Cell nucleus explained

The cell nucleus (; : nuclei) is a membrane-bound organelle found in eukaryotic cells. Eukaryotic cells usually have a single nucleus, but a few cell types, such as mammalian red blood cells, have no nuclei, and a few others including osteoclasts have many. The main structures making up the nucleus are the nuclear envelope, a double membrane that encloses the entire organelle and isolates its contents from the cellular cytoplasm; and the nuclear matrix, a network within the nucleus that adds mechanical support.

The cell nucleus contains nearly all of the cell's genome. Nuclear DNA is often organized into multiple chromosomes – long strands of DNA dotted with various proteins, such as histones, that protect and organize the DNA. The genes within these chromosomes are structured in such a way to promote cell function. The nucleus maintains the integrity of genes and controls the activities of the cell by regulating gene expression.

Because the nuclear envelope is impermeable to large molecules, nuclear pores are required to regulate nuclear transport of molecules across the envelope. The pores cross both nuclear membranes, providing a channel through which larger molecules must be actively transported by carrier proteins while allowing free movement of small molecules and ions. Movement of large molecules such as proteins and RNA through the pores is required for both gene expression and the maintenance of chromosomes. Although the interior of the nucleus does not contain any membrane-bound subcompartments, a number of nuclear bodies exist, made up of unique proteins, RNA molecules, and particular parts of the chromosomes. The best-known of these is the nucleolus, involved in the assembly of ribosomes.

Structures

The nucleus contains nearly all of the cell's DNA, surrounded by a network of fibrous intermediate filaments called the nuclear matrix, and is enveloped in a double membrane called the nuclear envelope. The nuclear envelope separates the fluid inside the nucleus, called the nucleoplasm, from the rest of the cell. The size of the nucleus is correlated to the size of the cell, and this ratio is reported across a range of cell types and species.[1] In eukaryotes the nucleus in many cells typically occupies 10% of the cell volume. The nucleus is the largest organelle in animal cells. In human cells, the diameter of the nucleus is approximately six micrometres (μm).

Nuclear envelope and pores

See main article: Nuclear envelope and Nuclear pore.

The nuclear envelope consists of two membranes, an inner and an outer nuclear membrane, perforated by nuclear pores.[2] Together, these membranes serve to separate the cell's genetic material from the rest of the cell contents, and allow the nucleus to maintain an environment distinct from the rest of the cell. Despite their close apposition around much of the nucleus, the two membranes differ substantially in shape and contents. The inner membrane surrounds the nuclear content, providing its defining edge. Embedded within the inner membrane, various proteins bind the intermediate filaments that give the nucleus its structure.[2] The outer membrane encloses the inner membrane, and is continuous with the adjacent endoplasmic reticulum membrane.[2] As part of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, the outer nuclear membrane is studded with ribosomes that are actively translating proteins across membrane.[2] The space between the two membranes is called the perinuclear space, and is continuous with the endoplasmic reticulum lumen.[2]

In a mammalian nuclear envelope there are between 3000 and 4000 nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) perforating the envelope.[2] Each NPC contains an eightfold-symmetric ring-shaped structure at a position where the inner and outer membranes fuse.[3] The number of NPCs can vary considerably across cell types; small glial cells only have about a few hundred, with large Purkinje cells having around 20,000.[2] The NPC provides selective transport of molecules between the nucleoplasm and the cytosol.[4] The nuclear pore complex is composed of approximately thirty different proteins known as nucleoporins.[2] The pores are about 60–80 million daltons in molecular weight and consist of around 50 (in yeast) to several hundred proteins (in vertebrates).[5] The pores are 100 nm in total diameter; however, the gap through which molecules freely diffuse is only about 9 nm wide, due to the presence of regulatory systems within the center of the pore. This size selectively allows the passage of small water-soluble molecules while preventing larger molecules, such as nucleic acids and larger proteins, from inappropriately entering or exiting the nucleus. These large molecules must be actively transported into the nucleus instead. Attached to the ring is a structure called the nuclear basket that extends into the nucleoplasm, and a series of filamentous extensions that reach into the cytoplasm. Both structures serve to mediate binding to nuclear transport proteins.[6]

Most proteins, ribosomal subunits, and some RNAs are transported through the pore complexes in a process mediated by a family of transport factors known as karyopherins. Those karyopherins that mediate movement into the nucleus are also called importins, whereas those that mediate movement out of the nucleus are called exportins. Most karyopherins interact directly with their cargo, although some use adaptor proteins.[7] Steroid hormones such as cortisol and aldosterone, as well as other small lipid-soluble molecules involved in intercellular signaling, can diffuse through the cell membrane and into the cytoplasm, where they bind nuclear receptor proteins that are trafficked into the nucleus. There they serve as transcription factors when bound to their ligand; in the absence of a ligand, many such receptors function as histone deacetylases that repress gene expression.[6]

Nuclear lamina

See main article: Nuclear lamina. In animal cells, two networks of intermediate filaments provide the nucleus with mechanical support: The nuclear lamina forms an organized meshwork on the internal face of the envelope, while less organized support is provided on the cytosolic face of the envelope. Both systems provide structural support for the nuclear envelope and anchoring sites for chromosomes and nuclear pores.[8]

The nuclear lamina is composed mostly of lamin proteins. Like all proteins, lamins are synthesized in the cytoplasm and later transported to the nucleus interior, where they are assembled before being incorporated into the existing network of nuclear lamina.[9] [10] Lamins found on the cytosolic face of the membrane, such as emerin and nesprin, bind to the cytoskeleton to provide structural support. Lamins are also found inside the nucleoplasm where they form another regular structure, known as the nucleoplasmic veil,[11] [12] that is visible using fluorescence microscopy. The actual function of the veil is not clear, although it is excluded from the nucleolus and is present during interphase.[13] Lamin structures that make up the veil, such as LEM3, bind chromatin and disrupting their structure inhibits transcription of protein-coding genes.[14]

Like the components of other intermediate filaments, the lamin monomer contains an alpha-helical domain used by two monomers to coil around each other, forming a dimer structure called a coiled coil. Two of these dimer structures then join side by side, in an antiparallel arrangement, to form a tetramer called a protofilament. Eight of these protofilaments form a lateral arrangement that is twisted to form a ropelike filament. These filaments can be assembled or disassembled in a dynamic manner, meaning that changes in the length of the filament depend on the competing rates of filament addition and removal.

Mutations in lamin genes leading to defects in filament assembly cause a group of rare genetic disorders known as laminopathies. The most notable laminopathy is the family of diseases known as progeria, which causes the appearance of premature aging in those with the condition. The exact mechanism by which the associated biochemical changes give rise to the aged phenotype is not well understood.[15]

Chromosomes

See main article: Chromosome.

The cell nucleus contains the majority of the cell's genetic material in the form of multiple linear DNA molecules organized into structures called chromosomes. Each human cell contains roughly two meters of DNA. During most of the cell cycle these are organized in a DNA-protein complex known as chromatin, and during cell division the chromatin can be seen to form the well-defined chromosomes familiar from a karyotype. A small fraction of the cell's genes are located instead in the mitochondria.

There are two types of chromatin. Euchromatin is the less compact DNA form, and contains genes that are frequently expressed by the cell.[16] The other type, heterochromatin, is the more compact form, and contains DNA that is infrequently transcribed. This structure is further categorized into facultative heterochromatin, consisting of genes that are organized as heterochromatin only in certain cell types or at certain stages of development, and constitutive heterochromatin that consists of chromosome structural components such as telomeres and centromeres.[17] During interphase the chromatin organizes itself into discrete individual patches,[18] called chromosome territories.[19] Active genes, which are generally found in the euchromatic region of the chromosome, tend to be located towards the chromosome's territory boundary.[20]

Antibodies to certain types of chromatin organization, in particular, nucleosomes, have been associated with a number of autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus.[21] These are known as anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) and have also been observed in concert with multiple sclerosis as part of general immune system dysfunction.[22]

Nucleolus

See main article: Nucleolus.

