Equivariant algebraic K-theory explained

In mathematics, the equivariant algebraic K-theory is an algebraic K-theory associated to the category

\operatorname{Coh}G(X)

of equivariant coherent sheaves on an algebraic scheme X with action of a linear algebraic group G, via Quillen's Q-construction; thus, by definition,
G(X)
K
i

=

+
\pi
i(B

\operatorname{Coh}G(X)).

In particular,
G(C)
K
0
is the Grothendieck group of

\operatorname{Coh}G(X)

. The theory was developed by R. W. Thomason in 1980s.[1] Specifically, he proved equivariant analogs of fundamental theorems such as the localization theorem.

Equivalently,

G(X)
K
i
may be defined as the

Ki

of the category of coherent sheaves on the quotient stack

[X/G]

.[2] [3] (Hence, the equivariant K-theory is a specific case of the K-theory of a stack.)

A version of the Lefschetz fixed-point theorem holds in the setting of equivariant (algebraic) K-theory.

Fundamental theorems

Let X be an equivariant algebraic scheme.

Examples

One of the fundamental examples of equivariant K-theory groups are the equivariant K-groups of

G

-equivariant coherent sheaves on a points, so
G
K
i(*)
. Since

CohG(*)

is equivalent to the category

Rep(G)

of finite-dimensional representations of

G

. Then, the Grothendieck group of

Rep(G)

, denoted

R(G)

is
G(*)
K
0
.[4]

Torus ring

Given an algebraic torus

T\cong

k
G
m
a finite-dimensional representation

V

is given by a direct sum of

1

-dimensional

T

-modules called the weights of

V

.[5] There is an explicit isomorphism between

KT

and

Z[t1,\ldots,tk]

given by sending

[V]

to its associated character.[6]

See also

References

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. Charles A. Weibel, Robert W. Thomason (1952–1995).
  2. Adem. Alejandro. Ruan. Yongbin. June 2003. Twisted Orbifold K-Theory. math/0107168. Communications in Mathematical Physics. 237. 3. 533–556. 10.1007/s00220-003-0849-x. 2003CMaPh.237..533A. 12059533. 0010-3616.
  3. Krishna. Amalendu. Ravi. Charanya. 2017-08-02. Algebraic K-theory of quotient stacks. 1509.05147. math.AG.
  4. Book: Chriss. Neil. Representation theory and complex geometry. Ginzburg. Neil. 243–244.
  5. For

    Gm

    there is a map

    f:Gm\toGm

    sending

    t\mapstotk

    . Since

    Gm\subsetA1

    there is an induced representation

    \hat{f}:Gm\toGL(A1)

    of weight

    k

    . See Algebraic torus for more info.
  6. Okounkov. Andrei. 2017-01-03. Lectures on K-theoretic computations in enumerative geometry. 1512.07363. 13. math.AG.