Banach fixed-point theorem explained

In mathematics, the Banach fixed-point theorem (also known as the contraction mapping theorem or contractive mapping theorem or Banach–Caccioppoli theorem) is an important tool in the theory of metric spaces; it guarantees the existence and uniqueness of fixed points of certain self-maps of metric spaces, and provides a constructive method to find those fixed points. It can be understood as an abstract formulation of Picard's method of successive approximations.[1] The theorem is named after Stefan Banach (1892–1945) who first stated it in 1922.[2] [3]

Statement

Definition. Let

(X,d)

be a metric space. Then a map

T:X\toX

is called a contraction mapping on X if there exists

q\in[0,1)

such that

d(T(x),T(y))\leqd(x,y)

for all

x,y\inX.

Banach fixed-point theorem. Let

(X,d)

be a non-empty complete metric space with a contraction mapping

T:X\toX.

Then T admits a unique fixed-point

x*

in X (i.e.

T(x*)=x*

). Furthermore,

x*

can be found as follows: start with an arbitrary element

x0\inX

and define a sequence

(xn)n\inN

by

xn=T(xn-1)

for

n\geq1.

Then

\limnxn=x*

.

Remark 1. The following inequalities are equivalent and describe the speed of convergence:

\begin{align} d(x*,xn)&\leq

qn
1-q

d(x1,x0),\\[5pt] d(x*,xn+1)&\leq

q
1-q

d(xn+1,xn),\\[5pt] d(x*,xn+1)&\leqq

*,x
d(x
n). \end{align}

Any such value of q is called a Lipschitz constant for

T

, and the smallest one is sometimes called "the best Lipschitz constant" of

T

.

Remark 2.

d(T(x),T(y))<d(x,y)

for all

xy

is in general not enough to ensure the existence of a fixed point, as is shown by the map

T:[1,infty)\to[1,infty),T(x)=x+\tfrac{1}{x},

which lacks a fixed point. However, if

X

is compact, then this weaker assumption does imply the existence and uniqueness of a fixed point, that can be easily found as a minimizer of

d(x,T(x))

, indeed, a minimizer exists by compactness, and has to be a fixed point of

T.

It then easily follows that the fixed point is the limit of any sequence of iterations of

T.

Remark 3. When using the theorem in practice, the most difficult part is typically to define

X

properly so that

T(X)\subseteqX.

Proof

Let

x0\inX

be arbitrary and define a sequence

(xn)n\inN

by setting

xn=T(xn-1)

. We first note that for all

n\in\N,

we have the inequality

d(xn+1,xn)\leqnd(x1,x0).

This follows by induction on n, using the fact that T is a contraction mapping. Then we can show that

(xn)n\inN

is a Cauchy sequence. In particular, let

m,n\in\N

such that

m>n

:

\begin{align} d(xm,xn)&\leqd(xm,xm-1)+d(xm-1,xm-2)++d(xn+1,xn)\\[5pt] &\leqqm-1d(x1,x0)+qm-2d(x1,x0)++

nd(x
q
1,

x0)\\[5pt] &=qnd(x1,x0)

m-n-1
\sum
k=0

qk\\[5pt] &\leqqnd(x1,x0)

infty
\sum
k=0

qk\\[5pt] &=qnd(x1,x0)\left(

1
1-q

\right). \end{align}

Let ε > 0 be arbitrary. Since

q\in[0,1)

, we can find a large

N\in\N

so that

qN<

\varepsilon(1-q)
d(x1,x0)

.

Therefore, by choosing

m

and

n

greater than

N

we may write:

d(xm,xn)\leqqnd(x1,x0)\left(

1
1-q

\right)<\left(

\varepsilon(1-q)
d(x1,x0)

\right)d(x1,x0)\left(

1
1-q

\right)=\varepsilon.

This proves that the sequence

(xn)n\inN

is Cauchy. By completeness of (X,d), the sequence has a limit

x*\inX.

Furthermore,

x*

must be a fixed point of T:
*=\lim
x
n\toinfty

xn=\limn\toinftyT(xn-1)=T\left(\limn\toinftyxn-1\right)=T(x*).

As a contraction mapping, T is continuous, so bringing the limit inside T was justified. Lastly, T cannot have more than one fixed point in (X,d), since any pair of distinct fixed points p1 and p2 would contradict the contraction of T:

d(T(p1),T(p2))=d(p1,p2)>qd(p1,p2).

Applications

  1. Ω′ := (I + g)(Ω) is an open subset of E: precisely, for any x in Ω such that one has
  2. I + g : Ω → Ω′ is a bi-Lipschitz homeomorphism;

precisely, (I + g)−1 is still of the form with h a Lipschitz map of constant k/(1 − k). A direct consequence of this result yields the proof of the inverse function theorem.

Converses

Several converses of the Banach contraction principle exist. The following is due to Czesław Bessaga, from 1959:

Let f : XX be a map of an abstract set such that each iterate fn has a unique fixed point. Let

q\in(0,1),

then there exists a complete metric on X such that f is contractive, and q is the contraction constant.

Indeed, very weak assumptions suffice to obtain such a kind of converse. For example if

f:X\toX

is a map on a T1 topological space with a unique fixed point a, such that for each

x\inX

we have fn(x) → a, then there already exists a metric on X with respect to which f satisfies the conditions of the Banach contraction principle with contraction constant 1/2.[8] In this case the metric is in fact an ultrametric.

