Cellular senescence explained

Cellular senescence is a phenomenon characterized by the cessation of cell division.[1] [2] [3] In their experiments during the early 1960s, Leonard Hayflick and Paul Moorhead found that normal human fetal fibroblasts in culture reach a maximum of approximately 50 cell population doublings before becoming senescent.[4] [5] [6] This process is known as "replicative senescence", or the Hayflick limit. Hayflick's discovery of mortal cells paved the path for the discovery and understanding of cellular aging molecular pathways.[7] Cellular senescence can be initiated by a wide variety of stress inducing factors. These stress factors include both environmental and internal damaging events, abnormal cellular growth, oxidative stress, autophagy factors, among many other things.[8]

The physiological importance for cell senescence has been attributed to prevention of carcinogenesis, and more recently, aging, development, and tissue repair.[9] Senescent cells contribute to the aging phenotype, including frailty syndrome, sarcopenia, and aging-associated diseases. Senescent astrocytes and microglia contribute to neurodegeneration.[10] [11]

Cellular mechanisms

Stress response and DNA damage

Mechanistically, replicative senescence can be triggered by a DNA damage response due to the shortening of telomeres. Cells can also be induced to senesce by DNA damage in response to elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS), activation of oncogenes, and cell-cell fusion. Normally, cell senescence is reached through a combination of a variety of factors (i.e., both telomere shortening and oxidative stress).[12] The DNA damage response (DDR) arrests cell cycle progression until DNA damage, such as double-strand breaks (DSBs), are repaired. Senescent cells display persistent DDR that appears to be resistant to endogenous DNA repair activities. The prolonged DDR activates both ATM and ATR DNA damage kinases. The phosphorylation cascade initiated by these two kinases causes the eventual arrest of the cell cycle. Depending on the severity of the DNA damage, the cells may no longer be able to undergo repair and either go through apoptosis or cell senescence.[8] Such senescent cells in mammalian culture and tissues retain DSBs and DDR markers.[13] It has been proposed that retained DSBs are major drivers of the aging process. Mutations in genes relating to genome maintenance has been linked with premature aging diseases, supporting the role of cell senescence in aging[14] (see DNA damage theory of aging).

Depletion of NAD+ can lead to DNA damage and cellular senescence in vascular smooth muscle cells.[15]

Although senescent cells can no longer replicate, they remain metabolically active and commonly adopt an immunogenic phenotype consisting of a pro-inflammatory secretome, the up-regulation of immune ligands, a pro-survival response, promiscuous gene expression (pGE), and stain positive for senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity.[16] Two proteins, senescence-associated beta-galactosidase and p16Ink4A, are regarded as biomarkers of cellular senescence. However, this results in a false positive for cells that naturally have these two proteins such as maturing tissue macrophages with senescence-associated beta-galactosidase and T-cells with p16Ink4A.[12]

Senescent cells can undergo conversion to an immunogenic phenotype that enables them to be eliminated by the immune system.[17] This phenotype consists of a pro-inflammatory secretome, the up-regulation of immune ligands, a pro-survival response, promiscuous gene expression (pGE) and stain positive for senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity.[16] The nucleus of senescent cells is characterized by senescence-associated heterochromatin foci (SAHF) and DNA segments with chromatin alterations reinforcing senescence (DNA-SCARS).[18] Senescent cells affect tumour suppression, wound healing and possibly embryonic/placental development and a pathological role in age-related diseases.[19]

Role of telomeres

Telomeres are DNA tandem repeats at the end of chromosomes that shorten during each cycle of cell division.[20] Recently, the role of telomeres in cellular senescence has aroused general interest, especially with a view to the possible genetically adverse effects of cloning. The successive shortening of the chromosomal telomeres with each cell cycle is also believed to limit the number of divisions of the cell, contributing to aging. After sufficient shortening, proteins responsible for maintaining telomere structure, such as TRF2, are displaced, resulting in the telomere being recognized as a site of a double-strand break.[21] This induces replicative senescence.[22] Theoretically, it is possible upon the discovery of the exact mechanism of biological immortality to genetically engineer cells with the same capability. The length of the telomere strand has senescent effects; telomere shortening activates extensive alterations in alternative RNA splicing that produce senescent toxins such as progerin, which degrades tissue and makes it more prone to failure.[23]

Role of oncogenes

BRAFV600E and Ras are two oncogenes implicated in cellular senescence. BRAFV600E induces senescence through synthesis and secretion of IGFBP7.[24] Ras activates the MAPK cascade which results in increased p53 activation and p16INK4a upregulation.[25] The transition to a state of senescence due to oncogene mutations are irreversible and have been termed oncogene-induced senescence (OIS).[26]

Interestingly, even after oncogenic activation of a tissue, several researchers have identified a senescent phenotype. Researchers have identified a senescent phenotype in benign lesions of the skin carrying oncogenic mutations in neurofibroma patients with a defect that specifically causes an increase in Ras. This finding has been highly reproducible in benign prostate lesions, in melanocytic lesions of UV-irradiated HGF/SF-transgenic mice,[27] in lymphocytes and in the mammary gland from N-Ras transgenic mice,[28] and in hyperplasias of the pituitary gland of mice with deregulated E2F activity.[29] The key to these findings is that genetic manipulations that abrogated the senescence response led to full-blown malignancy in those carcinomas. As such, the evidence suggests senescent cells can be associated with pre-malignant stages of the tumor. Further, it has been speculated that a senescent phenotype might serve as a promising marker for staging. There are two types of senescence in vitro. The irreversible senescence which is mediated by INK4a/Rb and p53 pathways and the reversible senescent phenotype which is mediated by p53. This suggests that p53 pathway could be effectively harnessed as a therapeutic intervention to trigger senescence and ultimately mitigate tumorigenesis.

