Eugenic feminism explained

Eugenic feminism was a current of the women's suffrage movement which overlapped with eugenics.[1] Originally coined by the Lebanese-British physician and vocal eugenicist Caleb Saleeby,[2] [3] the term has since been applied to summarize views held by prominent feminists of Great Britain and the United States. Some early suffragettes in Canada, especially a group known as The Famous Five, also pushed for various eugenic policies.

Eugenic feminists argued that if women were provided with more rights and equality, the deteriorating characteristics of a given race could be averted.

History

When Francis Galton originally formulated eugenics, he saw women functioning as a mere conduit to pass desirable traits from father to son. Later eugenicists saw women in a more active role, placing an increasing emphasis on women as “mothers of the race”. In particular new research in the science of heredity and the studies of procreation, child rearing and human reproduction led to changes in eugenic thought, which began to recognize the importance of women in those parts of the human life cycle. This change in emphasis led eventually to eugenicist Caleb Saleeby coining the term eugenic feminism in his book Woman and Womanhood: A Search for Principles (1911).[2] [4] Saleeby wrote,

The mark of the following pages is that they assume the principle of what we may call Eugenic Feminism, and that they endeavour to formulate its working-out. It is my business to acquaint myself with the literature of both eugenics and feminism, and I know that hitherto the eugenists have inclined to oppose the claims of feminism [...]

Devereux characterizes Saleeby's coining of eugenic feminism as "at least partly a deceptive rhetorical strategy" whose goal was to "draw middle-class women's rights activists back to home and duty".[5]

In the 1930s eugenic feminism began to decline as eugenic feminists began to fall out with mainstream eugenicists, and had largely failed to sway the public opinion.[6] [7]

In Great Britain

See also: Alice Vickery and Stella Churchill.

The Case of Marie Stopes

In Canada

In Canada, all members of the suffragist group known as the "Famous Five" (Henrietta Muir Edwards, Nellie McClung, Louise McKinney, Emily Murphy, and Irene Parlby) approved of eugenics.[8] They supported the 1928 Sexual Sterilization Act of Alberta, and the 1933 Sexual Sterilization Act of British Columbia.[1] Emmeline Pankhurst, the leader of the British suffragettes, spoke in favour of eugenics throughout Western Canada in the 1920s, arguing that Canada as part of the British Empire should strive for "race betterment". Speaking with the Canadian National Committee for Combating Venereal Disease, she often shared a speaking spot with Murphy.[9]

In the United States

Victoria Woodhull

Victoria Woodhull was a prominent advocate of eugenics. Woodhull also had a husband that was abusive, alcoholic, and disloyal, which she thought that might have contributed to the mental disability of her son, Byron.[7] With her newly sparked interest in eugenics, Woodhull promoted her views by giving addresses and publishing various books. A significant address was made in September 1871 and was titled Children: Their Rights and Privileges in which she claimed that “a perfect humanity must come of perfect children.”[10]

Moreover, she mentioned the importance of having “the best seed” to be able to have children that can grow into functional adults, the nurturing of parents to children, and the wickedness of abortion. With the effort of promoting eugenics by Woodhull, a portion of feminists also started to advocate for eugenics as well. These women thought that there were too many children and supported families that had fewer. In an 1876 speech in New Jersey, Woodhull placed a great importance on eugenics, more than the importance of obtaining the rights for women to vote, mentioning that women's suffrage was unimportant compared to creating a more superior human race.

Woodhull's version of eugenics, which held that adherence to then-prevalent sexual norms led to degenerate offspring, was sharply divergent from the mainstream eugenics of the 1890s. Her views shifted over time, never fully aligning with the eugenicist mainstream, particularly on birth control.

Charlotte Perkins Gilman

As a leading feminist author of her time, Charlotte Perkins Gilman published various feminist literary works, including poems, articles on eugenics for The Forerunner, and novels such as: Women and Economics, Herland, With Her in Ourland and His Religion and Hers.[11] [12] In Herland, Gilman champions eugenic feminism by imagining an all-female utopian society made up of women who somehow were able to reproduce asexually. They all descended from a single mother, therefore miscegenation was not a problem in her imagined society, neither, it seems, was inheriting undesirable genes, as those who were deemed unfit to reproduce were discouraged from doing so. Gilman's arguments essentially promoted feminism by “representing eugenic ideology as the source” of help. She advocated equal sexual rights for men and women and advocated legalizing birth control for women.

Decline

In the 1940s, eugenic feminism began to decline. There were irreconcilable differences between feminism and eugenics that could not accommodate each other. Feminists abandoned their eugenic ideas and opinions when it became harder to gather support and more difficult to combine the two movements. Additionally, support for the eugenics movement as a whole began to wane as the public compared American sterilization practices to the sterilization laws of Nazi Germany which were deemed "totalitarian."

