Coherent topology explained

In topology, a coherent topology is a topology that is uniquely determined by a family of subspaces. Loosely speaking, a topological space is coherent with a family of subspaces if it is a topological union of those subspaces. It is also sometimes called the weak topology generated by the family of subspaces, a notion that is quite different from the notion of a weak topology generated by a set of maps.[1]

Definition

Let

X

be a topological space and let

C=\left\{C\alpha:\alpha\inA\right\}

be a family of subsets of

X,

each with its induced subspace topology. (Typically

C

will be a cover of

X

.) Then

X

is said to be coherent with

C

(or determined by

C

)[2] if the topology of

X

is recovered as the one coming from the final topology coinduced by the inclusion mapsi_\alpha : C_\alpha \to X \qquad \alpha \in A.By definition, this is the finest topology on (the underlying set of)

X

for which the inclusion maps are continuous.

X

is coherent with

C

if either of the following two equivalent conditions holds:

U

is open in

X

if and only if

U\capC\alpha

is open in

C\alpha

for each

\alpha\inA.

U

is closed in

X

if and only if

U\capC\alpha

is closed in

C\alpha

for each

\alpha\inA.

Given a topological space

X

and any family of subspaces

C

there is a unique topology on (the underlying set of)

X

that is coherent with

C.

This topology will, in general, be finer than the given topology on

X.

Examples

X

is coherent with every open cover of

X.

More generally,

X

is coherent with any family of subsets whose interiors cover

X.

As examples of this, a weakly locally compact space is coherent with the family of its compact subspaces. And a locally connected space is coherent with the family of its connected subsets.

X

is coherent with every locally finite closed cover of

X.

X

is coherent with a partition of

X

if and only

X

is homeomorphic to the disjoint union of the elements of the partition.

X

is coherent with its family of

n

-skeletons

Xn.

Topological union

Let

\left\{X\alpha:\alpha\inA\right\}

be a family of (not necessarily disjoint) topological spaces such that the induced topologies agree on each intersection

X\alpha\capX\beta.

Assume further that

X\alpha\capX\beta

is closed in

X\alpha

for each

\alpha,\beta\inA.

Then the topological union

X

is the set-theoretic unionX^ = \bigcup_ X_\alphaendowed with the final topology coinduced by the inclusion maps

i\alpha:X\alpha\toXset

. The inclusion maps will then be topological embeddings and

X

will be coherent with the subspaces

\left\{X\alpha\right\}.

Conversely, if

X

is a topological space and is coherent with a family of subspaces

\left\{C\alpha\right\}

that cover

X,

then

X

is homeomorphic to the topological union of the family

\left\{C\alpha\right\}.

One can form the topological union of an arbitrary family of topological spaces as above, but if the topologies do not agree on the intersections then the inclusions will not necessarily be embeddings.

One can also describe the topological union by means of the disjoint union. Specifically, if

X

is a topological union of the family

\left\{X\alpha\right\},

then

X

is homeomorphic to the quotient of the disjoint union of the family

\left\{X\alpha\right\}

by the equivalence relation(x,\alpha) \sim (y,\beta) \Leftrightarrow x = yfor all

\alpha,\beta\inA.

; that is,X \cong \coprod_X_\alpha / \sim .

If the spaces

\left\{X\alpha\right\}

are all disjoint then the topological union is just the disjoint union.

Assume now that the set A is directed, in a way compatible with inclusion:

\alpha\leq\beta

whenever

X\alpha\subsetX\beta

. Then there is a unique map from

\varinjlimX\alpha

to

X,

which is in fact a homeomorphism. Here

\varinjlimX\alpha

is the direct (inductive) limit (colimit) of

\left\{X\alpha\right\}

in the category Top.

Properties

Let

X

be coherent with a family of subspaces

\left\{C\alpha\right\}.

A function

f:X\toY

from

X

to a topological space

Y

is continuous if and only if the restrictionsf\big\vert_ : C_ \to Y\,are continuous for each

\alpha\inA.

This universal property characterizes coherent topologies in the sense that a space

X

is coherent with

C

if and only if this property holds for all spaces

Y

and all functions

f:X\toY.

Let

X

be determined by a cover

C=\{C\alpha\}.

Then

C

is a refinement of a cover

D,

then

X

is determined by

D.

In particular, if

C

is a subcover of

D,

X

is determined by

D.

D=\{D\beta\}

is a refinement of

C

and each

C\alpha

is determined by the family of all

D\beta

contained in

C\alpha

then

X

is determined by

D.

Y

be an open or closed subspace of

X,

or more generally a locally closed subset of

X.

Then

Y

is determined by

\left\{Y\capC\alpha\right\}.

f:X\toY

be a quotient map. Then

Y

is determined by

\left\{f(C\alpha)\right\}.

Let

f:X\toY

be a surjective map and suppose

Y

is determined by

\left\{D\alpha:\alpha\inA\right\}.

For each

\alpha\inA

let f_\alpha : f^(D_\alpha) \to D_\alpha\,be the restriction of

f

to

f-1(D\alpha).

Then

f

is continuous and each

f\alpha

is a quotient map, then

f

is a quotient map.

f

is a closed map (resp. open map) if and only if each

f\alpha

is closed (resp. open).

Given a topological space

(X,\tau)

and a family of subspaces

C=\{C\alpha\}

there is a unique topology

\tauC

on

X

that is coherent with

C.

The topology

\tauC

is finer than the original topology

\tau,

and strictly finer if

\tau

was not coherent with

C.

But the topologies

\tau

and

\tauC

induce the same subspace topology on each of the

C\alpha

in the family

C.

And the topology

\tauC

is always coherent with

C.

As an example of this last construction, if

C

is the collection of all compact subspaces of a topological space

(X,\tau),

the resulting topology

\tauC

defines the k-ification

kX

of

X.

The spaces

X

and

kX

have the same compact sets, with the same induced subspace topologies on them. And the k-ification

kX

is compactly generated.

References

Notes and References

  1. Willard, p. 69
  2. X

    is also said to have the weak topology generated by

    C.

    This is a potentially confusing name since the adjectives and are used with opposite meanings by different authors. In modern usage the term is synonymous with initial topology and is synonymous with final topology. It is the final topology that is being discussed here.