Bacterial nanowires explained

Bacterial nanowires (also known as microbial nanowires) are electrically conductive appendages produced by a number of bacteria most notably from the Geobacter and Shewanella genera.[1] [2] Conductive nanowires have also been confirmed in the oxygenic cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC6803 and a thermophilic, methanogenic coculture consisting of Pelotomaculum thermopropionicum and Methanothermobacter thermoautotrophicus. From physiological and functional perspectives, bacterial nanowires are diverse. The precise role microbial nanowires play in their biological systems has not been fully realized, but several proposed functions exist. Outside of a naturally occurring environment, bacterial nanowires have shown potential to be useful in several fields, notably the bioenergy and bioremediation industries.[3]

Physiology

Geobacter nanowires were originally thought to be modified pili, which are used to establish connections to terminal electron acceptors during some types of anaerobic respiration. Further research has shown that Geobacter nanowires are composed of stacked cytochromes, namely OmcS and OmcZ. Despite being physiologically distinct from pili, bacterial nanowires are often described as pili anyway due to the initial misconception upon their discovery.[4] These stacked cytochrome nanowires form a seamless array of hemes which stabilize the nanowire via pi-stacking and provide a path for electron transport.[5] Species of the genus Geobacter use nanowires to transfer electrons to extracellular electron acceptors (such as Fe(III) oxides).[1] This function was discovered through the examination of mutants, whose nanowires could attach to the iron, but would not reduce it.[1]

Shewanella nanowires are also not technically pili, but extensions of the outer membrane that contain the decaheme outer membrane cytochromes MtrC and OmcA.[6] The reported presence of outer membrane cytochromes, and lack of conductivity in nanowires from the MtrC and OmcA-deficient mutant[7] directly support the proposed multistep hopping mechanism for electron transport through Shewanella nanowires.[8] [9] [10]

Additionally, nanowires can facilitate long-range electron transfer across thick biofilm layers.[11] By connecting to other cells around them, nanowires allow bacteria located in anoxic conditions to still use oxygen as their terminal electron acceptor. For example, organisms in the genus Shewanella have been observed to form electrically conductive nanowires in response to electron-acceptor limitation.

History

The concept of electromicrobiology has been around since the early 1900s when a series of discoveries found cells capable of producing electricity. It was demonstrated for the first time in 1911 by Michael Cressé Potter that cells could convert chemical energy to electrical energy.[12] It wasn't until 1988 that extracellular electron transport (EET) was observed for the first time with the independent discoveries of Geobacter and Shewanella bacteria and their respective nanowires. Since their discoveries, other nanowire containing microbes have been identified, but they remain the most intensively studied.[13] [14] In 1998, EET was observed in a microbial fuel cell setting for the first time using Shewanella bacteria to reduce an Fe(III) electrode.[15] In 2010, bacterial nanowires were shown to have facilitated the flow of electricity into Sporomusa bacteria. This was the first observed instance of EET used to draw electrons from the environment into a cell.[16] Research persists to date to explore the mechanisms, implications, and potential applications of nanowires and the biological systems they are a part of.

Implications and potential applications

Biological implications

Microorganisms have shown to use nanowires to facilitate the use of extracellular metals as terminal electron acceptors in an electron transport chain. The high reduction potential of the metals receiving electrons is capable of driving a considerable ATP production.[17] Aside from that, the extent of the implications brought on by the existence of bacterial nanowires is not fully realized. It has been speculated nanowires may function as conduits for electron transport between different members of a microbial community. This has potential to allow for regulatory feedback or other communication between members of the same or even different microbial species.[16] [18] Some organisms are capable of both expelling and taking in electrons through nanowires. Those species would likely be able to oxidize extracellular metals by using them as an electron or energy source to facilitate energy consuming cellular processes. Microbes also could potentially use nanowires to temporarily store electrons on metals. Building up an electron concentration on a metal anode would create a battery of sorts that the cells could later use to fuel metabolic activity. While these potential implications provide a reasonable hypothesis towards the role of the bacterial nanowire in a biological system, more research is needed to fully understand the extent of how cellular species benefit from nanowire use.

