Electromagnetic radiation and health explained

Electromagnetic radiation can be classified into two types: ionizing radiation and non-ionizing radiation, based on the capability of a single photon with more than 10 eV energy to ionize atoms or break chemical bonds.[1] Extreme ultraviolet and higher frequencies, such as X-rays or gamma rays are ionizing, and these pose their own special hazards: see radiation poisoning. The field strength of electromagnetic radiation is measured in volts per meter (V/m).

The most common health hazard of radiation is sunburn, which causes between approximately 100,000 and 1 million new skin cancers annually in the United States.[2]

In 2011, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) have classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B).[3]

Hazards

Dielectric heating from electromagnetic radiation can create a biological hazard. For example, touching or standing around an antenna while a high-power transmitter is in operation can cause burns. The mechanism is the same as that used in a microwave oven.[4]

The heating effect varies with the power and the frequency of the electromagnetic energy, as well as the inverse square of distance to the source. The eyes and testes are particularly susceptible to radio frequency heating due to the paucity of blood flow in these areas that could otherwise dissipate the heat buildup.[5]

Workplace exposure

Radio frequency (RF) energy at power density levels of 1–10 mW/cm2 or higher can cause measurable heating of tissues. Typical RF energy levels encountered by the general public are well below the level needed to cause significant heating, but certain workplace environments near high power RF sources may exceed safe exposure limits.[5] A measure of the heating effect is the specific absorption rate or SAR, which has units of watts per kilogram (W/kg). The IEEE[6] and many national governments have established safety limits for exposure to various frequencies of electromagnetic energy based on SAR, mainly based on ICNIRP Guidelines,[7] which guard against thermal damage.

Industrial installations for induction hardening and melting or on welding equipment may produce considerably higher field strengths and require further examination. If the exposure cannot be determined upon manufacturers' information, comparisons with similar systems or analytical calculations, measurements have to be accomplished. The results of the evaluation help to assess possible hazards to the safety and health of workers and to define protective measures. Since electromagnetic fields may influence passive or active implants of workers, it is essential to consider the exposure at their workplaces separately in the risk assessment.[8]

Low-level exposure

The World Health Organization (WHO) began a research effort in 1996 to study the health effects from the ever-increasing exposure of people to a diverse range of EMR sources. In 2011, the WHO/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)[9] has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer, associated with wireless phone use.

Epidemiological studies look for statistical correlations between EM exposure in the field and specific health effects. As of 2019, much of the current work is focused on the study of EM fields in relation to cancer.[10] There are publications which support the existence of complex biological and neurological effects of weaker non-thermal electromagnetic fields (see Bioelectromagnetics), including weak ELF electromagnetic fields[11] [12] and modulated RF and microwave fields.[13] [14]

Effects by frequency

While the most acute exposures to harmful levels of electromagnetic radiation are immediately realized as burns, the health effects due to chronic or occupational exposure may not manifest effects for months or years.

Extremely low frequency

Extremely low frequency EM waves can span from 0 Hz to 3 kHz, though definitions vary across disciplines. The maximum recommended exposure for the general public is 5 kV/m.

ELF waves around 50 Hz to 60 Hz are emitted by power generators, transmission lines and distribution lines, power cables, and electric appliances. Typical household exposure to ELF waves ranges in intensity from 5 V/m for a light bulb to 180 V/m for a stereo, measured at and using 240V power.[15] (120V power systems would be unable to reach this intensity unless an appliance has an internal voltage transformer.)

