Bioeconomy Explained

Biobased economy, bioeconomy or biotechonomy is economic activity involving the use of biotechnology and biomass in the production of goods, services, or energy. The terms are widely used by regional development agencies, national and international organizations, and biotechnology companies. They are closely linked to the evolution of the biotechnology industry and the capacity to study, understand, and manipulate genetic material that has been possible due to scientific research and technological development. This includes the application of scientific and technological developments to agriculture, health, chemical, and energy industries.[1] [2] The terms bioeconomy (BE) and bio-based economy (BBE) are sometimes used interchangeably. However, it is worth to distinguish them: the biobased economy takes into consideration the production of non-food goods, whilst bioeconomy covers both bio-based economy and the production and use of food and feed.[3] More than 60 countries and regions have bioeconomy or bioscience-related strategies, of which 20 have published dedicated bioeconomy strategies in Africa, Asia, Europe, Oceania, and the Americas.[4]

Definitions

Bioeconomy has large variety of definitions. The bioeconomy comprises those parts of the economy that use renewable biological resources from land and sea – such as crops, forests, fish, animals and micro-organisms – to produce food, health, materials, products, textiles and energy.[5] The definitions and usage does however vary between different areas of the world. [6]

An important aspect of the bioeconomy is understanding mechanisms and processes at the genetic, molecular, and genomic levels, and applying this understanding to creating or improving industrial processes, developing new products and services, and producing new energy. Bioeconomy aims to reduce our dependence on fossil natural resources, to prevent biodiversity loss and to create new economic growth and jobs that are in line with the principles of sustainable development.[7]

Earlier definitions

The term 'biotechonomy' was used by Juan Enríquez and Rodrigo Martinez at the Genomics Seminar in the 1997 AAAS meeting. An excerpt of this paper was published in Science."[8]

In 2010 it was defined in the report "The Knowledge Based Bio-Economy (KBBE) in Europe: Achievements and Challenges" by Albrecht & al. as follows: The bio-economy is the sustainable production and conversion of biomass, for a range of food, health, fibre and industrial products and energy, where renewable biomass encompasses any biological material to be used as raw material.”[9]

According to a 2013 study, "the bioeconomy can be defined as an economy where the basic building blocks for materials, chemicals and energy are derived from renewable biological resources".

The First Global Bioeconomy Summit in Berlin in November 2015 defines bioeconomy as "knowledge-based production and utilization of biological resources, biological processes and principles to sustainably provide goods and services across all economic sectors". According to the summit, bioeconomy involves three elements: renewable biomass, enabling and converging technologies, and integration across applications concerning primary production (i.e. all living natural resources), health (i.e. pharmaceuticals and medical devices), and industry (i.e. chemicals, plastics, enzymes, pulp and paper, bioenergy).[10]

History

Enríquez and Martinez' 2002 Harvard Business School working paper, "Biotechonomy 1.0: A Rough Map of Biodata Flow", showed the global flow of genetic material into and out of the three largest public genetic databases: GenBank, EMBL and DDBJ. The authors then hypothesized about the economic impact that such data flows might have on patent creation, evolution of biotech startups and licensing fees.[11] An adaptation of this paper was published in Wired magazine in 2003.[12]

The term 'bioeconomy' became popular from the mid-2000s with its adoption by the European Union and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development as a policy agenda and framework to promote the use of biotechnology to develop new products, markets, and uses of biomass.[13] Since then, both the EU (2012) and OECD (2006) have created dedicated bioeconomy strategies, as have an increasing number of countries around the world.[14] Often these strategies conflate the bioeconomy with the term 'bio-based economy'. For example, since 2005 the Netherlands has sought to promote the creation of a biobased economy.[15] Pilot plants have been started i.e. in Lelystad (Zeafuels), and a centralised organisation exists (Interdepartementaal programma biobased economy), with supporting research (Food & Biobased Research) being conducted.[16] Other European countries have also developed and implemented bioeconomy or bio-based economy policy strategies and frameworks.

In 2012 president Barack Obama of the USA announced intentions to encourage biological manufacturing methods, with a National Bioeconomy Blueprint.[17]

Aims

Global population growth and over consumption of many resources are causing increasing environmental pressure and climate change. Bioeconomy tackles with these challenges. It aims to ensure food security and to promote more sustainable natural resource use as well as to reduce the dependence on non-renewable resources, e.g. fossil natural resources and minerals. In some extent bioeconomy also helps economy to reduces greenhouse gas emissions and assists in mitigating and adapting to climate change.[18]

Genetic modification

See also: Algae fuel and Cellulosic ethanol. Organisms, ranging from bacteria over yeasts up to plants are used for production of enzymatic catalysis. Genetically modified bacteria have been used to produce insulin, artemisinic acid was made in engineered yeast. Some bioplastics (based on polyhydroxylbutyrate or polyhydroxylalkanoates) are produced from sugar using genetically modified microbes.[19]

Genetically modified organisms are also used for the production of biofuels. Biofuels are a type of carbon-neutral fuel.

Research is also being done towards CO2 fixation using a synthetic metabolic pathway. By genetically modifying E. coli bacteria so as to allow them to consume CO2, the bacterium may provide the infrastructure for the future renewable production of food and green fuels.[20] [21]

One of the organisms (Ideonella sakaiensis) that is able to break down PET (a plastic) into other substances has been genetically modified to break down PET even faster and also break down PEF. Once plastics (which are normally non-biodegradable) are broken down and recycled into other substances (i.e. biomatter in the case of Tenebrio molitor larvae) it can be used as an input for other animals.

Genetically modified crops are also used. Genetically modified energy crops for instance may provide some additional advantages such as reduced associated costs (i.e. costs during the manufacturing process[22]) and less water use. One example are trees have been genetically modified to either have less lignin, or to express lignin with chemically labile bonds.[23] [24]

With genetically modified crops however, there are still some challenges involved (hurdles to regulatory approvals, market adoption and public acceptance).[25]

Fields

According to European Union Bioeconomy Strategy updated in 2018 the bioeconomy covers all sectors and systems that rely on biological resources (animals, plants, micro-organisms and derived biomass, including organic waste), their functions and principles. It covers all primary production and economic and industrial sectors that base on use, production or processing biological resources from agriculture, forestry, fisheries and aquaculture. The product of bioeconomy are typically food, feed and other biobased products, bioenergy and services based on biological resources. The bioeconomy aims to drive towards sustainability, circularity as well as the protection of the environment and will enhance biodiversity.[26]

In some definitions, bioeconomy comprises also ecosystem services that are services offered by the environment, including binding carbon dioxide and opportunities for recreation. Another key aspect of the bioeconomy is not wasting natural resources but using and recycling them efficiently.[27]

According to EU Bioeconomy Report 2016, the bioeconomy brings together various sectors of the economy that produce, process and reuse renewable biological resources (agriculture, forestry, fisheries, food, bio-based chemicals and materials and bioenergy).[28]

Agriculture

See also: Food microbiology, Biochar, Agricultural technology and Regenerative agriculture.

