In mathematics, specifically in category theory, hom-sets (i.e. sets of morphisms between objects) give rise to important functors to the category of sets. These functors are called hom-functors and have numerous applications in category theory and other branches of mathematics.
Let C be a locally small category (i.e. a category for which hom-classes are actually sets and not proper classes).
For all objects A and B in C we define two functors to the category of sets as follows:
The functor Hom( -, B) is also called the functor of points of the object B.Note that fixing the first argument of Hom naturally gives rise to a covariant functor and fixing the second argument naturally gives a contravariant functor. This is an artifact of the way in which one must compose the morphisms.
The pair of functors Hom(A, -) and Hom( -, B) are related in a natural manner. For any pair of morphisms f : B → B′ and h : A′ → A the following diagram commutes:Both paths send g : A → B to f∘g∘h : A′ → B′.
The commutativity of the above diagram implies that Hom( -, -) is a bifunctor from C × C to Set which is contravariant in the first argument and covariant in the second. Equivalently, we may say that Hom( -, -) is a bifunctor
Hom( -, -) : Cop × C → Setwhere Cop is the opposite category to C. The notation HomC( -, -) is sometimes used for Hom( -, -) in order to emphasize the category forming the domain.
See main article: Yoneda lemma. Referring to the above commutative diagram, one observes that every morphism
h : A′ → A
gives rise to a natural transformation
Hom(h, -) : Hom(A, -) → Hom(A′, -)
and every morphism
f : B → B′
gives rise to a natural transformation
Hom( -, f) : Hom( -, B) → Hom( -, B′)
Yoneda's lemma implies that every natural transformation between Hom functors is of this form. In other words, the Hom functors give rise to a full and faithful embedding of the category C into the functor category SetCop (covariant or contravariant depending on which Hom functor is used).
Some categories may possess a functor that behaves like a Hom functor, but takes values in the category C itself, rather than Set. Such a functor is referred to as the internal Hom functor, and is often written as
\left[- -\right]:Cop x C\toC
⇒ :Cop x C\toC
\operatorname{hom}(-,-):Cop x C\toC.
\operatorname{Hom}(I,\operatorname{hom}(-,-))\simeq\operatorname{Hom}(-,-)
\operatorname{Hom}(X,Y ⇒ Z)\simeq\operatorname{Hom}(X ⊗ Y,Z)
⊗
Y ⇒ Z
⊗
x
Y ⇒ Z
ZY
Internal Homs, when chained together, form a language, called the internal language of the category. The most famous of these are simply typed lambda calculus, which is the internal language of Cartesian closed categories, and the linear type system, which is the internal language of closed symmetric monoidal categories.
Note that a functor of the form
Hom( -, A) : Cop → Set
is a presheaf; likewise, Hom(A, -) is a copresheaf.
A functor F : C → Set that is naturally isomorphic to Hom(A, -) for some A in C is called a representable functor (or representable copresheaf); likewise, a contravariant functor equivalent to Hom( -, A) might be called corepresentable.
Note that Hom( -, -) : Cop × C → Set is a profunctor, and, specifically, it is the identity profunctor
\operatorname{id}C\colonC\nrightarrowC
The internal hom functor preserves limits; that is,
\operatorname{hom}(X,-)\colonC\toC
\operatorname{hom}(-,X)\colonCop\toC
Cop
C
The endofunctor Hom(E, -) : Set → Set can be given the structure of a monad; this monad is called the environment (or reader) monad.
If A is an abelian category and A is an object of A, then HomA(A, -) is a covariant left-exact functor from A to the category Ab of abelian groups. It is exact if and only if A is projective.[2]
Let R be a ring and M a left R-module. The functor HomR(M, -): Mod-R → Ab is adjoint to the tensor product functor -
⊗