Overhead power lines range from 1kV for local distribution to 1,150 kV for ultra high voltage lines. These can produce electric fields up to 10kV/m on the ground directly underneath, but 50 m to 100 m away these levels return to approximately ambient. Metal equipment must be maintained at a safe distance from energized high-voltage lines.[16]

Exposure to ELF waves can induce an electric current. Because the human body is conductive, electric currents and resulting voltages differences typically accumulate on the skin but do not reach interior tissues. People can start to perceive high-voltage charges as tingling when hair or clothing in contact with the skin stands up or vibrates. In scientific tests, only about 10% of people could detect a field intensity in the range of 2-5 kV/m. Such voltage differences can also create electric sparks, similar to a discharge of static electricity when nearly touching a grounded object. When receiving such a shock at 5 kV/m, it was reported as painful by only 7% of test participants and by 50% of participants at 10 kV/m.[17]

Associations between exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ELF MF) and various health outcomes have been investigated through a variety of epidemiological studies. A pooled analysis found consistent evidence of an effect of ELF-MF on childhood leukaemia.[18] An assessment of the burden of disease potentially resulting from ELF MF exposure in Europe found that 1.5–2% of childhood leukaemia cases might be attributable to ELF MF, but uncertainties around causal mechanisms and models of dose-response were found to be considerable.[19]

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) finds "inadequate evidence" for human carcinogenicity.[20]

Shortwave

Shortwave (1.6 to 30 MHz) diathermy (where EM waves are used to produce heat) can be used as a therapeutic technique for its analgesic effect and deep muscle relaxation, but has largely been replaced by ultrasound. Temperatures in muscles can increase by 4–6 °C, and subcutaneous fat by 15 °C. The FCC has restricted the frequencies allowed for medical treatment, and most machines in the US use 27.12 MHz.[21] Shortwave diathermy can be applied in either continuous or pulsed mode. The latter came to prominence because the continuous mode produced too much heating too rapidly, making patients uncomfortable. The technique only heats tissues that are good electrical conductors, such as blood vessels and muscle. Adipose tissue (fat) receives little heating by induction fields because an electrical current is not actually going through the tissues.[22]

Studies have been performed on the use of shortwave radiation for cancer therapy and promoting wound healing, with some success. However, at a sufficiently high energy level, shortwave energy can be harmful to human health, potentially causing damage to biological tissues, for example by overheating or inducing electrical currents.[23] The FCC limits for maximum permissible workplace exposure to shortwave radio frequency energy in the range of 3–30 MHz has a plane-wave equivalent power density of (900/f2) mW/cm2 where f is the frequency in MHz, and 100 mW/cm2 from 0.3 to 3.0 MHz. For uncontrolled exposure to the general public, the limit is 180/f2 between 1.34 and 30 MHz.[5]

Radio and microwave frequencies

See also: Wireless device radiation and health and Microwave burn.

The designation of mobile phone signals as "possibly carcinogenic to humans" by the World Health Organization (WHO): "A positive association has been observed between exposure to the agent and cancer for which a causal interpretation is considered by the Working Group to be credible, but chance, bias or confounding could not be ruled out with reasonable confidence."[24] This classification has been interpreted to mean that there is very little scientific evidence as to phone signal carcinogenesis.[25]

In 2011, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified mobile phone radiation as Group 2B "possibly carcinogenic" (rather than Group 2A "probably carcinogenic" nor the "is carcinogenic" Group 1). That means that there "could be some risk" of carcinogenicity, so additional research into the long-term, heavy use of mobile phones needs to be conducted.[26] The WHO concluded in 2014 that "A large number of studies have been performed over the last two decades to assess whether mobile phones pose a potential health risk. To date, no adverse health effects have been established as being caused by mobile phone use."[27] [28]

Since 1962, the microwave auditory effect or tinnitus has been shown from radio frequency exposure at levels below significant heating.[29] Studies during the 1960s in Europe and Russia claimed to show effects on humans, especially the nervous system, from low energy RF radiation; the studies were disputed at the time.[30]

In 2019, reporters from the Chicago Tribune tested the level of radiation from smartphones and found that certain models emitted more than reported by the manufacturers and in some cases more than the U.S. Federal Communications Commission exposure limit. It is unclear if this resulted in any harm to consumers. Some problems apparently involved the phone's ability to detect proximity to a human body and lower the radio power. In response, the FCC began testing some phones itself rather than relying solely on manufacturer certifications.[31]

Microwave and other radio frequencies cause heating, and this can cause burns or eye damage if delivered in high intensity,[32] or hyperthermia as with any powerful heat source. Microwave ovens use this form of radiation, and have shielding to prevent it from leaking out and unintentionally heating nearby objects or people.

