Asynclitic birth explained

An asynclitic birth or asynclitism are terms used in obstetrics to refer to childbirth in which there is malposition of the head of the fetus in the uterus, relative to the birth canal.[1] Asynclitic presentation is different from a shoulder presentation, in which the shoulder is presenting first. Many babies enter the pelvis in an asynclitic presentation, and most asynclitism corrects spontaneously as part of the normal birthing process.

Fetal head asynclitism may affect the progression of labor, increase the need for obstetrical intervention, and may be associated with difficult instrumental delivery.[2] The prevalence of asynclitism at transperineal ultrasound was common in nulliparous women at second stage of labor and seemed more commonly associated with non occiput anterior position, suggesting an autocorrection occurs in many cases.

[3] There is no evidence to suggest that people with previous asynclitic presentation are more likely to experience it in subsequent childbirth.[4]

Diagnosis

Asynclitism can be digitally diagnosed using intrapartum ultrasound through the transabdominal cavity and the transperitoneal cavity. Intrapartum ultrasonography is regularly used during pregnancy to constantly monitor the fetal position within the mother's belly.[5] The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology Practice Guidelines recommend the use of intrapartum ultrasound to diagnose asynclitic births during prolonged and obstructed labors.[6]

Asynclitism is most easily diagnosed during labor when the cervix is opened allowing the orientation of the occiput, the back of the fetal head, to be visually assessed in relation to the mother's pelvis.[7] Posterior asynclitism is when the fetal occiput is facing the mother's spine, and anterior asynclitism is when the fetal occiput is facing the mother's belly. The most common and preferred type of asynclitism is the left occiput anterior asynclitism because the baby's head enters the pelvis in such a way that it minimizes the circumference of how the baby exits the body as much as possible. In this type of asynclitism, it allows the fetus to be in the most efficient position. The back of the fetus's head is towards the carrier's left side. Meanwhile, their face is towards the mother's right side at an angle between the hip and the spine of the mother.[8] Posterior asynclitism can lengthen the duration of labor and cause complications.[9] Asynclitism is most commonly discovered during vaginal exams conducted in labor. During the exam, the healthcare professional may feel the parietal bone more distinctly than others. Professionals can also use ultrasound to help identify potential asynclitism.[10]

Occurrence

Asynclitism can occur at any time during pregnancy. Most commonly, it occurs near the end of the third trimester or during labor. At this time, the fetus becomes more developed and begins moving down the birth canal.[11]

Causes

The exact cause of asynclitism is unknown. The shape and size of the uterus, the weight of the fetus, pelvic anatomy, and multiparity can contribute to it.[12] Factors can vary depending on the person carrying the fetus. For example, a pregnant person with rotated hips can increase the likelihood of asynclitism. Situational factors include a short umbilical cord and unevenness of the pregnant person's pelvic floor during contractions, leading to the baby's head tipping to one side.

Asynclitism can also begin at the time of the birth. This happens when the fetus quickly comes down on the pelvic floor before straightening their head when the water breaks.[13] This can be due to the water rushing through the pelvis too quickly; once it occurs, it is difficult to correct.

Signs and symptoms

Signs of asynclitism which may be observed without medical diagnostic equipment include visual asymmetric baby bumps, caused by the baby's head being tilted asymmetrically in relation to the mother's pelvis, or by an abnormal buildup of amniotic fluid.[14] The mother may report symptoms of abdominal discomfort, particularly on one side, or pain on one side of the hips.

Complications

Asynclitism is common as the fetus enters through and tilts the maternal pelvis. There are three types: anterior, posterior, and lateral asynclitism. Minor asynclitism generally resolves itself and results in uncomplicated births. Minor cases present mild molding and the slight deviation of the head from the midline, but are otherwise absent of major fetal head malpositioning. In cases that present with persistent occiput posterior - in which the head is in a downward position, but facing towards the front of the abdomen - or shoulder positions, this can result in prolonged and difficult delivery and may warrant surgical intervention.

Complications can occur before, during, and after birth that affect both parent and baby. Asynclitism can lead to slower and more difficult labor, increasing stress and fatigue. If the fetus' head is not optimally positioned, this can result in dystocia, necessitating an operative delivery. Complications are associated with procedures such as operational vaginal deliveries (OVD), particularly with the use of vacuum extraction, and caesarean sections (CS). Caesarean sections can increase the risk of maternal complications, which can affect future pregnancies. These include uterine ruptures, chronic pain, hemorrhages, and bladder injury. One of the more severe complications is placenta accreta, which can lead to a life-threatening hemorrhage and peripartum hysterectomy.

