Complex Wishart distribution explained

In statistics, the complex Wishart distribution is a complex version of the Wishart distribution. It is the distribution of

n

times the sample Hermitian covariance matrix of

n

zero-mean independent Gaussian random variables. It has support for

p x p

Hermitian positive definite matrices.[1]

The complex Wishart distribution is the density of a complex-valued sample covariance matrix. Let

Sp=

n
\sum
i=1

GiG

H
i

where each

Gi

is an independent column p-vector of random complex Gaussian zero-mean samples and

(.)H

is an Hermitian (complex conjugate) transpose. If the covariance of G is

E[GGH]=M

then

S\simnl{CW}(M,n,p)

where

l{CW}(M,n,p)

is the complex central Wishart distribution with n degrees of freedom and mean value, or scale matrix, M.

fS(S)=

\left|S\right|n-pe-\operatorname{tr(M-1S)
} { \left|M\right|

nl{C}\widetilde{\Gamma}p(n) },   n\gep,   \left|M\right|>0

where
l{C}\widetilde{\Gamma}
p

(n)=\pip(p-1)/2

p
\prod
j=1

\Gamma(n-j+1)

is the complex multivariate Gamma function.[2]

Using the trace rotation rule

\operatorname{tr}(ABC)=\operatorname{tr}(CAB)

we also get

fS(S)=

\left|S\right|n-p
\left|M\right|nl{C

\widetilde{\Gamma}p(n)}\exp\left(

p
-\sum
i=1
HM
G
i

-1Gi\right)

which is quite close to the complex multivariate pdf of G itself. The elements of G conventionally have circular symmetry such that

E[GGT]=0

.

Inverse Complex WishartThe distribution of the inverse complex Wishart distribution of

Y=

S-1

according to Goodman,[3] Shaman[4] is

fY(Y)=

\left|Y\right|-(n+p)e-\operatorname{tr
(
MY-1)
} { \left|M\right|

-nl{C}\widetilde{\Gamma}p(n) },   n\gep,   \det\left(Y\right)>0

where

M=

\Gamma-1
.

If derived via a matrix inversion mapping, the result depends on the complex Jacobian determinant

-1
l{C}J
Y(Y

)=\left|Y\right|-2p-2

Goodman and others[5] discuss such complex Jacobians.

Eigenvalues

The probability distribution of the eigenvalues of the complex Hermitian Wishart distribution are given by, for example, James[6] and Edelman.[7] For a

p x p

matrix with

\nu\gep

degrees of freedom we have

f(λ1...λp)=\tilde{K}\nu,p\exp\left(-

1
2
p
\sum
i=1

λi\right)

p
\prod
i=1
\nu-p
λ
i

\prodi<j(λi-

2
λ
j)

dλ1...dλp,    λi\inR\ge0

where

\tilde

-1
{K}
\nu,p

=2p\nu

p
\prod
i=1

\Gamma(\nu-i+1)\Gamma(p-i+1)

Note however that Edelman uses the "mathematical" definition of a complex normal variable

Z=X+iY

where iid X and Y each have unit variance and the variance of

Z=E\left(X2+Y2\right)=2

. For the definition more common in engineering circles, with X and Y each having 0.5 variance, the eigenvalues are reduced by a factor of 2.

While this expression gives little insight, there are approximations for marginal eigenvalue distributions. From Edelman we have that if S is a sample from the complex Wishart distribution with

p=\kappa\nu,  0\le\kappa\le1

such that

Sp\siml{CW}\left(2I,

p
\kappa

\right)

then in the limit

pinfty

the distribution of eigenvalues converges in probability to the Marchenko–Pastur distribution function

pλ(λ)=

\sqrt{[λ/2-(\sqrt{\kappa
-1

)2][\sqrt{\kappa}+1)2-λ/2]}} {4\pi\kappa(λ/2)},   2(\sqrt{\kappa}-1)2\leλ\le2(\sqrt{\kappa}+1)2,    0\le\kappa\le1

