Exponential type explained
for some
real-valued constant
as
. When a function is bounded in this way, it is then possible to express it as certain kinds of convergent summations over a series of other complex functions, as well as understanding when it is possible to apply techniques such as
Borel summation, or, for example, to apply the
Mellin transform, or to perform approximations using the
Euler–Maclaurin formula. The general case is handled by
Nachbin's theorem, which defines the analogous notion of
-type for a general function
as opposed to
.
Basic idea
A function
defined on the
complex plane is said to be of exponential type if there exist real-valued constants
and
such that
\left|f\left(rei\theta\right)\right|\leMe\tau
in the limit of
. Here, the
complex variable
was written as
to emphasize that the limit must hold in all directions
. Letting
stand for the
infimum of all such
, one then says that the function
is of
exponential type
.
For example, let
. Then one says that
is of exponential type
, since
is the smallest number that bounds the growth of
along the imaginary axis. So, for this example,
Carlson's theorem cannot apply, as it requires functions of exponential type less than
. Similarly, the
Euler–Maclaurin formula cannot be applied either, as it, too, expresses a theorem ultimately anchored in the theory of
finite differences.
Formal definition
is said to be of
exponential type
if for every
there exists a real-valued constant
such that
|F(z)|\leqA\varepsilone(\sigma+\varepsilon)|z|
for
where
.We say
is of exponential type if
is of exponential type
for some
. The number
\tau(F)=\sigma=\displaystyle\limsup|z| → infty|z|-1log|F(z)|
is the exponential type of
. The limit superior here means the limit of the
supremum of the ratio outside a given radius as the radius goes to infinity. This is also the limit superior of the maximum of the ratio at a given radius as the radius goes to infinity. The limit superior may exist even if the maximum at radius
does not have a limit as
goes to infinity. For example, for the function
the value of
at
is dominated by the
term so we have the asymptotic expressions:
\begin{align}
\left(max | |
| |z|=10n!-1 |
log|F(z)|\right)/10n!-1&\sim\left(log
\right)/10n!-1\\
&\sim(log10)\left[(n!-1)10(n-1)!-10(n-1)!(n-1)!\right]/10n!-1\\
&\sim(log10)(n!-1-(n-1)!)/10n!-1-(n-1)!\\
\end{align}
and this goes to zero as
goes to infinity,
[1] but
is nevertheless of exponential type 1, as can be seen by looking at the points
.
Exponential type with respect to a symmetric convex body
has given a generalization of exponential type for entire functions of several complex variables. Suppose
is a
convex,
compact, and
symmetric subset of
. It is known that for every such
there is an associated
norm
with the property that
K=\{x\inRn:\|x\|K\leq1\}.
In other words,
is the unit ball in
with respect to
. The set
K*=\{y\inRn:x ⋅ y\leq1forallx\in{K}\}
is called the polar set and is also a convex, compact, and symmetric subset of
. Furthermore, we can write
We extend
from
to
by
An entire function
of
-complex variables is said to be of exponential type with respect to
if for every
there exists a real-valued constant
such that
|F(z)|<A\varepsilon
| 2\pi(1+\varepsilon)\|z\|K |
e | |
for all
.
Fréchet space
Collections of functions of exponential type
can form a
complete uniform space, namely a
Fréchet space, by the
topology induced by the countable family of
norms
\|f\|n=\supz\exp\left[-\left(\tau+
\right)|z|\right]|f(z)|.
See also
Notes and References
- In fact, even
(max|z|=rloglog|F(z)|)/(logr)
goes to zero at
as
goes to infinity.