Fragmentology (manuscripts) explained

Fragmentology is the study of surviving fragments of manuscripts (mainly manuscripts from the Middle Ages and the Renaissance in the case of European manuscript cultures). A manuscript fragment may consist of whole or partial leaves, typically made of parchment, conjugate pairs or sometimes gatherings of a parchment book or codex, or parts of single-leaf documents such as notarial acts. They are commonly found in book bindings, especially printed books from the 15th to the 17th centuries, used in a variety of ways such as wrappers or covers for the book, as endpapers, or cut into pieces and used to reinforce the binding. In other non-Western manuscript cultures, fragments of paper manuscripts and other materials, takes place beside parchment, including board covers that many times reused written paper.

In recent years, fragmentology has become an active part of scholarly medieval studies fueled by the abundance in institutional libraries of binding fragments that have never been studied or even catalogued. A number of symposia, websites and projects have been formed to pursue the study. In their field-defining editorial, William Duba and Christoph Flüeler note that fragmentology's "transdisciplinary nature requires the collaboration of specialists trained in a range of fields, not just paleography, codicology, and diplomatics, but also the history of the printed book, the history of libraries, musicology, art history, intellectual history, digital humanities – in sum, most historical arts dealing with content on a page."^[1]

Fragments used in bookbindings

Leaves and parts of parchment leaves have been used in bindings of manuscripts since the Middle Ages. The use of manuscript fragments in bindings increased greatly at the end of the 15th century when printed books began to appear in increasing numbers, supplanting many older manuscripts.^[2] The conversion of northern Europe to Protestantism and the closing of monasteries and convents resulted in the discarding of many Catholic religious and liturgical manuscripts some of which were used by bookbinders.^[2] Sometimes, manuscript fragments have been removed from bookbindings either because the fragments were viewed as significant or valuable, or in the course of rebinding. Removal of these fragments destroys important context and evidence and is strongly criticized by scholars. Where it is necessary to remove such fragments, accepted practice requires they be preserved with the book and their original location recorded.

Evidentiary value of fragments

Manuscript fragments may provide a variety of useful evidence for medievalists, bibliographers and paleographers, including:

• Preservation of a unique or rare text or other writing.
• Preservation of early or significant script.
• Evidence where a book was bound. Since medieval manuscripts generally did not travel far from where they were produced, the fact that a binding incorporates fragments of a manuscript from a known location may be evidence that the book was bound there or nearby.^[3]
• Evidence concerning the book binder. The fact that fragments of the same manuscript are found in various bookbindings may connect the bindings, perhaps to a specific binder.^[4]
• Evidence of ownership or provenance.
• The internal and external structure of the bookbinding.

Modern breaking of manuscripts

Beginning in the nineteenth century, collectors cut ornamented initial letters and miniatures from illuminated manuscripts. In the twentieth century some book dealers began removing leaves from manuscripts to be sold for greater profit as individual pages or keepsakes.^[5] This "breaking" of manuscripts has been most common with books of hours which contain illuminated pages, gilding and attractive decorations. "As a result, today there are tens of thousands of single leaves in several hundred U.S. collections."^[5] This practice continues today and many individual leaves of books of hours and antiphonals are available on eBay and from book and manuscript dealers.^[6] Scholars strongly condemn this practice, even where the manuscript is incomplete to begin with, as it destroys the integrity and evidence of the entire manuscript. The most famous or infamous manuscript breaker was Otto Ege, who dismembered many complete and fragmentary manuscripts to sell the leaves individually or in large boxed collections.

Digital fragmentology

Scholars have studied Otto Ege's dismemberment and sale of manuscript leaves and have attempted to locate the present locations of the leaves of some of those manuscripts. A number of online projects have been started to collect images of these and other manuscript leaves in a virtual reconstruction of the original manuscripts, including Fragmentarium, based in Switzerland. This has been referred to as "digital fragmentology".^[5] Websites have also been used to identify and date manuscript fragments through crowdsourcing.^[7]

See also

• Codicology (the study of manuscript codices or books as physical objects)
• Paleography (the study of old handwriting and scripts)
• Otto Ege
  • Beauvais Missal – a 13th-/14th-century manuscript fragmented by Ege
• Binding waste (the sheets or fragments themselves)

