Email Explained

Electronic mail (email or e-mail) is a method of transmitting and receiving messages using electronic devices. It was conceived in the late–20th century as the digital version of, or counterpart to, mail (hence e- + mail). Email is a ubiquitous and very widely used communication medium; in current use, an email address is often treated as a basic and necessary part of many processes in business, commerce, government, education, entertainment, and other spheres of daily life in most countries.

Email operates across computer networks, primarily the Internet, and also local area networks. Today's email systems are based on a store-and-forward model. Email servers accept, forward, deliver, and store messages. Neither the users nor their computers are required to be online simultaneously; they need to connect, typically to a mail server or a webmail interface to send or receive messages or download it.

Originally an ASCII text-only communications medium, Internet email was extended by Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) to carry text in other character sets and multimedia content attachments. International email, with internationalized email addresses using UTF-8, is standardized but not widely adopted.

Terminology

The term electronic mail has been in use with its modern meaning since 1975, and variations of the shorter E-mail have been in use since 1979:[1] [2]

The service is often simply referred to as mail, and a single piece of electronic mail is called a message. The conventions for fields within emails—the "To", "From", "CC", "BCC" etc.—began with RFC-680 in 1975.[19]

An Internet email consists of an envelope and content;[20] the content consists of a header and a body.[21]

History

See main article: History of email. Computer-based messaging between users of the same system became possible after the advent of time-sharing in the early 1960s, with a notable implementation by MIT's CTSS project in 1965.[22] Most developers of early mainframes and minicomputers developed similar, but generally incompatible, mail applications. In 1971 the first ARPANET network mail was sent, introducing the now-familiar address syntax with the '@' symbol designating the user's system address.[23] Over a series of RFCs, conventions were refined for sending mail messages over the File Transfer Protocol.

Proprietary electronic mail systems soon began to emerge. IBM, CompuServe and Xerox used in-house mail systems in the 1970s; CompuServe sold a commercial intraoffice mail product in 1978 to IBM and to Xerox from 1981.[24] [25] [26] DEC's ALL-IN-1 and Hewlett-Packard's HPMAIL (later HP DeskManager) were released in 1982; development work on the former began in the late 1970s and the latter became the world's largest selling email system.[27] [28]

The Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) was implemented on the ARPANET in 1983. LAN email systems emerged in the mid 1980s. For a time in the late 1980s and early 1990s, it seemed likely that either a proprietary commercial system or the X.400 email system, part of the Government Open Systems Interconnection Profile (GOSIP), would predominate. However, once the final restrictions on carrying commercial traffic over the Internet ended in 1995,[29] [30] a combination of factors made the current Internet suite of SMTP, POP3 and IMAP email protocols the standard (see Protocol Wars).[31] [32]

Operation

The following is a typical sequence of events that takes place when sender Alice transmits a message using a mail user agent (MUA) addressed to the email address of the recipient.[33]

  1. The MUA formats the message in email format and uses the submission protocol, a profile of the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP), to send the message content to the local mail submission agent (MSA), in this case smtp.a.org.
  2. The MSA determines the destination address provided in the SMTP protocol (not from the message header)—in this case, bob@b.org—which is a fully qualified domain address (FQDA). The part before the @ sign is the local part of the address, often the username of the recipient, and the part after the @ sign is a domain name. The MSA resolves a domain name to determine the fully qualified domain name of the mail server in the Domain Name System (DNS).
  3. The DNS server for the domain b.org (ns.b.org) responds with any MX records listing the mail exchange servers for that domain, in this case mx.b.org, a message transfer agent (MTA) server run by the recipient's ISP.[34]
  4. smtp.a.org sends the message to mx.b.org using SMTP. This server may need to forward the message to other MTAs before the message reaches the final message delivery agent (MDA).
  5. The MDA delivers it to the mailbox of user bob.
  6. Bob's MUA picks up the message using either the Post Office Protocol (POP3) or the Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP).

In addition to this example, alternatives and complications exist in the email system:

Many MTAs used to accept messages for any recipient on the Internet and do their best to deliver them. Such MTAs are called open mail relays. This was very important in the early days of the Internet when network connections were unreliable.[35] [36] However, this mechanism proved to be exploitable by originators of unsolicited bulk email and as a consequence open mail relays have become rare,[37] and many MTAs do not accept messages from open mail relays.

Message format

The basic Internet message format used for email[38] is defined by, with encoding of non-ASCII data and multimedia content attachments defined in RFC 2045 through RFC 2049, collectively called Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions or MIME. The extensions in International email apply only to email. RFC 5322 replaced the earlier RFC 2822 in 2008, then RFC 2822 in 2001 replaced RFC 822 – the standard for Internet email for decades. Published in 1982, RFC 822 was based on the earlier RFC 733 for the ARPANET.[39]

Internet email messages consist of two sections, "header" and "body". These are known as "content".[40] [41] The header is structured into fields such as From, To, CC, Subject, Date, and other information about the email. In the process of transporting email messages between systems, SMTP communicates delivery parameters and information using message header fields. The body contains the message, as unstructured text, sometimes containing a signature block at the end. The header is separated from the body by a blank line.

Message header

RFC 5322 specifies the syntax of the email header. Each email message has a header (the "header section" of the message, according to the specification), comprising a number of fields ("header fields"). Each field has a name ("field name" or "header field name"), followed by the separator character ":", and a value ("field body" or "header field body").

Each field name begins in the first character of a new line in the header section, and begins with a non-whitespace printable character. It ends with the separator character ":". The separator is followed by the field value (the "field body"). The value can continue onto subsequent lines if those lines have space or tab as their first character. Field names and, without SMTPUTF8, field bodies are restricted to 7-bit ASCII characters. Some non-ASCII values may be represented using MIME encoded words.

