Cone (formal languages) explained

In formal language theory, a cone is a set of formal languages that has some desirable closure properties enjoyed by some well-known sets of languages, in particular by the families of regular languages, context-free languages and the recursively enumerable languages. The concept of a cone is a more abstract notion that subsumes all of these families. A similar notion is the faithful cone, having somewhat relaxed conditions. For example, the context-sensitive languages do not form a cone, but still have the required properties to form a faithful cone.

The terminology cone has a French origin. In the American oriented literature one usually speaks of a full trio. The trio corresponds to the faithful cone.

Definition

A cone is a family

l{S}

of languages such that

l{S}

contains at least one non-empty language, and for any

L\inl{S}

over some alphabet

\Sigma

,

h

is a homomorphism from

\Sigma\ast

to some

\Delta\ast

, the language

h(L)

is in

l{S}

;

h

is a homomorphism from some

\Delta\ast

to

\Sigma\ast

, the language

h-1(L)

is in

l{S}

;

R

is any regular language over

\Sigma

, then

L\capR

is in

l{S}

.

The family of all regular languages is contained in any cone.

If one restricts the definition to homomorphisms that do not introduce the empty word

λ

then one speaks of a faithful cone; the inverse homomorphisms are not restricted. Within the Chomsky hierarchy, the regular languages, the context-free languages, and the recursively enumerable languages are all cones, whereas the context-sensitive languages and the recursive languages are only faithful cones.

Relation to Transducers

A finite state transducer is a finite state automaton that has both input and output. It defines a transduction

T

, mapping a language

L

over the input alphabet into another language

T(L)

over the output alphabet. Each of the cone operations (homomorphism, inverse homomorphism, intersection with a regular language) can be implemented using a finite state transducer. And, since finite state transducers are closed under composition, every sequence of cone operations can be performed by a finite state transducer.

Conversely, every finite state transduction

T

can be decomposed into cone operations. In fact, there exists a normal form for this decomposition, which is commonly known as Nivat's Theorem:[1] Namely, each such

T

can be effectively decomposed as

T(L)=g(h-1(L)\capR)

, where

g,h

are homomorphisms, and

R

is a regular language depending only on

T

.

Altogether, this means that a family of languages is a cone if and only if it is closed under finite state transductions. This is a very powerful set of operations. For instance one easily writes a (nondeterministic) finite state transducer with alphabet

\{a,b\}

that removes every second

b

in words of even length (and does not change words otherwise). Since the context-free languages form a cone, they are closed under this exotic operation.

See also

References

External links

Notes and References

  1. cf.