Frameup Explained

In the United States criminal law, a frame-up (frameup) or setup is the act of falsely implicating (framing) someone in a crime by providing fabricated evidence or testimony.[1] In British usage, to frame, or stitch up, is to maliciously or dishonestly incriminate someone or set them up, in the sense trap or ensnare.

While incriminating those who are innocent might be done out of sheer malice, framing is primarily used as a distraction. Generally, the person who is framing someone else is the actual perpetrator of the crime. In other cases it is an attempt by law enforcement to get around due process. Motives include getting rid of political dissidents or "correcting" what they see as the court's mistake. Some lawbreakers will try to claim they were framed as a defense strategy. Frameups may use conspiracy theories to hide the true crimes of the accused.

Technique

In labor disputes

Frameups in labor disputes sometimes swing public opinion one way or the other. In Massachusetts, during the 1912 Lawrence Textile Strike, Massachusetts State Police officers acting on a tip discovered dynamite and blamed it on the Industrial Workers of the World union. National media echoed an anti-union message. Later, the police revealed that the dynamite had been wrapped in a magazine addressed to the son of the former mayor. The man had received an unexplained payment from the largest of the employers. Exposed, the plot swung public sympathy to the IWW.[2]

In police operations

A frameup where a police officer shoots an unarmed suspect and then places a weapon near the body is a form of police misconduct known as a "throw down". This is used to justify the shooting by making it appear that the officer fired in self-defence or to defend other bystanders.[3]

Notable frame-ups

See also

Notes and References

  1. Web site: frame-up - Definitions from Dictionary.com. dictionary.reference.com. 2008-07-13. 2012-10-22. https://web.archive.org/web/20121022080358/http://dictionary.reference.com/search?db=dictionary&q=frame-up. dead.
  2. Book: Roughneck, The Life and Times of Big Bill Haywood. registration. Peter Carlson. 1983. 163. W.W. Norton . 9780393016215.
  3. Web site: 689 F. 2d 1220 - Webster v. City of Houston . paragraph 29 . openjurist.org . 28 October 1982. F2d . 689 . 17 April 2015. Fifth Circuit .
  4. Web site: Zeliger. Robert. Smear campaign against hero of 'Hotel Rwanda'?. 18 January 2021. Foreign Policy. 27 June 2011 . en-US.
  5. Web site: 6 April 2013. The story of Hôtel des Mille Collines. 18 January 2021. The New Times Rwanda. en.
  6. Web site: Burke. Jason. 31 August 2020. 'Hotel Rwanda' inspiration Paul Rusesabagina held on terror charges. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20200904073746/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/aug/31/hotel-rwanda-businessman-paul-rusesabagina-held-on-terror-charges. 4 September 2020. 9 September 2020. The Guardian.