Further reading

Symposia and studies

• Duba, William and Christoph Flüeler, "Fragments and Fragmentology" (editorial), Fragmentology 1 (2018), 1-5. DOI: 10.24446/a04a
  • Web site: Manuscript "Fragmentology": Perspectives on the Scholarly and Pedagogical Value of Medieval Manuscript Fragments . 26 January 2017 . 2015 . 50th International Congress on Medieval Studies .
• Web site: Fragmentary Christian Texts of the Middle Ages: Contents, Methods, Challenges . 26 January 2017 . 2016 . .
• Steyn, Carol . 2016 . Fragmentology, the new manuscript study – with reference to manuscript fragments in South Africa. LitNet University Seminar .
• Web site: New exhibit, "Reused, Rebound, Recovered: Medieval Manuscript Fragments in Law Book Bindings" . 12 February 2017 . Widener . Michael. 2010 . .
• Web site: Medieval Fragments Project . 12 February 2017 . Erwin . Micah. 2012 . .
• Mark Mersiowsky: Wenn Buchmenschen zum Messer greifen: Zur Wiederverwendung mittelalterlicher Bücher. In: www.flick-werk.net. Die Kunst des Flickens und Wiederverwertens im historischen Tirol, hg. v. Siegfried de Rachewiltz u. Andreas Rauchegger in Zusammenarbeit mit Christiane Ganner (Schriften des Landwirtschaftsmuseums Brunnenburg 15), Brunnenburg 2014, S. 200–219 http://flick-werk.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Flickwerk_Mersiowsky.pdf.
• Perani, Mauro & Ruini, Cesarino (eds.), Fragmenta ne Pereant. Recupero e studio dei frammenti di manoscritti medievali e rinascimentali riutilizzati in legature, Longi Editore (Ravenna 2002).
• Kienhorst, Hans, Verbruikt Verleden, Handschriftfragmenten in en uit boeken van klooster Soeterbeeck, Radboud Universiteit (Nijmegen 2009) With photographs of manuscript fragments in books at the Soeterbeeck Cloister.

Catalogs of manuscript fragments

• Babcock, Robert Gary; Davis, Lisa Fagin & Rusche, Philip G., Catalogue Of Medieval And Renaissance Manuscripts In The Beinecke Rare Book And Manuscript Library At Yale University: MSS 184 - 485 (Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies: V. 34, 48, 100, 176), Brepols Pub. (2004), . Fragments in Beinecke Library.
• Gumbert, J. P., Illustrated Inventory of Medieval Manuscripts in Latin Script in the Netherlands, Introduction: Rules-Instructions, Hilversum, Netherlands (2009), . Rules for describing manuscript fragments.
• Gumbert, J. P., Illustrated Inventory of Medieval Manuscripts in Latin Script in the Netherlands, Vol. 1 Utrecht, Museum Catharijneconvent, Hilversum, Netherlands (2011), . (Illustrated)
• Gumbert, J. P., Illustrated Inventory of Medieval Manuscripts in Latin Script in the Netherlands, Vol. 2 Leiden, Universiteitsbibliotheek, Hilversum, Netherlands (2009), . (Illustrated)
• Ferrari, Mirella, Medieval and Renaissance Manuscripts at the University of California, Los Angeles, University of California Press (1991),, pp. 92–144. Collection of 134 medieval manuscript leaves.
• Ker, Neil R., Fragments of Medieval Manuscripts Used as Pastedowns in Oxford Bindings, with a Survey of Oxford Binding c. 1515-1620, Oxford Bibliographical Society Publications, Third Series, No. 4., Oxford: Oxford Bibliographical Society (1954), .
• Skemer, Don C., Medieval & Renaissance Manuscripts in the Princeton University Library, Princeton (2013), Vol. II, Ms. 132, pp. 371–381, Taylor Collection of 89 Manuscript Leaves and Documents, Ms. 138, pp. 387–400, Princeton general collection of 133 Manuscript Leaves and Documents .

External links

General

• Research Group on Manuscript Evidence
• Fragmentology: A Journal for the Study of Medieval Manuscript Fragments

Digital fragmentology projects

• Fragmentarium - International Digital Research Lab for Medieval Manuscript Fragments
• Broken Books Project - Center for Digital Humanities, College of Arts and Sciences at Saint Louis University
• Digital Analysis of Chant Transmission (DACT)
• Manuscriptlink - University of South Carolina
• Medieval Manuscript Fragment Project - University College, London
  • Lost Manuscripts - Centre for Bibliographical History at the University of Essex Books within books: Hebrew Fragments in European Libraries

Notes and References

1. Duba and Flüeler. 2018. Fragments and Fragmentology. Fragmentology. 1. 1–5. fragmentology.ms.
2. "Nicholas . Pickwoad . The Use of Fragments in Medieval Manuscripts in the Construction and Covering of Bindings on Printed Books . Interpreting and Collecting Fragments of Medieval Books (Proceedings of the Seminar in the History of the Book to 1500) . 1–20 . Anderson-Lovelace & The Red Gull Press . 2000 . Los Altos Hills, CA & London . 0-9626372-7-0 . "
3. http://blog.hrc.utexas.edu/2014/01/20/cisiojanus/ Katz, Farley, Rare French "Cisiojanus" fragment identified in bookbinding through crowdsourcing project, Cultural Compass
4. See Peter Kidd, Review: Fragments of Medieval Manuscripts Used as Pastedowns in Oxford Bindings, with a Survey of Oxford Binding c. 1515-1620, The Library: The Transactions of the Bibliographical Society, Vol. 7, No. 4 (December 2006), pp. 459-461.
5. Web site: Manuscript Road Trip: The Promise of Digital Fragmentology. Davis . Lisa Fagin . 13 July 2015 . 16 Jan 2017 . "
6. Ben Mauk, "Scattered Leaves", The New Yorker (Jan. 6, 2014).
7. http://blog.hrc.utexas.edu/2014/01/20/archivist-declares-medieval-manuscript-fragment-crowdsourcing-project-success/ Erwin, Micah, Archivist declares medieval manuscript fragment crowdsourcing project success