However, not all synthetic nutrition products are animal food products such as meat and dairy – for instance, as of 2021 there are also products of synthetic coffee that are reported to be close to commercialization.[29] [30] [31] Similar fields of research and production based on bioeconomy agriculture are:

Many of the foods produced with tools and methods of the bioeconomy may not be intended for human consumption but for non-human animals such as for livestock feed, insect-based pet food or sustainable aquacultural feed. There are various startups and research teams around the world who use synthetic biology to create animal feed.[40]

Moreover, crops could be genetically engineered in ways that e.g. safely increase yields, reduce the need for pesticides or ease indoor production.

One example of a product highly specific to the bioeconomy that is widely available is algae oil which is a dietary supplement that could substitute possibly less sustainable, larger-market-share fish oil supplements.[41] [42]

Fungiculture

See also: Fungiculture. For example, there is ongoing research and development for indoor high-yield mechanisms.[43]

Mycoprotein

Waste management, recycling and biomining

Biobased applications, research and development of waste management may form a part of the bioeconomy. Bio-based recycling (e-waste,[44] plastics recycling, etc.) is linked to waste management and relevant standards and requirements of production and products. Some of the recycling of waste may be biomining and some biomining could be applied beyond recycling.[45]

For example, in 2020, biotechnologists reported the genetically engineered refinement and mechanical description of synergistic enzymes – PETase, first discovered in 2016, and MHETase of Ideonella sakaiensis – for faster depolymerization of PET and also of PEF, which may be useful for depollution, recycling and upcycling of mixed plastics along with other approaches.[46] [47] [48] Such approaches may be more environmentally-friendly as well as cost-effective than mechanical and chemical PET-recycling, enabling circular plastic bio-economy solutions via systems based on engineered strains.[49] Moreover, microorganisms could be employed to mine useful elements from basalt rocks via bioleaching.[50] [51]

Medicine, nutritional science and the health economy

See also: Personal genomics. In 2020, the global industry for dietary supplements was valued at $140.3 billion by a "Grand View Research" analysis.[52] Certain parts of the health economy may overlap with the bioeconomy,[53] [54] including anti-aging- and life extension-related products and activities, hygiene/beauty products,[54] functional food,[54] sports performance related products and bio-based tests (such as of one's microbiota) and banks (such as stool banks[55] including oral "super stool" capsules[56]) and databases (mainly DNA databases), all of which can in turn be used for individualized interventions, monitoring as well as for the development of new products. The pharmaceutical sector, including the research and development of new antibiotics, can also be considered to be a bioeconomy sector.

Forest bioeconomy

The forest bioeconomy is based on forests and their natural resources, and covers a variety of different industry and production processes. Forest bioeconomy includes, for example, the processing of forest biomass to provide products relating to, energy, chemistry, or the food industry. Thus, forest bioeconomy covers a variety of different manufacturing processes that are based on wood material and the range of end products is wide.[57]

Besides different wood-based products, recreation, nature tourism and game are a crucial part of forest bioeconomy. Carbon sequestration and ecosystem services are also included in the concept of forest bioeconomy.

Pulp, paper, packaging materials and sawn timber are the traditional products of the forest industry. Wood is also traditionally used in furniture and construction industries. But in addition to these, as a renewable natural resource, ingredients from wood can be valorised into innovative bioproducts alongside a range of conventional forest industry products. Thus, traditional mill sites of large forest industry companies, for example in Finland, are in the process of becoming biorefineries. In different processes, forest biomass is used to produce textiles, chemicals, cosmetics, fuels, medicine, intelligent packaging, coatings, glues, plastics, food and feed.[58]

Blue bioeconomy

The blue bioeconomy covers businesses that are based on the sustainable use of renewable aquatic resources as well water related expertise areas. It covers the development and marketing of blue bioeconomy products and services. In that respect, the key sectors include business activities based on water expertise and technology, water-based tourism, making use of aquatic biomass, and the value chain of fisheries. Furthermore, the immaterial value of aquatic natural resources is also very high. Water areas have also other values beyond being platforms of economic activities. It provides human well-being, recreation and health.[59]

According to the European Union the blue bioeconomy has the focus on aquatic or marine environments, especially, on novel aquaculture applications, including non-food, food and feed.[60]

In the European Report on the Blue Growth Strategy - Towards more sustainable growth and jobs in the blue economy (2017) the blue bioeconomy is defined differently to the blue economy. The blue economy means the industries that are related to marine environment activities, e.g. shipbuilding, transport, coastal tourism, renewable energies (such as off-shore windmills), living and non-living resources.

Energy

See also: Ethanol fermentation. The bioeconomy also includes bioenergy, biohydrogen, biofuel and algae fuel.

According to World Bioenergy Association 17.8 % out of gross final energy consumption was covered with renewable energy. Among renewable energy sources, bioenergy (energy from bio-based sources) is the largest renewable energy source. In 2017, bioenergy accounted for 70% of renewable energy consumption.[61]

The role of bioenergy varies in different countries and continents. In Africa it is the most important energy sources with the share of 96%. Bioenergy has significant shares in energy production in the Americas (59%), Asia (65%) and Europe (59%). The bioenergy is produced out of a large variety of biomass from forestry, agriculture and waste and side streams of industries to produce useful end products (pellets, wood chips, bioethanol, biogas and biodiesel) for electricity, heat and transportation fuel around the world.

Biomass is a renewable natural resource but it is still a limited resource. Globally there are huge resources, but environmental, social and economic aspects limit their use. Biomass can play an important role for low-carbon solutions in the fields of customer supplies, energy, food and feed. In practice, there are many competing uses.

