Atmospheric-pressure plasma explained

Atmospheric-pressure plasma (or AP plasma or normal pressure plasma) is a plasma in which the pressure approximately matches that of the surrounding atmosphere – the so-called normal pressure.

Fundamentals of atmospheric-pressure plasma generation

A discharge can be ignited and plasma can be sustained when a DC voltage that is delivered to the gas medium via electrodes is higher than the breakdown voltage for the gas. The relationship between this breakdown voltage and the pd product—where p is the gas pressure and d is the distance between the electrodes—is referred to as Paschen's law.[1] [2] For a range of gas molecules, the breakdown voltage estimated by Paschen's law has a minimum value of around pd = 1-10 Torr cm. This suggests that in order to get a practical breakdown voltage for the gas discharge to ignite, a smaller electrode-gap distance is preferred as gas pressure increases. The Paschen-minimum condition at atmospheric pressure can be reached at a gap spacing of considerably less than a millimeter, at which point a few hundreds of volt should be the DC voltage needed for the gas breakdown. However, the breakdown DC voltage for argon gas at atmospheric pressure is predicted to rise to a few kV at a gap spacing of 5 mm.[3]

Reducing the breakdown voltage is advantageous from a plasma source design perspective since it allows for handling flexibility and easier source operation. The use of higher-frequency HF voltage sources is one approach to reducing the breakdown voltage.

As the pressure increases, the transfer of energy from electrons to gas molecules and ions through collisions becomes more efficient, resulting in the establishment of thermal equilibrium among electrons, gas molecules, and ions. However, it is possible to inhibit the energy transfer between the electrons and the gas molecules and ions. Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) is one of the main ways to produce low-temperature plasmas in a non-equilibrium condition at atmospheric pressure.[4] [5]

Additionally, there have been reports stating that the Atmospheric-pressure glow discharge, when powered by a low-frequency (10-100 kHz) source, needs a dielectric barrier on one side of the electrodes to ensure stable and consistent operation. However, when the operating frequency is increased to RF, reaching frequencies as high as 13.56 MHz, the stability of the plasma greatly improves, making the dielectric barrier no longer necessary for stable operation.[6]

Technical significance

Atmospheric-pressure plasmas matter because in contrast with low-pressure plasma or high-pressure plasma, no reaction vessel is needed to maintain pressure. Depending on the generation principle, these plasmas can be employed directly in the production line. This eliminates the need for cost-intensive chambers for producing a partial vacuum as used in low-pressure plasma technology.[7]

Generation

Although the disadvantages of low-pressure plasmas can be avoided by plasma formation at atmospheric pressure, maintaining atmospheric pressure plasmas necessitates high voltage for gas breakdown and causes greater collisions between electrons and gas molecules, which can lead to arcing and gas heating.[8]

Various forms of excitation are distinguished:

Atmospheric-pressure plasmas that have attained any noteworthy industrial significance are those generated by DC excitation (electric arc), AC excitation (corona discharge, dielectric barrier discharge, piezoelectric direct discharge and plasma jets as well as 2.45 GHz microwave microplasma).

DC plasma jet

By means of a high-voltage discharge (5–15 kV, 10–100 kHz) a pulsed electric arc is generated. A process gas, usually oil-free compressed air flowing past this discharge section, is excited and converted to the plasma state. This plasma passes through a jet head to the surface of the material to be treated. The jet head determines the geometry of the beam, and is at earth potential to hold back potential-carrying parts of the plasma stream.

Microwave plasma jet

A microwave system uses amplifiers that output up to 200 watts of power radio frequency (RF) power to produce the arc that generates plasma. Most solutions work at 2.45 GHz. A new technology provides ignition and highly efficient operation with the same electronic and couple network.[9] This kind of atmospheric-pressure plasmas is different. The plasma is only top of the electrode. That is the reason the construction of a cannula jet was possible.

Applications

Manufacturers use plasma jets for, among other things, activating and cleaning plastic and metal surfaces to prepare them for adhesive bonding and painting. Sheet materials up to several meters wide can be treated today by aligning a number of jets in a row. Surface modification achieved by plasma jets is comparable to the effects obtained with low-pressure plasma.[10]

Depending on the power of the jet, the plasma beam can be up to 40 mm long and attain a treatment width of 15 mm. Special rotary systems allow a treatment width per jet tool of up to 13 cm.[11] Depending on the required treatment performance, the plasma source is moved at a spacing of 10–40 mm and at a speed of 5–400 m/min relative to the surface of the material being treated.

A key advantage of this system is it can be integrated in-line in existing production systems. In addition the activation achievable is distinctly higher than in potential-based pretreatment methods (corona discharge).

It is possible to coat varied surfaces with this technique. Anticorrosive layers and adhesion promoter layers can be applied to many metals without solvents, providing a much more environmentally friendly solution.

See also

References

Citations
  • Bibliography
  • Notes and References

    1. Book: Lieberman, Michael A. . Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing . Lichtenberg . Allan J. . 2005-04-08 . Wiley . 978-0-471-72001-0 . 1 . en . 10.1002/0471724254.
    2. Paschen . Friedrich . Jan 1889 . Ueber die zum Funkenübergang in Luft, Wasserstoff und Kohlensäure bei verschiedenen Drucken erforderliche Potentialdifferenz . Annalen der Physik . en . 273 . 5 . 69–96 . 10.1002/andp.18892730505 . 0003-3804.
    3. Schutze . A. . Jeong . J.Y. . Babayan . S.E. . Jaeyoung Park . Selwyn . G.S. . Hicks . R.F. . Dec 1998 . The atmospheric-pressure plasma jet: a review and comparison to other plasma sources . IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science . 26 . 6 . 1685–1694 . 10.1109/27.747887.
    4. Kogelschatz . U. . Aug 2002 . Filamentary, patterned, and diffuse barrier discharges . IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science . en . 30 . 4 . 1400–1408 . 10.1109/TPS.2002.804201 . 0093-3813.
    5. Kanazawa . S . Kogoma . M . Moriwaki . T . Okazaki . S . 1988-05-14 . Stable glow plasma at atmospheric pressure . Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics . 21 . 5 . 838–840 . 10.1088/0022-3727/21/5/028 . 0022-3727.
    6. Nozaki . Tomohiro . Okazaki . Ken . 2008-06-13 . Carbon Nanotube Synthesis in Atmospheric Pressure Glow Discharge: A Review . Plasma Processes and Polymers . en . 5 . 4 . 300–321 . 10.1002/ppap.200700141 . 1612-8850.
    7. Wolf, Rory A., Atmospheric Pressure Plasma for Surface Modification, Wiley, 2012
    8. Schutze . A. . Jeong . J.Y. . Babayan . S.E. . Jaeyoung Park . Selwyn . G.S. . Hicks . R.F. . December 1998 . The atmospheric-pressure plasma jet: a review and comparison to other plasma sources . IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science . 26 . 6 . 1685–1694 . 10.1109/27.747887.
    9. Heuermann . Holger. Various applications and background of 10-200W 2.45GHz microplasmas. 60th International Microwave Symposium. June 2012. 10.1109/MWSYM.2012.6259386. etal. 2012imsd.conf59386H.
    10. Noeske M., Degenhardt J., Strudhoff S., Lommattzsch U.: Plasma Jet Treatment of five Polymers at Atmospheric Pressure: Surface Modifications and the Relevance for Adhesion; International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives; 24 (2) 2004, pp. 171–177
    11. Buske C., Förnsel P.: Vorrichtung zur Plasmabehandlung von Oberflächen (Device for the plasma treatment of surfaces); EP 0986939