In the larger context of the Navier-Stokes equations (and especially in the context of potential theory), elementary flows are basic flows that can be combined, using various techniques, to construct more complex flows. In this article the term "flow" is used interchangeably with the term "solution" due to historical reasons.
The techniques involved to create more complex solutions can be for example by superposition, by techniques such as topology or considering them as local solutions on a certain neighborhood, subdomain or boundary layer and to be patched together. Elementary flows can be considered the basic building blocks (fundamental solutions, local solutions and solitons) of the different types of equations derived from the Navier-Stokes equations. Some of the flows reflect specific constraints such as incompressible or irrotational flows, or both, as in the case of potential flow, and some of the flows may be limited to the case of two dimensions.[1]
Due to the relationship between fluid dynamics and field theory, elementary flows are relevant not only to aerodynamics but to all field theory in general. To put it in perspective boundary layers can be interpreted as topological defects on generic manifolds, and considering fluid dynamics analogies and limit cases in electromagnetism, quantum mechanics and general relativity one can see how all these solutions are at the core of recent developments in theoretical physics such as the ads/cft duality, the SYK model, the physics of nematic liquids, strongly correlated systems and even to quark gluon plasmas.
For steady-state, spatially uniform flow of a fluid in the plane, the velocity vector is
v=v0\cos(\theta0)ex+v0\sin(\theta0)ey
v0
v0=|v|
\theta0
\theta0
ex
ey
Because this flow is incompressible (i.e.,
\nabla ⋅ v=0
\psi
vx=
\partial\psi | |
\partialy |
vy=-
\partial\psi | |
\partialx |
\psi=\psi0-v0\sin(\theta0)x+v0\cos(\theta0)y
\psi0
In cylindrical coordinates:
vr=-
1 | |
r |
\partial\psi | |
\partial\theta |
v\theta=
\partial\psi | |
\partialr |
\psi=\psi0+v0r\sin(\theta-\theta0)
This flow is irrotational (i.e.,
\nabla x v=0
\phi
vx=-
\partial\phi | |
\partialx |
vy=-
\partial\phi | |
\partialy |
\phi=\phi0-v0\cos(\theta0)x-v0\sin(\theta0)y
\phi0
vr=
\partial\phi | |
\partialr |
v\theta=
1 | |
r |
\partial\phi | |
\partial\theta |
\phi=\phi0-v0r\cos(\theta-\theta0)
The case of a vertical line emitting at a fixed rate a constant quantity of fluid Q per unit length is a line source. The problem has a cylindrical symmetry and can be treated in two dimensions on the orthogonal plane.
Line sources and line sinks (below) are important elementary flows because they play the role of monopole for incompressible fluids (which can also be considered examples of solenoidal fields i.e. divergence free fields). Generic flow patterns can be also de-composed in terms of multipole expansions, in the same manner as for electric and magnetic fields where the monopole is essentially the first non-trivial (e.g. constant) term of the expansion.
This flow pattern is also both irrotational and incompressible.
This is characterized by a cylindrical symmetry:
v=vr(r)er
Where the total outgoing flux is constant
\intSv ⋅ dS=
2\pi | |
\int | |
0 |
(vr(r)er) ⋅ (errd\theta)=2\pirvr(r)=Q
Therefore,
vr=
Q | |
2\pir |
This is derived from a stream function
\psi(r,\theta)=-
Q | |
2\pi |
\theta
\phi(r,\theta)=-
Q | |
2\pi |
lnr
The case of a vertical line absorbing at a fixed rate a constant quantity of fluid Q per unit length is a line sink. Everything is the same as the case of a line source a part from the negative sign.
vr=-
Q | |
2\pir |
\psi(r,\theta)=
Q | |
2\pi |
\theta
\phi(r,\theta)=
Q | |
2\pi |
lnr
If we consider a line source and a line sink at a distance d we can reuse the results above and the stream function will be
\psi(r)=\psiQ(r-d/2)-\psiQ(r+d/2) \simeqd ⋅ \nabla\psiQ(r)
Given
d=d[\cos(\theta0)ex+\sin(\theta0)ey]=d[\cos(\theta-\theta0)er+\sin(\theta-\theta0)e\theta]
\psi(r,\theta)=-
Qd | |
2\pi |
\sin(\theta-\theta0) | |
r |
vr(r,\theta)=
Qd | |
2\pi |
\cos(\theta-\theta0) | |
r2 |
v\theta(r,\theta)=
Qd | |
2\pi |
\sin(\theta-\theta0) | |
r2 |
\phi(r,\theta)=
Qd | |
2\pi |
\cos(\theta-\theta0) | |
r |
This is the case of a vortex filament rotating at constant speed, there is a cylindrical symmetry and the problem can be solved in the orthogonal plane.
Dual to the case above of line sources, vortex lines play the role of monopoles for irrotational flows.
Also in this case the flow is also both irrotational and incompressible and therefore a case of potential flow.
This is characterized by a cylindrical symmetry:
v=v\theta(r)e\theta
Where the total circulation is constant for every closed line around the central vortex
\ointv ⋅ ds=
2\pi | |
\int | |
0 |
(v\theta(r)e\theta) ⋅ (e\thetard\theta)=2\pirv\theta(r)=\Gamma
Therefore,
v\theta=
\Gamma | |
2\pir |
This is derived from a stream function
\psi(r,\theta)=
\Gamma | |
2\pi |
lnr
\phi(r,\theta)=-
\Gamma | |
2\pi |
\theta
Given an incompressible two-dimensional flow which is also irrotational we have:
\nabla2\psi=0
1 | |
r |
\partial | |
\partialr |
\left(r
\partial\psi | |
\partialr |
\right)+
1 | |
r2 |
\partial2\psi | |
\partial\theta2 |
=0
\psi(r,\theta)=R(r)\Theta(\theta)
r | |
R(r) |
d | |
dr |
\left(r
dR(r) | |
dr |
\right)=-
1 | |
\Theta(\theta) |
d2\Theta(\theta) | |
d\theta2 |
\theta
\theta
r
d | |
dr |
\left(r
d | |
dr |
R(r)\right)=m2R(r)
d2\Theta(\theta) | |
d\theta2 |
=-m2\Theta(\theta)
ei
e-i
therefore the most generic solution is given by
\psi=\alpha0+\beta0lnr+\summ{\left(\alphamrm+\betamr-m\right)\sin{[m(\theta- \thetam)]}}
The potential is instead given by
\phi=\alpha0-\beta0\theta+\summ{(\alphamrm-\betamr-m)\cos{[m(\theta- \thetam)]}}