In mathematics, a confluent hypergeometric function is a solution of a confluent hypergeometric equation, which is a degenerate form of a hypergeometric differential equation where two of the three regular singularities merge into an irregular singularity. The term confluent refers to the merging of singular points of families of differential equations; confluere is Latin for "to flow together". There are several common standard forms of confluent hypergeometric functions:
The Kummer functions, Whittaker functions, and Coulomb wave functions are essentially the same, and differ from each other only by elementary functions and change of variables.
Kummer's equation may be written as:
z | d2w |
dz2 |
+(b-z)
dw | |
dz |
-aw=0,
with a regular singular point at and an irregular singular point at . It has two (usually) linearly independent solutions and .
Kummer's function of the first kind is a generalized hypergeometric series introduced in, given by:
infty | |
M(a,b,z)=\sum | |
n=0 |
a(n)zn | |
b(n)n! |
={}1F1(a;b;z),
where:
a(0)=1,
a(n)=a(a+1)(a+2) … (a+n-1),
is the rising factorial. Another common notation for this solution is . Considered as a function of,, or with the other two held constant, this defines an entire function of or, except when As a function of it is analytic except for poles at the non-positive integers.
Some values of and yield solutions that can be expressed in terms of other known functions. See
Just as the confluent differential equation is a limit of the hypergeometric differential equation as the singular point at 1 is moved towards the singular point at ∞, the confluent hypergeometric function can be given as a limit of the hypergeometric function
M(a,c,z)=\limb\toinfty{}2F1(a,b;c;z/b)
and many of the properties of the confluent hypergeometric function are limiting cases of properties of the hypergeometric function.
Since Kummer's equation is second order there must be another, independent, solution. The indicial equation of the method of Frobenius tells us that the lowest power of a power series solution to the Kummer equation is either 0 or . If we let be
w(z)=z1-bv(z)
z2-b
d2v | |
dz2 |
+2(1-b)z1-b
dv | |
dz |
-b(1-b)z-bv+(b-z)\left[z1-b
dv | |
dz |
+(1-b)z-bv\right]-az1-bv=0
z | d2v | +(2-b-z) |
dz2 |
dv | |
dz |
-(a+1-b)v=0.
U(a,b,z)= | \Gamma(1-b) | M(a,b,z)+ |
\Gamma(a+1-b) |
\Gamma(b-1) | |
\Gamma(a) |
z1-bM(a+1-b,2-b,z).
Although this expression is undefined for integer, it has the advantage that it can be extended to any integer by continuity. Unlike Kummer's function which is an entire function of, usually has a singularity at zero. For example, if and then is asymptotic to as goes to zero. But see
Note that the solution to Kummer's equation is the same as the solution, see
For most combinations of real or complex and, the functions and are independent, and if is a non-positive integer, so doesn't exist, then we may be able to use as a second solution. But if is a non-positive integer and is not a non-positive integer, then is a multiple of . In that case as well, can be used as a second solution if it exists and is different. But when is an integer greater than 1, this solution doesn't exist, and if then it exists but is a multiple of and of In those cases a second solution exists of the following form and is valid for any real or complex and any positive integer except when is a positive integer less than :
M(a,b,z)lnz+z1-b
infty | |
\sum | |
k=0 |
k | |
C | |
kz |
z(-u) | |
\int | |
-infty |
-beudu.
A similar problem occurs when is a negative integer and is an integer less than 1. In this case doesn't exist, and is a multiple of A second solution is then of the form:
z1-bM(a+1-b,2-b,z)ln
infty | |
z+\sum | |
k=0 |
k | |
C | |
kz |
Confluent Hypergeometric Functions can be used to solve the Extended Confluent Hypergeometric Equation whose general form is given as:
z | d2w | +(b-z) |
dz2 |
dw | |
dz |
M | |
-\left(\sum | |
m=0 |
amzm\right)w=0
Note that for or when the summation involves just one term, it reduces to the conventional Confluent Hypergeometric Equation.