The nucleolus is the largest of the discrete densely stained, membraneless structures known as nuclear bodies found in the nucleus. It forms around tandem repeats of rDNA, DNA coding for ribosomal RNA (rRNA). These regions are called nucleolar organizer regions (NOR). The main roles of the nucleolus are to synthesize rRNA and assemble ribosomes. The structural cohesion of the nucleolus depends on its activity, as ribosomal assembly in the nucleolus results in the transient association of nucleolar components, facilitating further ribosomal assembly, and hence further association. This model is supported by observations that inactivation of rDNA results in intermingling of nucleolar structures.[23]

In the first step of ribosome assembly, a protein called RNA polymerase I transcribes rDNA, which forms a large pre-rRNA precursor. This is cleaved into two large rRNA subunits5.8S, and 28S, and a small rRNA subunit 18S.[2] [24] The transcription, post-transcriptional processing, and assembly of rRNA occurs in the nucleolus, aided by small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) molecules, some of which are derived from spliced introns from messenger RNAs encoding genes related to ribosomal function. The assembled ribosomal subunits are the largest structures passed through the nuclear pores.

When observed under the electron microscope, the nucleolus can be seen to consist of three distinguishable regions: the innermost fibrillar centers (FCs), surrounded by the dense fibrillar component (DFC) (that contains fibrillarin and nucleolin), which in turn is bordered by the granular component (GC) (that contains the protein nucleophosmin). Transcription of the rDNA occurs either in the FC or at the FC-DFC boundary, and, therefore, when rDNA transcription in the cell is increased, more FCs are detected. Most of the cleavage and modification of rRNAs occurs in the DFC, while the latter steps involving protein assembly onto the ribosomal subunits occur in the GC.

Other nuclear bodies

See main article: Nuclear bodies.

+ Subnuclear structure sizes
Structure nameStructure diameter
Cajal bodies 0.2–2.0 μm [25]
Clastosomes 0.2–0.5 μm
PIKA 5 μm [26]
PML bodies 0.2–1.0 μm [27]
Paraspeckles 0.5–1.0 μm [28]
Speckles 20–25 nm
Besides the nucleolus, the nucleus contains a number of other nuclear bodies. These include Cajal bodies, gemini of Cajal bodies, polymorphic interphase karyosomal association (PIKA), promyelocytic leukaemia (PML) bodies, paraspeckles, and splicing speckles. Although little is known about a number of these domains, they are significant in that they show that the nucleoplasm is not a uniform mixture, but rather contains organized functional subdomains.

Other subnuclear structures appear as part of abnormal disease processes. For example, the presence of small intranuclear rods has been reported in some cases of nemaline myopathy. This condition typically results from mutations in actin, and the rods themselves consist of mutant actin as well as other cytoskeletal proteins.[29]

Cajal bodies and gems

A nucleus typically contains between one and ten compact structures called Cajal bodies or coiled bodies (CB), whose diameter measures between 0.2 μm and 2.0 μm depending on the cell type and species. When seen under an electron microscope, they resemble balls of tangled thread and are dense foci of distribution for the protein coilin.[30] CBs are involved in a number of different roles relating to RNA processing, specifically small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) and small nuclear RNA (snRNA) maturation, and histone mRNA modification.

Similar to Cajal bodies are Gemini of Cajal bodies, or gems, whose name is derived from the Gemini constellation in reference to their close "twin" relationship with CBs. Gems are similar in size and shape to CBs, and in fact are virtually indistinguishable under the microscope. Unlike CBs, gems do not contain small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs), but do contain a protein called survival of motor neuron (SMN) whose function relates to snRNP biogenesis. Gems are believed to assist CBs in snRNP biogenesis,[31] though it has also been suggested from microscopy evidence that CBs and gems are different manifestations of the same structure. Later ultrastructural studies have shown gems to be twins of Cajal bodies with the difference being in the coilin component; Cajal bodies are SMN positive and coilin positive, and gems are SMN positive and coilin negative.[32]

PIKA and PTF domains

PIKA domains, or polymorphic interphase karyosomal associations, were first described in microscopy studies in 1991. Their function remains unclear, though they were not thought to be associated with active DNA replication, transcription, or RNA processing.[33] They have been found to often associate with discrete domains defined by dense localization of the transcription factor PTF, which promotes transcription of small nuclear RNA (snRNA).[34]

PML-nuclear bodies

Promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML-nuclear bodies) are spherical bodies found scattered throughout the nucleoplasm, measuring around 0.1–1.0 μm. They are known by a number of other names, including nuclear domain 10 (ND10), Kremer bodies, and PML oncogenic domains.[35] PML-nuclear bodies are named after one of their major components, the promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML). They are often seen in the nucleus in association with Cajal bodies and cleavage bodies.[27] Pml-/- mice, which are unable to create PML-nuclear bodies, develop normally without obvious ill effects, showing that PML-nuclear bodies are not required for most essential biological processes.[36]

Splicing speckles

Speckles are subnuclear structures that are enriched in pre-messenger RNA splicing factors and are located in the interchromatin regions of the nucleoplasm of mammalian cells.[37] At the fluorescence-microscope level they appear as irregular, punctate structures, which vary in size and shape, and when examined by electron microscopy they are seen as clusters of interchromatin granules. Speckles are dynamic structures, and both their protein and RNA-protein components can cycle continuously between speckles and other nuclear locations, including active transcription sites. Speckles can work with p53 as enhancers of gene activity to directly enhance the activity of certain genes. Moreover, speckle-associating and non-associating p53 gene targets are functionally distinct.[38]

Studies on the composition, structure and behaviour of speckles have provided a model for understanding the functional compartmentalization of the nucleus and the organization of the gene-expression machinery[39] splicing snRNPs[40] [41] and other splicing proteins necessary for pre-mRNA processing.[39] Because of a cell's changing requirements, the composition and location of these bodies changes according to mRNA transcription and regulation via phosphorylation of specific proteins.[42] The splicing speckles are also known as nuclear speckles (nuclear specks), splicing factor compartments (SF compartments), interchromatin granule clusters (IGCs), and B snurposomes.[43] B snurposomes are found in the amphibian oocyte nuclei and in Drosophila melanogaster embryos. B snurposomes appear alone or attached to the Cajal bodies in the electron micrographs of the amphibian nuclei.[44] IGCs function as storage sites for the splicing factors.[45]

Paraspeckles

See main article: Paraspeckle. Discovered by Fox et al. in 2002, paraspeckles are irregularly shaped compartments in the interchromatin space of the nucleus.[46] First documented in HeLa cells, where there are generally 10–30 per nucleus,[47] paraspeckles are now known to also exist in all human primary cells, transformed cell lines, and tissue sections.[48] Their name is derived from their distribution in the nucleus; the "para" is short for parallel and the "speckles" refers to the splicing speckles to which they are always in close proximity.[47]

Paraspeckles sequester nuclear proteins and RNA and thus appear to function as a molecular sponge[49] that is involved in the regulation of gene expression.[50] Furthermore, paraspeckles are dynamic structures that are altered in response to changes in cellular metabolic activity. They are transcription dependent and in the absence of RNA Pol II transcription, the paraspeckle disappears and all of its associated protein components (PSP1, p54nrb, PSP2, CFI(m)68, and PSF) form a crescent shaped perinucleolar cap in the nucleolus. This phenomenon is demonstrated during the cell cycle. In the cell cycle, paraspeckles are present during interphase and during all of mitosis except for telophase. During telophase, when the two daughter nuclei are formed, there is no RNA Pol II transcription so the protein components instead form a perinucleolar cap.[48]

Perichromatin fibrils

Perichromatin fibrils are visible only under electron microscope. They are located next to the transcriptionally active chromatin and are hypothesized to be the sites of active pre-mRNA processing.