Header fields

Email header fields can be multi-line, with each line recommended to be no more than 78 characters, although the limit is 998 characters.[42] Header fields defined by RFC 5322 contain only US-ASCII characters; for encoding characters in other sets, a syntax specified in RFC 2047 may be used.[43] In some examples, the IETF EAI working group defines some standards track extensions,[44] [45] replacing previous experimental extensions so UTF-8 encoded Unicode characters may be used within the header. In particular, this allows email addresses to use non-ASCII characters. Such addresses are supported by Google and Microsoft products, and promoted by some government agents.[46]

The message header must include at least the following fields:[47] [48]

RFC 3864 describes registration procedures for message header fields at the IANA; it provides for permanent and provisional field names, including also fields defined for MIME, netnews, and HTTP, and referencing relevant RFCs. Common header fields for email include:[49]

The To: field may be unrelated to the addresses to which the message is delivered. The delivery list is supplied separately to the transport protocol, SMTP, which may be extracted from the header content. The "To:" field is similar to the addressing at the top of a conventional letter delivered according to the address on the outer envelope. In the same way, the "From:" field may not be the sender. Some mail servers apply email authentication systems to messages relayed. Data pertaining to the server's activity is also part of the header, as defined below.

SMTP defines the trace information of a message saved in the header using the following two fields:[51]

Other fields added on top of the header by the receiving server may be called trace fields.[52]

Message body

Content encoding

Internet email was designed for 7-bit ASCII.[58] Most email software is 8-bit clean, but must assume it will communicate with 7-bit servers and mail readers. The MIME standard introduced character set specifiers and two content transfer encodings to enable transmission of non-ASCII data: quoted printable for mostly 7-bit content with a few characters outside that range and base64 for arbitrary binary data. The 8BITMIME and BINARY extensions were introduced to allow transmission of mail without the need for these encodings, but many mail transport agents may not support them. In some countries, e-mail software violates by sending raw[59] non-ASCII text and several encoding schemes co-exist; as a result, by default, the message in a non-Latin alphabet language appears in non-readable form (the only exception is a coincidence if the sender and receiver use the same encoding scheme). Therefore, for international character sets, Unicode is growing in popularity.[60]

Plain text and HTML

Most modern graphic email clients allow the use of either plain text or HTML for the message body at the option of the user. HTML email messages often include an automatic-generated plain text copy for compatibility.

Advantages of HTML include the ability to include in-line links and images, set apart previous messages in block quotes, wrap naturally on any display, use emphasis such as underlines and italics, and change font styles. Disadvantages include the increased size of the email, privacy concerns about web bugs, abuse of HTML email as a vector for phishing attacks and the spread of malicious software.[61] Some e-mail clients interpret the body as HTML even in the absence of a Content-Type: html header field; this may cause various problems.

Some web-based mailing lists recommend all posts be made in plain text, with 72 or 80 characters per line for all the above reasons,[62] [63] and because they have a significant number of readers using text-based email clients such as Mutt.Various informal conventions evolved for marking up plain text in email and usenet posts, which later led to the development of formal languages like setext (c. 1992) and many others, the most popular of them being markdown.

Some Microsoft email clients may allow rich formatting using their proprietary Rich Text Format (RTF), but this should be avoided unless the recipient is guaranteed to have a compatible email client.[64]

Servers and client applications

Messages are exchanged between hosts using the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol with software programs called mail transfer agents (MTAs); and delivered to a mail store by programs called mail delivery agents (MDAs, also sometimes called local delivery agents, LDAs). Accepting a message obliges an MTA to deliver it,[65] and when a message cannot be delivered, that MTA must send a bounce message back to the sender, indicating the problem.

Users can retrieve their messages from servers using standard protocols such as POP or IMAP, or, as is more likely in a large corporate environment, with a proprietary protocol specific to Novell Groupwise, Lotus Notes or Microsoft Exchange Servers. Programs used by users for retrieving, reading, and managing email are called mail user agents (MUAs).

When opening an email, it is marked as "read", which typically visibly distinguishes it from "unread" messages on clients' user interfaces. Email clients may allow hiding read emails from the inbox so the user can focus on the unread.[66]

Mail can be stored on the client, on the server side, or in both places. Standard formats for mailboxes include Maildir and mbox. Several prominent email clients use their own proprietary format and require conversion software to transfer email between them. Server-side storage is often in a proprietary format but since access is through a standard protocol such as IMAP, moving email from one server to another can be done with any MUA supporting the protocol.

Many current email users do not run MTA, MDA or MUA programs themselves, but use a web-based email platform, such as Gmail or Yahoo! Mail, that performs the same tasks.[67] Such webmail interfaces allow users to access their mail with any standard web browser, from any computer, rather than relying on a local email client.

Filename extensions

Upon reception of email messages, email client applications save messages in operating system files in the file system. Some clients save individual messages as separate files, while others use various database formats, often proprietary, for collective storage. A historical standard of storage is the mbox format. The specific format used is often indicated by special filename extensions:

eml
  • Used by many email clients including Novell GroupWise, Microsoft Outlook Express, Lotus notes, Windows Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird, and Postbox. The files contain the email contents as plain text in MIME format, containing the email header and body, including attachments in one or more of several formats.
    emlx
  • Used by Apple Mail.
    msg
  • Used by Microsoft Office Outlook and OfficeLogic Groupware.
    mbx
  • Used by Opera Mail, KMail, and Apple Mail based on the mbox format.

    Some applications (like Apple Mail) leave attachments encoded in messages for searching while also saving separate copies of the attachments. Others separate attachments from messages and save them in a specific directory.

