Concretion Explained

A concretion is a hard, compact mass formed by the precipitation of mineral cement within the spaces between particles, and is found in sedimentary rock or soil.[1] Concretions are often ovoid or spherical in shape, although irregular shapes also occur. The word 'concretion' is derived from the Latin Latin: concretio "(act of) compacting, condensing, congealing, uniting", itself from con meaning "together" and crescere meaning "to grow".

Concretions form within layers of sedimentary strata that have already been deposited. They usually form early in the burial history of the sediment, before the rest of the sediment is hardened into rock. This concretionary cement often makes the concretion harder and more resistant to weathering than the host stratum.

There is an important distinction to draw between concretions and nodules. Concretions are formed from mineral precipitation around some kind of nucleus while a nodule is a replacement body.

Descriptions dating from the 18th century attest to the fact that concretions have long been regarded as geological curiosities. Because of the variety of unusual shapes, sizes and compositions, concretions have been interpreted to be dinosaur eggs, animal and plant fossils (called pseudofossils), extraterrestrial debris or human artifacts.

Origins

Detailed studies have demonstrated that concretions form after sediments are buried but before the sediment is fully lithified during diagenesis.[2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] They typically form when a mineral precipitates and cements sediment around a nucleus, which is often organic, such as a leaf, tooth, piece of shell or fossil. For this reason, fossil collectors commonly break open concretions in their search for fossil animal and plant specimens.[8] Some of the most unusual concretion nuclei are World War II military shells, bombs, and shrapnel, which are found inside siderite concretions found in an English coastal salt marsh.[9]

Depending on the environmental conditions present at the time of their formation, concretions can be created by either concentric or pervasive growth.[10] [11] In concentric growth, the concretion grows as successive layers of mineral precipitate around a central core. This process results in roughly spherical concretions that grow with time. In the case of pervasive growth, cementation of the host sediments, by infilling of its pore space by precipitated minerals, occurs simultaneously throughout the volume of the area, which in time becomes a concretion. Concretions are often exposed at the surface by subsequent erosion that removes the weaker, uncemented material.

Appearance

Concretions vary in shape, hardness and size, ranging from objects that require a magnifying lens to be clearly visible[12] to huge bodies three meters in diameter and weighing several thousand pounds.[13] The giant, red concretions occurring in Theodore Roosevelt National Park, in North Dakota, are almost 3abbr=onNaNabbr=on in diameter.[14] Spheroidal concretions, as large as 9abbr=onNaNabbr=on in diameter, have been found eroding out of the Qasr el Sagha Formation within the Faiyum depression of Egypt.[15] Concretions occur in a wide variety of shapes, including spheres, disks, tubes, and grape-like or soap bubble-like aggregates.[16]

Composition

Concretions are commonly composed of a mineral present as a minor component of the host rock. For example, concretions in sandstones or shales are commonly formed of a carbonate mineral such as calcite; those in limestones are commonly an amorphous or microcrystalline form of silica such as chert, flint, or jasper; while those in black shale may be composed of pyrite. Other minerals that form concretions include iron oxides or hydroxides (such as goethite and hematite),[17] [18] dolomite, siderite,[19] ankerite,[20] marcasite,[21] barite,[22] [23] and gypsum.[24]

Although concretions often consist of a single dominant mineral, other minerals can be present depending on the environmental conditions that created them. For example, carbonate concretions, which form in response to the reduction of sulfates by bacteria, often contain minor percentages of pyrite.[25] Other concretions, which formed as a result of microbial sulfate reduction, consist of a mixture of calcite, barite, and pyrite.[26]

Occurrence

Concretions are found in a variety of rocks, but are particularly common in shales, siltstones, and sandstones. They often outwardly resemble fossils or rocks that look as if they do not belong to the stratum in which they were found.[27] Occasionally, concretions contain a fossil, either as its nucleus or as a component that has been incorporated during its growth but concretions are not fossils themselves. They appear in nodular patches, concentrated along bedding planes, or protruding from weathered cliffsides.[28]

Small hematite concretions or Martian spherules have been observed by the Opportunity rover in the Eagle Crater on Mars.[29]

Types of concretion

Concretions vary considerably in their compositions, shapes, sizes and modes of origin.