Millimeter waves

In 2009, the US TSA introduced full-body scanners as a primary screening modality in airport security, first as backscatter X-ray scanners, which use ionizing radiation and which the European Union banned in 2011 due to health and safety concerns. These were followed by non-ionizing millimeter wave scanners.[33] Likewise WiGig for personal area networks have opened the 60 GHz and above microwave band to SAR exposure regulations. Previously, microwave applications in these bands were for point-to-point satellite communication with minimal human exposure.[34]

Infrared

Infrared wavelengths longer than 750 nm can produce changes in the lens of the eye. Glassblower's cataract is an example of a heat injury that damages the anterior lens capsule among unprotected glass and iron workers. Cataract-like changes can occur in workers who observe glowing masses of glass or iron without protective eyewear for prolonged periods over many years.[35]

Exposing skin to infrared radiation near visible light (IR-A) leads to increased production of free radicals.[36] Short-term exposure can be beneficial (activating protective responses), while prolonged exposure can lead to photoaging.[37]

Another important factor is the distance between the worker and the source of radiation. In the case of arc welding, infrared radiation decreases rapidly as a function of distance, so that farther than three feet away from where welding takes place, it does not pose an ocular hazard anymore but, ultraviolet radiation still does. This is why welders wear tinted glasses and surrounding workers only have to wear clear ones that filter UV.

Visible light

Photic retinopathy is damage to the macular area of the eye's retina that results from prolonged exposure to sunlight, particularly with dilated pupils. This can happen, for example, while observing a solar eclipse without suitable eye protection. The Sun's radiation creates a photochemical reaction that can result in visual dazzling and a scotoma. The initial lesions and edema will disappear after several weeks, but may leave behind a permanent reduction in visual acuity.[38]

Moderate and high-power lasers are potentially hazardous because they can burn the retina of the eye, or even the skin. To control the risk of injury, various specifications – for example ANSI Z136 in the US, EN 60825-1/A2 in Europe, and IEC 60825 internationally – define "classes" of lasers depending on their power and wavelength.[39] [40] Regulations prescribe required safety measures, such as labeling lasers with specific warnings, and wearing laser safety goggles during operation (see laser safety).

As with its infrared and ultraviolet radiation dangers, welding creates an intense brightness in the visible light spectrum, which may cause temporary flash blindness. Some sources state that there is no minimum safe distance for exposure to these radiation emissions without adequate eye protection.[41]

Ultraviolet

Sunlight includes sufficient ultraviolet power to cause sunburn within hours of exposure, and the burn severity increases with the duration of exposure. This effect is a response of the skin called erythema, which is caused by a sufficient strong dose of UV-B. The Sun's UV output is divided into UV-A and UV-B: solar UV-A flux is 100 times that of UV-B, but the erythema response is 1,000 times higher for UV-B. This exposure can increase at higher altitudes and when reflected by snow, ice, or sand. The UV-B flux is 2–4 times greater during the middle 4–6 hours of the day, and is not significantly absorbed by cloud cover or up to a meter of water.[42]

Ultraviolet light, specifically UV-B, has been shown to cause cataracts and there is some evidence that sunglasses worn at an early age can slow its development in later life.[43] Most UV light from the sun is filtered out by the atmosphere and consequently airline pilots often have high rates of cataracts because of the increased levels of UV radiation in the upper atmosphere.[44] It is hypothesized that depletion of the ozone layer and a consequent increase in levels of UV light on the ground may increase future rates of cataracts.[45] Note that the lens filters UV light, so if it is removed via surgery, one may be able to see UV light.[46] [47]