p53 has been shown to have promising therapeutic relevance in an oncological context. In the 2007 Nature paper by Xue et al., RNAi was used to regulate endogenous p53 in a liver carcinoma model. Xue et al. utilized a chimaeric liver cancer mouse model and transduced this model with the ras oncogene. They took embryonic progenitor cells, transduced those cells with oncogenic ras, along with the tetracycline transactivator (tta) protein to control p53 expression using doxycycline, a tetracycline analog and tetracycline responsive short hairpin RNA (shRNA). In the absence of Dox, p53 was actively suppressed as the microRNA levels increased, so as Dox was administered, p53 microRNA was turned off to facilitate the expression of p53. The liver cancers that expressed Ras showed signs of senescence following p53 reactivation including an increase in senescence associated B-galactosidase protein. Even if the expression of p53 was transiently activated or deactivated, senescence via SA B-gal was observed. Xue et al. show that by briefly reactivating p53 in tumors without functional p53 activity, tumor regression is observed. The induction of cellular senescence was associated with an increase in inflammatory cytokines as is expected based on the SASP. The presence of both senescence and an increase in immune activity is able to regress and limit liver carcinoma growth in this mouse model.[30]

Signaling pathways

There are several reported signaling pathways that lead to cellular senescence including the p53 and p16Ink4a pathways.[26] Both of these pathways are activated in response to cellular stressors and lead to cell cycle inhibition. p53 activates p21 which deactivates cyclin-dependent kinase 2(Cdk 2). Without Cdk 2, retinoblastoma protein (pRB) remains in its active, hypophosphorylated form and binds to the transcription factor E2F1, an important cell cycle regulator.[31] This represses the transcriptional targets of E2F1, leading to cell cycle arrest after the G1 phase.

p16Ink4a also activates pRB, but through inactivation of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (Cdk 4) and cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (Cdk 6). p16Ink4a is responsible for the induction of premature, stress-induced senescence. This is not irreversible; silencing of p16Ink4a through promotor methylation or deletion of the p16Ink4a locus allows the cell to resume the cell cycle if senescence was initiated by p16Ink4a activation.

Senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) gene expression is induced by a number of transcription factors, including C/EBPβ, of which the most important is NF-κB.[32] Aberrant oncogenes, DNA damage, and oxidative stress induce mitogen-activated protein kinases, which are the upstream regulators of NF-κB.[33]

Inhibition of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) suppresses cellular senescence, hence cellular senescence is inhibited by rapamycin.[34]

Characteristics of senescent cells

Senescent cells are highly heterogenous, which has caused most authorities in the field to believe that a universal marker of senescent cells will not be found, and that a multi-marker approach is required for the detection of senescent cells.[35] For this reason, the Cellular Senescence Program Network was created to identify and characterize senescent cells in different body tissues.[36]

Senescent cells are especially common in skin and adipose tissue.[37] Senescent cells are usually larger than non-senescent cells.[38] Transformation of a dividing cell into a non-dividing senescent cell is a slow process that can take up to six weeks.

Senescent cells affect tumor suppression, wound healing and possibly embryonic/placental development, and play a pathological role in age-related diseases.[19] There are two primary tumor suppressor pathways known to mediate senescence: p14arf/p53 and INK4A/RB.[4] More specifically p16INK4a-pRb tumor suppressor and p53 are known effectors of senescence. Most cancer cells have a mutated p53 and p16INK4a-pRb, which allows the cancer cells to escape a senescent fate. The p16 protein is a cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor and it activates Rb tumor suppressor.[39] p16 binds to CDK 4/6 to inhibit the kinase activity and inhibit Rb tumor suppressor via phosphorylation.[40] The Rb tumor suppressor has been shown to associate with E2F1 (a protein necessary for transcription) in its monophosphorylated form, which inhibits transcription of downstream target genes involved in the G1/S transition.[41] As part of a feedback loop, increased phosphorylation of Rb increases p16 expression that inhibits Cdk4/6. Reduced Cdk4/6 kinase activity results in higher levels of the hypo-phosphorylated (monophosphorylated) form of Rb, which subsequently leads to reduced levels of p16 expression.

The removal of aggregated p16 INK 4A positive senescent cells can delay tissue dysfunction and ultimately extend life. In the 2011 Nature paper by Baker et al. a novel transgene, INK-ATTAC, was used to inducibly eliminate p16 INK4A-positive senescent cells by action of a small molecule-induced activation of caspase 8, resulting in apoptosis. A BubR1 H/H mouse model known to experience the clinicopathological characteristics of aging-infertility, abnormal curvature to the spine, sarcopenia, cataracts, fat loss, dermal thinning, arrhythmias, etc. was used to test the consequences of p16INK4a removal. In these mice p16 INK4a aggregates in aging tissues including the skeletal and eye muscle, and adipose tissues. Baker et al. found that if the senescent cells are removed, it is possible to delay age-associated disorders. Not only does p16 play an important role in aging, but also in auto-immune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis that progressively lead to mobility impairment in advanced disease.