Septarian concretions

Septarian concretions (or septarian nodules) are carbonate-rich concretions containing angular cavities or cracks (septaria; , from the Latin Latin: septum "partition, separating element", referring to the cracks or cavities separating polygonal blocks of hardened material).[30] [31] Septarian nodules are characteristically found in carbonate-rich mudrock. They typically show an internal structure of polyhedral blocks (the matrix) separated by mineral-filled radiating cracks (the septaria) which taper towards the rim of the concretion. The radiating cracks sometimes intersect a second set of concentric cracks.[32] [30] However, the cracks can be highly variable in shape and volume, as well as the degree of shrinkage they indicate.[33] The matrix is typically composed of argillaceous carbonate, such as clay ironstone, while the crack filling is usually calcite.[32] [30] The calcite often contains significant iron (ferroan calcite) and may have inclusions of pyrite and clay minerals. The brown calcite common in septaria may also be colored by organic compounds produced by bacterial decay of organic matter in the original sediments.[34]

Septarian concretions are found in many kinds of mudstone, including lacustrine siltstones such as the Beaufort Group of northwest Mozambique,[35] but are most commonly found in marine shales, such as the Staffin Shale Formation of Skye,[34] the Kimmeridge Clay of England,[36] [37] or the Mancos Group of North America.[38]

It is commonly thought that concretions grew incrementally from the inside outwards. Chemical and textural zoning in many concretions are consistent with this concentric model of formation. However, the evidence is ambiguous, and many or most concretions may have formed by pervasive cementation of the entire volume of the concretion at the same time.[39] [40] [34] For example, if the porosity after early cementation varies across the concretion, then later cementation filling this porosity would produce compositional zoning even with uniform pore water composition.[40] Whether the initial cementation was concentric or pervasive, there is considerable evidence that it occurred quickly and at shallow depth of burial.[41] [42] [43] [34] In many cases, there is clear evidence that the initial concretion formed around some kind of organic nucleus.

The origin of the carbonate-rich septaria is still debated. One possibility is that dehydration hardens the outer shell of the concretion while causing the interior matrix to shrink until it cracks.[32] [30] Shrinkage of a still-wet matrix may also take place through syneresis, in which the particles of colloidal material in the interior of the concretion become gradually more tightly bound while expelling water.[35] Another possibility is that early cementation reduces the permeability of the concretion, trapping pore fluids and creating excess pore pressure during continued burial. This could crack the interior at depths as shallow as 10m (30feet).[44] A more speculative theory is that the septaria form by brittle fracturing resulting from earthquakes. Regardless of the mechanism of crack formation, the septaria, like the concretion itself, likely form at a relatively shallow depth of burial of less than 50m (160feet)[45] and possibly as little as 12m (39feet). Geologically young concretions of the Errol Beds of Scotland show texture consistent with formation from flocculated sediments containing organic matter, whose decay left tiny gas bubbles (30 to 35 microns in diameter) and a soap of calcium fatty acids salts. The conversion of these fatty acids to calcium carbonate may have promoted shrinkage and fracture of the matrix.[42] [34]

One model for the formation of septarian concretions in the Staffin Shales suggests that the concretions started as semirigid masses of flocculated clay. The individual colloidal clay particles were bound by extracellular polymeric substances or EPS produced by colonizing bacteria. The decay of these substances, together with syneresis of the host mud, produced stresses that fractured the interiors of the concretions while still at shallow burial depth. This was possible only with the bacterial colonization and the right sedimentation rate. Additional fractures formed during subsequent episodes of shallow burial (during the Cretaceous) or uplift (during the Paleogene). Water derived from rain and snow (meteoric water) later infiltrated the beds and deposited ferroan calcite in the cracks.[34]

Septarian concretions often record a complex history of formation that provides geologists with information on early diagenesis, the initial stages of the formation of sedimentary rock from unconsolidated sediments. Most concretions appear to have formed at depths of burial where sulfate-reducing microorganisms are active.[37] [46] This corresponds to burial depths of NaNm (-2,147,483,648feet), and is characterized by generation of carbon dioxide, increased alkalinity and precipitation of calcium carbonate.[47] However, there is some evidence that formation continues well into the methanogenic zone beneath the sulfate reduction zone.[48] [34] [38]

A spectacular example of boulder septarian concretions, which are as much as 3abbr=offNaNabbr=off in diameter, are the Moeraki Boulders. These concretions are found eroding out of Paleocene mudstone of the Moeraki Formation exposed along the coast near Moeraki, South Island, New Zealand. They are composed of calcite-cemented mud with septarian veins of calcite and rare late-stage quartz and ferrous dolomite.[49] [50] [51] [52] The much smaller septarian concretions found in the Kimmeridge Clay exposed in cliffs along the Wessex coast of England are more typical examples of septarian concretions.[53]

