In fluid mechanics and mathematics, a capillary surface is a surface that represents the interface between two different fluids. As a consequence of being a surface, a capillary surface has no thickness in slight contrast with most real fluid interfaces.
Capillary surfaces are of interest in mathematics because the problems involved are very nonlinear and have interesting properties, such as discontinuous dependence on boundary data at isolated points.[1] In particular, static capillary surfaces with gravity absent have constant mean curvature, so that a minimal surface is a special case of static capillary surface.
They are also of practical interest for fluid management in space (or other environments free of body forces), where both flow and static configuration are often dominated by capillary effects.
The defining equation for a capillary surface is called the stress balance equation,[2] which can be derived by considering the forces and stresses acting on a small volume that is partly bounded by a capillary surface. For a fluid meeting another fluid (the "other" fluid notated with bars) at a surface
S
\begin{align} &(\sigmaij-\bar{\sigma}ij)\hat{n
where
\scriptstyle\hat{n
\scriptstyle\sigmaij
\scriptstyle\gamma
\scriptstyle\nablaS
\scriptstyle-\nablaS ⋅ \hat{n
In fluid mechanics, this equation serves as a boundary condition for interfacial flows, typically complementing the Navier–Stokes equations. It describes the discontinuity in stress that is balanced by forces at the surface. As a boundary condition, it is somewhat unusual in that it introduces a new variable: the surface
S
For best use, this vector equation is normally turned into 3 scalar equations via dot product with the unit normal and two selected unit tangents:
((\sigmaij-\bar{\sigma}ij)\hat{n
((\sigmaij-\bar{\sigma}ij)\hat{n
((\sigmaij-\bar{\sigma}ij)\hat{n
Note that the products lacking dots are tensor products of tensors with vectors (resulting in vectors similar to a matrix-vector product), those with dots are dot products. The first equation is called the normal stress equation, or the normal stress boundary condition. The second two equations are called tangential stress equations.
The stress tensor is related to velocity and pressure. Its actual form will depend on the specific fluid being dealt with, for the common case of incompressible Newtonian flow the stress tensor is given by
\begin{align} \sigmaij&=-\begin{pmatrix} p&0&0\\ 0&p&0\\ 0&0&p \end{pmatrix}+ \mu\begin{pmatrix} 2
\partialu | |
\partialx |
&
\partialu | |
\partialy |
+
\partialv | |
\partialx |
&
\partialu | |
\partialz |
+
\partialw | \\ | |
\partialx |
\partialv | |
\partialx |
+
\partialu | |
\partialy |
&2
\partialv | |
\partialy |
&
\partialv | |
\partialz |
+
\partialw | \\ | |
\partialy |
\partialw | |
\partialx |
+
\partialu | |
\partialz |
&
\partialw | |
\partialy |
+
\partialv | |
\partialz |
&2
\partialw | |
\partialz |
\end{pmatrix}\\ &=-pI+\mu(\nablav+(\nablav)T) \end{align}
where
p
\scriptstylev
\mu
In the absence of motion, the stress tensors yield only hydrostatic pressure so that
\scriptstyle\sigmaij=-pI
\barp-p=\gamma\nabla ⋅ \hat{n
0=\nabla\gamma ⋅ \hat{t
The first equation establishes that curvature forces are balanced by pressure forces. The second equation implies that a static interface cannot exist in the presence of nonzero surface tension gradient.
If gravity is the only body force present, the Navier–Stokes equations simplify significantly:
0=-\nablap+\rhog
If coordinates are chosen so that gravity is nonzero only in the
z
dp | |
dz |
=\rhog ⇒ p=\rhogz+p0
where
p0
z=0
\bar\rhogz+\barp0-(\rhogz+p0)=\gamma\nabla ⋅ \hat{n
where
\Deltap
\Delta\rho
z
z
The pressure difference above is a constant, but its value will change if the
z
z
\Deltap=0
\kappaz+λ=\nabla ⋅ \hat{n
where (if gravity is in the negative
z
\kappa
This nonlinear equation has some rich properties, especially in terms of existence of unique solutions. For example, the nonexistence of solution to some boundary value problem implies that, physically, the problem can't be static. If a solution does exist, normally it'll exist for very specific values of
λ
λ
A deep property of capillary surfaces is the surface energy that is imparted by surface tension:
ES=\gammaSAS
where
A
E=\sum\gammaSAS=\gammaLGALG+\gammaSGASG+\gammaSLASL
where the subscripts
LG
SG
SL
Typically the surface tension values between the solid–gas and solid–liquid interfaces are not known. This does not pose a problem; since only changes in energy are of primary interest. If the net solid area
ASG+ASL
E=\gammaSL(ASL+ASG)+\gammaLGALG+\gammaLGASG\cos(\theta)
so that
\DeltaE | |
\gammaLG |
=\DeltaALG+\DeltaASG\cos(\theta)=\DeltaALG-\DeltaASL\cos(\theta)
where
\theta
\begin{align} 0&=\sumFContact line\\ &=\gammaLG\cos(\theta)+\gammaSL-\gammaSG\end{align}
where the sum is zero because of the static state. When solutions to the Young-Laplace equation aren't unique, the most physically favorable solution is the one of minimum energy, though experiments (especially low gravity) show that metastable surfaces can be surprisingly persistent, and that the most stable configuration can become metastable through mechanical jarring without too much difficulty. On the other hand, a metastable surface can sometimes spontaneously achieve lower energy without any input (seemingly at least) given enough time.
Boundary conditions for stress balance describe the capillary surface at the contact line: the line where a solid meets the capillary interface; also, volume constraints can serve as boundary conditions (a suspended drop, for example, has no contact line but clearly must admit a unique solution).
For static surfaces, the most common contact line boundary condition is the implementation of the contact angle, which specifies the angle that one of the fluids meets the solid wall. The contact angle condition on the surface
S
\hat{n
where
\theta
\scriptstyle\partialS
\scriptstyle\hatv
\scriptstyle\hatn
S
\scriptstyle\hatn
For dynamic interfaces, the boundary condition showed above works well if the contact line velocity is low. If the velocity is high, the contact angle will change ("dynamic contact angle"), and as of 2007 the mechanics of the moving contact line (or even the validity of the contact angle as a parameter) is not known and an area of active research.[3]