Clastosomes

Clastosomes are small nuclear bodies (0.2–0.5 μm) described as having a thick ring-shape due to the peripheral capsule around these bodies.[51] This name is derived from the Greek klastos, broken and soma, body. Clastosomes are not typically present in normal cells, making them hard to detect. They form under high proteolytic conditions within the nucleus and degrade once there is a decrease in activity or if cells are treated with proteasome inhibitors.[52] The scarcity of clastosomes in cells indicates that they are not required for proteasome function.[53] Osmotic stress has also been shown to cause the formation of clastosomes.[54] These nuclear bodies contain catalytic and regulatory subunits of the proteasome and its substrates, indicating that clastosomes are sites for degrading proteins.

Function

The nucleus provides a site for genetic transcription that is segregated from the location of translation in the cytoplasm, allowing levels of gene regulation that are not available to prokaryotes. The main function of the cell nucleus is to control gene expression and mediate the replication of DNA during the cell cycle.

Cell compartmentalization

The nuclear envelope allows control of the nuclear contents, and separates them from the rest of the cytoplasm where necessary. This is important for controlling processes on either side of the nuclear membrane: In most cases where a cytoplasmic process needs to be restricted, a key participant is removed to the nucleus, where it interacts with transcription factors to downregulate the production of certain enzymes in the pathway. This regulatory mechanism occurs in the case of glycolysis, a cellular pathway for breaking down glucose to produce energy. Hexokinase is an enzyme responsible for the first step of glycolysis, forming glucose-6-phosphate from glucose. At high concentrations of fructose-6-phosphate, a molecule made later from glucose-6-phosphate, a regulator protein removes hexokinase to the nucleus,[55] where it forms a transcriptional repressor complex with nuclear proteins to reduce the expression of genes involved in glycolysis.[56]

In order to control which genes are being transcribed, the cell separates some transcription factor proteins responsible for regulating gene expression from physical access to the DNA until they are activated by other signaling pathways. This prevents even low levels of inappropriate gene expression. For example, in the case of NF-κB-controlled genes, which are involved in most inflammatory responses, transcription is induced in response to a signal pathway such as that initiated by the signaling molecule TNF-α, binds to a cell membrane receptor, resulting in the recruitment of signalling proteins, and eventually activating the transcription factor NF-κB. A nuclear localisation signal on the NF-κB protein allows it to be transported through the nuclear pore and into the nucleus, where it stimulates the transcription of the target genes.

The compartmentalization allows the cell to prevent translation of unspliced mRNA.[57] Eukaryotic mRNA contains introns that must be removed before being translated to produce functional proteins. The splicing is done inside the nucleus before the mRNA can be accessed by ribosomes for translation. Without the nucleus, ribosomes would translate newly transcribed (unprocessed) mRNA, resulting in malformed and nonfunctional proteins.

Replication

See main article: Eukaryotic DNA replication.

The main function of the cell nucleus is to control gene expression and mediate the replication of DNA during the cell cycle. It has been found that replication happens in a localised way in the cell nucleus. In the S phase of interphase of the cell cycle; replication takes place. Contrary to the traditional view of moving replication forks along stagnant DNA, a concept of replication factories emerged, which means replication forks are concentrated towards some immobilised 'factory' regions through which the template DNA strands pass like conveyor belts.[58]

Gene expression

See main article: Gene expression.

See also: Transcription factories.

Gene expression first involves transcription, in which DNA is used as a template to produce RNA. In the case of genes encoding proteins, that RNA produced from this process is messenger RNA (mRNA), which then needs to be translated by ribosomes to form a protein. As ribosomes are located outside the nucleus, mRNA produced needs to be exported.[59]

Since the nucleus is the site of transcription, it also contains a variety of proteins that either directly mediate transcription or are involved in regulating the process. These proteins include helicases, which unwind the double-stranded DNA molecule to facilitate access to it, RNA polymerases, which bind to the DNA promoter to synthesize the growing RNA molecule, topoisomerases, which change the amount of supercoiling in DNA, helping it wind and unwind, as well as a large variety of transcription factors that regulate expression.[60]

Processing of pre-mRNA

See main article: Post-transcriptional modification. Newly synthesized mRNA molecules are known as primary transcripts or pre-mRNA. They must undergo post-transcriptional modification in the nucleus before being exported to the cytoplasm; mRNA that appears in the cytoplasm without these modifications is degraded rather than used for protein translation. The three main modifications are 5' capping, 3' polyadenylation, and RNA splicing. While in the nucleus, pre-mRNA is associated with a variety of proteins in complexes known as heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein particles (hnRNPs). Addition of the 5' cap occurs co-transcriptionally and is the first step in post-transcriptional modification. The 3' poly-adenine tail is only added after transcription is complete.

RNA splicing, carried out by a complex called the spliceosome, is the process by which introns, or regions of DNA that do not code for protein, are removed from the pre-mRNA and the remaining exons connected to re-form a single continuous molecule. This process normally occurs after 5' capping and 3' polyadenylation but can begin before synthesis is complete in transcripts with many exons. Many pre-mRNAs can be spliced in multiple ways to produce different mature mRNAs that encode different protein sequences. This process is known as alternative splicing, and allows production of a large variety of proteins from a limited amount of DNA.[61]

Dynamics and regulation

Nuclear transport

See main article: Nuclear transport.

The entry and exit of large molecules from the nucleus is tightly controlled by the nuclear pore complexes. Although small molecules can enter the nucleus without regulation,[62] macromolecules such as RNA and proteins require association karyopherins called importins to enter the nucleus and exportins to exit. "Cargo" proteins that must be translocated from the cytoplasm to the nucleus contain short amino acid sequences known as nuclear localization signals, which are bound by importins, while those transported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm carry nuclear export signals bound by exportins. The ability of importins and exportins to transport their cargo is regulated by GTPases, enzymes that hydrolyze the molecule guanosine triphosphate (GTP) to release energy. The key GTPase in nuclear transport is Ran, which is bound to either GTP or GDP (guanosine diphosphate), depending on whether it is located in the nucleus or the cytoplasm. Whereas importins depend on RanGTP to dissociate from their cargo, exportins require RanGTP in order to bind to their cargo.

Nuclear import depends on the importin binding its cargo in the cytoplasm and carrying it through the nuclear pore into the nucleus. Inside the nucleus, RanGTP acts to separate the cargo from the importin, allowing the importin to exit the nucleus and be reused. Nuclear export is similar, as the exportin binds the cargo inside the nucleus in a process facilitated by RanGTP, exits through the nuclear pore, and separates from its cargo in the cytoplasm.[63]

Specialized export proteins exist for translocation of mature mRNA and tRNA to the cytoplasm after post-transcriptional modification is complete. This quality-control mechanism is important due to these molecules' central role in protein translation. Mis-expression of a protein due to incomplete excision of exons or mis-incorporation of amino acids could have negative consequences for the cell; thus, incompletely modified RNA that reaches the cytoplasm is degraded rather than used in translation.