See also

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Rosario . Esther . Feminism . The Eugenics Archives . 27 October 2018 . en . 2013-09-13 . 2019-09-09 . https://web.archive.org/web/20190909135657/http://eugenicsarchive.ca/discover/tree/52336b0a5c2ec50000000049 . dead .
  2. Book: Saleeby . C. W. (Caleb Williams) . Woman and Womanhood A Search for Principles . 1911 . J. J. Little & Ives Co. MITCHELL KENNERLEY. East 24th Street, New York, NY, USA . 7 . 1 . 31 October 2018 . https://archive.org/details/womanwomanhoods00sale. First Principles . The mark of the following pages is that they assume the principle of what we may call Eugenic Feminism.
  3. Web site: Gibbons . S. . Women's suffrage . The Eugenics Archives . 31 October 2018 . en . Dr. Caleb Saleeby, an obstetrician and active member of the British Eugenics Education Society, opposed his contemporaries – such as Sir Francis Galton – who took strong anti-feminist stances in their eugenic philosophies. Perceiving the feminist movement as potentially “ruinous to the race” if it continued to ignore the eugenics movement, he coined the term “eugenic feminism” in his 1911 text Woman and Womanhood: A Search for Principles.
  4. Web site: Woman suffrage, eugenics, and eugenic feminism in Canada « Women Suffrage and Beyond . womensuffrage.org . 27 October 2018 . https://web.archive.org/web/20170428163310/http://womensuffrage.org/?p=22106 . 2017-04-28 . live . .
  5. Book: Devereux, Cecily . Growing a Race: Nellie L. McClung and the Fiction of Eugenic Feminism . . 2006 . 9780773573048 . 243600906.
  6. Ziegler . Mary . Eugenic Feminism: Mental Hygiene, the Women's Movement, and the Campaign for Eugenic Legal Reform, 1900-1935 . Harvard Journal of Law and Gender . 2008 . 31 . 211 . en . Several different visions of eugenic feminism were articulated between 1890 and 1930, but each found commonality in the argument that the eugenic decline of the race could be prevented only if women were granted greater political, social, sexual, and economic equality. This argument correlated gender equality with racial improvement: eugenic science and law had to guarantee some form of substantive gender equality in order to improve the race. Thus, in the years between 1915 and 1935, eugenic feminism existed distinct from, and in increasing tension with, mainstream eugenic science and policy. Ultimately, leading eugenic feminists could neither change the minds of a majority of the eugenic coalition nor resolve the contradictions inherent in their own eugenic theories. While they often argued that their reforms should be supported primarily as means to achieve a eugenic end, each leader held on to the very kinds of rights and equality-based arguments that mainstream eugenicists rejected. This contradiction contributed significantly to the decline and disappearance of eugenic feminism in the early and mid-1930s.. 1646393 .
  7. Ziegler. Mary. 2008. Eugenic Feminism: Mental Hygiene, the Women's Movement, and the Campaign for Eugenic Legal Reform. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender. 31. 213.
  8. Web site: Feminism . The Eugenics Archives . 31 October 2018 . en . All of the Famous Five were also involved in the race hygiene movement and supported the passage of the Sexual Sterilization Act of Alberta . 9 September 2019 . https://web.archive.org/web/20190909135657/http://eugenicsarchive.ca/discover/tree/52336b0a5c2ec50000000049 . dead .
  9. Carter . Sarah . 'Develop a Great Imperial Race': Emmeline Pankhurst, Emily Murphy, and Their Promotion of 'Race Betterment' in Western Canada in the 1920s . Finding Directions West: Readings That Locate and Dislocate Western Canada's Past . 2017 . 133–150 . 10.2307/j.ctv64h781.11 . 14 February 2021 . University of Calgary Press.
  10. Book: Lady Eugenist: Feminist Eugenics in the Speeches and Writings of Victoria Woodhull. Woodhull. Victoria. Perry. Michael W.. Inkling Books. 2005. 978-1587420429. 331.
  11. Nadkarni. Asha. Spring 2006. Eugenic Feminism: Asian Reproduction in the U.S. National Imagery. Novel: A Forum on Fiction. 39. 2. 221–226. 40267654. 10.1215/ddnov.039020221.
  12. Seitler. Dana. March 2003. Unnatural Selection: Mothers, Eugenic Feminism, Charlotte Perkins Gilman's Regeneration Narratives. American Quarterly. 55. 1. 63–66. 10.1353/aq.2003.0001. 30041957. 143831741.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Eugenic feminism".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.