Cannonball concretions

Cannonball concretions are large spherical concretions, which resemble cannonballs. These are found along the Cannonball River within Morton and Sioux Counties, North Dakota, and can reach 3abbr=onNaNabbr=on in diameter. They were created by early cementation of sand and silt by calcite. Similar cannonball concretions, which are as much as 4to in diameter, are found associated with sandstone outcrops of the Frontier Formation in northeast Utah and central Wyoming. They formed by the early cementation of sand by calcite. Somewhat weathered and eroded giant cannonball concretions, as large as 6abbr=offNaNabbr=off in diameter, occur in abundance at "Rock City" in Ottawa County, Kansas. Large and spherical boulders are also found along Koekohe beach near Moeraki on the east coast of the South Island of New Zealand.[54] The Moeraki Boulders, Ward Beach boulders and Koutu Boulders of New Zealand are examples of septarian concretions, which are also cannonball concretions. Large spherical rocks, which are found on the shore of Lake Huron near Kettle Point, Ontario, and locally known as "kettles", are typical cannonball concretions. Cannonball concretions have also been reported from Van Mijenfjorden, Spitsbergen; near Haines Junction, Yukon Territory, Canada; Jameson Land, East Greenland; near Mecevici, Ozimici, and Zavidovici in Bosnia-Herzegovina; in Alaska in the Kenai Peninsula Captain Cook State Park on north of Cook Inlet beach[55] and on Kodiak Island northeast of Fossil Beach;[56]

Hiatus concretions

Hiatus concretions are distinguished by their stratigraphic history of exhumation, exposure and reburial. They are found where submarine erosion has concentrated early diagenetic concretions as lag surfaces by washing away surrounding fine-grained sediments. Their significance for stratigraphy, sedimentology and paleontology was first noted by Voigt who referred to them as Hiatus-Konkretionen.[57] "Hiatus" refers to the break in sedimentation that allowed this erosion and exposure. They are found throughout the fossil record but are most common during periods in which calcite sea conditions prevailed, such as the Ordovician, Jurassic and Cretaceous.[58] Most are formed from the cemented infillings of burrow systems in siliciclastic or carbonate sediments.

A distinctive feature of hiatus concretions separating them from other types is that they were often encrusted by marine organisms including bryozoans, echinoderms and tube worms in the Paleozoic[59] and bryozoans, oysters and tube worms in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic. Hiatus concretions are also often significantly bored by worms and bivalves.[60]

Elongate concretions

Elongate concretions form parallel to sedimentary strata and have been studied extensively due to the inferred influence of phreatic (saturated) zone groundwater flow direction on the orientation of the axis of elongation.[61] [62] [63] [64] In addition to providing information about the orientation of past fluid flow in the host rock, elongate concretions can provide insight into local permeability trends (i.e., permeability correlation structure; variation in groundwater velocity,[65] and the types of geological features that influence flow.

Elongate concretions are well known in the Kimmeridge Clay formation of northwest Europe. In outcrops, where they have acquired the name "doggers", they are typically only a few meters across, but in the subsurface they can be seen to penetrate up to tens of meters of along-hole dimension. Unlike limestone beds, however, it is impossible to consistently correlate them between even closely spaced wells.

Moqui Marbles

Moqui Marbles, also called Moqui balls or "Moki marbles", are iron oxide concretions which can be found eroding in great abundance out of outcrops of the Navajo Sandstone within south-central and southeastern Utah. These concretions range in shape from spheres to discs, buttons, spiked balls, cylindrical forms, and other odd shapes. They range from pea-size to baseball-size.[66] [67]

The concretions were created by the precipitation of iron, which was dissolved in groundwater. The iron was originally present as a thin film of iron oxide surrounding sand grains in the Navajo Sandstone. Groundwater containing methane or petroleum from underlying rock beds reacted with the iron oxide, converting it to soluble reduced iron. When the iron-bearing groundwater came into contact with more oxygen-rich groundwater, the reduced iron was converted back to insoluble iron oxide, which formed the concretions.[66] [67] [68] It is possible that reduced iron first formed siderite concretions that were subsequently oxidized. Iron-oxidizing bacteria may have played a role.[69]

Kansas pop rocks

Kansas pop rocks are concretions of either iron sulfide, i.e. pyrite and marcasite, or in some cases jarosite, which are found in outcrops of the Smoky Hill Chalk Member of the Niobrara Formation within Gove County, Kansas. They are typically associated with thin layers of altered volcanic ash, called bentonite, that occur within the chalk comprising the Smoky Hill Chalk Member. A few of these concretions enclose, at least in part, large flattened valves of inoceramid bivalves. These concretions range in size from a few millimeters to as much as 0.7abbr=onNaNabbr=on in length and 12abbr=onNaNabbr=on in thickness. Most of these concretions are oblate spheroids. Other "pop rocks" are small polycuboid pyrite concretions, which are as much as 7abbr=onNaNabbr=on in diameter. These concretions are called "pop rocks" because they explode if thrown in a fire. Also, when they are either cut or hammered, they produce sparks and a burning sulfur smell. Contrary to what has been published on the Internet, none of the iron sulfide concretions, which are found in the Smoky Hill Chalk Member were created by either the replacement of fossils or by metamorphic processes. In fact, metamorphic rocks are completely absent from the Smoky Hill Chalk Member.[70] Instead, all of these iron sulfide concretions were created by the precipitation of iron sulfides within anoxic marine calcareous ooze after it had accumulated and before it had lithified into chalk.