The biobased economy uses first-generation biomass (crops), second-generation biomass (crop refuge), and third-generation biomass (seaweed, algae). Several methods of processing are then used (in biorefineries) to gather the most out of the biomass. This includes techniques such as

Anaerobic digestion is generally used to produce biogas, fermentation of sugars produces ethanol, pyrolysis is used to produce pyrolysis-oil (which is solidified biogas), and torrefaction is used to create biomass-coal.[62] Biomass-coal and biogas is then burnt for energy production, ethanol can be used as a (vehicle)-fuel, as well as for other purposes, such as skincare products.[63]

Biobased energy can be used to manage intermittency of variable renewable energy like solar and wind.

Getting the most out of the biomass

For economic reasons, the processing of the biomass is done according to a specific pattern (a process called cascading). This pattern depends on the types of biomass used. The whole of finding the most suitable pattern is known as biorefining. A general list shows the products with high added value and lowest volume of biomass to the products with the lowest added value and highest volume of biomass:[64]

Recent studies have highlighted the potential of traditionally used plants, in providing value-added products in remote areas of the world. A study conducted on tobacco plants proposed a non-exhaustive list of compounds with potential economic interest that can be sourced from these plants.[65]

Other fields and applications

See also: Timeline of biotechnology. Bioproducts or bio-based products are products that are made from biomass. The term “bioproduct” refers to a wide array of industrial and commercial products that are characterized by a variety of properties, compositions and processes, as well as different benefits and risks.[66]

Bio-based products are developed in order to reduce dependency on fossil fuels and non-renewable resources. To achieve this, the key is to develop new bio-refining technologies to sustainably transform renewable natural resources into bio-based products, materials and fuels, e.g.[67]

Climate change adaptation and mitigation

See also: Nature-based solutions. Activities and technologies for bio-based climate change adaptation could be considered as part of the bioeconomy. Examples may include:

[70] [71]

Materials

There is a potential for biobased-production of building materials (insulation, surface materials, etc.) as well as new materials in general (polymers, plastics, composites, etc.).[54] Photosynthetic microbial cells have been used as a step to synthetic production of spider silk.[32] [33]

Bioplastics

Bioplastics are not just one single material. They comprise a whole family of materials with different properties and applications. According to European Bioplastics, a plastic material is defined as a bioplastic if it is either bio-based plastic, biodegradable plastic, or is a material with both properties. Bioplastics have the same properties as conventional plastics and offer additional advantages, such as a reduced carbon footprint or additional waste management options, such as composting.[72]

Bioplastics are divided into three main groups:

Additionally, new materials such as PLA, PHA, cellulose or starch-based materials offer solutions with completely new functionalities such as biodegradability and compostability, and in some cases optimized barrier properties. Along with the growth in variety of bioplastic materials, properties such as flexibility, durability, printability, transparency, barrier, heat resistance, gloss and many more have been significantly enhanced.

Bioplastics have been made from sugarbeet, by bacteria.[73] [74]

= Examples of bioplastics

=

= Examples of bio-composites

=

For sustainable packaging

Textiles

See also: Environmental impact of fashion. The textile industry, or certain activities and elements of it, could be considered to be a strong global bioeconomy sector. Textiles are produced from natural fibres, regenerated fibres and synthetic fibres (Sinclair 2014). The natural fibre textile industry is based on cotton, linen, bamboo, hemp, wool, silk, angora, mohair and cashmere.[81]

Activities related to textile production and processing that more clearly fall under the domain of the bioeconomy are developments such as the biofabrication of leather-like material using fungi,[82] [83] [84] fungal cotton substitutes,[85] and renewable fibers from fungal cell walls.[86]

Textile fibres can be formed in chemical processes from bio-based materials. These fibres are called bio-based regenerated fibres. The oldest regenerated fibres are viscose and rayon, produced in the 19th century. The first industrial processes used a large amount of wood as raw material, as well as harmful chemicals and water. Later the process of regenerating fibres developed to reduce the use of raw materials, chemicals, water and energy.

In the 1990s the first more sustainable regenerated fibres, e.g. Lyocell, entered the market with the commercial name of Tencel. The production process uses wood cellulose and it processes the fibre without harmful chemicals.

The next generation of regenerated fibres are under development. The production processes use less or no chemicals, and the water consumption is also diminished.[87]

Issues

Degrowth, green growth and circular economy

The bioeconomy has largely been associated with visions of "green growth".[88] A study found that a "circular bioeconomy" may be "necessary to build a carbon neutral future in line with the climate objectives of the Paris Agreement".[89] However, some are concerned that with a focus or reliance on technological progress a fundamentally unsustainable socioeconomic model might be maintained rather than be changed.[90] Some are concerned it that may not lead to a ecologization of the economy but to an economization of the biological, "the living" and caution that potentials of non-bio-based techniques to achieve greater sustainability need to be considered.[90] A study found that the, as of 2019, current EU interpretation of the bioeconomy is "diametrically opposite to the original narrative of Baranoff and Georgescu-Roegen that told us that expanding the share of activities based on renewable resources in the economy would slow down economic growth and set strict limits on the overall expansion of the economy".[91] Furthermore, some caution that "Silicon Valley and food corporations" could use bioeconomy technologies for greenwashing and monopoly-concentrations. The bioeconomy, its potentials, disruptive new modes of production and innovations may distract from the need for systemic structural socioeconomic changes[92] and provide a false illusion of technocapitalist utopianism/optimism that suggests technological fixes[93] may make it possible to sustain contemporary patterns and structures, pre-empting structural changes.

Unemployment and work reallocation

Many farmers depend on conventional methods of producing crops and many of them live in developing economies.[94] Cellular agriculture for products such as synthetic coffee could, if the contemporary socioeconomic context (the socioeconomic system's mechanisms such as incentives and resource distribution mechanisms like markets) remains unaltered (e.g. in nature, purposes, scopes, limits and degrees), threaten their employment and livelihoods as well as the respective nation's economy and social stability. A study concluded that "given the expertise required and the high investment costs of the innovation, it seems unlikely that cultured meat immediately benefits the poor in developing countries" and emphasized that animal agriculture is often essential for the subsistence for farmers in poor countries.[95] However, not only developing countries may be affected.[96]

Patents, intellectual property and monopolies

Observers worry that the bioeconomy will become as opaque and free of accountability as the industry it attempts to replace, that is the current food system. The fear is that its core products will be mass-produced, nutritionally dubious meat sold at the homogeneous fast-food joints of the future.[97]

