Elliptic coordinate system should not be confused with Ecliptic coordinate system.
F1
F2
-a
+a
x
The most common definition of elliptic coordinates
(\mu,\nu)
\begin{align} x&=a \cosh\mu \cos\nu\\ y&=a \sinh\mu \sin\nu \end{align}
where
\mu
\nu\in[0,2\pi].
On the complex plane, an equivalent relationship is
x+iy=a \cosh(\mu+i\nu)
These definitions correspond to ellipses and hyperbolae. The trigonometric identity
x2 | |
a2\cosh2\mu |
+
y2 | |
a2\sinh2\mu |
=\cos2\nu+\sin2\nu=1
shows that curves of constant
\mu
x2 | |
a2\cos2\nu |
-
y2 | |
a2\sin2\nu |
=\cosh2\mu-\sinh2\mu=1
shows that curves of constant
\nu
In an orthogonal coordinate system the lengths of the basis vectors are known as scale factors. The scale factors for the elliptic coordinates
(\mu,\nu)
h\mu=h\nu=a\sqrt{\sinh2\mu+\sin2\nu}=a\sqrt{\cosh2\mu-\cos2\nu}.
Using the double argument identities for hyperbolic functions and trigonometric functions, the scale factors can be equivalently expressed as
h\mu=h\nu=a\sqrt{
1 | |
2 |
(\cosh2\mu-\cos2\nu)}.
Consequently, an infinitesimal element of area equals
\begin{align} dA&=h\muh\nud\mud\nu\\ &=a2\left(\sinh2\mu+\sin2\nu\right)d\mud\nu\\ &=a2\left(\cosh2\mu-\cos2\nu\right)d\mud\nu\\ &=
a2 | |
2 |
\left(\cosh2\mu-\cos2\nu\right)d\mud\nu \end{align}
and the Laplacian reads
\begin{align} \nabla2\Phi&=
1 | |
a2\left(\sinh2\mu+\sin2\nu\right) |
\left(
\partial2\Phi | |
\partial\mu2 |
+
\partial2\Phi | |
\partial\nu2 |
\right)\\ &=
1 | |
a2\left(\cosh2\mu-\cos2\nu\right) |
\left(
\partial2\Phi | |
\partial\mu2 |
+
\partial2\Phi | |
\partial\nu2 |
\right)\\ &=
2 | |
a2\left(\cosh2\mu-\cos2\nu\right) |
\left(
\partial2\Phi | |
\partial\mu2 |
+
\partial2\Phi | |
\partial\nu2 |
\right) \end{align}
Other differential operators such as
\nabla ⋅ F
\nabla x F
(\mu,\nu)
An alternative and geometrically intuitive set of elliptic coordinates
(\sigma,\tau)
\sigma=\cosh\mu
\tau=\cos\nu
\sigma
\tau
\tau
\sigma
(\sigma,\tau)
F1
F2
d1+d2
2a\sigma
d1-d2
2a\tau
F1
a(\sigma+\tau)
F2
a(\sigma-\tau)
F1
F2
x=-a
x=+a
A drawback of these coordinates is that the points with Cartesian coordinates (x,y) and (x,-y) have the same coordinates
(\sigma,\tau)
x=a\left.\sigma\right.\tau
y2=a2\left(\sigma2-1\right)\left(1-\tau2\right).
The scale factors for the alternative elliptic coordinates
(\sigma,\tau)
h\sigma=a\sqrt{
\sigma2-\tau2 | |
\sigma2-1 |
h\tau=a\sqrt{
\sigma2-\tau2 | |
1-\tau2 |
Hence, the infinitesimal area element becomes
dA=a2
\sigma2-\tau2 | |
\sqrt{\left(\sigma2-1\right)\left(1-\tau2\right) |
and the Laplacian equals
\nabla2\Phi=
1 | |
a2\left(\sigma2-\tau2\right) |
\left[ \sqrt{\sigma2-1}
\partial | |
\partial\sigma |
\left(\sqrt{\sigma2-1}
\partial\Phi | |
\partial\sigma |
\right)+\sqrt{1-\tau2
Other differential operators such as
\nabla ⋅ F
\nabla x F
(\sigma,\tau)
Elliptic coordinates form the basis for several sets of three-dimensional orthogonal coordinates:
z
x
y
Note that (ellipsoidal) Geographic coordinate system is a different concept from above.
The classic applications of elliptic coordinates are in solving partial differential equations, e.g., Laplace's equation or the Helmholtz equation, for which elliptic coordinates are a natural description of a system thus allowing a separation of variables in the partial differential equations. Some traditional examples are solving systems such as electrons orbiting a molecule or planetary orbits that have an elliptical shape.
The geometric properties of elliptic coordinates can also be useful. A typical example might involve an integration over all pairs of vectors
p
q
r=p+q
\left|p\right|
\left|q\right|
r
x
r=2a\hat{x
r
p
q