Iron sulfide concretions, such as the Kansas Pop rocks, consisting of either pyrite and marcasite, are nonmagnetic.[71] On the other hand, iron sulfide concretions, which either are composed of or contain either pyrrhotite or smythite, will be magnetic to varying degrees.[72] Prolonged heating of either a pyrite or marcasite concretion will convert portions of either mineral into pyrrhotite causing the concretion to become slightly magnetic.

Claystones, clay dogs, and fairy stones

Disc concretions composed of calcium carbonate are often found eroding out of exposures of interlaminated silt and clay, varved, proglacial lake deposits. For example, great numbers of strikingly symmetrical concretions have been found eroding out of outcrops of Quaternary proglacial lake sediments along and in the gravels of the Connecticut River and its tributaries in Massachusetts and Vermont. Depending the specific source of these concretions, they vary in an infinite variety of forms that include disc-shapes; crescent-shapes; watch-shapes; cylindrical or club-shapes; botryoidal masses; and animal-like forms. They can vary in length from 2abbr=onNaNabbr=on to over 22abbr=onNaNabbr=on and often exhibit concentric grooves on their surfaces. In the Connecticut River Valley, these concretions are often called "claystones" because the concretions are harder than the clay enclosing them. In local brickyards, they were called "clay-dogs" either because of their animal-like forms or the concretions were nuisances in molding bricks.[73] [74] [75] Similar disc-shaped calcium carbonate concretions have also been found in the Harricana River valley in the Abitibi-Témiscamingue administrative region of Quebec, and in Östergötland county, Sweden. In Scandinavia, they are known as "marlekor" ("fairy stones").[76] [77]

Gogottes

are sandstone concretions found in Oligocene (~30 million years) aged sediments near Fontainebleau, France. Gogottes have fetched high prices at auction due to their sculpture-like quality.[78]