    URI scheme mailto

    See main article: mailto. The URI scheme, as registered with the IANA, defines the mailto: scheme for SMTP email addresses. Though its use is not strictly defined, URLs of this form are intended to be used to open the new message window of the user's mail client when the URL is activated, with the address as defined by the URL in the To: field.[68] Many clients also support query string parameters for the other email fields, such as its subject line or carbon copy recipients.[69]

    Types

    Web-based email

    See main article: Webmail. Many email providers have a web-based email client. This allows users to log into the email account by using any compatible web browser to send and receive their email. Mail is typically not downloaded to the web client, so it cannot be read without a current Internet connection.

    POP3 email servers

    The Post Office Protocol 3 (POP3) is a mail access protocol used by a client application to read messages from the mail server. Received messages are often deleted from the server. POP supports simple download-and-delete requirements for access to remote mailboxes (termed maildrop in the POP RFC's).[70] POP3 allows downloading messages on a local computer and reading them even when offline.[71] [72]

    IMAP email servers

    The Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) provides features to manage a mailbox from multiple devices. Small portable devices like smartphones are increasingly used to check email while traveling and to make brief replies, larger devices with better keyboard access being used to reply at greater length. IMAP shows the headers of messages, the sender and the subject and the device needs to request to download specific messages. Usually, the mail is left in folders in the mail server.

    MAPI email servers

    Messaging Application Programming Interface (MAPI) is used by Microsoft Outlook to communicate to Microsoft Exchange Server—and to a range of other email server products such as Axigen Mail Server, Kerio Connect, Scalix, Zimbra, HP OpenMail, IBM Lotus Notes, Zarafa, and Bynari where vendors have added MAPI support to allow their products to be accessed directly via Outlook.

    Uses

    Business and organizational use

    Email has been widely accepted by businesses, governments and non-governmental organizations in the developed world, and it is one of the key parts of an 'e-revolution' in workplace communication (with the other key plank being widespread adoption of highspeed Internet). A sponsored 2010 study on workplace communication found 83% of U.S. knowledge workers felt email was critical to their success and productivity at work.[73]

    It has some key benefits to business and other organizations, including:

    Facilitating logistics
  • Much of the business world relies on communications between people who are not physically in the same building, area, or even country; setting up and attending an in-person meeting, telephone call, or conference call can be inconvenient, time-consuming, and costly. Email provides a method of exchanging information between two or more people with no set-up costs and that is generally far less expensive than a physical meeting or phone call.
    Helping with synchronization
  • With real time communication by meetings or phone calls, participants must work on the same schedule, and each participant must spend the same amount of time in the meeting or call. Email allows asynchrony: each participant may control their schedule independently. Batch processing of incoming emails can improve workflow compared to interrupting calls.
    Reducing cost
  • Sending an email is much less expensive than sending postal mail, or long distance telephone calls, telex or telegrams.
    Increasing speed
  • Much faster than most of the alternatives.
    Creating a "written" record
  • Unlike a telephone or in-person conversation, email by its nature creates a detailed written record of the communication, the identity of the sender(s) and recipient(s) and the date and time the message was sent. In the event of a contract or legal dispute, saved emails can be used to prove that an individual was advised of certain issues, as each email has the date and time recorded on it.
    Possibility of auto-processing and improved distribution
  • As well pre-processing of customer's orders or addressing the person in charge can be realized by automated procedures.

    Email marketing

    Email marketing via "opt-in" is often successfully used to send special sales offerings and new product information.[74] Depending on the recipient's culture,[75] email sent without permission - such as an "opt-in" - is likely to be viewed as unwelcome "email spam".

    Personal use

    Personal computer

    Many users access their personal emails from friends and family members using a personal computer in their house or apartment.

    Mobile

    Email has become used on smartphones and on all types of computers. Mobile "apps" for email increase accessibility to the medium for users who are out of their homes. While in the earliest years of email, users could only access email on desktop computers, in the 2010s, it is possible for users to check their email when they are away from home, whether they are across town or across the world. Alerts can also be sent to the smartphone or other devices to notify them immediately of new messages. This has given email the ability to be used for more frequent communication between users and allowed them to check their email and write messages throughout the day., there were approximately 1.4 billion email users worldwide and 50 billion non-spam emails that were sent daily.[76]

    Individuals often check emails on smartphones for both personal and work-related messages. It was found that US adults check their email more than they browse the web or check their Facebook accounts, making email the most popular activity for users to do on their smartphones. 78% of the respondents in the study revealed that they check their email on their phone.[77] It was also found that 30% of consumers use only their smartphone to check their email, and 91% were likely to check their email at least once per day on their smartphone. However, the percentage of consumers using email on a smartphone ranges and differs dramatically across different countries. For example, in comparison to 75% of those consumers in the US who used it, only 17% in India did.[78]

    Declining use among young people

    , the number of Americans visiting email web sites had fallen 6 percent after peaking in November 2009. For persons 12 to 17, the number was down 18 percent. Young people preferred instant messaging, texting and social media. Technology writer Matt Richtel said in The New York Times that email was like the VCR, vinyl records and film cameras—no longer cool and something older people do.[79] [80]

    A 2015 survey of Android users showed that persons 13 to 24 used messaging apps 3.5 times as much as those over 45, and were far less likely to use email.[81]

    Issues

    Attachment size limitation

    See main article: Email attachment. Email messages may have one or more attachments, which are additional files that are appended to the email. Typical attachments include Microsoft Word documents, PDF documents, and scanned images of paper documents. In principle, there is no technical restriction on the size or number of attachments. However, in practice, email clients, servers, and Internet service providers implement various limitations on the size of files, or complete email – typically to 25MB or less.[82] [83] [84] Furthermore, due to technical reasons, attachment sizes as seen by these transport systems can differ from what the user sees,[85] which can be confusing to senders when trying to assess whether they can safely send a file by email. Where larger files need to be shared, various file hosting services are available and commonly used.[86] [87]

    Information overload

    The ubiquity of email for knowledge workers and "white collar" employees has led to concerns that recipients face an "information overload" in dealing with increasing volumes of email.[88] [89] With the growth in mobile devices, by default employees may also receive work-related emails outside of their working day. This can lead to increased stress and decreased satisfaction with work. Some observers even argue it could have a significant negative economic effect,[90] as efforts to read the many emails could reduce productivity.