This distribution becomes identical to the real Wishart case, by replacing

λ

by

, on account of the doubled sample variance, so in the case

Sp\siml{CW}\left(I,

p
\kappa

\right)

, the pdf reduces to the real Wishart one:

pλ(λ)=

\sqrt{[λ-(\sqrt{\kappa
-1

)2][\sqrt{\kappa}+1)2-λ]}} {2\pi\kappaλ},   (\sqrt{\kappa}-1)2\leλ\le(\sqrt{\kappa}+1)2,    0\le\kappa\le1

A special case is

\kappa=1

pλ(λ)=

1
4\pi

\left(

8-λ
λ

\right

1
2
)

,0\leλ\le8

or, if a Var(Z) = 1 convention is used then

pλ(λ)=

1
2\pi

\left(

4-λ
λ

\right

1
2
)

,0\leλ\le4

.The Wigner semicircle distribution arises by making the change of variable

y=\pm\sqrt{λ}

in the latter and selecting the sign of y randomly yielding pdf

py(y)=

1
2\pi

\left(4-y2\right

1
2
)

,-2\ley\le2

In place of the definition of the Wishart sample matrix above,

Sp=

\nu
\sum
j=1

GjG

H
j

, we can define a Gaussian ensemble

Gi,j=[G1...G\nu]\inCp

such that S is the matrix product

S=

GGH

. The real non-negative eigenvalues of S are then the modulus-squared singular values of the ensemble

G

and the moduli of the latter have a quarter-circle distribution.

In the case

\kappa>1

such that

\nu<p

then

S

is rank deficient with at least

p-\nu

null eigenvalues. However the singular values of

G

are invariant under transposition so, redefining

\tilde{S}=

GHG

, then

\tilde{S}\nu

has a complex Wishart distribution, has full rank almost certainly, and eigenvalue distributions can be obtained from

\tilde{S}

in lieu, using all the previous equations.

In cases where the columns of

G

are not linearly independent and

\tilde{S}\nu

remains singular, a QR decomposition can be used to reduce G to a product like

G=Q\begin{bmatrix}R\ 0\end{bmatrix}

such that

Rq,  q\le\nu

is upper triangular with full rank and

\tilde\tilde{S}q=

RHR

has further reduced dimensionality.

The eigenvalues are of practical significance in radio communications theory since they define the Shannon channel capacity of a

\nu x p

MIMO wireless channel which, to first approximation, is modeled as a zero-mean complex Gaussian ensemble.

Notes and References

  1. N. R. Goodman . 1963 . The distribution of the determinant of a complex Wishart distributed matrix . The Annals of Mathematical Statistics . 34 . 1 . 178–180. 10.1214/aoms/1177704251 . free .
  2. Goodman. N R. 1963. Statistical analysis based on a certain multivariate complex Gaussian distribution (an introduction). Ann. Math. Statist.. 34. 152–177. 10.1214/aoms/1177704250. free.
  3. Goodman. N R. 1963. Statistical analysis based on a certain multivariate complex Gaussian distribution (an introduction). Ann. Math. Statist.. 34. 152–177. 10.1214/aoms/1177704250. free.
  4. Shaman. Paul. 1980. The Inverted Complex Wishart Distribution and Its Application to Spectral Estimation. Journal of Multivariate Analysis. 10. 51–59. 10.1016/0047-259X(80)90081-0. free.
  5. Web site: On the Relation between Real and Complex Jacobian Determinants. Cross. D J. May 2008. drexel.edu.
  6. James. A. T.. 1964. Distributions of Matrix Variates and Latent Roots Derived from Normal Samples. Ann. Math. Statist.. 35. 2. 475–501. 10.1214/aoms/1177703550. free.
  7. Edelman. Alan. October 1988. Eigenvalues and Condition Numbers of Random Matrices. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl.. 9 . 4. 543–560. 10.1137/0609045. 1721.1/14322. free.