Generalizations

There are a number of generalizations (some of which are immediate corollaries).[9]

Let T : XX be a map on a complete non-empty metric space. Then, for example, some generalizations of the Banach fixed-point theorem are:

\sum\nolimitsncn<infty.

Then T has a unique fixed point.In applications, the existence and uniqueness of a fixed point often can be shown directly with the standard Banach fixed point theorem, by a suitable choice of the metric that makes the map T a contraction. Indeed, the above result by Bessaga strongly suggests to look for such a metric. See also the article on fixed point theorems in infinite-dimensional spaces for generalizations.

A different class of generalizations arise from suitable generalizations of the notion of metric space, e.g. by weakening the defining axioms for the notion of metric.[10] Some of these have applications, e.g., in the theory of programming semantics in theoretical computer science.[11]

Example

An application of the Banach fixed-point theorem and fixed-point iteration can be used to quickly obtain an approximation of with high accuracy. Consider the function

f(x)=\sin(x)+x

. It can be verified that is a fixed point of f, and that f maps the interval

\left[3\pi/4,5\pi/4\right]

to itself. Moreover,

f'(x)=1+\cos(x)

, and it can be verified that
0\leq1+\cos(x)\leq1-1
\sqrt{2
}<1

on this interval. Therefore, by an application of the mean value theorem, f has a Lipschitz constant less than 1 (namely

1-1/\sqrt{2}

). Applying the Banach fixed-point theorem shows that the fixed point is the unique fixed point on the interval, allowing for fixed-point iteration to be used.

For example, the value 3 may be chosen to start the fixed-point iteration, as

3\pi/4\leq3\leq5\pi/4

. The Banach fixed-point theorem may be used to conclude that

\pi=f(f(f(f(3))))).

Applying f to 3 only three times already yields an expansion of accurate to 33 digits:

f(f(f(3)))=3.141592653589793238462643383279502\ldots.

See also

Notes

  1. Book: David . Kinderlehrer . David Kinderlehrer . Guido . Stampacchia . Guido Stampacchia . Variational Inequalities in RN . An Introduction to Variational Inequalities and Their Applications . New York . Academic Press . 1980 . 0-12-407350-6 . 7–22 . https://books.google.com/books?id=eCDnoB3Np5oC&pg=PA7 .
  2. Banach. Stefan. Stefan Banach. Sur les opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux équations intégrales. Fundamenta Mathematicae. 3. 1922. 133–181 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110607002842/http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/or/or2/or215.pdf . 2011-06-07 . live . 10.4064/fm-3-1-133-181.
  3. Krzysztof . Ciesielski . On Stefan Banach and some of his results . Banach J. Math. Anal. . 1 . 2007 . 1 . 1–10 . https://web.archive.org/web/20090530012258/http://www.emis.de/journals/BJMA/tex_v1_n1_a1.pdf . 2009-05-30 . live . 10.15352/bjma/1240321550 . free .
  4. Matthias. Günther. Zum Einbettungssatz von J. Nash . On the embedding theorem of J. Nash . de . Mathematische Nachrichten. 144 . 1989. 165–187. 10.1002/mana.19891440113 . 1037168.
  5. Book: Frank L. . Lewis . Draguna . Vrabie . Vassilis L. . Syrmos . Optimal Control . Reinforcement Learning and Optimal Adaptive Control . New York . John Wiley & Sons . 2012 . 978-1-118-12272-3 . 461–517 [p. 474] . https://books.google.com/books?id=U3Gtlot_hYEC&pg=PA474 .
  6. Ngo Van . Long . Antoine . Soubeyran . Existence and Uniqueness of Cournot Equilibrium: A Contraction Mapping Approach . . 67 . 3 . 2000 . 345–348 . 10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00211-1 . https://web.archive.org/web/20041230225125/http://www.cirano.qc.ca/pdf/publication/99s-22.pdf . 2004-12-30 . live .
  7. Book: Nancy L. . Stokey. Nancy Stokey . Robert E. Jr. . Lucas . Robert Lucas Jr. . Recursive Methods in Economic Dynamics . Cambridge . Harvard University Press . 1989 . 0-674-75096-9 . 508–516 .
  8. Pascal . Hitzler . Pascal Hitzler. Anthony K. . Seda . A 'Converse' of the Banach Contraction Mapping Theorem . Journal of Electrical Engineering . 52 . 10/s . 2001 . 3–6 .
  9. Book: Latif, Abdul . Topics in Fixed Point Theory . 33–64 . Banach Contraction Principle and its Generalizations . Springer . 2014 . 10.1007/978-3-319-01586-6_2 . 978-3-319-01585-9 .
  10. Book: Pascal . Hitzler . Pascal Hitzler. Anthony . Seda . Mathematical Aspects of Logic Programming Semantics . Chapman and Hall/CRC . 2010 . 978-1-4398-2961-5 .
  11. Anthony K. . Seda . Pascal . Hitzler . Pascal Hitzler. Generalized Distance Functions in the Theory of Computation . The Computer Journal . 53 . 4 . 443–464 . 2010 . 10.1093/comjnl/bxm108 .

References