Assembly and disassembly

During its lifetime, a nucleus may be broken down or destroyed, either in the process of cell division or as a consequence of apoptosis (the process of programmed cell death). During these events, the structural components of the nucleus — the envelope and lamina — can be systematically degraded.In most cells, the disassembly of the nuclear envelope marks the end of the prophase of mitosis. However, this disassembly of the nucleus is not a universal feature of mitosis and does not occur in all cells. Some unicellular eukaryotes (e.g., yeasts) undergo so-called closed mitosis, in which the nuclear envelope remains intact. In closed mitosis, the daughter chromosomes migrate to opposite poles of the nucleus, which then divides in two. The cells of higher eukaryotes, however, usually undergo open mitosis, which is characterized by breakdown of the nuclear envelope. The daughter chromosomes then migrate to opposite poles of the mitotic spindle, and new nuclei reassemble around them.

At a certain point during the cell cycle in open mitosis, the cell divides to form two cells. In order for this process to be possible, each of the new daughter cells must have a full set of genes, a process requiring replication of the chromosomes as well as segregation of the separate sets. This occurs by the replicated chromosomes, the sister chromatids, attaching to microtubules, which in turn are attached to different centrosomes. The sister chromatids can then be pulled to separate locations in the cell. In many cells, the centrosome is located in the cytoplasm, outside the nucleus; the microtubules would be unable to attach to the chromatids in the presence of the nuclear envelope.[64] Therefore, the early stages in the cell cycle, beginning in prophase and until around prometaphase, the nuclear membrane is dismantled. Likewise, during the same period, the nuclear lamina is also disassembled, a process regulated by phosphorylation of the lamins by protein kinases such as the CDC2 protein kinase.[65] Towards the end of the cell cycle, the nuclear membrane is reformed, and around the same time, the nuclear lamina are reassembled by dephosphorylating the lamins.

However, in dinoflagellates, the nuclear envelope remains intact, the centrosomes are located in the cytoplasm, and the microtubules come in contact with chromosomes, whose centromeric regions are incorporated into the nuclear envelope (the so-called closed mitosis with extranuclear spindle). In many other protists (e.g., ciliates, sporozoans) and fungi, the centrosomes are intranuclear, and their nuclear envelope also does not disassemble during cell division.[66]

Apoptosis is a controlled process in which the cell's structural components are destroyed, resulting in death of the cell. Changes associated with apoptosis directly affect the nucleus and its contents, for example, in the condensation of chromatin and the disintegration of the nuclear envelope and lamina. The destruction of the lamin networks is controlled by specialized apoptotic proteases called caspases, which cleave the lamin proteins and, thus, degrade the nucleus' structural integrity. Lamin cleavage is sometimes used as a laboratory indicator of caspase activity in assays for early apoptotic activity. Cells that express mutant caspase-resistant lamins are deficient in nuclear changes related to apoptosis, suggesting that lamins play a role in initiating the events that lead to apoptotic degradation of the nucleus. Inhibition of lamin assembly itself is an inducer of apoptosis.[67]

The nuclear envelope acts as a barrier that prevents both DNA and RNA viruses from entering the nucleus. Some viruses require access to proteins inside the nucleus in order to replicate and/or assemble. DNA viruses, such as herpesvirus replicate and assemble in the cell nucleus, and exit by budding through the inner nuclear membrane. This process is accompanied by disassembly of the lamina on the nuclear face of the inner membrane.

Disease-related dynamics

Initially, it has been suspected that immunoglobulins in general and autoantibodies in particular do not enter the nucleus. Now there is a body of evidence that under pathological conditions (e.g. lupus erythematosus) IgG can enter the nucleus.[68]

Nuclei per cell

Most eukaryotic cell types usually have a single nucleus, but some have no nuclei, while others have several. This can result from normal development, as in the maturation of mammalian red blood cells, or from faulty cell division.[69]

Anucleated cells

An anucleated cell contains no nucleus and is, therefore, incapable of dividing to produce daughter cells. The best-known anucleated cell is the mammalian red blood cell, or erythrocyte, which also lacks other organelles such as mitochondria, and serves primarily as a transport vessel to ferry oxygen from the lungs to the body's tissues. Erythrocytes mature through erythropoiesis in the bone marrow, where they lose their nuclei, organelles, and ribosomes. The nucleus is expelled during the process of differentiation from an erythroblast to a reticulocyte, which is the immediate precursor of the mature erythrocyte.[70] The presence of mutagens may induce the release of some immature "micronucleated" erythrocytes into the bloodstream.[71] [72] Anucleated cells can also arise from flawed cell division in which one daughter lacks a nucleus and the other has two nuclei.

In flowering plants, this condition occurs in sieve tube elements.[73]

Multinucleated cells

See main article: Multinucleate. Multinucleated cells contain multiple nuclei. Most acantharean species of protozoa[74] and some fungi in mycorrhizae[75] have naturally multinucleated cells. Other examples include the intestinal parasites in the genus Giardia, which have two nuclei per cell.[76] Ciliates have two kinds of nuclei in a single cell, a somatic macronucleus and a germline micronucleus.[77] In humans, skeletal muscle cells, also called myocytes and syncytium, become multinucleated during development; the resulting arrangement of nuclei near the periphery of the cells allows maximal intracellular space for myofibrils. Other multinucleate cells in the human are osteoclasts a type of bone cell. Multinucleated and binucleated cells can also be abnormal in humans; for example, cells arising from the fusion of monocytes and macrophages, known as giant multinucleated cells, sometimes accompany inflammation[78] and are also implicated in tumor formation.[79]

A number of dinoflagellates are known to have two nuclei. Unlike other multinucleated cells these nuclei contain two distinct lineages of DNA: one from the dinoflagellate and the other from a symbiotic diatom.[80]

Evolution

As the major defining characteristic of the eukaryotic cell, the nucleus's evolutionary origin has been the subject of much speculation. Four major hypotheses have been proposed to explain the existence of the nucleus, although none have yet earned widespread support.[81] [82] [83]

The first model known as the "syntrophic model" proposes that a symbiotic relationship between the archaea and bacteria created the nucleus-containing eukaryotic cell. (Organisms of the Archaea and Bacteria domain have no cell nucleus.[84]) It is hypothesized that the symbiosis originated when ancient archaea, similar to modern methanogenic archaea, invaded and lived within bacteria similar to modern myxobacteria, eventually forming the early nucleus. This theory is analogous to the accepted theory for the origin of eukaryotic mitochondria and chloroplasts, which are thought to have developed from a similar endosymbiotic relationship between proto-eukaryotes and aerobic bacteria.[85] One possibility is that the nuclear membrane arose as a new membrane system following the origin of mitochondria in an archaebacterial host.[86] The nuclear membrane may have served to protect the genome from damaging reactive oxygen species produced by the protomitochondria.[87] The archaeal origin of the nucleus is supported by observations that archaea and eukarya have similar genes for certain proteins, including histones. Observations that myxobacteria are motile, can form multicellular complexes, and possess kinases and G proteins similar to eukarya, support a bacterial origin for the eukaryotic cell.[88]

A second model proposes that proto-eukaryotic cells evolved from bacteria without an endosymbiotic stage. This model is based on the existence of modern Planctomycetota bacteria that possess a nuclear structure with primitive pores and other compartmentalized membrane structures.[89] A similar proposal states that a eukaryote-like cell, the chronocyte, evolved first and phagocytosed archaea and bacteria to generate the nucleus and the eukaryotic cell.[90]