Bioenergy applications in microbial fuel cells

In microbial fuel cells (MFCs), bacterial nanowires generate electricity via extracellular electron transport to the MFC's anode.[19] Nanowire networks have been shown to enhance the electricity output of MFCs with efficient and long-range conductivity. In particular, bacterial nanowires of Geobacter sulfurreducens possess metallic-like conductivity, producing electricity at levels comparable to those of synthetic metallic nanostructures.[20] When bacterial strains are genetically manipulated to boost nanowire formation, higher electricity yields are generally observed. Coating the nanowires with metal oxides also further promotes electrical conductivity.[21] Additionally, these nanowires can transport electrons up to centimeter-scale distances. Long-range electron transfer via microbial nanowire networks allows viable cells that are not in direct contact with an anode to contribute to electron flow.[11]

To date, the currency produced by bacterial nanowires is very low. Across a biofilm 7 micrometers thick, a current density of around 17 microamperes per square centimeter and a voltage of around 0.5 volts was reported.[22]

Other significant applications

Microbial nanowires of Shewanella and Geobacter have been shown to aid in bioremediation of uranium contaminated groundwater.[23] To demonstrate this, scientists compared and observed the concentration of uranium removed by piliated and nonpiliated strains of Geobacter. Through a series of controlled experiments, they were able to deduce that nanowire present strains were more effective at the mineralization of uranium as compared to nanowire absent mutants.[24]

Further significant application of bacterial nanowires can be seen in the bioelectronics industry.[3] With sustainable resources in mind, scientists have proposed the future use of biofilms of Geobacter as a platform for functional under water transistors and supercapacitors, capable of self-renewing energy.[25]

On 20 April 2020, researchers demonstrated a diffusive memristor fabricated from protein nanowires of the bacterium Geobacter sulfurreducens which functions at substantially lower voltages than the ones previously described and may allow the construction of artificial neurons which function at voltages of biological action potentials. Bacterial nanowires vary from traditionally utilized silicon nanowires by showing an increased degree of biocompatibility. More research is needed, but the memristors may eventually be used to directly process biosensing signals, for neuromorphic computing and/or direct communication with biological neurons.[26] [27]