The medical community has warned that gene patents can inhibit the practice of medicine and progress of science.[98] This can also apply to other areas where patents and private intellectual property licenses are being used, often entirely preventing the use and continued development of knowledge and techniques for many years or decades. On the other hand, some worry that without intellectual property protection as the type of R&D-incentive, particularly to current degrees and extents, companies would no longer have the resources or motives/incentives to perform competitive, viable biotech research – as otherwise they may not be able to generate sufficient returns from initial R&D investment or less returns than from other expenditures that are possible.[99] "Biopiracy" refers to "the use of intellectual property systems to legitimize the exclusive ownership and control over biological resources and biological products that have been used over centuries in non-industrialized cultures".[100]

Rather than leading to sustainable, healthy, inexpensive, safe, accessible food being produced with little labor locally – after knowledge- and technology transfer and timely, efficient innovation – the bioeconomy may lead to aggressive monopoly-formation and exacerbated inequality.[101] [102] [97] For instance, while production costs may be minimal, costs – including of medicine[103] – may be high.

Innovation management, public spending and governance

See also: Strategic planning. It has been argued that public investment would be a tool governments should use to regulate and license cellular agriculture. Private firms and venture capital would likely seek to maximise investor value rather than social welfare.[97] Moreover, radical innovation is considered to be more risky, "and likely involves more information asymmetry, so that private financial markets may imperfectly manage these frictions". Governments may also help to coordinate "since several innovators may be needed to push the knowledge frontier and make the market profitable, but no single company wants to make the early necessary investments". And investments in the relevant sectors seem to be a bottleneck hindering the transition toward a bioeconomy.[104] Governments could also help innovators that lack the network "to naturally obtain the visibility and political influence necessary to obtain public funds" and could help determine relevant laws.[105] By establishing supporting infrastructure for entrepreneurial ecosystems they can help creating a beneficial environment for innovative bioeconomy startups.[106] Enabling such bioeconomy startups to act on the opportunities provided through the bioeconomy transformation further contributes to its success.[107]

In popular media

Biopunk – so called due to similarity with cyberpunk – is a genre of science fiction that often thematizes the bioeconomy as well as its potential issues and technologies. The novel The Windup Girl portrays a society driven by a ruthless bioeconomy and ailing under climate change.[108] In the more recent novel Change Agent prevalent black market clinics offer wealthy people unauthorized human genetic enhancement services and e.g. custom narcotics are 3D-printed locally or smuggled with soft robots.[109] [110] Solarpunk is another emerging genre that focuses on the relationship between human societies and the environment and also addresses many of the bioeconomy's issues and technologies such as genetic engineering, synthetic meat and commodification.[111] [112]