Prolonged exposure to ultraviolet radiation from the sun can lead to melanoma and other skin malignancies.[48] Clear evidence establishes ultraviolet radiation, especially the non-ionizing medium wave UVB, as the cause of most non-melanoma skin cancers, which are the most common forms of cancer in the world. UV rays can also cause wrinkles, liver spots, moles, and freckles. In addition to sunlight, other sources include tanning beds, and bright desk lights. Damage is cumulative over one's lifetime, so that permanent effects may not be evident for some time after exposure.[49]

Ultraviolet radiation of wavelengths shorter than 300 nm (actinic rays) can damage the corneal epithelium. This is most commonly the result of exposure to the sun at high altitude, and in areas where shorter wavelengths are readily reflected from bright surfaces, such as snow, water, and sand. UV generated by a welding arc can similarly cause damage to the cornea, known as "arc eye" or welding flash burn, a form of photokeratitis.[50] Fluorescent light bulbs and tubes internally produce ultraviolet light. Normally this is converted to visible light by the phosphor film inside a protective coating. When the film is cracked by mishandling or faulty manufacturing then UV may escape at levels that could cause sunburn or even skin cancer.[51] [52]

Regulation

In the United States, nonionizing radiation is regulated in the Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968 and the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.[53]

See also

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. Book: Robert F. . Cleveland Jr . Jerry L. . Ulcek . vanc . Questions and Answers about Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields . OET (Office of Engineering and Technology) Federal Communications Commission . Washington, D.C. . 4th . August 1999 . 2019-01-29 . 30 June 2019 . https://web.archive.org/web/20190630222229/https://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet56/oet56e4.pdf . live .
  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2020 . CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians . 70 . 1 . 7–30 . January 2020 . 31912902 . 10.3322/caac.21590 . free .
  3. News: Gaudin, Ph.D.. Nicolas. 31 May 2011. IARC Classifies Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields As Possibly Carcinogenic to Humans. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 20 Nov 2021. 4 April 2012. https://web.archive.org/web/20120404203349/http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf. live.
  4. Book: Biological and Medical Aspects of Electromagnetic Fields . Frank S. . Barnes . Ben . Greenebaum . vanc . 3 . CRC Press . 2018 . 978-1420009460 . 378 . 29 January 2019 . 4 January 2021 . https://web.archive.org/web/20210104093511/https://books.google.com/books?id=B-bKBQAAQBAJ&pg=PT378 . live .
  5. Web site: Questions and Answers about Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields . Robert F. . Cleveland Jr . Jerry L. . Ulcek . vanc . Office of Engineering and Technology, Federal Communications Commission . OET Bulletin 56 . Fourth . August 1999 . 7 . 2019-02-02 . 30 June 2019 . https://web.archive.org/web/20190630222229/https://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet56/oet56e4.pdf . live .
  6. Standard for Safety Level with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3KHz to 300GHz . IEEE STD . C95.1-2005 . IEEE . October 2005 . 23 May 2015 . 7 May 2015 . https://web.archive.org/web/20150507092948/http://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/C95.1-2005.html . dead .
  7. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection . Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection . Health Physics . 74 . 4 . 494–522 . April 1998 . 9525427 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20081113052702/http://www.icnirp.de/documents/emfgdl.pdf . 2008-11-13 .
  8. Web site: Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance. Electromagnetic fields: key topics and projects.