    Spam

    See main article: Email spam. Email "spam" is unsolicited bulk email. The low cost of sending such email meant that, by 2003, up to 30% of total email traffic was spam,[91] [92] [93] and was threatening the usefulness of email as a practical tool. The US CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 and similar laws elsewhere[94] had some impact, and a number of effective anti-spam techniques now largely mitigate the impact of spam by filtering or rejecting it for most users,[95] but the volume sent is still very high - and increasingly consists not of advertisements for products, but malicious content or links.[96] In September 2017, for example, the proportion of spam to legitimate email rose to 59.56%.[97] The percentage of spam email in 2021 is estimated to be 85%.[98]

    Malware

    Emails are a major vector for the distribution of malware.[99] This is often achieved by attaching malicious programs to the message and persuading potential victims to open the file.[100] Types of malware distributed via email include computer worms[101] and ransomware.[102]

    Email spoofing

    See main article: Email spoofing. Email spoofing occurs when the email message header is designed to make the message appear to come from a known or trusted source. Email spam and phishing methods typically use spoofing to mislead the recipient about the true message origin. Email spoofing may be done as a prank, or as part of a criminal effort to defraud an individual or organization. An example of a potentially fraudulent email spoofing is if an individual creates an email that appears to be an invoice from a major company, and then sends it to one or more recipients. In some cases, these fraudulent emails incorporate the logo of the purported organization and even the email address may appear legitimate.

    Email bombing

    See main article: Email bomb.

    Email bombing is the intentional sending of large volumes of messages to a target address. The overloading of the target email address can render it unusable and can even cause the mail server to crash.

    Privacy concerns

    See main article: Email privacy.

    Today it can be important to distinguish between the Internet and internal email systems. Internet email may travel and be stored on networks and computers without the sender's or the recipient's control. During the transit time it is possible that third parties read or even modify the content. Internal mail systems, in which the information never leaves the organizational network, may be more secure, although information technology personnel and others whose function may involve monitoring or managing may be accessing the email of other employees.

    Email privacy, without some security precautions, can be compromised because:

    There are cryptography applications that can serve as a remedy to one or more of the above. For example, Virtual Private Networks or the Tor network can be used to encrypt traffic from the user machine to a safer network while GPG, PGP, SMEmail,[103] or S/MIME can be used for end-to-end message encryption, and SMTP STARTTLS or SMTP over Transport Layer Security/Secure Sockets Layer can be used to encrypt communications for a single mail hop between the SMTP client and the SMTP server.

    Additionally, many mail user agents do not protect logins and passwords, making them easy to intercept by an attacker. Encrypted authentication schemes such as SASL prevent this. Finally, the attached files share many of the same hazards as those found in peer-to-peer filesharing. Attached files may contain trojans or viruses.

    Legal contracts

    It is possible for an exchange of emails to form a binding contract, so users must be careful about what they send through email correspondence.[104] [105] A signature block on an email may be interpreted as satisfying a signature requirement for a contract.[106]

    Flaming

    Flaming occurs when a person sends a message (or many messages) with angry or antagonistic content. The term is derived from the use of the word incendiary to describe particularly heated email discussions. The ease and impersonality of email communications mean that the social norms that encourage civility in person or via telephone do not exist and civility may be forgotten.[107]

    Email bankruptcy

    See main article: Email bankruptcy. Also known as "email fatigue", email bankruptcy is when a user ignores a large number of email messages after falling behind in reading and answering them. The reason for falling behind is often due to information overload and a general sense there is so much information that it is not possible to read it all. As a solution, people occasionally send a "boilerplate" message explaining that their email inbox is full, and that they are in the process of clearing out all the messages. Harvard University law professor Lawrence Lessig is credited with coining this term, but he may only have popularized it.[108]

    Internationalization

    Originally Internet email was completely ASCII text-based. MIME now allows body content text and some header content text in international character sets, but other headers and email addresses using UTF-8, while standardized[109] have yet to be widely adopted.[110] [111]

    Tracking of sent mail

    The original SMTP mail service provides limited mechanisms for tracking a transmitted message, and none for verifying that it has been delivered or read. It requires that each mail server must either deliver it onward or return a failure notice (bounce message), but both software bugs and system failures can cause messages to be lost. To remedy this, the IETF introduced Delivery Status Notifications (delivery receipts) and Message Disposition Notifications (return receipts); however, these are not universally deployed in production.

    Many ISPs now deliberately disable non-delivery reports (NDRs) and delivery receipts due to the activities of spammers:

    In the absence of standard methods, a range of system based around the use of web bugs have been developed. However, these are often seen as underhand or raising privacy concerns,[112] [113] and only work with email clients that support rendering of HTML. Many mail clients now default to not showing "web content".[114] Webmail providers can also disrupt web bugs by pre-caching images.[115]