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Smyth. S. J.. Aerni. P.. Castle. D.. Demont. M.. Falck-Zepeda. J. B.. Paarlberg. R.. Phillips. P. W. B.. Pray. C. E.. Savastano. S.. Wesseler. Zilberman. D.. 2011. Sustainability and the bioeconomy: Policy recommendations from the 15th ICABR conference. AgBioForum. 14. 3. 180–186.
  2. Wesseler. Spielman. D. S.. Demont. M.. 2011. The Future of Governance in the Global Bioeconomy: Policy, Regulation, and Investment Challenges for the Biotechnology and Bioenergy Sectors. AgBioForum. 13. 4. 288–290.
  3. Staffas. Louise. Gustavsson. Mathias. McCormick. Kes. 2013-06-20. Strategies and Policies for the Bioeconomy and Bio-Based Economy: An Analysis of Official National Approaches. Sustainability. en. 5. 6. 2751–2769. 10.3390/su5062751. 2071-1050. free.
  4. Web site: Document card Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations . 2022-09-16 . www.fao.org.
  5. Book: Innovating for sustainable growth: a bioeconomy for Europe. 2012. European Union. European Commission. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.. 978-92-79-25376-8. Luxembourg. 839878465.
  6. Roos . Annie . Blomquist . Mimmi . Bhatia . Riina . Ekegren . Katarina . Rönnberg . Jonas . Torfgård . Lovisa . Tunberg . Maria . 2021-11-17 . The digitalisation of the Nordic bioeconomy and its effect on gender equality . Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research . 36 . 7–8 . 639–654 . 10.1080/02827581.2021.1996629 . 240328487 . 0282-7581. free . 2021SJFR...36..639R .
  7. Book: Growth by integrating bioeconomy and low-carbon economy : scenarios for Finland until 2050. Arasto, Antti, Koljonen, Tiina, Similä, Lassi. 2018. 978-951-38-8699-8. [Espoo]. 1035157127.
  8. Enríquez-Cabot, Juan. "Genomics and the World's Economy." Science 281 (14 August 1998): 925-926.
  9. J. Albrecht. D. Carrez. P. Cunningham. L.Daroda. R. Mancia. L. Máthé. A. Raschka. M. Carus. S.Piotrowski. 2010. The Knowledge Based Bio-Economy (KBBE) in Europe: Achievements and Challenges.. 10.13140/RG.2.2.36049.94560.
  10. Web site: An Overview on How Sustainability is Addressed in Official Bioeconomy Strategies at International, National and Regional Levels. fao.org.
  11. Juan Enríquez, Rodrigo Martinez. "Biotechonomy 1.0: A Rough Map of Biodata Flow", Harvard Business School working paper # 03-028, August 2002.
  12. Rodrigo Martinez, Juan Enríquez, Jonathan West. "DNA Space. The Geography of the Genome", Wired, June 2003. p. 160.
  13. Book: Birch, Kean. Neoliberal Bio-economies? The Co-construction of Markets and Natures. Palgrave Macmillan. 2019. 978-3-319-91424-4. London. 64–67.
  14. Web site: Schematic showing the biomass and processes used in Zeafuels. Jan 6, 2021. biooekonomierat.de.
  15. Web site: BioBased Economy – De Nederlandse BioBased Economy community. Jan 6, 2021.
  16. Web site: TransIP - Reserved domain. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20120426050549/http://www.duurzameenergiethuis.nl/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/acrres_afbeelding.jpg. Apr 26, 2012. Jan 6, 2021. www.duurzameenergiethuis.nl.
  17. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/26/business/energy-environment/white-house-promotes-a-bioeconomy.html White House Promotes a Bioeconomy
  18. Book: Review of the 2012 European Bioeconomy Strategy. European Commission. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.. 2017. 978-92-79-74382-5. Luxembourg. 1060956843.
  19. Web site: Building a circular bioeconomy with synthetic biology. phys.org. Jan 6, 2021.
  20. Web site: The Greenest Diet: Bacteria Switch to Eating Carbon Dioxide. 27 November 2019 . Jan 6, 2021.
  21. http://www.weizmann.ac.il/WeizmannCompass/sections/briefs/diet-for-the-planet Diet for the planet
  22. Smith . Rebecca A. . Cass . Cynthia L. . Mazaheri . Mona . Sekhon . Rajandeep S. . Heckwolf . Marlies . Kaeppler . Heidi . de Leon . Natalia . Mansfield . Shawn D. . Kaeppler . Shawn M. . Sedbrook . John C. . Karlen . Steven D. . Ralph . John . Suppression of CINNAMOYL-CoA REDUCTASE increases the level of monolignol ferulates incorporated into maize lignins . Biotechnology for Biofuels . 2 May 2017 . 10 . 1 . 109 . 10.1186/s13068-017-0793-1 . 28469705 . 5414125 . free .
  23. Web site: Redesigned crops could produce far more fuel. Hal. Hodson. New Scientist. Jan 6, 2021.
  24. Web site: Plant genetic engineering for biofuel production: towards affordable cellulosic ethanol. | Learn Science at Scitable. www.nature.com. Jan 6, 2021.
  25. 17701080 . 10.1007/s11248-007-9122-y . 16 . 6 . Genetically modified crops for the bioeconomy: meeting public and regulatory expectations . 2007 . Transgenic Res . 675–88 . Chapotin . SM . Wolt . JD. 37104746 .
  26. Book: A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment : updated bioeconomy strategy. Europäische Kommission Generaldirektion Forschung und Innovation. 2018. 978-92-79-94144-3. Luxembourg. 1099358181.
  27. Web site: The Finnish Ministry of Employment and the Economy. Sustainable growth from bioeconomy – The Finnish Bioeconomy Strategy. live. Bioeconomy.fi. https://web.archive.org/web/20150505173432/http://biotalous.fi:80/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/The_Finnish_Bioeconomy_Strategy_110620141.pdf . 2015-05-05 .
  28. Book: Union, Publications Office of the European. 2017-06-09. Bioeconomy report 2016.. 2020-12-17. op.europa.eu. 9789279657115. en.
  29. News: Lavars . Nick . Lab-grown coffee cuts out the beans and deforestation . 18 October 2021 . New Atlas . 20 September 2021.
  30. News: Eco-friendly, lab-grown coffee is on the way, but it comes with a catch . 26 October 2021 . The Guardian . 16 October 2021 . en.
  31. Web site: Sustainable coffee grown in Finland – VTT News . www.vttresearch.com . 15 September 2021 . 18 October 2021 . en.
  32. News: Spider silk made by photosynthetic bacteria . 16 August 2020 . phys.org . en . 7 August 2020 . https://web.archive.org/web/20200807092649/https://phys.org/news/2020-07-spider-silk-photosynthetic-bacteria.html . live .
  33. Foong . Choon Pin . Higuchi-Takeuchi . Mieko . Malay . Ali D. . Oktaviani . Nur Alia . Thagun . Chonprakun . Numata . Keiji . A marine photosynthetic microbial cell factory as a platform for spider silk production . Communications Biology . Springer Science and Business Media LLC . 3 . 1 . 2020-07-08 . 2399-3642 . 10.1038/s42003-020-1099-6 . 357 . 32641733 . 7343832 .