Thus Confluent Hypergeometric Functions can be used to solve "most" second-order ordinary differential equations whose variable coefficients are all linear functions of, because they can be transformed to the Extended Confluent Hypergeometric Equation. Consider the equation:
(A+Bz) | d2w |
dz2 |
+(C+Dz)
dw | |
dz |
+(E+Fz)w=0
First we move the regular singular point to by using the substitution of, which converts the equation to:
z | d2w |
dz2 |
+(C+Dz)
dw | |
dz |
+(E+Fz)w=0
with new values of, and . Next we use the substitution:
z\mapsto
1 | |
\sqrt{D2-4F |
and multiply the equation by the same factor, obtaining:
z | d2w | +\left(C+ |
dz2 |
D | |
\sqrt{D2-4F |
whose solution is
\exp\left(-\left(1+
D | |
\sqrt{D2-4F |
where is a solution to Kummer's equation with
a=\left(1+
D | |
\sqrt{D2-4F |
Note that the square root may give an imaginary or complex number. If it is zero, another solution must be used, namely
\exp\left(-\tfrac{1}{2}Dz\right)w(z),
where is a confluent hypergeometric limit function satisfying
zw''(z)+Cw'(z)+\left(E-\tfrac{1}{2}CD\right)w(z)=0.
As noted below, even the Bessel equation can be solved using confluent hypergeometric functions.
If, can be represented as an integral
M(a,b,z)=
\Gamma(b) | |
\Gamma(a)\Gamma(b-a) |
1 | |
\int | |
0 |
ezuua-1(1-u)b-a-1du.
thus is the characteristic function of the beta distribution. For with positive real part can be obtained by the Laplace integral
U(a,b,z)=
1 | |
\Gamma(a) |
infty | |
\int | |
0 |
e-ztta-1(1+t)b-a-1dt, (\operatorname{Re} a>0)
The integral defines a solution in the right half-plane .
They can also be represented as Barnes integrals
M(a,b,z)=
1 | |
2\pii |
\Gamma(b) | |
\Gamma(a) |
iinfty | |
\int | |
-iinfty |
\Gamma(-s)\Gamma(a+s) | |
\Gamma(b+s) |
(-z)sds
where the contour passes to one side of the poles of and to the other side of the poles of .
If a solution to Kummer's equation is asymptotic to a power of as, then the power must be . This is in fact the case for Tricomi's solution . Its asymptotic behavior as can be deduced from the integral representations. If, then making a change of variables in the integral followed by expanding the binomial series and integrating it formally term by term gives rise to an asymptotic series expansion, valid as :[2]
U(a,b,x)\simx-a2F0\left(a,a-b+1;;-
1 | |
x\right), |
where
2F0( ⋅ , ⋅ ;;-1/x)
The asymptotic behavior of Kummer's solution for large is:
M(a,b,z)\sim\Gamma(b)\left( | ezza-b | + |
\Gamma(a) |
(-z)-a | |
\Gamma(b-a) |
\right)
The powers of are taken using .[3] The first term is not needed when is finite, that is when is not a non-positive integer and the real part of goes to negative infinity, whereas the second term is not needed when is finite, that is, when is a not a non-positive integer and the real part of goes to positive infinity.
There is always some solution to Kummer's equation asymptotic to as . Usually this will be a combination of both and but can also be expressed as .
There are many relations between Kummer functions for various arguments and their derivatives. This section gives a few typical examples.
Given, the four functions are called contiguous to . The function can be written as a linear combination of any two of its contiguous functions, with rational coefficients in terms of, and . This gives relations, given by identifying any two lines on the right hand side of
\begin{align} z | dM |
dz |
=z
a | |
b |
M(a+,b+) &=a(M(a+)-M)\\ &=(b-1)(M(b-)-M)\\ &=(b-a)M(a-)+(a-b+z)M\\ &=z(a-b)M(b+)/b+zM\\ \end{align}
In the notation above,,, and so on.
Repeatedly applying these relations gives a linear relation between any three functions of the form (and their higher derivatives), where, are integers.
There are similar relations for .