The most controversial model, known as viral eukaryogenesis, posits that the membrane-bound nucleus, along with other eukaryotic features, originated from the infection of a prokaryote by a virus. The suggestion is based on similarities between eukaryotes and viruses such as linear DNA strands, mRNA capping, and tight binding to proteins (analogizing histones to viral envelopes). One version of the proposal suggests that the nucleus evolved in concert with phagocytosis to form an early cellular "predator".[91] Another variant proposes that eukaryotes originated from early archaea infected by poxviruses, on the basis of observed similarity between the DNA polymerases in modern poxviruses and eukaryotes.[92] [93] It has been suggested that the unresolved question of the evolution of sex could be related to the viral eukaryogenesis hypothesis.[94]

A more recent proposal, the exomembrane hypothesis, suggests that the nucleus instead originated from a single ancestral cell that evolved a second exterior cell membrane; the interior membrane enclosing the original cell then became the nuclear membrane and evolved increasingly elaborate pore structures for passage of internally synthesized cellular components such as ribosomal subunits.[95]

History

The nucleus was the first organelle to be discovered. What is most likely the oldest preserved drawing dates back to the early microscopist Antonie van Leeuwenhoek (1632–1723). He observed a "lumen", the nucleus, in the red blood cells of salmon.[96] Unlike mammalian red blood cells, those of other vertebrates still contain nuclei.[97]

The nucleus was also described by Franz Bauer in 1804[98] and in more detail in 1831 by Scottish botanist Robert Brown in a talk at the Linnean Society of London. Brown was studying orchids under the microscope when he observed an opaque area, which he called the "areola" or "nucleus", in the cells of the flower's outer layer.[99] He did not suggest a potential function.

In 1838, Matthias Schleiden proposed that the nucleus plays a role in generating cells, thus he introduced the name "cytoblast" ("cell builder"). He believed that he had observed new cells assembling around "cytoblasts". Franz Meyen was a strong opponent of this view, having already described cells multiplying by division and believing that many cells would have no nuclei. The idea that cells can be generated de novo, by the "cytoblast" or otherwise, contradicted work by Robert Remak (1852) and Rudolf Virchow (1855) who decisively propagated the new paradigm that cells are generated solely by cells ("Latin: Omnis cellula e cellula"). The function of the nucleus remained unclear.[100]

Between 1877 and 1878, Oscar Hertwig published several studies on the fertilization of sea urchin eggs, showing that the nucleus of the sperm enters the oocyte and fuses with its nucleus. This was the first time it was suggested that an individual develops from a (single) nucleated cell. This was in contradiction to Ernst Haeckel's theory that the complete phylogeny of a species would be repeated during embryonic development, including generation of the first nucleated cell from a "monerula", a structureless mass of primordial protoplasm ("Urschleim"). Therefore, the necessity of the sperm nucleus for fertilization was discussed for quite some time. However, Hertwig confirmed his observation in other animal groups, including amphibians and molluscs. Eduard Strasburger produced the same results for plants in 1884. This paved the way to assign the nucleus an important role in heredity. In 1873, August Weismann postulated the equivalence of the maternal and paternal germ cells for heredity. The function of the nucleus as carrier of genetic information became clear only later, after mitosis was discovered and the Mendelian rules were rediscovered at the beginning of the 20th century; the chromosome theory of heredity was therefore developed.[100]

See also

Further reading

A review article about nuclear lamins, explaining their structure and various roles

A review article about nuclear transport, explains the principles of the mechanism, and the various transport pathways

A review article about the nucleus, explaining the structure of chromosomes within the organelle, and describing the nucleolus and other subnuclear bodies

A review article about the evolution of the nucleus, explaining a number of different theories

A university level textbook focusing on cell biology. Contains information on nucleus structure and function, including nuclear transport, and subnuclear domains