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Book: Glossary of terms in soil science. 1976. Agriculture Canada. Ottawa. 0662015339. 13.
  2. The Moeraki Boulders; anatomy of some septarian concretions. Journal of Sedimentary Research. 1985-05-01. 1527-1404. 398–406. 55. 3. 10.1306/212F86E3-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D. en. P.. Dale. C. A.. Landis. J. R.. Boles.
  3. Isotopic evidence for origin of the Moeraki septarian concretions, New Zealand. Journal of Sedimentary Research. 1989-03-01. 1527-1404. 272–279. 59. 2. 10.1306/212F8F6C-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D. en. James R.. Boles. Geoffrey D.. Thyne.
  4. The geochemistry of concretions from the Kimmeridge Clay Formation of southern and eastern England. Sedimentology. 1991. 1365-3091. 79–106. 38. 1. 10.1111/j.1365-3091.1991.tb01856.x. en. I. C.. Scotchman. 1991Sedim..38...79S.
  5. Mozley . Peter S. . Burns . Stephen J. . Oxygen and Carbon Isotopic Composition of Marine Carbonate Concretions: An Overview . SEPM Journal of Sedimentary Research . 1993 . 63 . 10.1306/D4267A91-2B26-11D7-8648000102C1865D . 19 August 2021.
  6. Calcite-Cemented Concretions in Cretaceous Sandstone, Wyoming and Utah, U.S.A.. Journal of Sedimentary Research. 2003-05-01. 1527-1404. 462–483. 73. 3. 10.1306/111602730462. en. Kitty L.. Milliken. M. Dane. Picard. Earle F.. McBride. 2003JSedR..73..462M.
  7. Internal structure and mode of growth of elongate calcite concretions: Evidence for small-scale, microbially induced, chemical heterogeneity in groundwater. GSA Bulletin. 2005-11-01. 0016-7606. 1400–1412. 117. 11–12. 10.1130/B25618.1. en. J. Matthew. Davis. Peter S.. Mozley. 2005GSAB..117.1400M.
  8. Book: Prothero . Donald R. . Schwab . Fred . Sedimentary geology : an introduction to sedimentary rocks and stratigraphy . 2004 . W.H. Freeman . New York . 0716739054 . 118 . 2nd.
  9. Complex cementation textures and authigenic mineral assemblages in Recent concretions from the Lincolnshire Wash (east coast, UK) driven by Fe(0) to Fe(II) oxidation. Journal of the Geological Society. 1995-02-01. 0016-7649. 157–171. 152. 1. 10.1144/gsjgs.152.1.0157. en. J.. Esson. C. D.. Curtis. S. D.. Burley. M. R.. Al-AGHA . 1995JGSoc.152..157A . 129359274. https://web.archive.org/web/20191213005520/http://iugspace.iugaza.edu.ps/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.12358/26050/Al-Aghaetal1995RecentconcretionsfromtheWash.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. 2019-12-13. dead.
  10. Relationship between oriented calcite concretions and permeability correlation structure in an alluvial aquifer, Sierra Ladrones Formation, New Mexico. Journal of Sedimentary Research. 1996-01-01. 1527-1404. 11–16. 66. 1. 10.1306/D4268293-2B26-11D7-8648000102C1865D. en. J. Matthew. Davis. Peter S.. Mozley.
  11. Mudrock‐hosted carbonate concretions: a review of growth mechanisms and their influence on chemical and isotopic composition. Journal of the Geological Society. 2000-01-01. 0016-7649. 239–251. 157. 1. 10.1144/jgs.157.1.239. en. Q. J.. Fisher. R.. Raiswell. 2000JGSoc.157..239R. 128897857.
  12. Book: Allaby . Michael . A dictionary of geology and earth sciences . 2013 . Oxford University Press . Oxford . 9780199653065 . Fourth . concretion.
  13. Book: Boggs . Sam . Principles of sedimentology and stratigraphy . 2006 . Pearson Prentice Hall . Upper Saddle River, N.J. . 0131547283 . 4th . 114.
  14. Web site: Theodore Roosevelt National Park North Unit Scenic Byway . 2012-05-13 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20120508204512/http://www.parkrec.nd.gov/byways/theodore/theodore.html . 2012-05-08 .
  15. Abdel-Wahab . A. . McBride . E. F. . Origin of Giant Calcite-Cemented Concretions, Temple Member, Qasr El Sagha Formation (Eocene), Faiyum Depression, Egypt . Journal of Sedimentary Research . 1 January 2001 . 71 . 1 . 70–81 . 10.1306/031700710070. 2001JSedR..71...70A .
  16. Todd . J. E. . Concretions and their geological effects . Geological Society of America Bulletin . 1 January 1903 . 14 . 1 . 353–368 . 10.1130/GSAB-14-353. 1903GSAB...14..353T .
  17. Busigny . Vincent . Dauphas . Nicolas . Tracing paleofluid circulations using iron isotopes: A study of hematite and goethite concretions from the Navajo Sandstone (Utah, USA) . Earth and Planetary Science Letters . February 2007 . 254 . 3–4 . 272–287 . 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.11.038. 2007E&PSL.254..272B .
  18. Parry . W.T. . Composition, nucleation, and growth of iron oxide concretions . Sedimentary Geology . January 2011 . 233 . 1–4 . 53–68 . 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2010.10.009. 2011SedG..233...53P .
