } \approx \sqrt \\&= 3.43 \times 10^ \sqrt \times \frac\endwhere a typical interatomic distance of 1.7 Å was used for solids in contact and a F_s of 40 μN was used as per a study by Autumn et al.^[4]

Experimental verification

The equation for r_s can then be used with calculated Hamaker constants^[7] to determine an approximate seta radius. Hamaker constants through both a vacuum and a monolayer of water were used. For those with a monolayer of water, the distance was doubled to account for the water molecules.

Calculated seta radii! Materials A/B !! A_H (10⁻²⁰ J) !! Calculated r_s (μm)

Hydrocarbon/Hydrocarbon (vacuum)	2.6–6.0	0.21–0.14
Hydrocarbon/Hydrocarbon (water)	0.36–0.44	1.6–1.5
Hydrocarbon/Silica (vacuum)	4.1–4.4	0.17–0.16
Hydrocarbon/Silica (water)	0.25–0.82	1.9–1.1
Albumin/Silica (water)	0.7	1.2

These values are similar to the actual radius of the setae on a gecko's foot (approx. 2.5 μm).^{[4] [8]}

Synthetic adhesives

See main article: Synthetic setae. Research attempts to simulate the gecko's adhesive attribute. Projects that have explored the subject include:

• Replicating the adhesive rigid polymers manufactured in microfibers that are approximately the same size as gecko setae.^[9]
• Replicating the self-cleaning attribute that naturally occurs when gecko feet accumulate particles from an exterior surface between setae.^[10]
• Carbon nanotube arrays transferred onto a polymer tape.^[11] In 2015 commercial products inspired by this work were released.^[12]

See also

• Arthropod adhesion

Notes and References

1. Web site: Skibinski . Brian . All Species . Geckolist.com . June 3, 2011.
2. Web site: What do Crested Geckos Eat? 12 Best Foods & Feeding Guide 2019. 2018-12-25.
3. Web site: Crested Geckos . LLLReptile and Supply, Inc. 2006 . June 3, 2011.
4. Evidence for Van Der Waals adhesion in gecko setae . K. . Autumn. M. . Setti. Y. A. . Liang. A. M. . Peattie. W. R. . Hansen. S. . Sponberg. T. W. . Kenny. R. . Fearing. J. N. . Israelachvili. R. J. . Full . PNAS . 99 . 19 . 10.1073/pnas.192252799 . 12252–12256 . 2002 . 12198184. 129431 . 2002PNAS...9912252A. free .
5. Electrostatic Gecko Mechanism . T. . Prevenslik . Tribology in Industry . 31 . 1&2 . 2009 .
6. Popov. Valentin L.. Pohrt. Roman. Li. Qiang. 2017-09-01. Strength of adhesive contacts: Influence of contact geometry and material gradients. Friction. en. 5. 3. 308–325. 10.1007/s40544-017-0177-3. 2223-7690. free.
7. Book: Hans-Jürgen . Butt. Karlheinz . Graf. Michael . Kappl. [{{google books |plainurl=y |id=zODc90UDk4sC}} Physics and Chemistry of Interfaces]. 6 March 2006. John Wiley & Sons. 978-3-527-60640-5.
8. From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices . E. . Arzt . S. . Gorb. R. . Spolenak . PNAS . 100 . 19 . 10603–10606 . 2003 . 10.1073/pnas.1534701100 . 12960386 . 196850. 2003PNAS..10010603A . free .
9. C. . Majidi . R. E. . Groff . Y. . Maeno . B. . Schubert . S. . Baek . B. . Bush . R. . Maboudian . N. . Gravish . M. . Wilkinson . K. . Autumn . R. S.. Fearing . High Friction from a Stiff Polymer using Micro-Fiber Arrays . Physical Review Letters . 18 August 2006 . 10.1103/physrevlett.97.076103 . 17026251 . 97 . 7 . 076103 . 2006PhRvL..97g6103M.
10. Web site: Fearing . Ronald . Self-Cleaning Synthetic Gecko Tape . University of California, Berkeley .
11. Liehuie . Ge . Sunny . Sethi . Lijie . Ci . Pulickel M. . Ajayan . Ali . Dhinojwala . Carbon nanotube-based synthetic gecko tapes . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 104 . 26 . June 19, 2007 . 10.1073/pnas.0703505104 . 17578915 . 1904109 . 10792–10795 . 2007PNAS..10410792G. free .
12. Web site: Gecko-inspired adhesive tape finally scales to market. www.gizmag.com. 2015-12-23. 2015-12-22. Lavars. Nick.