External links

Notes and References

  1. Kume K, Cantwell H, Neumann FR, Jones AW, Snijders AP, Nurse P . A systematic genomic screen implicates nucleocytoplasmic transport and membrane growth in nuclear size control . PLOS Genet . 13 . 5 . e1006767 . May 2017 . 28545058 . 5436639 . 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006767 . free .
  2. Book: Molecular Biology of the Cell . 6 . Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Morgan D, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P . Garland Science . 2015 . New York.
  3. Shulga N, Mosammaparast N, Wozniak R, Goldfarb DS . Yeast nucleoporins involved in passive nuclear envelope permeability . The Journal of Cell Biology . 149 . 5 . 1027–38 . May 2000 . 10831607 . 2174828 . 10.1083/jcb.149.5.1027 . Primary .
  4. Book: Alberts . Bruce . Essential cell biology . 2019 . New York . 9780393680393 . 242 . Fifth.
  5. Book: Lodish HF, Berk A, Kaiser C, Krieger M, Bretscher A, Ploegh H, Amon A, Martin KC, Darnell JE . 6 . Molecular Cell Biology . 2016 . W.H. Freeman . New York . 978-1-4641-8339-3 . Eighth .
  6. Book: Lodish H, Berk A, Matsudaira P, Kaiser CA, Krieger M, Scott MP, Zipursky SL, Darnell J . Molecular Cell Biology . WH Freeman . 5th . 2004 . New York . 978-0-7167-2672-2 . registration .
  7. Pemberton LF, Paschal BM . Mechanisms of receptor-mediated nuclear import and nuclear export . Traffic . 6 . 3 . 187–98 . March 2005 . 15702987 . 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00270.x . 172279 . Review . free .
  8. Book: 2002 . Molecular Biology of the Cell . Chapter 4: DNA and Chromosomes . 191–234 . Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P . New York . Garland Science . 4th . 978-0-8153-4072-0 .
  9. Stuurman N, Heins S, Aebi U . Nuclear lamins: their structure, assembly, and interactions . Journal of Structural Biology . 122 . 1–2 . 42–66 . 1998 . 9724605 . 10.1006/jsbi.1998.3987 . Review .
  10. Goldman AE, Moir RD, Montag-Lowy M, Stewart M, Goldman RD . Pathway of incorporation of microinjected lamin A into the nuclear envelope . The Journal of Cell Biology . 119 . 4 . 725–35 . November 1992 . 1429833 . 2289687 . 10.1083/jcb.119.4.725 . Primary .
  11. Goldman RD, Gruenbaum Y, Moir RD, Shumaker DK, Spann TP . Nuclear lamins: building blocks of nuclear architecture . Genes & Development . 16 . 5 . 533–47 . March 2002 . 11877373 . 10.1101/gad.960502 . free . Review .
  12. Broers JL, Ramaekers FC . Dynamics of nuclear lamina assembly and disassembly . Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology . 56 . 177–92 . 2004 . 15565881 . 9781134279838 . Review .
  13. Moir RD, Yoon M, Khuon S, Goldman RD . Nuclear lamins A and B1: different pathways of assembly during nuclear envelope formation in living cells . The Journal of Cell Biology . 151 . 6 . 1155–68 . December 2000 . 11121432 . 2190592 . 10.1083/jcb.151.6.1155 . Primary .
  14. Spann TP, Goldman AE, Wang C, Huang S, Goldman RD . Alteration of nuclear lamin organization inhibits RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription . The Journal of Cell Biology . 156 . 4 . 603–8 . February 2002 . 11854306 . 2174089 . 10.1083/jcb.200112047 . Primary .
  15. Mounkes LC, Stewart CL . Aging and nuclear organization: lamins and progeria . Current Opinion in Cell Biology . 16 . 3 . 322–7 . June 2004 . 15145358 . 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.03.009 . Review .
  16. Ehrenhofer-Murray AE . Chromatin dynamics at DNA replication, transcription and repair . European Journal of Biochemistry . 271 . 12 . 2335–49 . June 2004 . 15182349 . 10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04162.x . Review . free .
  17. Grigoryev SA, Bulynko YA, Popova EY . The end adjusts the means: heterochromatin remodelling during terminal cell differentiation . Chromosome Research . 14 . 1 . 53–69 . 2006 . 16506096 . 10.1007/s10577-005-1021-6 . 6040822 . Review .
  18. Schardin M, Cremer T, Hager HD, Lang M . Specific staining of human chromosomes in Chinese hamster x man hybrid cell lines demonstrates interphase chromosome territories . Human Genetics . 71 . 4 . 281–7 . December 1985 . 2416668 . 10.1007/BF00388452 . 9261461 . Primary .
  19. Lamond AI, Earnshaw WC . Structure and function in the nucleus . Science . 280 . 5363 . 547–53 . April 1998 . 9554838 . 10.1126/science.280.5363.547 . 10.1.1.323.5543 . Review .
  20. Kurz A, Lampel S, Nickolenko JE, Bradl J, Benner A, Zirbel RM, Cremer T, Lichter P . 6 . Active and inactive genes localize preferentially in the periphery of chromosome territories . The Journal of Cell Biology . 135 . 5 . 1195–205 . December 1996 . 8947544 . 2121085 . 10.1083/jcb.135.5.1195 . dead . Primary . https://web.archive.org/web/20070929104104/http://intl.jcb.org/cgi/content/abstract/135/5/1195 . 29 September 2007 .
  21. Rothfield NF, Stollar BD . The relation of immunoglobulin class, pattern of anti-nuclear antibody, and complement-fixing antibodies to DNA in sera from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus . The Journal of Clinical Investigation . 46 . 11 . 1785–94 . November 1967 . 4168731 . 292929 . 10.1172/JCI105669 . Primary .
  22. Barned S, Goodman AD, Mattson DH . Frequency of anti-nuclear antibodies in multiple sclerosis . Neurology . 45 . 2 . 384–5 . February 1995 . 7854544 . 10.1212/WNL.45.2.384 . 30482028 . Primary .
  23. Hernandez-Verdun D . Nucleolus: from structure to dynamics . Histochemistry and Cell Biology . 125 . 1–2 . 127–37 . January 2006 . 16328431 . 10.1007/s00418-005-0046-4 . 20769260 . Review .
  24. Lamond AI, Sleeman JE . Nuclear substructure and dynamics . Current Biology . 13 . 21 . R825-8 . October 2003 . 14588256 . 10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.012 . 16865665 . Review . free . 2003CBio...13.R825L .
  25. Cioce M, Lamond AI . Cajal bodies: a long history of discovery . Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology . 21 . 105–31 . 2005 . 16212489 . 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.010403.103738 . 8807316 . Review .
  26. Book: Pollard . Thomas D. . William C. . Earnshaw . vanc . Cell Biology . Saunders . 2004 . Philadelphia . 978-0-7216-3360-2 . registration .
  27. Dundr M, Misteli T . Functional architecture in the cell nucleus . The Biochemical Journal . 356 . Pt 2 . 297–310 . June 2001 . 11368755 . 1221839 . 10.1042/0264-6021:3560297 . Review .
  28. Bond CS, Fox AH . Paraspeckles: nuclear bodies built on long noncoding RNA . The Journal of Cell Biology . 186 . 5 . 637–44 . September 2009 . 19720872 . 2742191 . 10.1083/jcb.200906113 . Review .
  29. Goebel HH, Warlo I . Nemaline myopathy with intranuclear rods--intranuclear rod myopathy . Neuromuscular Disorders . 7 . 1 . 13–9 . January 1997 . 9132135 . 10.1016/S0960-8966(96)00404-X . 29584217 . Review .
  30. Matera AG, Frey MR . Coiled bodies and gems: Janus or gemini? . American Journal of Human Genetics . 63 . 2 . 317–21 . August 1998 . 9683623 . 1377332 . 10.1086/301992 . Review .
  31. Matera AG . Of coiled bodies, gems, and salmon . Journal of Cellular Biochemistry . 70 . 2 . 181–92 . August 1998 . 9671224 . 10.1002/(sici)1097-4644(19980801)70:2<181::aid-jcb4>3.0.co;2-k . 44941483 . Review .
  32. Navascues J, Berciano MT, Tucker KE, Lafarga M, Matera AG . Targeting SMN to Cajal bodies and nuclear gems during neuritogenesis . Chromosoma . 112 . 8 . 398–409 . June 2004 . 15164213 . 1592132 . 10.1007/s00412-004-0285-5 . Primary .
  33. Saunders WS, Cooke CA, Earnshaw WC . Compartmentalization within the nucleus: discovery of a novel subnuclear region . The Journal of Cell Biology . 115 . 4 . 919–31 . November 1991 . 1955462 . 2289954 . 10.1083/jcb.115.4.919 . Primary .
  34. Pombo A, Cuello P, Schul W, Yoon JB, Roeder RG, Cook PR, Murphy S . Regional and temporal specialization in the nucleus: a transcriptionally-active nuclear domain rich in PTF, Oct1 and PIKA antigens associates with specific chromosomes early in the cell cycle . The EMBO Journal . 17 . 6 . 1768–78 . March 1998 . 9501098 . 1170524 . 10.1093/emboj/17.6.1768 . Primary .