  34. News: Growing food with air and solar power: More efficient than planting crops . 11 July 2021 . phys.org . en.
  35. Leger . Dorian . Matassa . Silvio . Noor . Elad . Shepon . Alon . Milo . Ron . Bar-Even . Arren . Photovoltaic-driven microbial protein production can use land and sunlight more efficiently than conventional crops . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 29 June 2021 . 118 . 26 . e2015025118 . 10.1073/pnas.2015025118 . 34155098 . 235595143 . en . 0027-8424. 8255800 . 2021PNAS..11815025L . free .
  36. News: 'Vegan spider silk' provides sustainable alternative to single-use plastics . 11 July 2021 . phys.org . en.
  37. Kamada . Ayaka . Rodriguez-Garcia . Marc . Ruggeri . Francesco Simone . Shen . Yi . Levin . Aviad . Knowles . Tuomas P. J. . Controlled self-assembly of plant proteins into high-performance multifunctional nanostructured films . Nature Communications . 10 June 2021 . 12 . 1 . 3529 . 10.1038/s41467-021-23813-6 . 34112802 . 8192951 . 2021NatCo..12.3529K . en . 2041-1723.
  38. News: World-first artificial synthesis of starch from CO2 outperforms nature . 18 October 2021 . New Atlas . 28 September 2021.
  39. Cai . Tao . Sun . Hongbing . Qiao . Jing . Zhu . Leilei . Zhang . Fan . Zhang . Jie . Tang . Zijing . Wei . Xinlei . Yang . Jiangang . Yuan . Qianqian . Wang . Wangyin . Yang . Xue . Chu . Huanyu . Wang . Qian . You . Chun . Ma . Hongwu . Sun . Yuanxia . Li . Yin . Li . Can . Jiang . Huifeng . Wang . Qinhong . Ma . Yanhe . Cell-free chemoenzymatic starch synthesis from carbon dioxide . Science . 24 September 2021 . 373 . 6562 . 1523–1527 . 10.1126/science.abh4049 . 34554807 . 2021Sci...373.1523C . 237615280 . EN. free .
  40. News: China to make protein for livestock from carbon monoxide . 1 December 2022 . Reuters . 1 November 2021 . en.
  41. Arterburn . Linda M. . Oken . Harry A. . Bailey Hall . Eileen . Hamersley . Jacqueline . Kuratko . Connye N. . Hoffman . James P. . Algal-Oil Capsules and Cooked Salmon: Nutritionally Equivalent Sources of Docosahexaenoic Acid . Journal of the American Dietetic Association . 1 July 2008 . 108 . 7 . 1204–1209 . 10.1016/j.jada.2008.04.020 . 18589030 . en . 0002-8223.
  42. Ryan . Lisa . Symington . Amy M. . Algal-oil supplements are a viable alternative to fish-oil supplements in terms of docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3; DHA) . Journal of Functional Foods . 1 December 2015 . 19 . 852–858 . 10.1016/j.jff.2014.06.023 . en . 1756-4646.
  43. News: Katsnelson . Alla . Cultivating Coveted Morels Year-Round and Indoors . 1 December 2022 . The New York Times . 26 April 2022.
  44. Ilyas . Sadia . Srivastava . Rajiv R. . Kim . Hyunjung . Das . Subhankar . Singh . Vinay K. . Circular bioeconomy and environmental benignness through microbial recycling of e-waste: A case study on copper and gold restoration . Waste Management . 15 February 2021 . 121 . 175–185 . 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.013 . 33360816 . 2021WaMan.121..175I . 229693482 . en . 0956-053X.
  45. Web site: Mitha . Farhan . Biomining: Turning Waste into Gold Sustainably with Microbes . Labiotech.eu . 26 October 2021 . 18 November 2020.
  46. News: Carrington . Damian . New super-enzyme eats plastic bottles six times faster . 12 October 2020 . The Guardian . 28 September 2020 . 12 October 2020 . https://web.archive.org/web/20201012004245/https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/sep/28/new-super-enzyme-eats-plastic-bottles-six-times-faster . live .
  47. News: Plastic-eating enzyme 'cocktail' heralds new hope for plastic waste . 12 October 2020 . phys.org . en . 11 October 2020 . https://web.archive.org/web/20201011210353/https://phys.org/news/2020-09-plastic-eating-enzyme-cocktail-heralds-plastic.html . live .
  48. Knott . Brandon C. . Erickson . Erika . Allen . Mark D. . Gado . Japheth E. . Graham . Rosie . Kearns . Fiona L. . Pardo . Isabel . Topuzlu . Ece . Anderson . Jared J. . Austin . Harry P. . Dominick . Graham . Johnson . Christopher W. . Rorrer . Nicholas A. . Szostkiewicz . Caralyn J. . Copié . Valérie . Payne . Christina M. . Woodcock . H. Lee . Donohoe . Bryon S. . Beckham . Gregg T. . McGeehan . John E. . Characterization and engineering of a two-enzyme system for plastics depolymerization . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 24 September 2020 . 117 . 41 . 25476–25485 . 10.1073/pnas.2006753117 . 32989159 . 7568301 . 2020PNAS..11725476K . en . 0027-8424 . free .
  49. Gautom . Trishnamoni . Dheeman . Dharmendra . Levy . Colin . Butterfield . Thomas . Alvarez Gonzalez . Guadalupe . Le Roy . Philip . Caiger . Lewis . Fisher . Karl . Johannissen . Linus . Dixon . Neil . Structural basis of terephthalate recognition by solute binding protein TphC . Nature Communications . 29 October 2021 . 12 . 1 . 6244 . 10.1038/s41467-021-26508-0 . 34716322 . 8556258 . 2021NatCo..12.6244G . 240229196 . en . 2041-1723.
  50. News: Crane . Leah . Asteroid-munching microbes could mine materials from space rocks . 9 December 2020 . New Scientist . 7 December 2020 . https://web.archive.org/web/20201207190406/https://www.newscientist.com/article/2259373-asteroid-munching-microbes-could-mine-materials-from-space-rocks/ . live .
  51. Cockell . Charles S. . Santomartino . Rosa . Finster . Kai . Waajen . Annemiek C. . Eades . Lorna J. . Moeller . Ralf . Rettberg . Petra . Fuchs . Felix M. . Van Houdt . Rob . Leys . Natalie . Coninx . Ilse . Hatton . Jason . Parmitano . Luca . Krause . Jutta . Koehler . Andrea . Caplin . Nicol . Zuijderduijn . Lobke . Mariani . Alessandro . Pellari . Stefano S. . Carubia . Fabrizio . Luciani . Giacomo . Balsamo . Michele . Zolesi . Valfredo . Nicholson . Natasha . Loudon . Claire-Marie . Doswald-Winkler . Jeannine . Herová . Magdalena . Rattenbacher . Bernd . Wadsworth . Jennifer . Craig Everroad . R. . Demets . René . Space station biomining experiment demonstrates rare earth element extraction in microgravity and Mars gravity . Nature Communications . 10 November 2020 . 11 . 1 . 5523 . 10.1038/s41467-020-19276-w . 33173035 . 7656455 . 2020NatCo..11.5523C . en . 2041-1723 . .
  52. Web site: Dietary Supplements Market Size & Trends Report, 2021-2028 . 2021-07-30 . San Francisco, CA . Grand View Research . en.
  53. Web site: The global bioeconomy . Ebrary . 26 October 2021.