    See also

    Further reading

    External links

    Notes and References

    1. Web site: email noun earlier than 1979 . Oxford English Dictionary . 2012-10-25 . 2020-05-14 . April 6, 2023 . https://web.archive.org/web/20230406100025/https://public.oed.com/appeals/email/ . live .
    2. News: Ohlheiser . Abby . Why the first use of the word 'e-mail' may be lost forever . Washington Post . 2015-07-28 . 2020-05-14 . April 7, 2023 . https://web.archive.org/web/20230407131904/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2015/07/28/why-the-first-use-of-the-word-e-mail-may-be-lost-forever/ . live .
    3. Web site: Yahoo style guide. Styleguide.yahoo.com. https://web.archive.org/web/20130509154006/https://styleguide.yahoo.com/word-list/e. May 9, 2013. 2014-01-09.
    4. Web site: AP Removes Hyphen From 'Email' In Style Guide. Huffington Post. New York City. March 18, 2011. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20150512055628/https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/18/ap-removes-hyphen-from-em_n_837833.html . May 12, 2015.
    5. Web site: RFC Editor Terms List. IETF. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20131228152111/https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/terms-online.txt. 2013-12-28. This is suggested by the RFC Document Style Guide
    6. Web site: What is the correct way to spell 'e' words such as 'email', 'ecommerce', 'egovernment'? . . FAQ . 4 September 2009 . AskOxford Language Query team . https://web.archive.org/web/20080701194047/https://www.askoxford.com/asktheexperts/faq/aboutspelling/email?view=uk . We recommend email, this is the common form . dead . July 1, 2008.
    7. Web site: Reference.com . Dictionary.reference.com . 2014-01-09 . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20131216094405/https://dictionary.reference.com/browse/email . 2013-12-16 .
    8. Random House Unabridged Dictionary, 2006
    9. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
    10. Princeton University WordNet 3.0
    11. The American Heritage Science Dictionary, 2002
    12. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. 9 May 2014. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20140512221444/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/email. 12 May 2014.
    13. Web site: "RFC Style Guide", Table of decisions on consistent use in RFC . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20131228152111/https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/terms-online.txt . 2013-12-28 . 2014-01-09.
    14. Web site: "Email" or "e-mail". English Language & Usage – Stack Exchange. August 25, 2010. September 26, 2010. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20100831185446/https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/1925/email-or-e-mail. August 31, 2010.
    15. Web site: AP Stylebook editors share big changes . 15th National Conference of the American Copy Editors Society (2011, Phoenix) . 23 March 2011. Gerri Berendzen . dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20110322142235/https://www.aces2011.org/sessions/18/the-ap-stylebook-editors-visit-aces-2011/. 22 March 2011.
    16. Web site: How do you spell "e-mail"? . Mark . Israel . Alt-usage-english.org . 2014-01-09 . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20120403084841/https://www.alt-usage-english.org/excerpts/fxhowdoy.html . 2012-04-03 .
    17. Web site: Did V.A. Shiva Ayyadurai Invent Email? . SIGCIS . thaigh . 2015 . 2020-09-05 . April 17, 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220417130400/https://www.sigcis.org/Ayyadurai . live .
    18. Web site: Masnick . Mike . Laying Out All The Evidence: Shiva Ayyadurai Did Not Invent Email . 2020-09-05 . Techdirt. . May 22, 2019 . January 27, 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220127173452/https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190518/23370542236/laying-out-all-evidence-shiva-ayyadurai-did-not-invent-email.shtml . live .
    19. News: Pexton . Patrick B. . 2012-03-01 . Origins of e-mail: My mea culpa . subscription . 2022-04-18 . Washington Post . en-US . May 19, 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220519192857/https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/omblog/post/origins-of-e-mail-my-mea-culpa/2012/03/01/gIQAiOD5kR_blog.html . live .
    20. Simple Mail Transfer Protocol . 5321 . 2.3.1 . Mail Objects . SMTP transports a mail object. A mail object contains an envelope and content. . .
    21. Simple Mail Transfer Protocol . 5321 . 2.3.1 . Mail Objects . The SMTP content is sent in the SMTP DATA protocol unit, and has two parts: the header section and the body. If the content conforms to other contemporary standards, the header section is a collection of header fields, each consisting of a header name, a colon, and data, structured as in the message format specification . IETF.
    22. Web site: The History of Electronic Mail. Tom Van Vleck. March 23, 2005. December 2, 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/20171202025034/http://www.multicians.org/thvv/mail-history.html. live.
    23. Web site: Ray Tomlinson . The First Network Email . Openmap.bbn.com . 2019-10-05 . May 6, 2006 . https://web.archive.org/web/20060506003539/https://openmap.bbn.com/~tomlinso/ray/firstemailframe.html . dead .
    24. Gardner . P. C. . 1981 . A system for the automated office environment . IBM Systems Journal . 20 . 3 . 321–345 . 10.1147/sj.203.0321 . 0018-8670 . none.
      Web site: 2020-08-02 . IBM100 - The Networked Business Place . . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20200802211021/https://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/ibm100/us/en/icons/networkbus/ . 2020-08-02 . 2020-09-07.
    25. Connie Winkler . October 22, 1979 . CompuServe pins hopes on MicroNET, InfoPlex . . 13 . 42 . 69 . none.
      Dylan Tweney . September 24, 1979 . Sept. 24, 1979: First Online Service for Consumers Debuts . Wired.
    26. News: Ollig . Mark . October 31, 2011 . They could have owned the computer industry . Herald Journal . 2021-02-26 . none . February 27, 2021 . https://web.archive.org/web/20210227062954/http://www.herald-journal.com/archives/2011/columns/mo103111.html . live .
