Equal-time rule explained

The equal-time rule (47 U.S. Code § 315 - Candidates for public office[1]) specifies that American radio and television broadcast stations must provide equivalent access to competing political candidates. This means, for example, that if a station broadcasts a message by a candidate, it must offer the same amount of time on the same terms (in, say, prime time) to an opposing candidate.[2]

Details

This rule originated in §18 of the Radio Act of 1927 which established the Federal Radio Commission; it was later superseded by the Communications Act of 1934, with the FRC becoming the FCC, the Federal Communications Commission. A related provision, in §315(b), requires that broadcasters offer time to candidates at the same rate as their "most favored advertiser".

The equal-time rule was created due to concerns that broadcast stations could easily manipulate the outcome of elections by presenting just one point of view and excluding other candidates.

There are several exceptions to the equal-time rule;

When candidates for office have careers in media, the rule can affect previously produced material. When Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump ran for president, television networks did not broadcast films or programs they appeared in.[4] Localized invocations of the rule apply in elections for lower office, with television stations revising their schedules if they broadcast within the state or district where the candidate in question is running.[4] [5]

The equal-time rule was suspended by Congress in 1960 to permit the Kennedy-Nixon debates to take place.[6]

Fairness doctrines

The equal-time rule should not be confused with the now-defunct FCC fairness doctrine, which dealt with presenting balanced points of view on matters of public importance.

The Zapple doctrine (part of a specific provision of the fairness doctrine) was similar to the equal-time rule but applied to different political campaign participants. The equal-time rule applies to the political candidate only. The Zapple doctrine had the same purpose and requirements of equivalent coverage opportunity as the equal-time rule, but its scope included the candidate's spokesman and supporters, not the candidate.[7]

References

Bibliography

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Legal Information Institute . 47 U.S. Code § 315 - Candidates for public office . July 28, 2024.
  2. Book: Miller . Philip . Media Law for Producers . February 11, 2013 . CRC Press . 9781136046025 . 340 . March 24, 2016.
  3. Web site: Anderson Cooper's Talk Show Is a News Program, FCC Rules; The government regulators have determined talk show qualifies as news and is thus exempt from obligations to giving political candidates equal air time.. Gardner. Eriq. December 2, 2011. The Hollywood Reporter. December 24, 2011.
  4. News: Here's what happens to Dr. Oz's talk show now that he's running for Senate. Battaglio. Stephen. November 30, 2021. Los Angeles Times. December 1, 2021.
  5. Web site: 'Dr. Oz Show' to End in January as Host Pursues Pennsylvania Senate Run. Joe. Otterson. Variety. December 13, 2021. December 13, 2021.
  6. Pietrusza D. 1960:LBJ vs. JFK vs. Nixon. Union Square Press 2008
  7. Web site: FCC Decides that it will No Longer Enforce the Zapple Doctrine – Killing the Last Remnant of the Fairness Doctrine. Broadcast Law Blog. David. Oxenford. September 6, 2017. May 8, 2014.