Notes and References

  1. Reguera G, McCarthy KD, Mehta T, Nicoll JS, Tuominen MT, Lovley DR . Extracellular electron transfer via microbial nanowires . Nature . 435 . 7045 . 1098–101 . June 2005 . 15973408 . 10.1038/nature03661 . 2005Natur.435.1098R . 4425287 .
  2. Gorby YA, Yanina S, McLean JS, Rosso KM, Moyles D, Dohnalkova A, Beveridge TJ, Chang IS, Kim BH, Kim KS, Culley DE, Reed SB, Romine MF, Saffarini DA, Hill EA, Shi L, Elias DA, Kennedy DW, Pinchuk G, Watanabe K, Ishii S, Logan B, Nealson KH, Fredrickson JK . 6 . Electrically conductive bacterial nanowires produced by Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1 and other microorganisms . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 103 . 30 . 11358–63 . July 2006 . 16849424 . 1544091 . 10.1073/pnas.0604517103 . 2006PNAS..10311358G . amp . free .
  3. Sure S, Ackland ML, Torriero AA, Adholeya A, Kochar M. December 2016. Microbial nanowires: an electrifying tale. Microbiology. 162. 12. 2017–2028. 10.1099/mic.0.000382. 27902405. free.
  4. Yalcin SE, O'Brien JP, Gu Y, Reiss K, Yi SM, Jain R, Srikanth V, Dahl PJ, Huynh W, Vu D, Acharya A, Chaudhuri S, Varga T, Batista VS, Malvankar NS . 6 . Electric field stimulates production of highly conductive microbial OmcZ nanowires . Nature Chemical Biology . 16 . 10 . 1136–1142 . October 2020 . 32807967 . 7502555 . 10.1038/s41589-020-0623-9 .
  5. Wang F, Gu Y, O'Brien JP, Yi SM, Yalcin SE, Srikanth V, Shen C, Vu D, Ing NL, Hochbaum AI, Egelman EH, Malvankar NS . 6 . Structure of Microbial Nanowires Reveals Stacked Hemes that Transport Electrons over Micrometers . Cell . 177 . 2 . 361–369.e10 . April 2019 . 30951668 . 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.029 . 6720112 . free .
  6. Pirbadian S, Barchinger SE, Leung KM, Byun HS, Jangir Y, Bouhenni RA, Reed SB, Romine MF, Saffarini DA, Shi L, Gorby YA, Golbeck JH, El-Naggar MY . 6 . Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 nanowires are outer membrane and periplasmic extensions of the extracellular electron transport components . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 111 . 35 . 12883–8 . September 2014 . 25143589 . 4156777 . 10.1073/pnas.1410551111 . 2014PNAS..11112883P . free .
  7. El-Naggar MY, Wanger G, Leung KM, Yuzvinsky TD, Southam G, Yang J, Lau WM, Nealson KH, Gorby YA . 6 . Electrical transport along bacterial nanowires from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 107 . 42 . 18127–31 . October 2010 . 20937892 . 2964190 . 10.1073/pnas.1004880107 . 2010PNAS..10718127E . free .
  8. Pirbadian S, El-Naggar MY . Multistep hopping and extracellular charge transfer in microbial redox chains . Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics . 14 . 40 . 13802–8 . October 2012 . 22797729 . 10.1039/C2CP41185G . 2012PCCP...1413802P .
  9. Polizzi NF, Skourtis SS, Beratan DN . Physical constraints on charge transport through bacterial nanowires . Faraday Discussions . 155 . 43–62; discussion 103–14 . 2012 . 22470966 . 3392031 . 10.1039/C1FD00098E . 2012FaDi..155...43P .
  10. Strycharz-Glaven SM, Snider RM, Guiseppi-Elie A, Tender LM . 2011 . On the electrical conductivity of microbial nanowires and biofilms . Energy Environ Sci . 4 . 11. 4366–4379 . 10.1039/C1EE01753E .
  11. Reguera G, Nevin KP, Nicoll JS, Covalla SF, Woodard TL, Lovley DR . Biofilm and nanowire production leads to increased current in Geobacter sulfurreducens fuel cells . Applied and Environmental Microbiology . 72 . 11 . 7345–8 . November 2006 . 16936064 . 1636155 . 10.1128/aem.01444-06 . 2006ApEnM..72.7345R .
  12. Potter MC, Waller AD . 1911-09-14. Electrical effects accompanying the decomposition of organic compounds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character. 84. 571. 260–276. 10.1098/rspb.1911.0073. free.
  13. Myers CR, Nealson KH . Bacterial manganese reduction and growth with manganese oxide as the sole electron acceptor . Science . 240 . 4857 . 1319–21 . June 1988 . 17815852 . 10.1126/science.240.4857.1319 . 1988Sci...240.1319M . 9662366 .