  54. Haapala . Antti . Härkönen . Janne . Leviäkangas . Pekka . Kess . Pekka . Häggman . Hely . Arvola . Jouko . Stoor . Tuomas . Ämmälä . Ari . Karppinen . Katja . Leppilampi . Mari . Niinimäki . Jouko . Bioeconomy potential - focus on Northern Finland . International Journal of Sustainable Economy . 1 January 2015 . 7 . 1 . 66–90 . 10.1504/IJSE.2015.066408 . 1756-5804.
  55. McLeod . Carmen . Nerlich . Brigitte . Jaspal . Rusi . Fecal microbiota transplants: emerging social representations in the English-language print media . New Genetics and Society . 3 July 2019 . 38 . 3 . 331–351 . 10.1080/14636778.2019.1637721 . 195390497 . 1463-6778. free .
  56. News: Super poo: the emerging science of stool transplants and designer gut bacteria . 1 December 2022 . The Guardian . 2 January 2022 . en.
  57. Web site: Green bioeconomy. December 11, 2020. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland.
  58. Book: Wood-Based Bioeconomy Solving Global Challenges. Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment Enterprise and Innovation Department. 2017. 978-952-327-215-6. Lilja. Kari. 9–10. Loukola-Ruskeeniem. Kirsti.
  59. Web site: Blue bioeconomy. 2020-12-17. Maa- ja metsätalousministeriö. en-US.
  60. Book: Blue Bioeconomy Forum : highlights : synthesis of the roadmap and a selection of viable and innovative projects.. Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises., Technopolis Group., Wageningen Research.. 2020. 978-92-9202-730-8. Luxembourg. 1140706262.
  61. Web site: World Bioenergy Association. Global bioenergy statistics 2019. 13 November 2020. worldbioenergy.org.
  62. Web site: 4. Bioenergy conversion technologies. . www.fao.org . 1 August 2021.
  63. Web site: Home. Acrres. Jan 6, 2021.
  64. Kijk magazine, number 8, 2011
  65. Laszlo C, Kaminski K, Guan H, Fatarova M, Wei J, Bergounioux A, Schlage WK, Schorderet-Weber S, Guy PA, Ivanov NV, Lamottke K, Hoeng J . Fractionation and Extraction Optimization of Potentially Valuable Compounds and Their Profiling in Six Varieties of Two Nicotiana Species . Molecules . 27 . 22 . 8105 . November 2022 . 36432206 . 9694777 . 10.3390/molecules27228105 . free .
  66. Book: Primer on bioproducts.. 2004. Pollution Probe. Pollution Probe., BIOCAP Canada Foundation.. 978-0-919764-57-6. Toronto, Ont.. 181844396.
  67. 2015-07-01. The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: Policies and facts. Environmental Development. en. 15. 3–34. 10.1016/j.envdev.2015.03.006. 2211-4645. Scarlat. Nicolae. Dallemand. Jean-François. Monforti-Ferrario. Fabio. Nita. Viorel. free. 2015EnvDe..15....3S .
  68. News: Probiotics help lab corals survive deadly heat stress . 22 September 2021 . Science News . 13 August 2021.
  69. Santoro . Erika P. . Borges . Ricardo M. . Espinoza . Josh L. . Freire . Marcelo . Messias . Camila S. M. A. . Villela . Helena D. M. . Pereira . Leandro M. . Vilela . Caren L. S. . Rosado . João G. . Cardoso . Pedro M. . Rosado . Phillipe M. . Assis . Juliana M. . Duarte . Gustavo A. S. . Perna . Gabriela . Rosado . Alexandre S. . Macrae . Andrew . Dupont . Christopher L. . Nelson . Karen E. . Sweet . Michael J. . Voolstra . Christian R. . Peixoto . Raquel S. . Coral microbiome manipulation elicits metabolic and genetic restructuring to mitigate heat stress and evade mortality . Science Advances . August 2021 . 7 . 33 . 10.1126/sciadv.abg3088 . 34389536 . 8363143 . 2021SciA....7.3088S . EN.
  70. News: The problem with blue carbon: can seagrass be replanted … by hand? . 1 December 2022 . The Guardian . 5 November 2021 . en.
  71. Macreadie . Peter I. . Costa . Micheli D. P. . Atwood . Trisha B. . Friess . Daniel A. . Kelleway . Jeffrey J. . Kennedy . Hilary . Lovelock . Catherine E. . Serrano . Oscar . Duarte . Carlos M. . Blue carbon as a natural climate solution . Nature Reviews Earth & Environment . December 2021 . 2 . 12 . 826–839 . 10.1038/s43017-021-00224-1 . 2021NRvEE...2..826M . en . 2662-138X. 10754/673304 . 240290913 . free .
  72. Web site: What are bioplastics?. 17 December 2020. www.european-bioplastics.org.
  73. https://bloom-bioeconomy.eu/2020/04/01/video-series-on-bioeconomy-bioplastics-from-sugar-beets/ Video Series on Bioeconomy – Bioplastics from Sugar Beets
  74. Web site: Bioplastics from sugerbeet video created by project "Boosting European Citizen's Knowledge and Awareness of Bio-Economy Research and Innovation" that is European Union Horizon project under programme H2020-EU.3.2.4.3. - Supporting market development for bio-based products and processes.. 25 November 2020. Bloom-bioeconomy.eu. 16 July 2020.
  75. Web site: Fact sheet of PAPTIC®. 17 December 2020. ec.europa.eu/easme. Fact sheet of EASME - Executive Agency for SMEs under European Commission.
  76. Web site: Haimi. Suvi. 25 April 2017. The biodegradable Sulapac® material aims to challenge plastic. 17 December 2020. Bioeconomy.fi.
  77. Web site: Pasanen. Teemu. 17 June 2017. Woodio's waterproof wood composite elevates wood to a new level. Bioeconomy.fi.
  78. Web site: 4 June 2014. Woodcast. 17 December 2020. Bioeconomy.fi.
  79. Web site: 14 December 2016. Splinting material made from wood and bioplastics. 17 December 2020. forest.fi.
  80. Web site: n.d.. Revolutionary casting material. woodcastmedical.com.
  81. . p. 5
  82. News: Leather jackets made in labs? This fashion designer wants to make it happen . 1 December 2022 . Grist . 12 November 2015 . en-us.
  83. News: Gamillo . Elizabeth . This Mushroom-Based Leather Could Be the Next Sustainable Fashion Material . Smithsonian Magazine . en.
  84. Jones . Mitchell . Gandia . Antoni . John . Sabu . Bismarck . Alexander . Leather-like material biofabrication using fungi . Nature Sustainability . January 2021 . 4 . 1 . 9–16 . 10.1038/s41893-020-00606-1 . 221522085 . en . 2398-9629.
  85. News: Sustainable textiles made from fungi . 1 December 2022 . cosmosmagazine.com . 23 March 2022 . en-AU.
  86. Svensson . Sofie E. . Ferreira . Jorge A. . Hakkarainen . Minna . Adolfsson . Karin H. . Zamani . Akram . Fungal textiles: Wet spinning of fungal microfibers to produce monofilament yarns . Sustainable Materials and Technologies . 1 July 2021 . 28 . e00256 . 10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00256 . en . 2214-9937. free . 2021SusMT..2800256S .