  9. https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr208_E.pdf
  10. Web site: What are electromagnetic fields? – Summary of health effects . World Health Organization . 2019-02-07 . 16 October 2019 . https://web.archive.org/web/20191016020000/https://www.who.int/peh-emf/about/WhatisEMF/en/index1.html . live .
  11. Delgado JM, Leal J, Monteagudo JL, Gracia MG . Embryological changes induced by weak, extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields . Journal of Anatomy . 134 . Pt 3 . 533–551 . May 1982 . 7107514 . 1167891 .
  12. Harland JD, Liburdy RP . Environmental magnetic fields inhibit the antiproliferative action of tamoxifen and melatonin in a human breast cancer cell line . Bioelectromagnetics . 18 . 8 . 555–562 . 1997 . 9383244 . 10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1997)18:8<555::AID-BEM4>3.0.CO;2-1 . 29 June 2019 . 16 December 2019 . https://web.archive.org/web/20191216194119/https://zenodo.org/record/1235522 . live .
  13. Aalto S, Haarala C, Brück A, Sipilä H, Hämäläinen H, Rinne JO . Mobile phone affects cerebral blood flow in humans . Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism . 26 . 7 . 885–890 . July 2006 . 16495939 . 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600279 . free .
  14. Pall ML . Microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produce widespread neuropsychiatric effects including depression . Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy . 75 . Pt B . 43–51 . September 2016 . 26300312 . 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.08.001 . free .
  15. Web site: Radiation: Electromagnetic fields - Q&A . . 4 August 2016 . 21 January 2022 . 18 January 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220118185654/https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/radiation-electromagnetic-fields . live .
  16. Web site: How to identify powerline voltage level and safe clearance level . Ubong Edet . Dec 6, 2017 . 21 January 2022 . 12 May 2021 . https://web.archive.org/web/20210512153534/https://hsewatch.com/powerline . live .
  17. https://web.archive.org/web/20070629003658/http://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/elf_ehc/en/index.html Extremely Low Frequency Fields Environmental Health Criteria Monograph No.238
  18. ((Kheifets, L.)), ((Ahlbom, A.)), ((Crespi, C. M.)), ((Draper, G.)), ((Hagihara, J.)), ((Lowenthal, R. M.)), ((Mezei, G.)), ((Oksuzyan, S.)), ((Schüz, J.)), ((Swanson, J.)), ((Tittarelli, A.)), ((Vinceti, M.)), ((Wunsch Filho, V.)) . British Journal of Cancer . Pooled analysis of recent studies on magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia . 103 . 7 . 1128–1135 . Nature Publishing Group . September 2010 . 1532-1827 . 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605838. 20877339 . 2965855 .
  19. ((Grellier, J.)), ((Ravazzani, P.)), ((Cardis, E.)) . Environment International . Potential health impacts of residential exposures to extremely low frequency magnetic fields in Europe . 62 . 55–63 . Pergamon . 2014 . 10.1016/j.envint.2013.09.017. 24161447 . 2014EnInt..62...55G . 10044/1/41782 . free .
  20. Web site: Power Lines, Electrical Devices, and Extremely Low Frequency Radiation . 22 April 2020 . 11 April 2020 . https://web.archive.org/web/20200411110119/https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/radiation-exposure/extremely-low-frequency-radiation.html . live .
  21. Book: Bonica's Management of Pain . Scott . Fishman . Jane . Ballantyne . James P. . Rathmell . vanc . Lippincott Williams & Wilkins . 2010 . 978-0781768276 . 1589 . 1 February 2019 . 18 August 2021 . https://web.archive.org/web/20210818115515/https://books.google.com/books?id=Pms0hxH8f-sC&pg=PA1589 . live .
  22. Book: Therapeutic Modalities: The Art and the Science . Knight KL, Draper DO . Lippincott Williams & Wilkins . 2008 . 978-0781757447 . 288 . 1 February 2019 . 15 December 2019 . https://web.archive.org/web/20191215052423/https://books.google.com/books?id=aMwKx91zI18C&pg=PA288 . live .