In the nervous system, senescence has been described in astrocytes and microglia, but is less understood in neurons.[42] Because senescence arrests cell division, studies of senescence in the brain were focused mainly on glial cells and less studies were focused on nondividing neurons.[43] Analyzing single nucleus RNA-Seq data from human brains suggested p19 as a marker for senescent neurons, which are strongly associated with neurons containing neurofibrillary tangle.[44]

SASP

See main article: Senescence Associated Secretory Phenotype. The secretome of senescent cells is very complex. The products are mainly associated with inflammation, proliferation, and changes in the extracellular matrix.[45] [46] A Senescence Associated Secretory Phenotype (SASP) consisting of inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, and proteases is another characteristic feature of senescent cells.[47] There are many SASP effector mechanisms that utilize autocrine or paracrine signalling. SASP induces an unfolded protein response in the endoplasmic reticulum because of an accumulation of unfolded proteins, resulting in proteotoxic impairment of cell function.[48] Autophagy is upregulated to promote survival,[49] while inflammaging is simultaneously induced.[50] [51]

Considering cytokines, SASP molecules IL-6 and IL-8 are likely to cause senescence without affecting healthy neighbor cells. IL-1beta, unlike IL-6 or IL-8, is able to induce senescence in normal cells with paracrine signaling. IL-1beta is also dependent on cleavage of IL-1 by caspase-1, causing a pro-inflammatory response.[52] Growth factors, GM-CSF and VEGF also serve as SASP molecules.[53] From the cellular perspective, cooperation of transcriptional factors NF-κB and C/EBPβ increase the level of SASP expression.[54] Regulation of the SASP is managed through a transcription level autocrine feedback loop, but most importantly by a continuous DDR.[55] [56] Proteins p53, p21, p16ink4a,[57] and Bmi-1 have been termed as major senescence signalling factors, allowing them to serve as markers.[58] Other markers register morphology changes, reorganization of chromatin, apoptosis resistance, altered metabolism, enlarged cytoplasm or abnormal shape of the nucleus.[59] SASPs have distinct effects depending on the cellular context, including inflammatory or anti-inflammatory and tumor or anti-tumor effects. While considered a pro-tumorogenic effect, they likely support already tumor-primed cells instead of shifting healthy cells into transformation. Likewise, they operate as anti-tumor protectors[60] by facilitating the elimination of damaged cells by phagocytes. The SASP is associated with many age-related diseases, including type 2 diabetes[61] and atherosclerosis.[12] This has motivated researchers to develop senolytic drugs to kill and eliminate senescent cells to improve health in the elderly.[12] The nucleus of senescent cells is characterized by senescence-associated heterochromatin foci (SAHF) and DNA segments with chromatin alterations reinforcing senescence (DNA-SCARS).

Clearance of senescent cells by the immune system

Due to the heterogeneous nature of senescent cells, different immune system cells eliminate different senescent cells.[62] Specific components of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) factors secreted by senescent cells attract and activate different components of both the innate and adaptive immune system.

Natural killer cells (NK cells) and macrophages play a major role in clearance of senescent cells.[63] Natural killer cells directly kill senescent cells, and produce cytokines which activate macrophages which remove senescent cells. Senescent cells can be phagocytized by neutrophils as well as by macrophages. Senolytic drugs which induce apoptosis in senescent cells rely on phagocytic immune system cells to remove the apoptosed cells.

Natural killer cells can use NKG2D killer activation receptors to detect the MICA and ULBP2 ligands which become upregulated on senescent cells.[15] [64] The senescent cells are killed using perforin pore-forming cytolytic protein.[65] CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes also use NKG2D receptors to detect senescent cells, and promote killing similar to NK cells.

Aging of the immune system (immunosenescence) results in a diminished capacity of the immune system to remove senescent cells, thereby leading to an increase in senescent cells. Chronic inflammation due to SASP from senescent cells can also reduce the capacity of the immune system to remove senescent cells. T cells, B cells, and NK cells have all been reported to become senescent themselves.[66] Senescent-like aging CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes become more innate in structure and function, resembling NK cells.[67] Immune system cells can be recruited by SASP to senescent cells, after which the SASP from the senescent cells can induce the immune system cells to become senescent.[68]

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells have been proposed as an alternative means to senolytic drugs for the elimination of senescent cells. Urokinase receptors have been found to be highly expressed on senescent cells, leading researchers to use chimeric antigen receptor T cells to eliminate senescent cells in mice.[69] [70] Chimeric antigen receptor natural killer cells have been proposed as an allogeneic means of eliminating senescent cells.[71]

Transient senescence

It is important to recognize that cellular senescence is not inherently a negative phenomenon. During mammalian embryogenesis, programmed cellular senescence plays a role in tissue remodeling via macrophage infiltration and subsequent clearance of senescent cells.[72] A study on the mesonephros and endolymphatic sac in mice highlighted the importance of cellular senescence for eventual morphogenesis of the embryonic kidney and the inner ear, respectively.

They serve to direct tissue repair and regeneration.[25] Cellular senescence limits fibrosis during wound closure by inducing cell cycle arrest in myofibroblasts once they have fulfilled their function. When these cells have accomplished these tasks, the immune system clears them away. This phenomenon is termed acute senescence.[26] Senescence of hepatic stellate cells could prevent progression of liver fibrosis, although this has not been implemented as a therapy, and would carry the risk of hepatic dysfunction.[73]

The negative implications of cellular senescence present themselves in the transition from acute to chronic senescence. When the immune system cannot clear senescent cells at the rate at which senescent cells are being produced, possibly as a result of the decline in immune function with age, accumulation of these cells leads to a disruption in tissue homeostasis.[74]

Cellular senescence in mammalian disease

Transplantation of only a few (1 per 10,000) senescent cells into lean middle-aged mice was shown to be sufficient to induce frailty, early onset of aging-associated diseases, and premature death.[75]

Biomarkers of cellular senescence have been shown to accumulate in tissues of older individuals.[76] The accumulation of senescent cells in tissues of vertebrates with age is thought to contribute to the development of ageing-related diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, endocrine disorders including type 2 diabetes, and various cancers.[12] [77] [78] [79] [80]

Progeria is another example of a disease that may be related to cell senescence. The disease is thought to be caused by mutations in the DNA damage response, telomere shortening, or a combination of the two.[81] Progeroid syndromes are all examples of aging diseases where cell senescence appears to be implicated.

