Constrained equal losses explained

Constrained equal losses (CEL) is a division rule for solving bankruptcy problems. According to this rule, each claimant should lose an equal amount from his or her claim, except that no claimant should receive a negative amount. In the context of taxation, it is known as poll tax.[1]

Formal definition

There is a certain amount of money to divide, denoted by

E

(=Estate or Endowment). There are n claimants. Each claimant i has a claim denoted by

ci

. Usually,
n
\sum
i=1

ci>E

, that is, the estate is insufficient to satisfy all the claims.

The CEL rule says that each claimant i should receive

max(0,ci-r)

, where r is a constant chosen such that
n
\sum
i=1

max(0,ci-r)=E

. The rule can also be described algorithmically as follows:

Examples

Examples with two claimants:

CEL(60,90;100)=(35,65)

; here

r=25

.

CEL(50,100;100)=(25,75)

; here

r=25

too.

CEL(40,80;100)=(30,70)

; here

r=10

.

Examples with three claimants:

CEL(50,100,150;100)=(0,25,75)

; here

r=75

.

CEL(50,100,150;200)=(16.667,66.666,116.667)

; here

r=33.333

.

CEL(50,100,150;300)=(50,100,150)

; here

r=0

.

Usage

In the Jewish law, if several bidders participate in an auction and then revoke their bids simultaneously, they have to compensate the seller for the loss. The loss is divided among the bidders according to the CEL rule.[2] [3]

Characterizations

The CEL rule has several characterizations. It is the only rule satisfying the following sets of axioms:

Dual rule

The constrained equal awards (CEA) rule is the dual of the CEL rule, that is: for each problem

(c,E)

, we have

CEA(c,E)=c-CEL(c,\sumc-E)

.

Notes and References

  1. William. Thomson. 2003-07-01. Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey. Mathematical Social Sciences. en. 45. 3. 249–297. 10.1016/S0165-4896(02)00070-7. 0165-4896.
  2. Aumann. Robert J. Maschler. Michael. 1985-08-01. Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud. Journal of Economic Theory. en. 36. 2. 195–213. 10.1016/0022-0531(85)90102-4. 0022-0531.
  3. [Maimonides]
  4. Herrero. Carmen. Villar. Antonio. 2002-12-01. Sustainability in bankruptcy problems. Top. en. 10. 2. 261–273. 10.1007/BF02579019. 120694615 . 1863-8279.
  5. C-H Yeh, 2001, "Sustainability, claims monotonicity, and the constrained equal award rule", Mimeo.