      Web site: 15 February 2012 . Tech before its time: Xerox's shooting Star computer . 2022-04-18 . New Scientist . en-US . none . April 18, 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220418181102/https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21328521-800-tech-before-its-time-xeroxs-shooting-star-computer/ . live . ; Web site: The Xerox Star . 2022-04-18 . toastytech.com . July 18, 2011 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110718030555/http://toastytech.com/guis/star.html . live .
    27. Web site: 1998-01-30 . ALL-IN-1 . DIGITAL Computing Timeline . April 20, 2022 . January 3, 2017 . https://web.archive.org/web/20170103002807/http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/gbell/Digital/timeline/1982-4.htm . live .
    28. Web site: HP Computer Museum . November 10, 2016 . September 9, 2016 . https://web.archive.org/web/20160909011243/http://www.hpmuseum.net/divisions.php?did=10 . live .
    29. https://merit.edu/research/nsfnet_article.php "Retiring the NSFNET Backbone Service: Chronicling the End of an Era"
    30. Web site: A Brief History of the Internet . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20150811053448/https://www.walthowe.com/navnet/history.html . 2015-08-11 . 1999cs........1011L . Leiner . Barry M. . Cerf . Vinton G. . Clark . David D. . Kahn . Robert E. . Kleinrock . Leonard . Lynch . Daniel C. . Postel . Jon . Roberts . Larry G. . Wolf . Stephen . 1999 . cs/9901011 .
    31. Rutter . Dorian . From Diversity to Convergence: British Computer Networks and the Internet, 1970-1995 . 2005 . Computer Science . The University of Warwick . December 23, 2022 . October 10, 2022 . https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221010/http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/1197/1/WRAP_THESIS_Rutter_2005.pdf . live .
    32. Campbell-Kelly . Martin . Garcia-Swartz . Daniel D . 2013 . The History of the Internet: The Missing Narratives . Journal of Information Technology . en . 28 . 1 . 18–33 . 10.1057/jit.2013.4 . 867087 . 41013 . 0268-3962.
    33. How E-mail Works. howstuffworks.com. 2008. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20170611181852/https://computer.howstuffworks.com/e-mail-messaging/email.htm. 2017-06-11.
    34. https://dnsdb.cit.cornell.edu/explain_mx.html "MX Record Explanation"
    35. Web site: What is open relay? . 2008-04-07 . 2004-07-19 . WhatIs.com . . https://web.archive.org/web/20070824005337/https://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid7_gci782509,00.html . 2007-08-24 .
    36. Book: Ch Seetha Ram. Information Technology for Management. 2010. Deep & Deep Publications. 978-81-8450-267-1. 164.
    37. Web site: Allowing Relaying in SMTP: A Series of Surveys . 2008-04-13 . Hoffman . Paul . 2002-08-20 . IMC Reports . . https://web.archive.org/web/20070118121843/https://www.imc.org/ube-relay.html . 2007-01-18 .
    38. The Internet message format is also used for network news
    39. Web site: Ken. Simpson. An update to the email standards. October 3, 2008. MailChannels Blog Entry. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20081006080735/https://blog.mailchannels.com/2008/10/update-to-email-standards.html. October 6, 2008.
    40. 5321. Simple Mail Transfer Protocol. October 2008. J. Klensin. 2.3.1. . Mail Objects. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-2.3.1. SMTP transports a mail object. A mail object contains an envelope and content. ... The SMTP content is sent in the SMTP DATA protocol unit, and has two parts: the header section and the body.. cs2.
    41. 5598. Internet Mail Architecture. July 2009. D. Crocker. 4.1. . Message Data. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5598#section-4.1. A message comprises a transit-handling envelope and the message content. The envelope contains information used by the MHS. The content is divided into a structured header and the body.. cs2.
    42. Web site: RFC 5322, Internet Message Format. P. Resnick, Ed. . P . Resnick . October 2008 . IETF . 10.17487/RFC5322 . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20150222194318/https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322. 2015-02-22.
    43. Web site: Moore. K. MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part Three: Message Header Extensions for Non-ASCII Text. IETF. 2012-01-21. November 1996 . 10.17487/RFC2047. 264604077. live . https://web.archive.org/web/20120114135211/https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2047. 2012-01-14.
    44. RFC 6532, Internationalized Email Headers. A Yang, Ed.. IETF Request for Comments (RFC) Pages - Test. February 2012. IETF. 10.17487/RFC6532 . 2070-1721. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20150218095512/https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6532. 2015-02-18. free.
    45. RFC 6531, SMTP Extension for Internationalized Email Addresses. J. Yao . W. Mao . IETF Request for Comments (RFC) Pages - Test. February 2012. IETF. 10.17487/RFC6531 . 2070-1721. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20150218034315/https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6531. 2015-02-18.
    46. News: Now, get your email address in Hindi - The Economic Times. The Economic Times. 2016-10-17. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20160828044631/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/now-get-your-email-address-in-hindi/articleshow/53830034.cms. 2016-08-28.
    47. Web site: RFC 5322, 3.6. Field Definitions . Tools.ietf.org . October 2008 . 2014-01-09 . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20131230021424/https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.6 . 2013-12-30 . Resnick . Pete . P . Resnick . 10.17487/RFC5322 .
    48. Web site: RFC 5322, 3.6.4. Identification Fields . Tools.ietf.org . October 2008 . 2014-01-09 . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20131230021424/https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.6.4 . 2013-12-30 . Resnick . Pete . P . Resnick . 10.17487/RFC5322 .
    49. Web site: RFC 5064 . Tools.ietf.org . December 2007 . 2014-01-09 . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20140725215530/https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5064 . 2014-07-25 . Dürst . Martin J. . 10.17487/RFC5064 .
    50. Microsoft, Auto Response Suppress, 2010, Microsoft reference, 2010 Sep 22
    51. Simple Mail Transfer Protocol. 5321. John Klensin. Trace Information. 4.4. October 2008 . IETF.
    52. Web site: Trace headers. John Levine. 14 January 2012. email message. IETF. 16 January 2012. there are many more trace fields than those two. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20120811135249/https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg04115.html. 11 August 2012.