  19. Curtis . C.D. . Coleman . M.L. . Love . L.G. . Pore water evolution during sediment burial from isotopic and mineral chemistry of calcite, dolomite and siderite concretions . Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta . October 1986 . 50 . 10 . 2321–2334 . 10.1016/0016-7037(86)90085-2. 1986GeCoA..50.2321C .
  20. Strickler . Michael E. . Fe Substitution for Al in Glauconite with Increasing Diagenesis in the First Wilcox Sandstone (Lower Eocene), Livingston Parish, Louisiana . Clays and Clay Minerals . 1990 . 38 . 1 . 69–76 . 10.1346/CCMN.1990.0380110. 1990CCM....38...69S . 140180525 .
  21. Van Horn . F.R. . Van Horn . K.R. . 1933 . X-ray study of pyrite or marcasite concretions in the rocks of the Cleveland, Ohio, quadrangles . American Mineralogist. 18 . 7 . 288–294 . 10 August 2021.
  22. Bréhéret . Jean-G. . Brumsack . Hans-J. . Barite concretions as evidence of pauses in sedimentation in the Marnes Bleues Formation of the Vocontian Basin (SE France) . Sedimentary Geology . February 2000 . 130 . 3–4 . 205–228 . 10.1016/S0037-0738(99)00112-8. 2000SedG..130..205B .
  23. Leśniak . P.M. . Łącka . B. . Hladı́kova . J. . Zieliński . G. . Origin of barite concretions in the West Carpathian flysch, Poland . Chemical Geology . June 1999 . 158 . 1–2 . 155–163 . 10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00010-8. 1999ChGeo.158..155L .
  24. Cruz . Mar&#237 . P&#237 . A . Characterization of Gypsum Concretion in Loess: Some Geotechnical Considerations . From Fundamentals to Applications in Geotechnics . 2015 . From Fundamentals to Applications in Geotechnics . 3248–3255 . 10.3233/978-1-61499-603-3-3248.
  25. Coleman . Max L. . Microbial processes: Controls on the shape and composition of carbonate concretions . Marine Geology . July 1993 . 113 . 1–2 . 127–140 . 10.1016/0025-3227(93)90154-N. 1993MGeol.113..127C .
  26. Raiswell . R. . Bottrell . S. H. . Dean . S. P. . Marshall . J. D. . Carr . A. . Hatfield . D. . Isotopic constraints on growth conditions of multiphase calcite-pyrite-barite concretions in Carboniferous mudstones: Diagenetic history of septarian concretions in Carboniferous mudstones . Sedimentology . 25 April 2002 . 49 . 2 . 237–254 . 10.1046/j.1365-3091.2002.00439.x. 129664903 .
  27. Web site: Concretions . Paleontological Research Institution . 11 August 2021.
  28. Marshall . Jim D. . Pirrie . Duncan . Carbonate concretions-explained . Geology Today . March 2013 . 29 . 2 . 53–62 . 10.1111/gto.12002. 129659655 .
  29. Web site: Dvorsky . George . The Enduring Mystery of the Martian 'Blueberries' Discovered by Opportunity Rover . 15 February 2019 . Gizmodo.
  30. Book: Jackson . Julia A. . Glossary of geology. . 1997 . American Geological Institute . Alexandria, Virginia . 0922152349 . Fourth . septarium.
  31. Web site: septarian. dictionary.reference.com. March 20, 2014.
  32. Book: Potter . Paul Edwin . Maynard . J. Barry . Pryor . Wayne A. . Sedimentology of shale : study guide and reference source . 1980 . Springer-Verlag . New York . 0387904301 . 23, 36.
  33. Pratt . Brian R. . Septarian concretions: internal cracking caused by synsedimentary earthquakes . Sedimentology . 27 February 2001 . 48 . 1 . 189, 193–194 . 10.1046/j.1365-3091.2001.00366.x. 2001Sedim..48..189P . 140665532 .
  34. Hendry . James P. . Pearson . Michael J. . Trewin . Nigel H. . Fallick . Anthony E. . Jurassic septarian concretions from NW Scotland record interdependent bacterial, physical and chemical processes of marine mudrock diagenesis: Jurassic septarian concretions, NW Scotland . Sedimentology . 16 May 2006 . 53 . 3 . 537–565 . 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2006.00779.x. 130767202 . free .
  35. Melezhik . Victor A. . Fallick . Anthony E. . Smith . Richard A. . Rosse . Danta M. . Spherical and columnar, septarian, 18 O-depleted, calcite concretions from Middle–Upper Permian lacustrine siltstones in northern Mozambique: evidence for very early diagenesis and multiple fluids . Sedimentology . December 2007 . 54 . 6 . 1389–1416 . 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2007.00886.x. 2007Sedim..54.1389M . 129030770 .
  36. Astin . T. R. . Scotchman . I. C. . The diagenetic history of some septarian concretions from the Kimmeridge Clay, England . Sedimentology . April 1988 . 35 . 2 . 349–368 . 10.1111/j.1365-3091.1988.tb00952.x. 1988Sedim..35..349A .
  37. Scotchman . I. C. . The geochemistry of concretions from the Kimmeridge Clay Formation of southern and eastern England . Sedimentology . February 1991 . 38 . 1 . 79–106 . 10.1111/j.1365-3091.1991.tb01856.x. 1991Sedim..38...79S .
  38. Dale . Annabel . John . Cédric M. . Mozley . Peter S. . Smalley . P. C. . Muggeridge . Ann H. . Time-capsule concretions: Unlocking burial diagenetic processes in the Mancos Shale using carbonate clumped isotopes . Earth and Planetary Science Letters . May 2014 . 394 . 30–37 . 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.03.004. 2014E&PSL.394...30D . free .
