Big man (political science) explained

The terms big man, big man syndrome, and bigmanism, within the context of political science, refer to corrupt, autocratic and often totalitarian rule of countries by a single person.

Generally associated with neopatrimonial states, where there is a framework of formal law and administration but the state is informally captured by patronage networks. The distribution of the spoils of office takes precedence over the formal functions of the state, severely limiting the ability of public officials to make policies in the general interest. Whileneopatrimonialism may be considered the norm where a modern state is constructed in a preindustrialcontext, however, the African variants often result in bigmanism in the form of a strongly presidentialist political system.[1]

Examples

Africa

Central and West Asia

Southeast Asia and Oceania

Europe

The Americas

See also

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. Booth, David; Cammack, Diana; Harrigan, Jane; Kanyongolo, Edge; Mataure, Mike and Ngwira, Naomi (2006) Drivers of Change and Development in Malawi. Working Paper No. 261. London : Overseas Development Institute. Source:http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/download/1318.pdf
  2. Web site: Fisher . Jonathan . Cheeseman . Nic . 31 October 2019 . How colonial rule predisposed Africa to fragile authoritarianism . 6 April 2020 . The Conversation.
  3. Web site: Lagenheim . Johnny . 2012-06-01 . Big Man Politics . 2022-08-07 . The Monthly . en.
  4. Johanna Granville, "Dej-a-Vu: Early Roots of Romania's Independence," East European Quarterly, vol. XLII, no. 4 (Winter 2008), pp. 365–404.
  5. https://books.google.com/books?id=eeCT2svkPIYC&pg=RA1-PA340&dq=kangaroo+court+romania Jeri Laber The Courage of Strangers