  35. Zimber A, Nguyen QD, Gespach C . Nuclear bodies and compartments: functional roles and cellular signalling in health and disease . Cellular Signalling . 16 . 10 . 1085–104 . October 2004 . 15240004 . 10.1016/j.cellsig.2004.03.020 . Review .
  36. Lallemand-Breitenbach V, de Thé H . PML nuclear bodies . Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology . 2 . 5 . a000661 . May 2010 . 20452955 . 2857171 . 10.1101/cshperspect.a000661 . Review .
  37. Spector DL, Lamond AI . Nuclear speckles . Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology . 3 . 2 . a000646 . Feb 2011 . 20926517 . 3039535 . 10.1101/cshperspect.a000646 . Review .
  38. Alexander KA, Coté A, Nguyen SC, Zhang L, Berger SL . p53 mediates target gene association with nuclear speckles for amplified RNA expression . Molecular Cell . 81. 8. S1097-2765(21)00174-X . Mar 2021 . 33823140 . 8830378. 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.03.006 . 233172170 . Primary .
  39. Lamond AI, Spector DL . Nuclear speckles: a model for nuclear organelles . Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology . 4 . 8 . 605–12 . August 2003 . 12923522 . 10.1038/nrm1172 . 6439413 . Review .
  40. Tripathi K, Parnaik VK . Differential dynamics of splicing factor SC35 during the cell cycle . Journal of Biosciences . 33 . 3 . 345–54 . September 2008 . 19005234 . 10.1007/s12038-008-0054-3 . live . 6332495 . Primary . https://web.archive.org/web/20111115235056/http://www.ias.ac.in/jbiosci/sep2008/345.pdf . 15 November 2011 .
  41. Tripathi K, Parnaik VK . Differential dynamics of splicing factor SC35 during the cell cycle . Journal of Biosciences . 33 . 3 . 345–54 . September 2008 . 19005234 . 10.1007/s12038-008-0054-3 . 6332495 . Primary .
  42. Handwerger KE, Gall JG . Subnuclear organelles: new insights into form and function . Trends in Cell Biology . 16 . 1 . 19–26 . January 2006 . 16325406 . 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.11.005 . Review .
  43. Web site: Cellular component Nucleus speckle . UniProt: UniProtKB . 30 August 2013.
  44. Gall JG, Bellini M, Wu Z, Murphy C . Assembly of the nuclear transcription and processing machinery: Cajal bodies (coiled bodies) and transcriptosomes . Molecular Biology of the Cell . 10 . 12 . 4385–402 . December 1999 . 10588665 . 25765 . 10.1091/mbc.10.12.4385 . Primary .
  45. Matera AG, Terns RM, Terns MP . Non-coding RNAs: lessons from the small nuclear and small nucleolar RNAs . Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology . 8 . 3 . 209–20 . March 2007 . 17318225 . 10.1038/nrm2124 . 30268055 . Review .
  46. Fox AH, Lamond AI . Paraspeckles . Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology . 2 . 7 . a000687 . July 2010 . 20573717 . 2890200 . 10.1101/cshperspect.a000687 . Review .
  47. Web site: Fox . Archa . Wendy . Bickmore . vanc . Nuclear Compartments: Paraspeckles . Nuclear Protein Database . 2004 . http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20080910110920/http://npd.hgu.mrc.ac.uk/compartments/paraspeckles.html . dead . 10 September 2008 . 6 March 2007 .
  48. Fox AH, Bond CS, Lamond AI . P54nrb forms a heterodimer with PSP1 that localizes to paraspeckles in an RNA-dependent manner . Molecular Biology of the Cell . 16 . 11 . 5304–15 . November 2005 . 16148043 . 1266428 . 10.1091/mbc.E05-06-0587 . Primary .
  49. Nakagawa S, Yamazaki T, Hirose T . Molecular dissection of nuclear paraspeckles: towards understanding the emerging world of the RNP milieu . Open Biology . 8 . 10 . October 2018 . 180150 . 30355755 . 6223218 . 10.1098/rsob.180150 . Review .
  50. Pisani G, Baron B . Nuclear paraspeckles function in mediating gene regulatory and apoptotic pathways . Non-Coding RNA Research . 4 . 4 . 128–134 . December 2019 . 32072080 . 7012776 . 10.1016/j.ncrna.2019.11.002 . Review .
  51. Lafarga M, Berciano MT, Pena E, Mayo I, Castaño JG, Bohmann D, Rodrigues JP, Tavanez JP, Carmo-Fonseca M . 6 . Clastosome: a subtype of nuclear body enriched in 19S and 20S proteasomes, ubiquitin, and protein substrates of proteasome . Molecular Biology of the Cell . 13 . 8 . 2771–82 . August 2002 . 12181345 . 117941 . 10.1091/mbc.e02-03-0122 . 10.1.1.321.6138 . Primary .
  52. Kong XN, Yan HX, Chen L, Dong LW, Yang W, Liu Q, Yu LX, Huang DD, Liu SQ, Liu H, Wu MC, Wang HY . 6 . LPS-induced down-regulation of signal regulatory protein contributes to innate immune activation in macrophages . The Journal of Experimental Medicine . 204 . 11 . 2719–31 . October 2007 . 17954568 . 2118489 . 10.1084/jem.20062611 . Primary .
  53. Carmo-Fonseca M, Berciano MT, Lafarga M . Orphan nuclear bodies . Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology . 2 . 9 . a000703 . September 2010 . 20610547 . 2926751 . 10.1101/cshperspect.a000703 . Review .
  54. Sampuda KM, Riley M, Boyd L . Stress induced nuclear granules form in response to accumulation of misfolded proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans . BMC Cell Biology . 18 . 1 . 18 . April 2017 . 28424053 . 5395811 . 10.1186/s12860-017-0136-x . Primary . free .
  55. Book: Lehninger . Albert L. . Nelson . David L. . Cox . Michael M. . vanc . Lehninger principles of biochemistry . 3rd . 2000 . Worth Publishers . New York . 978-1-57259-931-4 . registration .
  56. Moreno F, Ahuatzi D, Riera A, Palomino CA, Herrero P . Glucose sensing through the Hxk2-dependent signalling pathway . Biochemical Society Transactions . 33 . Pt 1 . 265–8 . February 2005 . 15667322 . 10.1042/BST0330265 . 20647022 . Primary .
  57. Görlich D, Kutay U . Transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm . Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology . 15 . 1 . 607–60 . 1999 . 10611974 . 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.15.1.607 . Review .
  58. Hozák P, Cook PR . Replication factories . Trends in Cell Biology . 4 . 2 . 48–52 . February 1994 . 14731866 . 10.1016/0962-8924(94)90009-4 . Review .
  59. Book: Protein Synthesis and Ribosome Structure: Translating the Genome . Nierhaus . Knud H. . Daniel N. . Wilson . vanc . 2004 . Wiley-VCH . 978-3-527-30638-1 .
  60. Book: Nicolini, Claudio A. . Genome Structure and Function: From Chromosomes Characterization to Genes Technology . vanc . 1997 . Springer . 978-0-7923-4565-7 .
  61. Black DL . Mechanisms of alternative pre-messenger RNA splicing . Annual Review of Biochemistry . 72 . 1 . 291–336 . 2003 . 12626338 . 10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161720 . 23576288 . Review .
  62. Book: Watson JD, Baker TA, Bell SP, Gann A, Levine M, Losick R . Molecular Biology of the Gene . Peason Benjamin Cummings; CSHL Press. . 2004 . 5th . Ch9–10 . 978-0-8053-9603-4 .
  63. Cavazza T, Vernos I . The RanGTP Pathway: From Nucleo-Cytoplasmic Transport to Spindle Assembly and Beyond . Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology . 3 . 82 . 2015 . 26793706 . 4707252 . 10.3389/fcell.2015.00082 . Review . free .
  64. Lippincott-Schwartz J . Cell biology: ripping up the nuclear envelope . Nature . 416 . 6876 . 31–2 . March 2002 . 11882878 . 10.1038/416031a . 4431000 . Commentary . 2002Natur.416...31L . free .
  65. Boulikas T . Phosphorylation of transcription factors and control of the cell cycle . Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression . 5 . 1 . 1–77 . 1995 . 7549180 . Review .
  66. Boettcher B, Barral Y . The cell biology of open and closed mitosis . Nucleus . Austin, Tex. . 4 . 3 . 160–5 . 2013 . 23644379 . 3720745 . 10.4161/nucl.24676 . Review .
  67. Steen RL, Collas P . Mistargeting of B-type lamins at the end of mitosis: implications on cell survival and regulation of lamins A/C expression . The Journal of Cell Biology . 153 . 3 . 621–6 . April 2001 . 11331311 . 2190567 . 10.1083/jcb.153.3.621 . Primary .
