The fluctuation–dissipation theorem (FDT) or fluctuation–dissipation relation (FDR) is a powerful tool in statistical physics for predicting the behavior of systems that obey detailed balance. Given that a system obeys detailed balance, the theorem is a proof that thermodynamic fluctuations in a physical variable predict the response quantified by the admittance or impedance (to be intended in their general sense, not only in electromagnetic terms) of the same physical variable (like voltage, temperature difference, etc.), and vice versa. The fluctuation–dissipation theorem applies both to classical and quantum mechanical systems.
The fluctuation–dissipation theorem was proven by Herbert Callen and Theodore Welton in 1951[1] and expanded by Ryogo Kubo. There are antecedents to the general theorem, including Einstein's explanation of Brownian motion[2] during his annus mirabilis and Harry Nyquist's explanation in 1928 of Johnson noise in electrical resistors.[3]
The fluctuation–dissipation theorem says that when there is a process that dissipates energy, turning it into heat (e.g., friction), there is a reverse process related to thermal fluctuations. This is best understood by considering some examples:
If an object is moving through a fluid, it experiences drag (air resistance or fluid resistance). Drag dissipates kinetic energy, turning it into heat. The corresponding fluctuation is Brownian motion. An object in a fluid does not sit still, but rather moves around with a small and rapidly-changing velocity, as molecules in the fluid bump into it. Brownian motion converts heat energy into kinetic energy—the reverse of drag.
If electric current is running through a wire loop with a resistor in it, the current will rapidly go to zero because of the resistance. Resistance dissipates electrical energy, turning it into heat (Joule heating). The corresponding fluctuation is Johnson noise. A wire loop with a resistor in it does not actually have zero current, it has a small and rapidly-fluctuating current caused by the thermal fluctuations of the electrons and atoms in the resistor. Johnson noise converts heat energy into electrical energy—the reverse of resistance.
When light impinges on an object, some fraction of the light is absorbed, making the object hotter. In this way, light absorption turns light energy into heat. The corresponding fluctuation is thermal radiation (e.g., the glow of a "red hot" object). Thermal radiation turns heat energy into light energy—the reverse of light absorption. Indeed, Kirchhoff's law of thermal radiation confirms that the more effectively an object absorbs light, the more thermal radiation it emits.
The fluctuation–dissipation theorem is a general result of statistical thermodynamics that quantifies the relation between the fluctuations in a system that obeys detailed balance and the response of the system to applied perturbations.
For example, Albert Einstein noted in his 1905 paper on Brownian motion that the same random forces that cause the erratic motion of a particle in Brownian motion would also cause drag if the particle were pulled through the fluid. In other words, the fluctuation of the particle at rest has the same origin as the dissipative frictional force one must do work against, if one tries to perturb the system in a particular direction.
From this observation Einstein was able to use statistical mechanics to derive the Einstein–Smoluchowski relation
D={\muk\rmT}
which connects the diffusion constant D and the particle mobility μ, the ratio of the particle's terminal drift velocity to an applied force. kB is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the absolute temperature.
In 1928, John B. Johnson discovered and Harry Nyquist explained Johnson–Nyquist noise. With no applied current, the mean-square voltage depends on the resistance
R
k\rmT
\Delta\nu
\langleV2\rangle ≈ 4Rk\rmT\Delta\nu.
This observation can be understood through the lens of the fluctuation-dissipation theorem. Take, for example, a simple circuit consisting of a resistor with a resistance
R
C
V=-R | dQ | + |
dt |
Q | |
C |
and so the response function for this circuit is
\chi(\omega)\equiv | Q(\omega) | = |
V(\omega) |
1 | ||||
|
In the low-frequency limit
\omega\ll(RC)-1
Im\left[\chi(\omega)\right] ≈ \omegaRC2
which then can be linked to the power spectral density function
SV(\omega)
S | ||||
|
≈
2k\rmT | |
C2\omega |
Im\left[\chi(\omega)\right]=2Rk\rmT
The Johnson–Nyquist voltage noise
\langleV2\rangle
\Delta\nu=\Delta\omega/(2\pi)
\omega=\pm\omega0
\langleV2\rangle ≈ SV(\omega) x 2\Delta\nu ≈ 4Rk\rmT\Delta\nu
The fluctuation–dissipation theorem can be formulated in many ways; one particularly useful form is the following:.
Let
x(t)
H0(x)
x(t)
\langlex\rangle0
Sx(\omega)=\langle\hat{x}(\omega)\hat{x}*(\omega)\rangle
f(t)
H(x)=H0(x)-f(t)x
x(t)
f(t)
\chi(t)
\langlex(t)\rangle=\langlex\rangle0+
t | |
\int | |
-infty |
f(\tau)\chi(t-\tau)d\tau,
where the perturbation is adiabatically (very slowly) switched on at
\tau=-infty
The fluctuation–dissipation theorem relates the two-sided power spectrum (i.e. both positive and negative frequencies) of
x
\hat{\chi}(\omega)
\chi(t)
which holds under the Fourier transform convention
infty | |
f(\omega)=\int | |
-infty |
f(t)e-i\omegadt
x
f(t)=F\sin(\omegat+\phi)
This is the classical form of the theorem; quantum fluctuations are taken into account by replacing
2kBT/\omega
\hbar\coth(\hbar\omega/2kBT)
\hbar\to0
2kBT/\omega
The fluctuation–dissipation theorem can be generalized in a straightforward way to the case of space-dependent fields, to the case of several variables or to a quantum-mechanics setting.[1]
We derive the fluctuation–dissipation theorem in the form given above, using the same notation.Consider the following test case: the field f has been on for infinite time and is switched off at t=0
f(t)=f0\theta(-t),
\theta(t)
x
P(x',t|x,0)
\langlex(t)\rangle=\intdx'\intdxx'P(x',t|x,0)W(x,0).
The probability distribution function W(x,0) is an equilibrium distribution and hencegiven by the Boltzmann distribution for the Hamiltonian
H(x)=H0(x)-xf0
W(x,0)=
\exp(-\betaH(x)) | |
\intdx'\exp(-\betaH(x')) |
,
\beta-1=k\rmT
\betaxf0\ll1
W(x,0) ≈ W0(x)[1+\betaf0(x-\langlex\rangle0)],
here
W0(x)
\langlex(t)\rangle