  39. Mozley . Peter S. . The internal structure of carbonate concretions in mudrocks: a critical evaluation of the conventional concentric model of concretion growth . Sedimentary Geology . May 1996 . 103 . 1–2 . 85–91 . 10.1016/0037-0738(95)00087-9. 1996SedG..103...85M .
  40. Raiswell . R. . Fisher . Q. J. . Mudrock‐hosted carbonate concretions: a review of growth mechanisms and their influence on chemical and isotopic composition . Journal of the Geological Society . January 2000 . 157 . 1 . 239–251 . 10.1144/jgs.157.1.239. 2000JGSoc.157..239R . 128897857 .
  41. Thyne . Geoffrey D. . Boles . James R. . Isotopic Evidence for Origin of the Moeraki Septarian Concretions, New Zealand . SEPM Journal of Sedimentary Research . 1989 . 59 . 10.1306/212F8F6C-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D.
  42. Duck . R. W. . Subaqueous shrinkage cracks and early sediment fabrics preserved in Pleistocene calcareous concretions . Journal of the Geological Society . February 1995 . 152 . 1 . 151–156 . 10.1144/gsjgs.152.1.0151. 1995JGSoc.152..151D . 129928697 .
  43. De Craen . M. . Swennen . R. . Keppens . E. . Petrography and geochemistry of septarian carbonate concretions from the Boom Clay Formation (Oligocene, Belgium) . Geologie en Mijnbouw . 1998 . 77 . 1 . 63–76 . 10.1023/A:1003468328212. 126635562 .
  44. Hounslow . Mark W. . Significance of localized pore pressures to the genesis of septarian concretions . Sedimentology . November 1997 . 44 . 6 . 1133–1147 . 10.1046/j.1365-3091.1997.d01-64.x. 1997Sedim..44.1133H . 130385560 .
  45. Astin . T. R. . Septarian crack formation in carbonate concretions from shales and mudstones . Clay Minerals . October 1986 . 21 . 4 . 617–631 . 10.1180/claymin.1986.021.4.12. 1986ClMin..21..617A . 128609480 .
  46. Pearson . M.J. . Hendry . J.P. . Taylor . C.W. . Russell . M.A. . Fatty acids in sparry calcite fracture fills and microsparite cement of septarian diagenetic concretions . Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta . April 2005 . 69 . 7 . 1773–1786 . 10.1016/j.gca.2004.09.024. 2005GeCoA..69.1773P .
  47. Raiswell . R. . Fisher . Q.J. . Rates of carbonate cementation associated with sulphate reduction in DSDP/ODP sediments: implications for the formation of concretions . Chemical Geology . November 2004 . 211 . 1–2 . 71–85 . 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.06.020 . 2004ChGeo.211...71R . 2021-08-19 . 2022-01-30 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220130203933/https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/404/1/raiswellr6.pdf . dead .
  48. Huggett . J. M. . Diagenesis of mudrocks and concretions from the London Clay Formation in the London Basin . Clay Minerals . October 1994 . 29 . 4 . 693–707 . 10.1180/claymin.1994.029.4.22. 1994ClMin..29..693H . 129727119 .
  49. Boles . J.R. . Landis . C.A. . Dale . P. . The Moeraki Boulders--Anatomy of Some Septarian Concretions . SEPM Journal of Sedimentary Research . 1985 . 55 . 398–406 . 10.1306/212F86E3-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D.
  50. Fordyce, E., and P. Maxwell, 2003, Canterbury Basin Paleontology and Stratigraphy, Geological Society of New Zealand Annual Field Conference 2003 Field Trip 8, Miscellaneous Publication 116B, Geological Society of New Zealand, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  51. Forsyth, P.J., and G. Coates, 1992, The Moeraki boulders. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, Information Series no. 1, (Lower Hutt, New Zealand)
  52. Thyne, G.D., and J.R. Boles, 1989, Isotopic evidence for origin of the Moeraki septarian concretions, New Zealand, Journal of Sedimentary Petrology. v. 59, n. 2, p. 272-279.
  53. Astin . T. R. . The diagenetic history of some septarian concretions from the Kimmeridge Clay, England . Sedimentology . 35 . 2 . 349–368 . 10.1111/j.1365-3091.1988.tb00952.x . 1988 . 1988Sedim..35..349A .
  54. Dann, C., and Peat, N. (1989) Dunedin, North and South Otago. Wellington: GP Books.
  55. Web site: Kenai Peninsula Online - Alaska Newspaper - . 2010-05-13 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20110708191432/http://cookinletconcretions.com/Kenai%20Article.htm . 2011-07-08 .
  56. Web site: Geological Survey Professional Paper. 24 May 1976. U.S. Government Printing Office. Google Books.
  57. Voigt . Ehrhard . Über Hiatus-Konkretionen (dargestellt an Beispielen aus dem Lias) . Geologische Rundschau . October 1968 . 58 . 1 . 281–296 . 10.1007/BF01820609. 1968GeoRu..58..281V . 128842746 .
  58. Zatoń . Michał . Hiatus concretions . Geology Today . 24 September 2010 . 26 . 5 . 186–189 . 10.1111/j.1365-2451.2010.00762.x. 247665440 .