Kummer's functions are also related by Kummer's transformations:
M(a,b,z)=ezM(b-a,b,-z)
U(a,b,z)=z1-bU\left(1+a-b,2-b,z\right)
The following multiplication theorems hold true:
\begin{align} U(a,b,z)&=e(1-t)z\sumi=0
(t-1)izi | |
i! |
U(a,b+i,zt)\\ &=e(1-t)ztb-1\sumi=0
| |||||
i! |
U(a-i,b-i,zt). \end{align}
In terms of Laguerre polynomials, Kummer's functions have several expansions, for example
M\left(a,b, | xy |
x-1 |
\right)=(1-x)a ⋅
\sum | ||||
|
(b-1) | |
L | |
n |
(y)xn
\operatorname{M}\left(a;b;z\right)=
\Gamma\left(1-a\right) ⋅ \Gamma\left(b\right) | |
\Gamma\left(b-a\right) |
⋅
b-1 | |
\operatorname{L | |
-a |
Functions that can be expressed as special cases of the confluent hypergeometric function include:
M(0,b,z)=1
U(0,c,z)=1
M(b,b,z)=ez
infty | |
U(a,a,z)=e | |
z |
u-ae-udu
U(1,b,z) | + | |
\Gamma(b-1) |
M(1,b,z) | |
\Gamma(b) |
=z1-bez
M(n,b,z)
U(n,c,z)
\tfrac{\Gamma(1-c)}{\Gamma(n+1-c)}M(n,c,z)
U(c-n,c,z)
\tfrac{\Gamma(c-1)}{\Gamma(c-n)}z1-cM(1-n,2-c,z)
U(a,a+1,z)=z-a
U(-n,-2n,z)
M(1,2,z)=(ez-1)/z, M(1,3,z)=2!(ez-1-z)/z2
Using the contiguous relation
aM(a+)=(a+z)M+z(a-b)M(b+)/b
M(2,1,z)=(1+z)ez.
{}1F1(a,2a,x)=ex/2{}0F1\left(;a+\tfrac{1}{2};\tfrac{x2}{16}\right)=ex/2\left(\tfrac{x}{4}\right)1/2-a\Gamma\left(a+\tfrac{1}{2}\right)Ia-1/2\left(\tfrac{x}{2}\right).
This identity is sometimes also referred to as Kummer's second transformation. Similarly
U(a,2a,x)=
ex/2 | |
\sqrt\pi |
x1/2-aKa-1/2(x/2),
When is a non-positive integer, this equals where is a Bessel polynomial.
erf(x)=
2 | |
\sqrt{\pi |
M\kappa,\mu(z)=e-\tfrac{z{2}}z\mu+\tfrac{1{2}}M\left(\mu-\kappa+\tfrac{1}{2},1+2\mu;z\right)
W\kappa,\mu(z)=e-\tfrac{z{2}}z\mu+\tfrac{1{2}}U\left(\mu-\kappa+\tfrac{1}{2},1+2\mu;z\right)
\begin{align} \operatorname{E}\left[\left|N\left(\mu,\sigma2\right)\right|p\right]&=
\left(2\sigma2\right)p/2\Gamma\left(\tfrac{1+p | |
2 |
\right)}{\sqrt\pi} {}1F1\left(-\tfracp2,\tfrac12,-\tfrac{\mu2}{2\sigma2}\right)\\ \operatorname{E}\left[N\left(\mu,\sigma2\right)p\right]&=\left(-2\sigma2\right)p/2U\left(-\tfracp2,\tfrac12,-\tfrac{\mu2}{2\sigma2}\right) \end{align}
In the second formula the function's second branch cut can be chosen by multiplying with .
By applying a limiting argument to Gauss's continued fraction it can be shown that[5]
M(a+1,b+1,z) | |
M(a,b,z) |
=\cfrac{1}{1-\cfrac{{\displaystyle
b-a | |
b(b+1) |
z}} {1+\cfrac{{\displaystyle
a+1 | |
(b+1)(b+2) |
z}} {1-\cfrac{{\displaystyle
b-a+1 | |
(b+2)(b+3) |
z}} {1+\cfrac{{\displaystyle
a+2 | |
(b+3)(b+4) |
z}}{1-\ddots}}}}}
and that this continued fraction converges uniformly to a meromorphic function of in every bounded domain that does not include a pole.