    53. This extensible field is defined by RFC 7001, this also defines an IANA registry of Email Authentication Parameters.
    54. RFC 7208.
    55. Web site: RFC6376 . 2011 . 10.17487/RFC6376 . 28 January 2020 . Crocker . Hansen . Kucherawy . D . T . M . Crocker . D. . Hansen . T. . Kucherawy . M. . free . October 1, 2018 . https://web.archive.org/web/20181001085643/https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6376 . live .
    56. Defined in RFC 3834, and updated by RFC 5436.
    57. RFC 5518.
    58. Book: TCP/IP Network Administration. 2002. 978-0-596-00297-8. Craig Hunt. O'Reilly Media. 70.
    59. Not using Internationalized Email or MIME
    60. Web site: What is unicode? . 2022-01-31. Konfinity . January 31, 2022. https://web.archive.org/web/20220131083432/https://www.konfinity.com/what-is-unicode. live.
    61. Web site: Email policies that prevent viruses. https://web.archive.org/web/20070512053927/https://advosys.ca/papers/mail-policies.html . Advosys Consulting . 2007-05-12. dead.
    62. Web site: Problem Solving: Sending Messages in Plain Text . When posting to a RootsWeb mailing list, your message should be sent as "plain text." . RootsWeb HelpDesk . 2014-01-09 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20140219024856/https://helpdesk.rootsweb.com/listadmins/plaintext.html . 2014-02-19 .
    63. Web site: OpenBSD Mailing Lists . Plain text, 72 characters per line . OpenBSD . 2014-01-09 . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20140208005706/https://openbsd.org/mail.html . 2014-02-08 .
    64. Web site: Verhindern, dass die Datei "Winmail.dat" an Internetbenutzer gesendet wird . How to Prevent the Winmail.dat File from Being Sent to Internet Users . Microsoft Support . 2010-07-02 . 2014-01-09 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20140109193922/https://support.microsoft.com/kb/138053 . 2014-01-09 .
    65. In practice, some accepted messages may nowadays not be delivered to the recipient's InBox, but instead to a Spam or Junk folder which, especially in a corporate environment, may be inaccessible to the recipient
    66. Web site: View only unread messages . support.microsoft.com . November 13, 2021 . November 13, 2021 . https://web.archive.org/web/20211113164358/https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/view-only-unread-messages-f2c8450c-9cd0-4037-a5d3-26f6946727ca . live .
    67. Web site: Free Email Providers in the Yahoo! Directory. dir.yahoo.com. https://web.archive.org/web/20140704154604/https://dir.yahoo.com/business_and_economy/business_to_business/communications_and_networking/internet_and_world_wide_web/email_providers/free_email/. 2014-07-04. dead.
    68. RFC 2368 section 3 : by Paul Hoffman in 1998 discusses operation of the "mailto" URL.
    69. Web site: Creating hyperlinks § E-mail links. MDN Web Docs. en. 2019-09-30. August 18, 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20190818224233/https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/HTML/Introduction_to_HTML/Creating_hyperlinks. live.
    70. Book: Allen, David . Windows to Linux . Prentice Hall . 2004 . 192 . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20161226051835/https://books.google.com/books?id=UD0h_GqgbHgC&printsec=frontcover&dq=network%2B+guide+to+networks&ct=result&resnum=1 . 2016-12-26 . 978-1423902454 .
    71. 1733 . DISTRIBUTED ELECTRONIC MAIL MODELS IN IMAP4 . 4.5. . Implementation and Operation .
    72. 5598 . Internet Mail Architecture . 4.2.2. . Message Store (MS) .
    73. By Om Malik, GigaOm. "Is Email a Curse or a Boon? " September 22, 2010. Retrieved October 11, 2010.
    74. Martin . Brett A. S. . Van Durme . Joel . Raulas . Mika . Merisavo . Marko . 2003 . E-mail Marketing: Exploratory Insights from Finland . Journal of Advertising Research . 43 . 3 . 293–300 . 10.1017/s0021849903030265 . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20121021150626/https://www.basmartin.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Martin-et-al-2003.pdf . 2012-10-21 . 0021-8499.
    75. Web site: Spam culture, part 1: China. Amir. Lev. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20161110174233/https://www.computerworld.com/article/2467778/endpoint-security/spam-culture--part-1--china.html. 2016-11-10. 2009-10-02.
    76. Book: Hansen . Derek . Smith . Marc A. . Heer . Jeffrey . Jeffrey Heer . E-Mail . https://books.google.com/books?id=fCfrCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA245 . Barnett . George A . Encyclopedia of social networks . Sage . Thousand Oaks, Calif . 2011 . 9781412994170 . 245 . 959670912.
    77. Web site: Email Is Top Activity On Smartphones, Ahead Of Web Browsing & Facebook [Study]]. 28 March 2013. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20140429184034/https://marketingland.com/smartphone-activities-study-email-web-facebook-37954. 29 April 2014.
    78. Web site: The ultimate mobile email statistics overview. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20140711160527/https://www.emailmonday.com/mobile-email-usage-statistics. 2014-07-11.
    79. News: E-Mail Gets an Instant Makeover. subscription . Richtel. Matt. The New York Times. 2010-12-20. 2018-04-04. April 5, 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20180405033137/https://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/21/technology/21email.html. live.
    80. News: Why Are Young People Abandoning Email?. subscription . Gustini. Ray. The Atlantic. 2010-12-21. 2018-04-04. April 5, 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20180405024822/https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2010/12/why-are-young-people-abandoning-email/339329/. live.
    81. News: Email is dying among mobile's youngest users. Perez. Sarah. TechCrunch . 2016-03-24. 2018-04-04. April 5, 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20180405025214/https://techcrunch.com/2016/03/24/email-is-dying-among-mobiles-youngest-users/. live.
    82. Web site: live . Set Message Size Limits in Exchange 2010 and Exchange 2007 . https://web.archive.org/web/20130212114611/https://exchangepedia.com/2007/09/exchange-server-2007-setting-message-size-limits.html . 2013-02-12 . Bharat . Suneja . Exchangepedia . September 10, 2007 .