Complications the baby may face include cephalohematomas, hyperbilirubinemia, and intracranial hemorrhages.[15] [16] Asynclitic birth can also increase the risk of birth injuries such as brachial plexus injury in which the nerves responsible for sending signals to the baby's arm are damaged, resulting in temporary or permanent numbness, weakness, or even paralysis in the affected arm.[17] In rare cases, uncorrected asynclitism can lead to neonatal asphyxia, in which the child does not receive enough oxygen before, during, or just after birth, which can result in temporary or permanent organ damage.[18] The mother may experience complications such as vaginal or cervical tears, excessive blood loss, infection of the placental membrane, and postpartum infections.[19] Asynclitism can also affect the development of facial structures and nerves during pregnancy, with lifelong consequences for the child. These complications can include facial malformation, Bell's palsy, deviated septum, and facial asymmetry.[20]

Management

Various techniques have been tried to resolve an asynclitic position of the fetus. Vacuum extraction, a delivery assistance method used for prolonged or obstructed labor, has been shown to reverse the position from the less optimal one, known as occiput posterior or occiput transverse, to the more favorable position known as occiput anterior.[21] However, it is not the primary treatment for asynclitic births, as the effectiveness rate is not very high and vacuum extraction can lead to additional complications.[22] Possible complications include fetal morbidity and fatality, and damage to the derma layer leading to bleeding within the brain and the layer of skin on the skull, known as cephalohematomas.[23] Facial nerve damage and immobility are permanent consequences from intracranial hemorrhage leading to a diminished quality of life. However, when it is successful, vacuum extraction can change the position from a non-occital anterior position to an occital anterior position, which is more favorable in terms of asynclitic births.[24] Following any medical procedure to alter the occiput position or any assisted vaginal delivery, monitoring of the neonate is extremely important as intracranial hemorrhages may be imperceptible.

Non-invasive techniques are typically the first steps when dealing with asynclitic birth. Short and quick breaths synchronized with contractions are commonly suggested by the obstetrician to help with prolonged labor with asynclitism.[25] Positioning techniques can also employed to help the baby to rotate or descend.[26] Examples of these techniques include the hands-on-knees position, lunging, kneeling lunge, side-lying release, and use of a birth ball. If positioning techniques do not work, healthcare professionals may attempt manual rotation, attempting to adjust the baby's position manually via the vagina.[27]

If none of these methods are successful, the physician may consider a caesarean section to deliver the baby safely.[28]

Along with procedural interventions, there are supportive measures that are taken to alleviate the physical and psychological trauma associated with childbirth. Supportive measures come in both non-pharmacological and pharmacological forms. For pain management, labor analgesia has been shown to be effective. Depending on the procedure, different types of anesthesia, such as pudendal block anesthesia, may be used.