  87. Web site: Knuuttila. Kirsi. Sciences. fi=Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulusv=Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakouluen=JAMK University of Applied. 2020. Uudet bio- ja kierrätyspohjaiset tekstiilimateriaalit ja niiden ominaisuuksien testaaminen. 2020-12-17. www.theseus.fi.
  88. Hausknost . Daniel . Schriefl . Ernst . Lauk . Christian . Kalt . Gerald . A Transition to Which Bioeconomy? An Exploration of Diverging Techno-Political Choices . Sustainability . April 2017 . 9 . 4 . 669 . 10.3390/su9040669 . en. free .
  89. Hoehn . Daniel . Laso . Jara . Margallo . María . Ruiz-Salmón . Israel . Amo-Setién . Francisco José . Abajas-Bustillo . Rebeca . Sarabia . Carmen . Quiñones . Ainoa . Vázquez-Rowe . Ian . Bala . Alba . Batlle-Bayer . Laura . Fullana-i-Palmer . Pere . Aldaco . Rubén . Introducing a Degrowth Approach to the Circular Economy Policies of Food Production, and Food Loss and Waste Management: Towards a Circular Bioeconomy . Sustainability . January 2021 . 13 . 6 . 3379 . 10.3390/su13063379 . en. free . 10902/21665 . free .
  90. Book: Pietzsch . Joachim . Bioeconomy for Beginners . 6 March 2020 . Springer Nature . 978-3-662-60390-1 . en.
  91. Giampietro . Mario . On the Circular Bioeconomy and Decoupling: Implications for Sustainable Growth . Ecological Economics . 1 August 2019 . 162 . 143–156 . 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.001 . 201329805 . en . 0921-8009. free . 2019EcoEc.162..143G .
  92. Forster . Piers M. . Forster . Harriet I. . Evans . Mat J. . Gidden . Matthew J. . Jones . Chris D. . Keller . Christoph A. . Lamboll . Robin D. . Quéré . Corinne Le . Rogelj . Joeri. Joeri Rogelj . Rosen . Deborah . Schleussner . Carl-Friedrich . Richardson . Thomas B. . Smith . Christopher J. . Turnock . Steven T. . Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19 . Nature Climate Change . 7 August 2020 . 10 . 10 . 913–919 . 10.1038/s41558-020-0883-0 . 2020NatCC..10..913F . 221019148 . en . 1758-6798. free .
  93. McCormick. Kes. Kautto. Niina. 2013. The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview. Sustainability. 5. 6. 2589–2608. 10.3390/su5062589. free.
  94. News: Eco-friendly, lab-grown coffee is on the way, but it comes with a catch . 26 October 2021 . The Guardian . 16 October 2021 . en.
  95. Treich . Nicolas . Cultured Meat: Promises and Challenges . Environmental & Resource Economics . 2021 . 79 . 1 . 33–61 . 10.1007/s10640-021-00551-3 . 33758465 . 7977488 . en.
  96. Newton . Peter . Blaustein-Rejto . Daniel . Social and Economic Opportunities and Challenges of Plant-Based and Cultured Meat for Rural Producers in the US . Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems . 2021 . 5 . 10 . 10.3389/fsufs.2021.624270 . 2571-581X. free .
  97. News: Man v food: is lab-grown meat really going to solve our nasty agriculture problem? . 26 October 2021 . The Guardian . 29 July 2021 . en.
  98. Andrews . LB . 2000 . Genes and Patent Policy: Rethinking IP Rights . Nature Reviews Genetics . 3 . 10 . 803–8 . 10.1038/nrg909. 12360238 . 13822192 .
  99. Marchant GE. 2007. Genomics, Ethics, and Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property Management in Health and Agricultural Innovation: A Handbook of Best Practices. Ch 1.5:29-38
  100. Hamilton . Chris . Intellectual property rights, the bioeconomy and the challenge of biopiracy . Genomics, Society and Policy . 15 December 2008 . 4 . 3 . 26 . 10.1186/1746-5354-4-3-26 . 35186396 . 1746-5354. free . 5424966 .
  101. Book: Braun . Veit . Bioeconomy and Global Inequalities . Tools of Extraction or Means of Speculation? Making Sense of Patents in the Bioeconomy . Bioeconomy and Global Inequalities: Socio-Ecological Perspectives on Biomass Sourcing and Production . 2021 . 65–84 . 10.1007/978-3-030-68944-5_4 . Springer International Publishing . 978-3-030-68943-8 . 236731518 . en. free .
  102. Birch . Kean . Rethinking Value in the Bio-economy: Finance, Assetization, and the Management of Value . Science, Technology, & Human Values . 1 May 2017 . 42 . 3 . 460–490 . 10.1177/0162243916661633 . 28458406 . 5390941 . 1702910 . en . 0162-2439.
  103. Löfgren . Hans . The Competition State and the Private Control of Healthcare . Global Health Governance . 2009 . 245–264 . 10.1057/9780230249486_12 . Palgrave Macmillan UK . 978-1-349-30228-4 . en.
  104. Hinderer . Sebastian. Brändle . Leif. Kuckertz. Andreas. 2021 . Transition to a Sustainable Bioeconomy. Sustainability . 13 . 15 . 8232 . 10.3390/SU13158232 . free .
  105. Treich . Nicolas . Cultured Meat: Promises and Challenges . Environmental and Resource Economics . 1 May 2021 . 79 . 1 . 33–61 . 10.1007/s10640-021-00551-3 . 33758465 . 7977488 . en . 1573-1502.
  106. Kuckertz . Andreas. Berger. Elisabeth S.C.. Brändle . Leif. Entrepreneurship and the sustainable bioeconomy transformation . Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions . 2020 . 37 . 332–344 . 10.1016/j.eist.2020.10.003 . free . 2020EIST...37..332K .
  107. Hinderer . Sebastian. Kuckertz. Andreas. 2022 . The bioeconomy transformation as an external enabler of sustainable entrepreneurship. Business Strategy and the Environment. 31 . 7 . 2947–2963. 10.1002/BSE.3056 . 10419/266672. free.
  108. Idema . Tom . When the levees break: global heating, watery rhetoric and complexity in Paolo Bacigalupi's The Windup Girl . Green Letters . 2 January 2020 . 24 . 1 . 51–63 . 10.1080/14688417.2020.1752509 . 219811345 . 1468-8417. free .
  109. Web site: Robertson . Adi . Change Agent is a terrible book that will make a great movie . The Verge . 29 October 2021 . en . 18 April 2017.
  110. Web site: Aune . Clayton J. . Building the Hyper-Capable Operator: Should the Military Enhance Its Special Operations Warriors? . https://web.archive.org/web/20211029160833/https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1120842 . live . October 29, 2021 . Naval War College – Newport, R.I.. en . 7 June 2019.
  111. Farver . Kenneth . Negotiating the Boundaries of Solarpunk Literature in Environmental Justice . WWU Honors College Senior Projects . 1 April 2019.
  112. Mohr . Dunja M. . Mohr, Dunja M.: Anthropocene Fiction: Narrating the 'Zero Hour' in Margaret Atwood's MaddAddam Trilogy. Writing Beyond the End Times? The Literatures of Canada and Quebec. Eds. Ursula Mathis-Moser and Marie Carrière. Innsbruck: Innsbruck UP, 2017, 25-46. . 29 October 2021.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Bioeconomy".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.