List of progeroid syndromes

Senolytic drugs

Targeting senescent cells is a promising strategy to overcome age-related disease, simultaneous alleviate multiple comorbidities, and mitigate the effects of frailty. Removing the senescent cells by inducing apoptosis is the most straightforward option, and there are several agents that have been shown to accomplish this.[12] Some of these senolytic drugs take advantage of the senescent-cell anti-apoptotic pathways (SCAPs); knocking out expression of the proteins involved in these pathways can lead to the death of senescent cells, leaving healthy cells.[83]

Organisms lacking senescence

Cellular senescence is not observed in some organisms, including perennial plants, sponges, corals, and lobsters. In other organisms, where cellular senescence is observed, cells eventually become post-mitotic: they can no longer replicate themselves through the process of cellular mitosis (i.e., cells experience replicative senescence). How and why cells become post-mitotic in some species has been the subject of much research and speculation, but it has been suggested that cellular senescence evolved as a way to prevent the onset and spread of cancer.[84] Somatic cells that have divided many times will have accumulated DNA mutations and would be more susceptible to becoming cancerous if cell division continued. As such, it is becoming apparent that senescent cells undergo conversion to an immunologic phenotype that enables them to be eliminated by the immune system.[17]

See also

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. Gao . Haoyu . Nepovimova . Eugenie . Heger . Zbynek . Valko . Marian . Wu . Qinghua . Kuca . Kamil . Adam . Vojtech . 2023-08-01 . Role of hypoxia in cellular senescence . Pharmacological Research . 194 . 106841 . 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106841 . 37385572 . 259295481 . 1043-6618. free . 10481/84477 . free .
  2. Beausejour . C. M. . 2003-08-15 . Reversal of human cellular senescence: roles of the p53 and p16 pathways . The EMBO Journal . en . 22 . 16 . 4212–4222 . 10.1093/emboj/cdg417 . 1460-2075 . 175806 . 12912919.
  3. Kuehnemann . Chisaka . Hughes . Jun-Wei B. . Desprez . Pierre-Yves . Melov . Simon . Wiley . Christopher D. . Campisi . Judith . 2022-12-20 . Antiretroviral protease inhibitors induce features of cellular senescence that are reversible upon drug removal . Aging Cell . en . 22 . 1 . e13750 . 10.1111/acel.13750 . 1474-9718 . 9835573 . 36539941.
  4. Collado M, Blasco MA, Serrano M . Cellular senescence in cancer and aging . Cell . 130 . 2 . 223–233 . July 2007 . 17662938 . 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.003 . 18689141 . free .
  5. Book: Tumor dormancy, quiescence, and senescence, Volume 2: Aging, cancer, and noncancer pathologies. Hayat M. 2014. Springer. 188.
  6. Book: Epigenetics of Aging. limited. Tollefsbol T. 2010. Springer. 978-1-4419-0638-0. 227.
  7. Shay JW, Wright WE . Hayflick, his limit, and cellular ageing . Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology . 1 . 1 . 72–76 . October 2000 . 11413492 . 10.1038/35036093 . 6821048 .
  8. Kuilman T, Michaloglou C, Mooi WJ, Peeper DS . The essence of senescence . Genes & Development . 24 . 22 . 2463–2479 . November 2010 . 21078816 . 2975923 . 10.1101/gad.1971610 .
  9. van Deursen JM . The role of senescent cells in ageing . Nature . 509 . 7501 . 439–446 . May 2014 . 24848057 . 4214092 . 10.1038/nature13193 . 2014Natur.509..439V .
  10. Rivera-Torres J, San José E . Src Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: New Perspectives on Their Immune, Antiviral, and Senotherapeutic Potential . Frontiers in Pharmacology . 10 . 1011 . 2019 . 31619990 . 6759511 . 10.3389/fphar.2019.01011 . free .
  11. Shafqat . Areez . Khan . Saifullah . Omer . Mohamed H. . Niaz . Mahnoor . Albalkhi . Ibrahem . AlKattan . Khaled . Yaqinuddin . Ahmed . Tchkonia . Tamara . Kirkland . James L. . Hashmi . Shahrukh K. . 2023 . Cellular senescence in brain aging and cognitive decline . Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience . 15 . 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1281581 . free . 38076538 . 1663-4365. 10702235 .
  12. Childs BG, Durik M, Baker DJ, van Deursen JM . Cellular senescence in aging and age-related disease: from mechanisms to therapy . Nature Medicine . 21 . 12 . 1424–1435 . December 2015 . 26646499 . 4748967 . 10.1038/nm.4000 .
  13. Galbiati A, Beauséjour C, d'Adda di Fagagna F . A novel single-cell method provides direct evidence of persistent DNA damage in senescent cells and aged mammalian tissues . Aging Cell . 16 . 2 . 422–427 . April 2017 . 28124509 . 5334542 . 10.1111/acel.12573 .
