Contiguity (probability theory) explained

In probability theory, two sequences of probability measures are said to be contiguous if asymptotically they share the same support. Thus the notion of contiguity extends the concept of absolute continuity to the sequences of measures.

The concept was originally introduced by as part of his foundational contribution to the development of asymptotic theory in mathematical statistics. He is best known for the general concepts of local asymptotic normality and contiguity.[1]

Definition

Let (\Omega_n,\mathcal_n) be a sequence of measurable spaces, each equipped with two measures Pn and Qn.

The notion of contiguity is closely related to that of absolute continuity. We say that a measure Q is absolutely continuous with respect to P (denoted) if for any measurable set A, implies . That is, Q is absolutely continuous with respect to P if the support of Q is a subset of the support of P, except in cases where this is false, including, e.g., a measure that concentrates on an open set, because its support is a closed set and it assigns measure zero to the boundary, and so another measure may concentrate on the boundary and thus have support contained within the support of the first measure, but they will be mutually singular. In summary, this previous sentence's statement of absolute continuity is false. The contiguity property replaces this requirement with an asymptotic one: Qn is contiguous with respect to Pn if the "limiting support" of Qn is a subset of the limiting support of Pn. By the aforementioned logic, this statement is also false.

It is possible however that each of the measures Qn be absolutely continuous with respect to Pn, while the sequence Qn not being contiguous with respect to Pn.

The fundamental Radon–Nikodym theorem for absolutely continuous measures states that if Q is absolutely continuous with respect to P, then Q has density with respect to P, denoted as, such that for any measurable set A

Q(A)=\intAfdP,

which is interpreted as being able to "reconstruct" the measure Q from knowing the measure P and the derivative ƒ. A similar result exists for contiguous sequences of measures, and is given by the Le Cam's third lemma.

Properties

(Pn,Qn)=(P,Q)

for all n it applies

Qn\triangleleftPn\LeftrightarrowQ\llP

.

Pn\llQn

is true for all n without

Pn\triangleleftQn

.[2]

Le Cam's first lemma

For two sequences of measures

(Pn)and(Qn)

on measurable spaces (\Omega_n,\mathcal_n) the following statements are equivalent:

Pn\triangleleftQn

dQn
dPn

\overset{Pn}{\longrightarrow}UalongasubsequenceP(U>0)=1

dPn
dQn

\overset{Qn}{\longrightarrow}ValongasubsequenceE(V)=1

Tn\overset{Pn}{\longrightarrow}0 ⇒ Tn\overset{Qn}{\longrightarrow}0

for any statistics

Tn:\OmeganR

.where

U

and

V

are random variables on

(\Omega,l{F},P)and(\Omega',l{F}',Q)

.

Interpretation

Prohorov's theorem tells us that given a sequence of probability measures, every subsequence has a further subsequence which converges weakly. Le Cam's first lemma shows that the properties of the associated limit points determine whether contiguity applies or not. This can be understood in analogy with the non-asymptotic notion of absolute continuity of measures.[3]

Applications

See also

References

Additional literature

External links

Notes and References

  1. Wolfowitz J.(1974) Review of the book: "Contiguity of Probability Measures: Some Applications in Statistics. by George G. Roussas",Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 278 - 279 jstor
  2. Web site: Contiguity: Examples .
  3. Vaart AW van der. Asymptotic Statistics. Cambridge University Press; 1998.
  4. Web site: Werker . Bas . Advanced topics in Financial Econometrics . 2009-11-12 . https://web.archive.org/web/20060430084413/http://www.samsi.info/200506/fmse/course-info/werker-updated-nov14.pdf . 2006-04-30 . dead . June 2005.