  14. Lovley DR, Phillips EJ . Novel mode of microbial energy metabolism: organic carbon oxidation coupled to dissimilatory reduction of iron or manganese . Applied and Environmental Microbiology . 54 . 6 . 1472–80 . June 1988 . 16347658 . 10.1128/aem.54.6.1472-1480.1988 . 202682 . 1988ApEnM..54.1472L .
  15. Kim B . 1999. Dynamic effects of learning capabilities and profit structures on the innovation competition . Optimal Control Applications and Methods. en. 20. 3. 127–144. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1514(199905/06)20:3<127::AID-OCA650>3.0.CO;2-I. 1099-1514.
  16. Rabaey K, Rozendal RA . Microbial electrosynthesis - revisiting the electrical route for microbial production . Nature Reviews. Microbiology . 8 . 10 . 706–16 . October 2010 . 20844557 . 10.1038/nrmicro2422 . 11417035 .
  17. Nealson KH, Rowe AR . Electromicrobiology: realities, grand challenges, goals and predictions . Microbial Biotechnology . 9 . 5 . 595–600 . September 2016 . 27506517 . 4993177 . 10.1111/1751-7915.12400 .
  18. Shi L, Dong H, Reguera G, Beyenal H, Lu A, Liu J, Yu HQ, Fredrickson JK . 6 . Extracellular electron transfer mechanisms between microorganisms and minerals . Nature Reviews. Microbiology . 14 . 10 . 651–62 . October 2016 . 27573579 . 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.93 . 20626915 .
  19. Kodesia, A.; Ghosh, M.; Chatterjee, A. (September 5, 2017). "Development of Biofilm Nanowires and Electrode for Efficient Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCs)". Thapar University Digital Repository (TuDR).
  20. Malvankar NS, Vargas M, Nevin KP, Franks AE, Leang C, Kim BC, Inoue K, Mester T, Covalla SF, Johnson JP, Rotello VM, Tuominen MT, Lovley DR . Tunable metallic-like conductivity in microbial nanowire networks . Nature Nanotechnology . 6 . 9 . 573–9 . August 2011 . 21822253 . 10.1038/nnano.2011.119 . 2011NatNa...6..573M .
  21. Maruthupandy M, Anand M, Maduraiveeran G, Beevi AS, Priya RJ . Fabrication of CuO nanoparticles coated bacterial nanowire film for a high-performance electrochemical conductivity. . Journal of Materials Science . September 2017 . 52 . 18 . 10766–78 . 10.1007/s10853-017-1248-6 . 2017JMatS..5210766M . 103105219 .
  22. Liu X, Gao H, Ward JE, Liu X, Yin B, Fu T, Chen J, Lovley DR, Yao J . 6 . Power generation from ambient humidity using protein nanowires . Nature . 578 . 7796 . 550–554 . February 2020 . 32066937 . 10.1038/s41586-020-2010-9 . 2020Natur.578..550L . free .
  23. Jiang S, Kim MG, Kim SJ, Jung HS, Lee SW, Noh DY, Sadowsky MJ, Hur HG . 6 . Bacterial formation of extracellular U(VI) nanowires . Chemical Communications . 47 . 28 . 8076–8 . July 2011 . 21681306 . 10.1039/C1CC12554K .
  24. Cologgi DL, Lampa-Pastirk S, Speers AM, Kelly SD, Reguera G . Extracellular reduction of uranium via Geobacter conductive pili as a protective cellular mechanism . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 108 . 37 . 15248–52 . September 2011 . 21896750 . 3174638 . 10.1073/pnas.1108616108 . 2011PNAS..10815248C . free .
  25. Malvankar NS, Lovley DR . Microbial nanowires: a new paradigm for biological electron transfer and bioelectronics . ChemSusChem . 5 . 6 . 1039–46 . June 2012 . 22614997 . 10.1002/cssc.201100733 .
  26. Fu T, Liu X, Gao H, Ward JE, Liu X, Yin B, Wang Z, Zhuo Y, Walker DJ, Joshua Yang J, Chen J, Lovley DR, Yao J . 6 . Bioinspired bio-voltage memristors . Nature Communications . 11 . 1 . 1861 . April 2020 . 32313096 . 10.1038/s41467-020-15759-y . 7171104 . 2020NatCo..11.1861F . free .
  27. Web site: Researchers Unveil Electronics that Mimic the Human Brain in Efficient, Biological Learning. 2021-04-20. Office of News & Media Relations UMass Amherst. en.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Bacterial nanowires".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.