See also

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. Vlasyuk . Vasily . The importance of asynclitism in birth trauma and intrapartum sonography . The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine . 35 . 2022 . 11 . 2188–2194 . 10.1080/14767058.2020.1777270 . 32538217 . 219706630 .
  2. Hung CM, Chan VY, Ghi T, Lau W . Asynclitism in the second stage of labor: prevalence, associations, and outcome . American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM . 3 . 5 . 100437 . September 2021 . 34217855 . 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100437.
  3. Web site: Asynclitism - A Helpful Guide and Solutions . 2023-07-25 . Spinning Babies. 23 June 2020 .
  4. Web site: Herbert C . What is asynclitic presentation? . 2023-07-25 . BabyCentre UK.
  5. Malvasi A, Giacci F, Gustapane S, Sparic R, Barbera A, Tinelli A . Intrapartum sonographic signs: new diagnostic tools in malposition and malrotation . The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine . 29 . 15 . 2408–2413 . 2016 . 26444321 . 10.3109/14767058.2015.1092137. 46126409 .
  6. Beck R, Malvasi A, Kuczkowski KM, Marinelli E, Zaami S . Intrapartum sonography of fetal head in second stage of labor with neuraxial analgesia: a literature review and possible medicolegal aftermath . European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences . 23 . 8 . 3159–3166 . April 2019 . 31081066 . 10.26355/eurrev_201904_17673 . 153308972.
  7. Malvasi A, Barbera A, Di Vagno G, Gimovsky A, Berghella V, Ghi T, Di Renzo GC, Tinelli A . 6 . Asynclitism: a literature review of an often forgotten clinical condition . The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine . 28 . 16 . 1890–1894 . November 2015 . 25283847 . 10.3109/14767058.2014.972925 . 24295521.
  8. Ghi T, Conversano F, Ramirez Zegarra R, Pisani P, Dall'Asta A, Lanzone A, Lau W, Vimercati A, Iliescu DG, Mappa I, Rizzo G, Casciaro S . 6 . Novel artificial intelligence approach for automatic differentiation of fetal occiput anterior and non-occiput anterior positions during labor . Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology . 59 . 1 . 93–99 . January 2022 . 34309926 . 10.1002/uog.23739 . Rocco . Giovanni Battista Luca . 236432509.
  9. Ghi T, Youssef A, Pilu G, Malvasi A, Ragusa A . Intrapartum sonographic imaging of fetal head asynclitism . Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology . 39 . 2 . 238–240 . February 2012 . 21523842 . 10.1002/uog.9034 . 206543816. free .
  10. Book: Copel JA, D'Alton ME, Feltovich H, Gratacós E, Krakow D, Odibo AO, Platt LD, Tutschek B . 6 . Obstetric imaging: Fetal diagnosis and care . Research Profiles at Washington University School of Medicine . 2nd . 2017-01-01 . Elsevier . 10.1016/C2014-0-00100-1 . 978-0-323-44548-1.
  11. Web site: Your baby in the birth canal . 2023-07-31 . MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia.
  12. Dasa TT, Okunlola MA, Dessie Y . Effect of grand multiparity on adverse maternal outcomes: A prospective cohort study . Frontiers in Public Health . 10 . 959633 . 2022 . 36311606 . 10.3389/fpubh.2022.959633 . 9608575 . free.
  13. Web site: Tully . G . What Causes Asynclitism . Spinning Babies . 19 July 2019 . 26 July 2023.
  14. Shamsnajafabadi H, Soheili ZS . Amniotic fluid characteristics and its application in stem cell therapy: A review . International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine . 20 . 8 . 627–643 . August 2022 . 36313262 . 9596929 . 10.18502/ijrm.v20i8.11752.
  15. Book: Jacob K, Hoerter JE . Caput Succedaneum . 2023 . StatPearls . 2023-07-27 . Treasure Island (FL) . StatPearls Publishing . 34662048 .
  16. Malvasi A, Vinciguerra M, Lamanna B, Cascardi E, Damiani GR, Muzzupapa G, Kosmas I, Beck R, Falagario M, Vimercati A, Cicinelli E, Trojano G, Tinelli A, Cazzato G, Dellino M . 6 . Asynclitism and Its Ultrasonographic Rediscovery in Labor Room to Date: A Systematic Review . Diagnostics . 12 . 12 . 2998 . November 2022 . 36553005 . 9776610 . 10.3390/diagnostics12122998 . free.
  17. Althaus JE, Petersen S, Driggers R, Cootauco A, Bienstock JL, Blakemore KJ . Cephalopelvic disproportion is associated with an altered uterine contraction shape in the active phase of labor . American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology . 195 . 3 . 739–742 . September 2006 . 16949406 . 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.053.
  18. Book: American Academy of Pediatrics. American Heart Association . Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation (NRP) . 7th . 2016-04-16 . American Academy of Pediatrics . 978-1-61002-025-1.
  19. Simkin P . March 2010 . The fetal occiput posterior position: state of the science and a new perspective . Birth . 37 . 1 . 61–71 . 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00380.x . 20402724.
  20. Sapin SO, Miller AA, Bass HN . Neonatal asymmetric crying facies: a new look at an old problem . Clinical Pediatrics . 44 . 2 . 109–119 . March 2005 . 15735828 . 10.1177/000992280504400202. 25670821 .
  21. Jeon J, Na S . Vacuum extraction vaginal delivery: current trend and safety . Obstetrics & Gynecology Science . 60 . 6 . 499–505 . November 2017 . 29184857 . 5694723 . 10.5468/ogs.2017.60.6.499.
  22. Kettle C, Tohill S . Perineal care . BMJ Clinical Evidence . 2011 . 1401 . April 2011 . 21481287 . 3275301.
  23. Ali UA, Norwitz ER . Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery . Reviews in Obstetrics & Gynecology . 2 . 1 . 5–17 . 2009 . 19399290 . 2672989.
  24. Kahrs BH, Usman S, Ghi T, Youssef A, Torkildsen EA, Lindtjørn E, Østborg TB, Benediktsdottir S, Brooks L, Harmsen L, Salvesen KÅ, Lees CC, Eggebø TM . 6 . Fetal rotation during vacuum extractions for prolonged labor: a prospective cohort study . Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica . 97 . 8 . 998–1005 . August 2018 . 29770435 . 10.1111/aogs.13372 . 21721014. free . 10044/1/61107 . free .
  25. Hanson L . Second-stage labor care: challenges in spontaneous bearing down . The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing . 23 . 1 . 31–39 . January 2009 . 19209057 . 10.1097/JPN.0b013e318196526b. 9830451 .
  26. Book: Simkin P, Hanson L, Ancheta R . The Labor Progress Handbook: Early Interventions to Prevent and Treat Dystocia . 2017 . Wiley Blackwell . Hoboken, New Jersey . 978-1-119-17046-4 . Fourth.
  27. Book: Williams Obstetrics . 2014 . McGraw-Hill education . New York . 978-0-07-179893-8 . 24th .
  28. Web site: Birsner . Meredith . Porter . Flint . April 2013 . Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request . 2023-07-31 . American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.