Concentrated disadvantage explained

A concentrated disadvantage is a sociological term for neighborhoods with high percentages of residents of low socioeconomic status. It is expressed as the percent of households located in census tracts with high levels of concentrated disadvantage.

Associations and effects

Concentrated disadvantage has been found to be positively related to homicide rates and reduces probability of high school completion.[1] [2] A positive association between concentrated disadvantage and rates of violence more generally has also been found; this relationship is mediated primarily by collective efficacy.[3] There is also evidence that juvenile court officials perceive more disadvantaged neighborhoods as more dangerous, and so are less likely to release youth from such neighborhoods into their communities.[4] Child development is enhanced the most in neighborhoods with approximately equal amounts of concentrated disadvantage and affluence.[5]

Calculation

According to one formula, concentrated disadvantage is calculated based on five metrics. These metrics are:

  1. Percent of individuals below the poverty line
  2. Percent of individuals on public assistance
  3. Percent female-headed households,
  4. Percent unemployed, and
  5. Percent less than age 18.[6] Another measure of concentrated disadvantage is based on "welfare receipt, poverty, unemployment, female-headed households, racial composition (percentage black), and density of children."[7]

Notes and References

  1. Wodtke . Geoffrey T. . Harding . David J. . Elwert . Felix . 2011-10-01 . Neighborhood Effects in Temporal Perspective: The Impact of Long-Term Exposure to Concentrated Disadvantage on High School Graduation . American Sociological Review . en . 76 . 5 . 713–736 . 10.1177/0003122411420816 . 22879678 . 0003-1224. 3413291 .
  2. Becker . Jacob H. . 2016-03-01 . The Dynamics of Neighborhood Structural Conditions: The Effects of Concentrated Disadvantage on Homicide over Time and Space . City & Community . en . 15 . 1 . 64–82 . 10.1111/cico.12152 . 1540-6040. free .
  3. Sampson . Robert J. . Raudenbush . Stephen W. . Earls . Felton . 1997-08-15 . Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy . Science . en . 277 . 5328 . 918–924 . 10.1126/science.277.5328.918 . 0036-8075 . 9252316.
  4. Rodriguez . Nancy . 2013-05-01 . Concentrated Disadvantage and the Incarceration of Youth: Examining How Context Affects Juvenile Justice . Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency . en . 50 . 2 . 189–215 . 10.1177/0022427811425538 . 145172633 . 0022-4278.
  5. Carpiano . Richard M. . Lloyd . Jennifer E. V. . Hertzman . Clyde . 2009-08-01 . Concentrated affluence, concentrated disadvantage, and children's readiness for school: A population-based, multi-level investigation . Social Science & Medicine . 69 . 3 . 420–432 . 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.028. 19540643 .
  6. Web site: Life Course Indicator: Concentrated Disadvantage . Association of Maternal & Child Health Programs.
  7. Sampson . Robert J. . Sharkey . Patrick . Raudenbush . Stephen W. . 2008-01-22 . Durable effects of concentrated disadvantage on verbal ability among African-American children . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . en . 105 . 3 . 845–852 . 10.1073/pnas.0710189104 . 0027-8424 . 18093915. 2242679 . free .

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Concentrated disadvantage".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.