  23. Yu C, Peng RY . Biological effects and mechanisms of shortwave radiation: a review . Military Medical Research . 4 . 24 . 2017 . 28729909 . 5518414 . 10.1186/s40779-017-0133-6 . free .
  24. Web site: IARC classifies Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans . 2024-06-16 . www.iarc.who.int . en-US.
  25. Boice JD, Tarone RE . Cell phones, cancer, and children . Journal of the National Cancer Institute . 103 . 16 . 1211–1213 . August 2011 . 21795667 . 10.1093/jnci/djr285 . free .
  26. IARC classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans . press release N° 208 . . 31 May 2011 . 2 June 2011 . 1 June 2011 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110601063650/http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf . live .
  27. Web site: Electromagnetic fields and public health: mobile phones – Fact sheet N°193 . World Health Organization . October 2014 . 2 August 2016 . 6 August 2016 . https://web.archive.org/web/20160806074308/http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs193/en/ . live .
  28. http://www.euitt.upm.es/estaticos/catedra-coitt/web_salud_medioamb/Informes/informes_PDF/rf/HealthCanada/99ehd237.pdf Limits of Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in the Frequency Range from 3 kHz to 300 GHz
  29. Frey AH . Human auditory system response to modulated electromagnetic energy . Journal of Applied Physiology . 17 . 4 . 689–692 . July 1962 . 13895081 . 10.1152/jappl.1962.17.4.689 . 12359057 .
  30. Book: Michaelson. Sol M.. vanc. Calvin. Melvin. Gazenko. Oleg G. 1975. Ecological and Physiological Bases of Space Biology and Medicine. NASA Scientific and Technical Information Office. Washington, D.C.. 409–452 [427–430]. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19760019731.pdf. Volume II Book 2 of Foundations of Space Biology and Medicine. Radio-Frequency and Microwave Energies, Magnetic and Electric Fields. 19 December 2018. 7 March 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/20170307030322/https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19760019731.pdf. live.
  31. News: We tested popular cellphones for radiofrequency radiation. Now the FCC is investigating. . Sam Roe . . August 21, 2019 .
  32. "Microwaves, Radio Waves, and Other Types of Radiofrequency Radiation." American Cancer Society, http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/radiation-exposure/radiofrequency-radiation.html
  33. News: Khan . Farah Naz . vanc . Is That Airport Security Scanner Really Safe? . Scientific American . 2020-03-28 . 2017-12-18 . en . 17 December 2019 . https://web.archive.org/web/20191217045222/https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/is-that-airport-security-scanner-really-safe/ . live .
  34. Web site: Characterization of 60GHz Millimeter-Wave Focusing Beam for Living-Body Exposure Experiments, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Masaki KOUZAI et al., 2009 . 18 January 2014 . 1 February 2014 . https://web.archive.org/web/20140201213651/http://www.ieice.org/proceedings/EMC09/pdf/22S1-1.pdf . live .
  35. Book: Clinical Practice in Small Incision Cataract Surgery . Luther L. . Fry . Ashok . Garg . Francisco . Guitérrez-Camona . Suresh K. . Pandey . Geoffrey . Tabin . vanc . CRC Press . 2004 . 0203311825 . 79 . 31 January 2019 . 15 December 2019 . https://web.archive.org/web/20191215060611/https://books.google.com/books?id=Gswq6FvdU7oC&pg=PA79 . live .
  36. Schieke SM, Schroeder P, Krutmann J . Cutaneous effects of infrared radiation: from clinical observations to molecular response mechanisms . Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine . 19 . 5 . 228–234 . October 2003 . 14535893 . 10.1034/j.1600-0781.2003.00054.x . free .
  37. Tsai SR, Hamblin MR . Biological effects and medical applications of infrared radiation . Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology . 170 . 197–207 . May 2017 . 28441605 . 5505738 . 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.04.014 . free . 2017JPPB..170..197T .