    83. Web site: Humphries . Matthew . Jun 29, 2009 . Google updates file size limits for Gmail and YouTube . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20111219141547/https://www.geek.com/articles/news/google-updates-file-size-limits-for-gmail-and-youtube-20090629 . Dec 19, 2011 . Geek.com.
    84. https://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=8770&topic=1517 "Maximum attachment size", Gmail Help.
    85. Walther . Henrik . January 2009 . Mysterious Attachment Size Increases, Replicating Public Folders, and More . . . 2021-11-07. Exchange Queue & A.
    86. https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Send-large-files-to-other-people-7005da19-607a-47d5-b2c5-8f3982c6cc83 "Send large files to other people"
    87. https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/8-ways-to-email-large-attachments/ "8 ways to email large attachments"
    88. Web site: Radicati. Sara. Email Statistics Report, 2010. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20110901222039/https://www.radicati.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Email-Statistics-Report-2010-2014-Executive-Summary2.pdf. 2011-09-01.
    89. News: Gross. Doug. Happy Information Overload Day!. CNN. October 20, 2010. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20151023041454/https://edition.cnn.com/2010/TECH/web/10/20/information.overload.day/index.html. October 23, 2015. March 24, 2019.
    90. News: Struggling to Evade the E-Mail Tsunami. 2008-04-20. The New York Times. Randall. Stross. May 1, 2010. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20090417094850/https://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/technology/20digi.html. April 17, 2009.
    91. Web site: Seeing Spam? How To Take Care of Your Google Analytics Data. sitepronews.com. 5 September 2017. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20171107005139/https://www.sitepronews.com/2015/05/04/seeing-spam-how-to-take-care-of-your-google-analytics-data/. 7 November 2017. 2015-05-04.
    92. Rich Kawanagh. The top ten email spam list of 2005. ITVibe news, 2006, January 02, ITvibe.com
    93. How Microsoft is losing the war on spam Salon.com
    94. Spam Bill 2003 (PDF)
    95. https://www.wired.com/2015/07/google-says-ai-catches-99-9-percent-gmail-spam/ "Google Says Its AI Catches 99.9 Percent of Gmail Spam"
    96. https://securelist.com/analysis/quarterly-spam-reports/74682/spam-and-phishing-in-q1-2016/ "Spam and phishing in Q1 2016"
    97. Web site: Kaspersky Lab Spam and Phishing report. May 26, 2021. July 17, 2018. July 17, 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20180717183438/https://usa.kaspersky.com/about/press-releases/2018_fifa-2018-and-bitcoin-among-2017-most-luring-topics. live.
    98. Web site: 2021 Email Usage Statistics. October 5, 2021. October 5, 2021. October 5, 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20211005234608/https://www.thexyz.com/blog/2021-email-usage-statistics/. live.
    99. Web site: Waichulis . Arin . 2024-04-05 . Security Bite: iCloud Mail, Gmail, others shockingly bad at detecting malware, study finds . 2024-05-27 . 9to5Mac . en-US.
    100. Web site: When are email attachments safe to open? . 2024-05-27 . Cloudflare.
    101. Web site: Griffiths . James . 2020-05-02 . How a badly-coded computer virus caused billions in damage CNN Business . 2024-05-27 . . en.
    102. Web site: French . Laura . 2024-05-14 . LockBit ransomware spread in millions of emails via Phorpiex botnet . 2024-05-27 . SC Media . en.
    103. https://www.arxiv.org/pdf/1002.3176 SMEmail – A New Protocol for the Secure E-mail in Mobile Environments
    104. Web site: When Email Exchanges Become Binding Contracts. law.com. December 6, 2019. June 19, 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20190619151252/https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/almID/1202794877741/When-Email-Exchanges-Become-Binding-Contracts/. live.
    105. Catarina . Jessica . Feitel . Jesse . Inadvertent Contract Formation via Email under New York Law: An Update . Syracuse Law Review . 2019 . 69.
    106. News: Corfield. Gareth. UK court ruling says email signature blocks can sign binding contracts. 6 December 2019. The Register. October 17, 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191017063749/https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/09/30/email_signature_legally_binding_contract/. live.
    107. S. Kiesler . D. Zubrow . A.M. Moses . V. Geller . Affect in computer-mediated communication: an experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion. Human-Computer Interaction. 1. 77–104. 1985. 10.1207/s15327051hci0101_3.
    108. News: All We Are Saying.. The New York Times. December 23, 2007. 2007-12-24. Grant. Barrett. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20090417094849/https://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/23/weekinreview/23buzzwords.html. April 17, 2009.
    109. Web site: Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) Registry.In. registry.in. 2016-10-17. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20160513012539/https://registry.in/Internationalized_Domain_Names_IDNs. 2016-05-13.
    110. Web site: DataMail: World's first free linguistic email service supports eight India languages. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20161022080739/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/datamail-worlds-first-free-linguistic-email-service-supports-eight-india-languages/articleshow/54923001.cms. 2016-10-22.
    111. Web site: Made In India 'Datamail' Empowers Russia With Email Address In Russian Language - Digital Conqueror. 7 December 2016. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20170305005327/https://digitalconqurer.com/gadgets/made-india-datamail-empowers-russia-email-address-russian-language/. 5 March 2017.
    112. News: Software That Tracks E-Mail Is Raising Privacy Concerns. Amy Harmon. The New York Times. 2000-11-22. 2012-01-13.
    113. Web site: About.com . Email.about.com . 2013-12-19 . 2014-01-09 . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20160827203219/https://email.about.com/od/emailbehindthescenes/a/html_return_rcp.htm . 2016-08-27 .
    114. https://www.slipstick.com/outlook/email/microsoft-outlook-web-bugs-blocked-html-images "Outlook: Web Bugs & Blocked HTML Images"
    115. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/12/gmail-blows-up-e-mail-marketing-by-caching-all-images-on-google-servers/ "Gmail blows up e-mail marketing..."