  14. White RR, Vijg J . Do DNA Double-Strand Breaks Drive Aging? . Molecular Cell . 63 . 5 . 729–738 . September 2016 . 27588601 . 5012315 . 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.004 .
  15. Song P, Zhao Q, Zou MH . Targeting senescent cells to attenuate cardiovascular disease progression . Ageing Research Reviews . 60 . 101072 . July 2020 . 32298812 . 7263313 . 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101072 .
  16. Campisi J . Aging, cellular senescence, and cancer . Annual Review of Physiology . 75 . 685–705 . 2013 . 23140366 . 4166529 . 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183653 .
  17. Burton DG, Faragher RG . Cellular senescence: from growth arrest to immunogenic conversion . Age . 37 . 2 . 27 . 2015 . 25787341 . 4365077 . 10.1007/s11357-015-9764-2 .
  18. Rodier F, Campisi J . Four faces of cellular senescence . The Journal of Cell Biology . 192 . 4 . 547–556 . February 2011 . 21321098 . 3044123 . 10.1083/jcb.201009094 .
  19. Burton DG, Krizhanovsky V . Physiological and pathological consequences of cellular senescence . Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences . 71 . 22 . 4373–4386 . November 2014 . 25080110 . 4207941 . 10.1007/s00018-014-1691-3 .
  20. Rivera T, Haggblom C, Cosconati S, Karlseder J . A balance between elongation and trimming regulates telomere stability in stem cells . Nature Structural & Molecular Biology . 24 . 1 . 30–39 . January 2017 . 27918544 . 5215970 . 10.1038/nsmb.3335 . Jan Karlseder .
  21. Takai H, Smogorzewska A, de Lange T . DNA damage foci at dysfunctional telomeres . Current Biology . 13 . 17 . 1549–1556 . September 2003 . 12956959 . 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00542-6 . 5626820 . free . 2003CBio...13.1549T . Agata Smogorzewska . Titia de Lange .
  22. Victorelli S, Passos JF . Telomeres and Cell Senescence - Size Matters Not . eBioMedicine . 21 . 14–20 . July 2017 . 28347656 . 5514392 . 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.03.027 . free .
  23. Cao K, Blair CD, Faddah DA, Kieckhaefer JE, Olive M, Erdos MR, Nabel EG, Collins FS . 6 . Progerin and telomere dysfunction collaborate to trigger cellular senescence in normal human fibroblasts . The Journal of Clinical Investigation . 121 . 7 . 2833–2844 . July 2011 . 21670498 . 3223819 . 10.1172/JCI43578 .
  24. Wajapeyee N, Serra RW, Zhu X, Mahalingam M, Green MR . Oncogenic BRAF induces senescence and apoptosis through pathways mediated by the secreted protein IGFBP7 . Cell . 132 . 3 . 363–374 . February 2008 . 18267069 . 2266096 . 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.032 .
  25. Yun MH . Cellular senescence in tissue repair: every cloud has a silver lining . The International Journal of Developmental Biology . 62 . 6–7–8 . 591–604 . 2018-06-21 . 29938770 . 10.1387/ijdb.180081my . free .
  26. Childs BG, Baker DJ, Kirkland JL, Campisi J, van Deursen JM . Senescence and apoptosis: dueling or complementary cell fates? . EMBO Reports . 15 . 11 . 1139–1153 . November 2014 . 25312810 . 4253488 . 10.15252/embr.201439245 .
  27. Ha L, Ichikawa T, Anver M, Dickins R, Lowe S, Sharpless NE, Krimpenfort P, Depinho RA, Bennett DC, Sviderskaya EV, Merlino G . 6 . ARF functions as a melanoma tumor suppressor by inducing p53-independent senescence . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 104 . 26 . 10968–10973 . June 2007 . 17576930 . 1904138 . 10.1073/pnas.0611638104 . free . 2007PNAS..10410968H .
  28. Braig M, Lee S, Loddenkemper C, Rudolph C, Peters AH, Schlegelberger B, Stein H, Dörken B, Jenuwein T, Schmitt CA . 6 . Oncogene-induced senescence as an initial barrier in lymphoma development . Nature . 436 . 7051 . 660–665 . August 2005 . 16079837 . 10.1038/nature03841 . 4373792 . 2005Natur.436..660B .
  29. Lazzerini Denchi E, Attwooll C, Pasini D, Helin K . Deregulated E2F activity induces hyperplasia and senescence-like features in the mouse pituitary gland . Molecular and Cellular Biology . 25 . 7 . 2660–2672 . April 2005 . 15767672 . 1061636 . 10.1128/MCB.25.7.2660-2672.2005 . 842574443 .
  30. Xue W, Zender L, Miething C, Dickins RA, Hernando E, Krizhanovsky V, Cordon-Cardo C, Lowe SW . 6 . Senescence and tumour clearance is triggered by p53 restoration in murine liver carcinomas . Nature . 445 . 7128 . 656–660 . February 2007 . 17251933 . 4601097 . 10.1038/nature05529 .
  31. Ben-Porath I, Weinberg RA . The signals and pathways activating cellular senescence . The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology . 37 . 5 . 961–976 . May 2005 . 15743671 . 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.10.013 .
  32. Ghosh K, Capell BC . The Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype: Critical Effector in Skin Cancer and Aging . The Journal of Investigative Dermatology . 136 . 11 . 2133–2139 . November 2016 . 27543988 . 5526201 . 10.1016/j.jid.2016.06.621 .