  38. Book: Clinical Environmental Health and Toxic Exposures . John Burke . Sullivan . Gary R. . Krieger . vanc . Lippincott Williams & Wilkins . 2001 . 978-0683080278 . 275 .
  39. Web site: Laser Standards and Classifications . Rockwell Laser Industries . 2019-02-10 . 8 April 2017 . https://web.archive.org/web/20170408100339/http://rli.com/resources/articles/classification.aspx . live .
  40. Web site: Lasermet . An Overview of the LED and Laser Classification System in EN 60825-1 and IEC 60825-1 . 2019-02-10 . 12 February 2019 . https://web.archive.org/web/20190212012026/https://www.lasermet.com/resources/classification_overview.php . live .
  41. Web site: What is the minimum safe distance from the welding arc above which there is no risk of eye damage? . The Welding Institute (TWI Global) . 10 March 2014 . https://web.archive.org/web/20140310115217/http://www.twi-global.com/technical-knowledge/faqs/health-and-safety-faqs/faq-what-is-the-minimum-safe-distance-from-the-welding-arc-above-which-there-is-no-risk-of-eye-damage/ . 10 March 2014 . dead .
  42. Book: SPEC – Andrews' Diseases of the Skin . William D. . James . Dirk . Elston . Timothy . Berger . vanc . 11 . Elsevier Health Sciences . 2011 . 978-1437736199 . 23–24 .
  43. Sliney DH . UV radiation ocular exposure dosimetry . Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology . 88 . 3–4 . 243–254 . 1994 . 7634993 . 10.1007/bf01203678 . 8242055 .
  44. Rafnsson V, Olafsdottir E, Hrafnkelsson J, Sasaki H, Arnarsson A, Jonasson F . Cosmic radiation increases the risk of nuclear cataract in airline pilots: a population-based case-control study . Archives of Ophthalmology . 123 . 8 . 1102–1105 . August 2005 . 16087845 . 10.1001/archopht.123.8.1102 . free .
  45. Dobson R . Ozone depletion will bring big rise in number of cataracts. BMJ. 331. 7528. 1292–1295. 2005. 1298891 . 10.1136/bmj.331.7528.1292-d .
  46. Web site: Case study of ultraviolet vision after IOL removal for Cataract Surgery . Komarnitsky . 17 January 2014 . 9 February 2014 . https://web.archive.org/web/20140209130900/http://www.komar.org/faq/colorado-cataract-surgery-crystalens/ultra-violet-color-glow/ . live .
  47. Griswold MS, Stark WS . Scotopic spectral sensitivity of phakic and aphakic observers extending into the near ultraviolet . Vision Research . 32 . 9 . 1739–1743 . September 1992 . 1455745 . 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90166-G . 45178405 .
  48. Book: Cleaver JE, Mitchell DL . Bast RC, Kufe DW, Pollock RE . Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine . 5th . B.C. Decker . Hamilton, Ontario . 2000 . 15. Ultraviolet Radiation Carcinogenesis . 1-55009-113-1 . https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20854/ . 31 January 2011 . etal . 4 September 2015 . https://web.archive.org/web/20150904102726/http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20854/ . live .
  49. Web site: UV Exposure & Your Health . UV Awareness . 10 March 2014 . 2 May 2019 . https://web.archive.org/web/20190502112551/http://www.uvawareness.com/uv-info/uv-exposure.php . live .
  50. Web site: Ultraviolet keratitis. Medscape. 31 May 2017. 1 November 2015. https://web.archive.org/web/20151101111139/http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/799025-overview. live.
  51. Mironava T, Hadjiargyrou M, Simon M, Rafailovich MH . The effects of UV emission from compact fluorescent light exposure on human dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes in vitro . Photochemistry and Photobiology . 88 . 6 . 1497–1506 . 20 July 2012 . 22724459 . 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2012.01192.x . 2626216 .
  52. Nicole W . Ultraviolet Leaks from CFLs . Environmental Health Perspectives . 120 . 10 . a387 . October 2012 . 23026199 . 3491932 . 10.1289/ehp.120-a387 .
  53. Book: Fundamental and Applied Aspects of Nonionizing Radiation . Solomon . Michaelson . vanc . Springer Science & Business Media . 2012 . 978-1468407600 . xv . 30 January 2019 . 14 December 2019 . https://web.archive.org/web/20191214052605/https://books.google.com/books?id=bezTBwAAQBAJ . live .