Denominal verb explained

In grammar, denominal verbs are verbs derived from nouns.[1] Many languages have regular morphological indicators to create denominal verbs.

English

English examples are to school, from school, meaning to instruct; to shelve, from shelf, meaning to put on shelves; and to symbolize, from symbol, meaning to be a symbol for.

Some common denominalizing affixes in English are -ize/-ise (e.g., summarize), -ify (e.g., classify), -ate (e.g., granulate), en- (e.g., enslave), be- (e.g., behead), and zero or -∅ (e.g., school).

A variety of semantic relations are expressed between the base noun X and the derived verb. Although there is no simple relationship between the affix and the semantic relation,[2] there are semantic regularities that can define certain subclasses. [3] Such subclasses include:[4] [5]

Rgyalrong

In Rgyalrong languages, denominal derivations are extremely developed and have given rise to incorporating and antipassive constructions.[6] [7]

Latin

Many Latin verbs are denominal.[8] For example, the first conjugation verb nominare (to name) is derived from nomen (a name), and the fourth conjugation verb mollire (to soften) derives from the adjective mollis (soft).[9]

Hebrew

Denominal verb derivation is highly productive in Hebrew. They are derived from denominal roots and mostly get a set of, and binyans, but can accept others as well. Only active binyan is shown here:

Some roots derive verbs from more than one binyan set:

See also

Notes and References

  1. Clark. Eve V.. Clark. Herbert H.. December 1979. When Nouns Surface as Verbs. Language. 55. 4. 767–811. 10.2307/412745. 412745.
  2. Carolyn A. Gottfurcht, Denominal Verb Formation in English, Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University, 2008 full text
  3. Book: Rimell, Laura D.. Nominal Roots as Event Predicates in English Denominal Conversion Verbs. 2012.
  4. Kastovsky. Dieter. 1973. Causatives. Foundations of Language. 10. 2. 255–315. 25000716. 0015-900X.
  5. Book: Plag, Ingo. Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. De Gruyter Mouton. 1999. 978-3-11-080286-3. en. 10.1515/9783110802863. 260644701 .
  6. Jacques. Guillaume. 2012. From denominal derivation to incorporation. Lingua. en. 122. 11. 1207–1231. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.05.010. 0024-3841.
  7. Jacques. Guillaume. 2014. Denominal affixes as sources of antipassive markers in Japhug Rgyalrong. Lingua. en. 138. 1–22. 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.011. 0024-3841.
  8. Book: Moreland . Floyd L. . Fleischer . Rita M. . 1990 . Latin: An Intensive Course . London, England . University of California Press . 29 . 0520031830 . registration .
  9. Book: Fortson, Benjamin W. IV . 2004 . Indo-European Languages and Culture . Blackwell . 978-1-4051-0315-2 . 13.13.