  33. Anerillas C, Abdelmohsen K, Gorospe M . Regulation of senescence traits by MAPKs . GeroScience . 42 . 2 . 397–408 . April 2020 . 32300964 . 7205942 . 10.1007/s11357-020-00183-3 .
  34. Carosi JM, Fourrier C, Bensalem J, Sargeant TJ . The mTOR-lysosome axis at the centre of ageing . . 12 . 4 . 739–757 . 202 . 10.1002/2211-5463.13347 . 8972043 . 34878722 .
  35. Gurkar AU, Gerencser AA, Passos JF . Spatial mapping of cellular senescence: emerging challenges and opportunities . . 3 . 7 . 776–790 . 2023 . 10.1038/s43587-023-00446-6 . 10505496 . 37400722 .
  36. SenNet Consortium . NIH SenNet Consortium to map senescent cells throughout the human lifespan to understand physiological health . . 2 . 12 . 1090–1100 . 2022 . 10.1038/s43587-022-00326-5 . 10019484 . 36936385 .
  37. Wyld L, Bellantuono I, Tchkonia T, Morgan J, Turner O, Foss F, George J, Danson S, Kirkland JL . 6 . Senescence and Cancer: A Review of Clinical Implications of Senescence and Senotherapies . Cancers . 12 . 8 . e2134 . July 2020 . 32752135 . 7464619 . 10.3390/cancers12082134 . free .
  38. Kirkland JL, Tchkonia T . Senolytic drugs: from discovery to translation . Journal of Internal Medicine . 288 . 5 . 518–536 . November 2020 . 32686219 . 7405395 . 10.1111/joim.13141 .
  39. Baker DJ, Wijshake T, Tchkonia T, LeBrasseur NK, Childs BG, van de Sluis B, Kirkland JL, van Deursen JM . 6 . Clearance of p16Ink4a-positive senescent cells delays ageing-associated disorders . Nature . 479 . 7372 . 232–236 . November 2011 . 22048312 . 3468323 . 10.1038/nature10600 . 2011Natur.479..232B .
  40. Rayess H, Wang MB, Srivatsan ES . Cellular senescence and tumor suppressor gene p16 . International Journal of Cancer . 130 . 8 . 1715–1725 . April 2012 . 22025288 . 3288293 . 10.1002/ijc.27316 .
  41. Narasimha AM, Kaulich M, Shapiro GS, Choi YJ, Sicinski P, Dowdy SF . Cyclin D activates the Rb tumor suppressor by mono-phosphorylation . eLife . 3 . June 2014 . 24876129 . 4076869 . 10.7554/eLife.02872 . free .
  42. Vazquez-Villaseñor I, Garwood CJ, Heath PR, Simpson JE, Ince PG, Wharton SB . Expression of p16 and p21 in the frontal association cortex of ALS/MND brains suggests neuronal cell cycle dysregulation and astrocyte senescence in early stages of the disease . Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology . 46 . 2 . 171–185 . February 2020 . 31077599 . 7217199 . 10.1111/nan.12559 . free .
  43. Chinta SJ, Woods G, Rane A, Demaria M, Campisi J, Andersen JK . Cellular senescence and the aging brain . Experimental Gerontology . 68 . 3–7 . August 2015 . 25281806 . 4382436 . 10.1016/j.exger.2014.09.018 .
  44. Dehkordi SK, Walker J, Sah E, Bennett E, Atrian F, Frost B, Woost B, Bennett RE, Orr TC, Zhou Y, Andhey PS, Colonna M, Sudmant PH, Xu P, Wang M, Zhang B, Zare H, Orr ME . 6 . Profiling senescent cells in human brains reveals neurons with CDKN2D/p19 and tau neuropathology . Nature Aging . 1 . 12 . 1107–1116 . December 2021 . 35531351 . 9075501 . 10.1038/s43587-021-00142-3 .
  45. Acosta JC, O'Loghlen A, Banito A, Guijarro MV, Augert A, Raguz S, Fumagalli M, Da Costa M, Brown C, Popov N, Takatsu Y, Melamed J, d'Adda di Fagagna F, Bernard D, Hernando E, Gil J . 6 . Chemokine signaling via the CXCR2 receptor reinforces senescence . Cell . 133 . 6 . 1006–1018 . June 2008 . 18555777 . 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.038 . 6708172 . free .
  46. Kuilman T, Michaloglou C, Vredeveld LC, Douma S, van Doorn R, Desmet CJ, Aarden LA, Mooi WJ, Peeper DS . 6 . Oncogene-induced senescence relayed by an interleukin-dependent inflammatory network . Cell . 133 . 6 . 1019–1031 . June 2008 . 18555778 . 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.039 . 15295092 . free .
  47. Malaquin N, Martinez A, Rodier F . Keeping the senescence secretome under control: Molecular reins on the senescence-associated secretory phenotype . Experimental Gerontology . 82 . 39–49 . September 2016 . 27235851 . 10.1016/j.exger.2016.05.010 . 207584394 .
  48. Soto-Gamez A, Quax WJ, Demaria M . Regulation of Survival Networks in Senescent Cells: From Mechanisms to Interventions . Journal of Molecular Biology . 431 . 15 . 2629–2643 . July 2019 . 31153901 . 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.05.036 . free .
  49. Liu XL, Ding J, Meng LH . Oncogene-induced senescence: a double edged sword in cancer . Acta Pharmacologica Sinica . 39 . 10 . 1553–1558 . October 2018 . 29620049 . 6289471 . 10.1038/aps.2017.198 .
  50. Lyamina S, Baranovskii D, Kozhevnikova E, Ivanova T, Kalish S, Sadekov T, Klabukov I, Maev I, Govorun V . 6 . Mesenchymal Stromal Cells as a Driver of Inflammaging . International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 24 . 7 . 6372 . March 2023 . 37047346 . 10094085 . 10.3390/ijms24076372 . free .