  59. Wilson . M. A. . Disturbance and Ecologic Succession in an Upper Ordovician Cobble-Dwelling Hardground Fauna . Science . 3 May 1985 . 228 . 4699 . 575–577 . 10.1126/science.228.4699.575. 17736081 . 1985Sci...228..575W . 28818298 .
  60. Wilson . Mark A. . Taylor . Paul D. . Palaeocology of Hard Substrate Faunas from the Cretaceous Qahlah Formation of the Oman Mountains . Palaeontology . February 2001 . 44 . 1 . 21–41 . 10.1111/1475-4983.00167. 2001Palgy..44...21W . 129664357 . free .
  61. Johnson . M.R. . Paleogeographic Significance of Oriented Calcareous Concretions in the Triassic Katberg Formation, South Africa . SEPM Journal of Sedimentary Research . 1989 . 59 . 1008–1010 . 10.1306/212F90D9-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D.
  62. McBride . E. F. . Picard . M. D. . Milliken . K. L. . Calcite-Cemented Concretions in Cretaceous Sandstone, Wyoming and Utah, U.S.A. . Journal of Sedimentary Research . 1 May 2003 . 73 . 3 . 462–483 . 10.1306/111602730462. 2003JSedR..73..462M .
  63. Mozley . Peter S. . Goodwin . Laurel B. . Patterns of cementation along a Cenozoic normal fault: A record of paleoflow orientations . Geology . 1 June 1995 . 23 . 6 . 539–542 . 10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<0539:POCAAC>2.3.CO;2. 1995Geo....23..539M .
  64. Mozley . Peter S. . Davis . J. Matthew . Internal structure and mode of growth of elongate calcite concretions: Evidence for small-scale, microbially induced, chemical heterogeneity in groundwater . Geological Society of America Bulletin . 2005 . 117 . 11 . 1400 . 10.1130/B25618.1. 2005GSAB..117.1400M .
  65. Davis . J. Matthew . Oriented carbonate concretions in a paleoaquifer: Insights into geologic controls on fluid flow . Water Resources Research . June 1999 . 35 . 6 . 1705–1711 . 10.1029/1999WR900042. 1999WRR....35.1705D . 129502157 . free .
  66. Chan . M.A. . W.T. . Parry . 2002 . Mysteries of Sandstone Colors and Concretions in Colorado Plateau Canyon Country . Utah Geological Survey Public Information Series . 77 . 1–19 . 18 August 2021.
  67. Catling . David C. . On Earth, as it is on Mars? . Nature . June 2004 . 429 . 6993 . 707–708 . 10.1038/429707a. 15201892 . 4393420 . free .
  68. Chan . M.A. . B.B. . Beitler . W.T. . Parry . J. . Ormo . G. . Komatsu . 2005 . Red Rock and Red Planet Diagenesis: Comparison of Earth and Mars Concretions . GSA Today . 15 . 8 . 4–10 . 10.1130/1052-5173(2005)015[4:RRARPD]2.0.CO;2 . 18 August 2021.
  69. Loope . David B. . Kettler . Richard M. . Weber . Karrie A. . Morphologic Clues to the Origins of Iron Oxide–Cemented Spheroids, Boxworks, and Pipelike Concretions, Navajo Sandstone of South-Central Utah, U.S.A. . The Journal of Geology . September 2011 . 119 . 5 . 505–520 . 10.1086/661110. 2011JG....119..505L . 10139364 .
  70. Hattin . D.E. . 1982 . Stratigraphy and depositional environment of the Smoky Hill Chalk Member, Niobrara Chalk (Upper Cretaceous) of the type area, western Kansas . Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin . 225 . 1–108.
  71. Hobbs . D . Hafner . J . Magnetism and magneto-structural effects in transition-metal sulphides . Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter . 25 October 1999 . 11 . 42 . 8197–8222 . 10.1088/0953-8984/11/42/303. 1999JPCM...11.8197H . 250900204 .
  72. Hoffmann . Viktor . Stanjek . Helge . Murad . Enver . Mineralogical, magnetic and mössbauer data of symthite (Fe9S11) . Studia Geophysica & Geodætica . December 1993 . 37 . 4 . 366–381 . 10.1007/BF01613583. 1993StGG...37..366H . 131123088 .
  73. Gratacap . L.P. . 1884 . Opinions Upon Clay Stones and Concretions . The American Naturalist . 18 . 9 . 10.1086/273756 . 882–892 . 84690956 . 18 August 2021.
  74. Book: Sheldon . J.M.A. . 1900 . Concretions from the Champlain clays of the Connecticut Valley . University Press . Boston . 74 . 18 August 2021.
  75. Tarr . W. A. . Concretions in the Champlain formation of the Connecticut River Valley . Geological Society of America Bulletin . 31 October 1935 . 46 . 10 . 1493–1534 . 10.1130/GSAB-46-1493. 1935GSAB...46.1493T .
  76. Kindle . E. M. . Range and Distribution of Certain Types of Canadian Pleistocene Concretions . Geological Society of America Bulletin . 30 September 1923 . 34 . 3 . 609–648 . 10.1130/GSAB-34-609. 1923GSAB...34..609K .
  77. Warkentin, B.P., 1967. Carbonate content of concretions in varved sediments. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 4(2), pp.333-333.
  78. News: Haigney. Sophie. 2021-06-18. Once Again, Fossils Are Hot. en-US. The New York Times. 2021-07-14. 0362-4331.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Concretion".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.