Dynamic risk measure explained

In financial mathematics, a conditional risk measure is a random variable of the financial risk (particularly the downside risk) as if measured at some point in the future. A risk measure can be thought of as a conditional risk measure on the trivial sigma algebra.

A dynamic risk measure is a risk measure that deals with the question of how evaluations of risk at different times are related. It can be interpreted as a sequence of conditional risk measures. [1]

A different approach to dynamic risk measurement has been suggested by Novak.[2]

Conditional risk measure

Consider a portfolio's returns at some terminal time

T

as a random variable that is uniformly bounded, i.e.,

X\inLinfty\left(l{F}T\right)

denotes the payoff of a portfolio. A mapping

\rhot:Linfty\left(l{F}T\right)

infty
L
t

=Linfty\left(l{F}t\right)

is a conditional risk measure if it has the following properties for random portfolio returns

X,Y\inLinfty\left(l{F}T\right)

:[3]
Conditional cash invariance

\forallmt\in

infty
L
t:

\rhot(X+mt)=\rhot(X)-mt

Monotonicity

IfX\leqYthen\rhot(X)\geq\rhot(Y)

Normalization

\rhot(0)=0

If it is a conditional convex risk measure then it will also have the property:

Conditional convexity

\forallλ\in

infty
L
t,

0\leqλ\leq1:\rhot(λX+(1-λ)Y)\leqλ\rhot(X)+(1-λ)\rhot(Y)

A conditional coherent risk measure is a conditional convex risk measure that additionally satisfies:

Conditional positive homogeneity

\forallλ\in

infty
L
t,

λ\geq0:\rhot(λX)=λ\rhot(X)

Acceptance set

See main article: Acceptance set. The acceptance set at time

t

associated with a conditional risk measure is

At=\{X\in

infty
L
T:

\rhot(X)\leq0a.s.\}

.

If you are given an acceptance set at time

t

then the corresponding conditional risk measure is

\rhot=essinf\{Y\in

infty
L
t:

X+Y\inAt\}

where

essinf

is the essential infimum.[4]

Regular property

A conditional risk measure

\rhot

is said to be regular if for any

X\in

infty
L
T
and

A\inl{F}t

then

\rhot(1AX)=1A\rhot(X)

where

1A

is the indicator function on

A

. Any normalized conditional convex risk measure is regular.[5]

The financial interpretation of this states that the conditional risk at some future node (i.e.

\rhot(X)[\omega]

) only depends on the possible states from that node. In a binomial model this would be akin to calculating the risk on the subtree branching off from the point in question.

Time consistent property

See main article: Time consistency. A dynamic risk measure is time consistent if and only if

\rhot+1(X)\leq\rhot+1(Y)\rhot(X)\leq\rhot(Y)\forallX,Y\inL0(l{F}T)

.[6]

Example: dynamic superhedging price

The dynamic superhedging price involves conditional risk measures of the form

\rhot(-X)=\operatorname*{ess\sup}QEQ[X|l{F}t]

. It is shown that this is a time consistent risk measure.

Notes and References

  1. Acciaio . Beatrice . Penner . Irina . 2011 . Advanced Mathematical Methods for Finance . 1–34 . Dynamic risk measures . July 22, 2010 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20110902182345/http://wws.mathematik.hu-berlin.de/~penner/Acciaio_Penner.pdf . September 2, 2011 .
  2. Book: Novak. S.Y.. On measures of financial risk. In: Current Topics on Risk Analysis: ICRA6 and RISK 2015 Conference, M. Guillén et al. (Eds). 541–549. 2015. 978-849844-4964.
  3. Föllmer . Hans . Penner . Irina . 2006 . Convex risk measures and the dynamics of their penalty functions . Statistics & Decisions . 24 . 1 . 61–96. 10.1524/stnd.2006.24.1.61 . 10.1.1.604.2774 . 54734936 .
  4. Penner . Irina . 2007 . Dynamic convex risk measures: time consistency, prudence, and sustainability . February 3, 2011 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20110719042923/http://wws.mathematik.hu-berlin.de/~penner/penner.pdf . July 19, 2011 .
  5. Detlefsen. K.. Scandolo. G.. Conditional and dynamic convex risk measures. Finance and Stochastics. 9. 4. 539–561. 2005. 10.1007/s00780-005-0159-6. 10.1.1.453.4944. 10579202 .
  6. Cheridito. Patrick. Stadje. Mitja. Time-inconsistency of VaR and time-consistent alternatives. Finance Research Letters. 6. 1. 40–46. 2009. 10.1016/j.frl.2008.10.002.