  51. Baker JR, Vuppusetty C, Colley T, Hassibi S, Fenwick PS, Donnelly LE, Ito K, Barnes PJ . 6 . MicroRNA-570 is a novel regulator of cellular senescence and inflammaging . FASEB Journal . 33 . 2 . 1605–1616 . February 2019 . 30156909 . 6338629 . 10.1096/fj.201800965R . free .
  52. Acosta JC, Banito A, Wuestefeld T, Georgilis A, Janich P, Morton JP, Athineos D, Kang TW, Lasitschka F, Andrulis M, Pascual G, Morris KJ, Khan S, Jin H, Dharmalingam G, Snijders AP, Carroll T, Capper D, Pritchard C, Inman GJ, Longerich T, Sansom OJ, Benitah SA, Zender L, Gil J . 6 . A complex secretory program orchestrated by the inflammasome controls paracrine senescence . Nature Cell Biology . 15 . 8 . 978–990 . August 2013 . 23770676 . 3732483 . 10.1038/ncb2784 . free .
  53. Book: Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotypes Reveal Cell-Nonautonomous Functions of Oncogenic RAS and the p53 Tumor Suppressor. . Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. United States. Department of Energy. Office of Scientific and Technical Information . 2008. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 893411490.
  54. Chien Y, Scuoppo C, Wang X, Fang X, Balgley B, Bolden JE, Premsrirut P, Luo W, Chicas A, Lee CS, Kogan SC, Lowe SW . 6 . Control of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype by NF-κB promotes senescence and enhances chemosensitivity . Genes & Development . 25 . 20 . 2125–2136 . October 2011 . 21979375 . 3205583 . 10.1101/gad.17276711 .
  55. Casella G, Munk R, Kim KM, Piao Y, De S, Abdelmohsen K, Gorospe M . Transcriptome signature of cellular senescence . Nucleic Acids Research . 47 . 14 . 7294–7305 . August 2019 . 31251810 . 6698740 . 10.1093/nar/gkz555 .
  56. Coppé JP, Desprez PY, Krtolica A, Campisi J . The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression . Annual Review of Pathology . 5 . 1 . 99–118 . January 2010 . 20078217 . 4166495 . 10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102144 .
  57. Serrano M, Lin AW, McCurrach ME, Beach D, Lowe SW . Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a . Cell . 88 . 5 . 593–602 . March 1997 . 9054499 . 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81902-9 . 17518294 . free .
  58. Milanovic M, Fan DN, Belenki D, Däbritz JH, Zhao Z, Yu Y, Dörr JR, Dimitrova L, Lenze D, Monteiro Barbosa IA, Mendoza-Parra MA, Kanashova T, Metzner M, Pardon K, Reimann M, Trumpp A, Dörken B, Zuber J, Gronemeyer H, Hummel M, Dittmar G, Lee S, Schmitt CA . 6 . Senescence-associated reprogramming promotes cancer stemness . Nature . 553 . 7686 . 96–100 . January 2018 . 29258294 . 10.1530/endoabs.56.s25.2 . BioScientifica . 2018Natur.553...96M .
  59. Salama R, Sadaie M, Hoare M, Narita M . Cellular senescence and its effector programs . Genes & Development . 28 . 2 . 99–114 . January 2014 . 24449267 . 3909793 . 10.1101/gad.235184.113 .
  60. Serrano M . Cancer: final act of senescence . Nature . 479 . 7374 . 481–482 . November 2011 . 22113687 . 10.1038/479481a . 36154048 . free . 2011Natur.479..481S .
  61. Narasimhan A, Flores RR, Robbins PD, Niedernhofer LJ . Role of Cellular Senescence in Type II Diabetes . Endocrinology . 162 . 10 . October 2021 . 34363464 . 8386762 . 10.1210/endocr/bqab136 .
  62. Sagiv A, Krizhanovsky V . Immunosurveillance of senescent cells: the bright side of the senescence program . Biogerontology . 14 . 6 . 617–628 . December 2013 . 24114507 . 10.1007/s10522-013-9473-0 . 2775067 .
  63. Antonangeli F, Zingoni A, Soriani A, Santoni A . Senescent cells: Living or dying is a matter of NK cells . Journal of Leukocyte Biology . 105 . 6 . 1275–1283 . June 2019 . 30811627 . 10.1002/JLB.MR0718-299R . 73469394 .
  64. Radosavljevic M, Cuillerier B, Wilson MJ, Clément O, Wicker S, Gilfillan S, Beck S, Trowsdale J, Bahram S . 6 . A cluster of ten novel MHC class I related genes on human chromosome 6q24.2-q25.3 . Genomics . 79 . 1 . 114–123 . January 2002 . 11827464 . 10.1006/geno.2001.6673 .
  65. Prata LG, Ovsyannikova IG, Tchkonia T, Kirkland JL . Senescent cell clearance by the immune system: Emerging therapeutic opportunities . Seminars in Immunology . 40 . 101275 . December 2018 . 31088710 . 7061456 . 10.1016/j.smim.2019.04.003 .
  66. Frasca D . Senescent B cells in aging and age-related diseases: Their role in the regulation of antibody responses . Experimental Gerontology . 107 . 55–58 . July 2018 . 28687479 . 5754260 . 10.1016/j.exger.2017.07.002 .
  67. Pereira BI, Akbar AN . Convergence of Innate and Adaptive Immunity during Human Aging . Frontiers in Immunology . 7 . 445 . 2016 . 27867379 . 5095488 . 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00445 . free .
  68. Song P, An J, Zou MH . Immune Clearance of Senescent Cells to Combat Ageing and Chronic Diseases . Cells . 9 . 3 . E671 . March 2020 . 32164335 . 7140645 . 10.3390/cells9030671 . free .