  68. Böhm I . IgG deposits can be detected in cell nuclei of patients with both lupus erythematosus and malignancy . Clinical Rheumatology . 26 . 11 . 1877–82 . November 2007 . 17364135 . 10.1007/s10067-007-0597-y . 44879431 . Primary .
  69. Book: Ressel . Lorenzo . vanc . Nuclear Morphologies . Normal cell morphology in canine and feline cytology: an identification guide . 2017 . John Wiley & Sons . Hoboken, NJ . 978-1-119-27891-7 . 6 . https://books.google.com/books?id=AkwrDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA6.
  70. Skutelsky E, Danon D . Comparative study of nuclear expulsion from the late erythroblast and cytokinesis . Experimental Cell Research . 60 . 3 . 427–36 . June 1970 . 5422968 . 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90536-7 . Primary .
  71. Torous DK, Dertinger SD, Hall NE, Tometsko CR . Enumeration of micronucleated reticulocytes in rat peripheral blood: a flow cytometric study . Mutation Research . 465 . 1–2 . 91–9 . February 2000 . 10708974 . 10.1016/S1383-5718(99)00216-8 . Primary .
  72. Hutter KJ, Stöhr M . Rapid detection of mutagen induced micronucleated erythrocytes by flow cytometry . Histochemistry . 75 . 3 . 353–62 . 1982 . 7141888 . 10.1007/bf00496738 . 28973947 . Primary .
  73. Ham BK, Lucas WJ . The angiosperm phloem sieve tube system: a role in mediating traits important to modern agriculture . Journal of Experimental Botany . 65 . 7 . 1799–816 . April 2014 . 24368503 . 10.1093/jxb/ert417 . free .
  74. Zettler LA, Sogin ML, Caron DA . Phylogenetic relationships between the Acantharea and the Polycystinea: a molecular perspective on Haeckel's Radiolaria . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 94 . 21 . 11411–6 . October 1997 . 9326623 . 23483 . 10.1073/pnas.94.21.11411 . Primary . 1997PNAS...9411411A . free .
  75. Horton TR . The number of nuclei in basidiospores of 63 species of ectomycorrhizal Homobasidiomycetes . Mycologia . 98 . 2 . 233–8 . 2006 . 16894968 . 10.3852/mycologia.98.2.233 . Primary .
  76. Adam RD . The biology of Giardia spp . Microbiological Reviews . 55 . 4 . 706–32 . December 1991 . 1779932 . 372844 . 10.1128/MMBR.55.4.706-732.1991 . Review .
  77. Vogt A, Goldman AD, Mochizuki K, Landweber LF . Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements . PLOS Genetics . 1 August 2013 . 9 . 8 . e1003659 . 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003659 . 23935529 . 3731211 . free .
  78. McInnes A, Rennick DM . Interleukin 4 induces cultured monocytes/macrophages to form giant multinucleated cells . The Journal of Experimental Medicine . 167 . 2 . 598–611 . February 1988 . 3258008 . 2188835 . 10.1084/jem.167.2.598 . Primary .
  79. Goldring SR, Roelke MS, Petrison KK, Bhan AK . Human giant cell tumors of bone identification and characterization of cell types . The Journal of Clinical Investigation . 79 . 2 . 483–91 . February 1987 . 3027126 . 424109 . 10.1172/JCI112838 . Primary .
  80. Imanian B, Pombert JF, Dorrell RG, Burki F, Keeling PJ . Tertiary endosymbiosis in two dinotoms has generated little change in the mitochondrial genomes of their dinoflagellate hosts and diatom endosymbionts . PLOS ONE . 7 . 8 . e43763 . 2012 . 22916303 . 3423374 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0043763 . 2012PLoSO...743763I . Primary . free .
  81. Pennisi E . Elizabeth Pennisi . Evolutionary biology. The birth of the nucleus . Science . 305 . 5685 . 766–8 . August 2004 . 15297641 . 10.1126/science.305.5685.766 . 83769250 . News .
  82. Devos DP, Gräf R, Field MC . Evolution of the nucleus . Current Opinion in Cell Biology . 28 . 8–15 . June 2014 . 100 . 24508984 . 4071446 . 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.01.004 . Review .
  83. López-García P, Moreira D . Open Questions on the Origin of Eukaryotes . Trends in Ecology & Evolution . 30 . 11 . 697–708 . November 2015 . 26455774 . 4640172 . 10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.005 . Review .
  84. Book: Hogan CM . Archaea . Encyclopedia of Earth . Monosson E, Cleveland C . National Council for Science and the Environment . Washington, DC. . 2010 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110511133400/http://www.eoearth.org/article/Archaea?topic=49496 . 11 May 2011 . http://www.eoearth.org/article/Archaea?topic=49496 .
  85. Book: Margulis, Lynn . Lynn Margulis . vanc . 1981 . Symbiosis in Cell Evolution . 206–227 . W. H. Freeman and Company . San Francisco . 978-0-7167-1256-5 .
  86. Martin W . Archaebacteria (Archaea) and the origin of the eukaryotic nucleus . Curr Opin Microbiol . 8 . 6 . 630–7 . December 2005 . 16242992 . 10.1016/j.mib.2005.10.004 .
  87. Bernstein, H., Bernstein, C. (2017). Sexual Communication in Archaea, the Precursor to Eukaryotic Meiosis. In: Witzany, G. (eds) Biocommunication of Archaea. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65536-9_7
  88. López-García P, Moreira D . Selective forces for the origin of the eukaryotic nucleus . BioEssays . 28 . 5 . 525–33 . May 2006 . 16615090 . 10.1002/bies.20413 . Review .
  89. Fuerst JA . Intracellular compartmentation in planctomycetes . Annual Review of Microbiology . 59 . 299–328 . 2005 . 15910279 . 10.1146/annurev.micro.59.030804.121258 . Review .
  90. Hartman H, Fedorov A . The origin of the eukaryotic cell: a genomic investigation . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 99 . 3 . 1420–5 . February 2002 . 11805300 . 122206 . 10.1073/pnas.032658599 . Primary . 2002PNAS...99.1420H . free .
  91. Bell PJ . Viral eukaryogenesis: was the ancestor of the nucleus a complex DNA virus? . Journal of Molecular Evolution . 53 . 3 . 251–6 . September 2001 . 11523012 . 10.1007/s002390010215 . 20542871 . Comment . 2001JMolE..53..251L . free .
  92. Takemura M . Poxviruses and the origin of the eukaryotic nucleus . Journal of Molecular Evolution . 52 . 5 . 419–25 . May 2001 . 11443345 . 10.1007/s002390010171 . 21200827 . Primary . 2001JMolE..52..419T .
  93. Villarreal LP, DeFilippis VR . A hypothesis for DNA viruses as the origin of eukaryotic replication proteins . Journal of Virology . 74 . 15 . 7079–84 . August 2000 . 10888648 . 112226 . 10.1128/JVI.74.15.7079-7084.2000 . Primary .
  94. Bell PJ . Sex and the eukaryotic cell cycle is consistent with a viral ancestry for the eukaryotic nucleus . Journal of Theoretical Biology . 243 . 1 . 54–63 . November 2006 . 16846615 . 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.05.015 . 2006JThBi.243...54B . Primary .
  95. de Roos AD . The origin of the eukaryotic cell based on conservation of existing interfaces . Artificial Life . 12 . 4 . 513–23 . 2006 . 16953783 . 10.1162/artl.2006.12.4.513 . 5963228 . Primary .
  96. Book: Van Leeuwenhoek A . Opera Omnia, seu Arcana Naturae ope exactissimorum Microscopiorum detecta, experimentis variis comprobata, Epistolis ad varios illustres viros J. Arnold et Delphis, A. Beman, Lugdinum Batavorum . The Works of, or arcana of nature by means of exactissimorum microscopes had been detected and confirmed by a variety of experiments, the Epistles to the various illustrious men of valor J. Arnold and Delphi, A. Beman, Lugdina York 1719-1730 . la . Cited in Book: Gerlach D . Geschichte der Mikroskopie . . Frankfurt am Main, Germany . 2009 . 978-3-8171-1781-9 .
  97. 10.1007/BF01283036 . The cytomorphic system of anucleate non-mammalian erythrocytes . 1982 . Cohen WD . Protoplasma . 113 . 23–32. 41287948 .
  98. Book: Harris H . The Birth of the Cell . 1999 . Yale University Press . New Haven . 978-0-300-07384-3 . registration .
  99. Brown . Robert . vanc . On the Organs and Mode of Fecundation of Orchidex and Asclepiadea . Miscellaneous Botanical Works I . 511–514 . 1866.
  100. Book: Cremer, Thomas . vanc . Von der Zellenlehre zur Chromosomentheorie . 1985 . Springer Verlag . Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo . 978-3-540-13987-4. Online Version here