  69. Wagner V, Gil J . T cells engineered to target senescence . Nature . 583 . 7814 . 37–38 . July 2020 . 32601490 . 10.1038/d41586-020-01759-x . 220260026 . free . 2020Natur.583...37W . 10044/1/80980 . free .
  70. Amor C, Feucht J, Leibold J, Ho YJ, Zhu C, Alonso-Curbelo D, Mansilla-Soto J, Boyer JA, Li X, Giavridis T, Kulick A, Houlihan S, Peerschke E, Friedman SL, Ponomarev V, Piersigilli A, Sadelain M, Lowe SW . 6 . Senolytic CAR T cells reverse senescence-associated pathologies . Nature . 583 . 7814 . 127–132 . July 2020 . 32555459 . 7583560 . 10.1038/s41586-020-2403-9 . 2020Natur.583..127A .
  71. Kale A, Sharma A, Stolzing A, Desprez PY, Campisi J . Role of immune cells in the removal of deleterious senescent cells . Immunity & Ageing . 17 . 16 . 2020 . 32518575 . 7271494 . 10.1186/s12979-020-00187-9 . free .
  72. Muñoz-Espín D, Cañamero M, Maraver A, Gómez-López G, Contreras J, Murillo-Cuesta S, Rodríguez-Baeza A, Varela-Nieto I, Ruberte J, Collado M, Serrano M . 6 . Programmed cell senescence during mammalian embryonic development . Cell . 155 . 5 . 1104–1118 . November 2013 . 24238962 . 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.019 . free . 20.500.11940/3668 . free .
  73. Zhang M, Serna-Salas S, Damba T, Borghesan M, Demaria M, Moshage H . Hepatic stellate cell senescence in liver fibrosis: Characteristics, mechanisms and perspectives . Mechanisms of Ageing and Development . 199 . 111572 . October 2021 . 34536446 . 10.1016/j.mad.2021.111572 . 237524296 . free .
  74. Solana R, Tarazona R, Gayoso I, Lesur O, Dupuis G, Fulop T . Innate immunosenescence: effect of aging on cells and receptors of the innate immune system in humans . Seminars in Immunology . 24 . 5 . 331–341 . October 2012 . 22560929 . 10.1016/j.smim.2012.04.008 .
  75. Khosla S, Farr JN, Tchkonia T, Kirkland JL . The role of cellular senescence in ageing and endocrine disease . Nature Reviews. Endocrinology . 16 . 5 . 263–275 . May 2020 . 32161396 . 7227781 . 10.1038/s41574-020-0335-y .
  76. Bernardes de Jesus B, Blasco MA . Assessing cell and organ senescence biomarkers . Circulation Research . 111 . 1 . 97–109 . June 2012 . 22723221 . 4824275 . 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.247866 .
  77. Trias E, Beilby PR, Kovacs M, Ibarburu S, Varela V, Barreto-Núñez R, Bradford SC, Beckman JS, Barbeito L . 6 . Emergence of Microglia Bearing Senescence Markers During Paralysis Progression in a Rat Model of Inherited ALS . Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience . 11 . 42 . 2019 . 30873018 . 6403180 . 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00042 . free .
  78. Zhang P, Kishimoto Y, Grammatikakis I, Gottimukkala K, Cutler RG, Zhang S, Abdelmohsen K, Bohr VA, Misra Sen J, Gorospe M, Mattson MP . 6 . Senolytic therapy alleviates Aβ-associated oligodendrocyte progenitor cell senescence and cognitive deficits in an Alzheimer's disease model . Nature Neuroscience . 22 . 5 . 719–728 . May 2019 . 30936558 . 6605052 . 10.1038/s41593-019-0372-9 .
  79. Aguayo-Mazzucato C, Andle J, Lee TB, Midha A, Talemal L, Chipashvili V, Hollister-Lock J, van Deursen J, Weir G, Bonner-Weir S . 6 . Acceleration of β Cell Aging Determines Diabetes and Senolysis Improves Disease Outcomes . Cell Metabolism . 30 . 1 . 129–142.e4 . July 2019 . 31155496 . 6610720 . 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.006 .
  80. Stokar . Joshua . July 2023 . Targeting senescent cells in ageing-related endocrine diseases . Nature Reviews Endocrinology . en . 19 . 7 . 382–382 . 10.1038/s41574-023-00848-x . 1759-5037.
  81. Sinha JK, Ghosh S, Raghunath M . Progeria: a rare genetic premature ageing disorder . The Indian Journal of Medical Research . 139 . 5 . 667–674 . May 2014 . 25027075 . 4140030 .
  82. Carrero D, Soria-Valles C, López-Otín C . Hallmarks of progeroid syndromes: lessons from mice and reprogrammed cells . Disease Models & Mechanisms . 9 . 7 . 719–735 . July 2016 . 27482812 . 4958309 . 10.1242/dmm.024711 .
  83. Kirkland JL, Tchkonia T, Zhu Y, Niedernhofer LJ, Robbins PD . The Clinical Potential of Senolytic Drugs . Journal of the American Geriatrics Society . 65 . 10 . 2297–2301 . October 2017 . 28869295 . 5641223 . 10.1111/jgs.14969 .
  84. Sahu S, Dattani A, Aboobaker AA . Secrets from immortal worms: What can we learn about biological ageing from the planarian model system? . Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology . 70 . 108–121 . October 2017 . 28818620 . 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.08.028 . Science communication in the field of fundamental biomedical research .

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Cellular senescence".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.