Ankylosauridae is a family of armored dinosaurs within Ankylosauria, and is the sister group to Nodosauridae. The oldest known Ankylosaurids date to around 122 million years ago and went extinct 66 million years ago during the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event.[1] These animals were mainly herbivorous and were obligate quadrupeds, with leaf-shaped teeth and robust, scute-covered bodies. Ankylosaurids possess a distinctly domed and short snout, wedge-shaped osteoderms on their skull, scutes along their torso, and a tail club.[2]
Ankylosauridae is exclusively known from the northern hemisphere, with specimens found in western North America, Europe, and East Asia. The first discoveries within this family were of the genus Ankylosaurus, by Peter Kaiser and Barnum Brown in Montana in 1906.[3] Brown went on to name Ankylosauridae and the subfamily Ankylosaurinae in 1908.
Ankylosaurids are stout, solidly built, armoured dinosaurs. They possess accessory ossifications on cranial bones that cover some skull openings and form wedge-shaped, horn-like structures. Along the ankylosaurid torso are scute rows, which are filled in with smaller ossicles to create a fused shield of armour. Only two collars of armour plates can be found on the neck, as opposed to the sister group, nodosaurids, which have three. Nodosauridae and Ankylosauridae also share the unique attribute of abundant structural fibres in both primary and secondary bone.[4] Ankylosaurids also have an S-shaped narial passage.
The most distinguishing feature of ankylosaurids is the presence of a tail club. It is made out of modified interlocking distal caudal vertebrae and enlarged, bulbous osteoderms.[5] The "handle" of the tail club involves the vertebrae, and requires elongated prezygapophyses to overlap at least half of the preceding vertebral centrum length. These distal caudal vertebrae also lack transverse processes and neural spines, and therefore tend to be longer than they are wide; the reverse is true for proximal caudal vertebrae. Derived ankylosaurids possess a fusion of posterior dorsal, sacral, and sometimes anterior caudal vertebrae, which forms a singular structure called a "synsacrum complex". There is a complete fusion between centra, neural arches, zygapophyses, and sometimes neural spines.[6]
In 2017, Victoria M. Arbour and David C. Evans described a new genus of ankylosaurine that preserved extensive soft tissues along the body. This animal, named Zuul after its resemblance to the Ghostbusters monster, is also the first ankylosaur from the Judith River Formation.[7]
Barnum Brown and Peter Kaisen discovered the first ankylosaurid genus, Ankylosaurus, in 1906 in the Hell Creek Beds in Montana. The fossil material they found was a portion of the skull, two teeth, some vertebrae, a distorted scapula, ribs and more than thirty osteoderms. Reconstruction of the specimen was initially met with skepticism by those who believed it to be at least very close to, or completely a part of the genus Stegopelta, and Brown himself placed it within the suborder Stegosauria.
It has previously been interpreted that variation in ankylosaurid tail club shape is due to sexual dimorphism, which assumes that tail club morphology has a sex-linked intraspecific function. This is possible if the tail club was used for agonistic behaviour. However, a sexual dimorphism theory would predict roughly equal numbers of individuals with two distinct sizes of tail clubs. Obvious sexual dimorphism has not been documented, but if the clubs of one sex are much larger, then there would be a bias for preservation and discovery towards that sex.[8]
In 1978, W.P. Coombs, Jr. classified almost all valid species of Ankylosauria within either Nodosauridae or Ankylosauridae.[9] This was a pivotal study and described many characters of ankylosaurs in the earliest phylogenetic analyses of the group.
Later in 1998, Paul Sereno formally defined Ankylosauridae as all ankylosaurs more closely related to Ankylosaurus than to Panoplosaurus.[10] Ankylosaurs not known to possess a tail club were included in Kenneth Carpenter's 2001 phylogeny of Ankylosauridae.[11] In a study done in 2004 by Vickaryous et al., Gargoyleosaurus, Gastonia, and Minmi were recorded as basal ankylosaurids, with the rest of the ankylosaurids filled out with Gobisaurus, Shamosaurus, and ankylosaurines from China, Mongolia, and North America.[12]
In 2012, Thompson et al. undertook an analysis of almost all known valid ankylosaurs and outgroup taxa at the time.[13] They based their resulting phylogeny on characters representing cranial, post-cranial, and osteodermal anatomy, and details of synapomorphies for each recovered clade. This study placed Gargoyleosaurus and Gastonia within basal Nodosauridae, and put Cedarpelta and Liaoningosaurus as basal ankylosaurids.In 2016, Arbour and Currie have presented a phylogenetic analysis of Ankylosauridae consisting of Gastonia, Cedarpelta, Chuanqilong, other basal ankylosaurids, and a number of derived ankylosaurids. Their phylogeny includes some uncertain phylogenetic relationships, between Ankylosaurus, Anodontosaurus, Scolosaurus, and Ziapelta.[14]
Ankylosaurids were likely very slow-moving animals. In all Ankylosauria, the fibula is more slender than the tibia, suggesting that the tibia carried most of the weight of the animal, while the fibula served as an area of muscular attachment.[15] Hindlimb muscles of Euoplocephalus have been restored and the placement of several muscles inserting on the femur have very short moment arms. Muscles inserting on the tibia and fibula have longer moment arms. This pattern of retractor muscles points to an elephantine locomotion, consistent with columnar posture.
Restoration of Euoplocephalus forelimbs demonstrate similarities to crocodilian forelimb musculature.[16] The most well developed muscles in the pectoral region had more of a weight-bearing function than a rotational one. It has also been postulated that the carpals and metacarpals bear resemblance to those of tetrapods with fossorial (burrowing) habits.
Several muscles in the posterior of ankylosaurids (dorsalis caudae, ilio-caudalis, coccygeo-femoralis brevis, coccygeo-femoralis longus, ilio-tibialis, and ischio caudalis) were used for motion of the tail and tail club. Ankylosaurids tend to have horizontal rather than an obliquely vertical orientation of zygapophyseal articulations in the free caudal vertebrae of the tail. This arrangement is most effective for side-to-side rather than vertical mobility. The absence of musculature to elevate the tail, and this orientation of zygapophyses suggest that the tail and its club swept parallel to and slightly above the ground.
It is difficult to establish the geographical origin of Ankylosauridae at present. There is a mix of basal ankylosaurids from both North America and Asia, which carries on through accepted cladistic analyses.[17] It appears that in the mid-Cretaceous, Asian nodosaurids were replaced by ankylosaurine ankylosaurids.[14] Some researchers postulate that Ankylosaurines migrated into North America from Asia between the Albian and Campanian, where they diversified into a clade of ankylosaurines characterized by arched snouts and flat cranial bone plates (caputegulae). There is no evidence for ankylosaurids in Gondwana.
Within Ankylosauridae there is much individual and interspecific variation in expression of armour. However, the most researched aspect of ankylosaurid armour is the tail club. There has been substantial ontogenetic and individual variability found in the morphology of this feature. There have been at least 16 caudal vertebrae included in the handle of the tail club of Pinacosaurus grangeri, and Euoplocephalus has an estimated 9 – 11 coossified caudals.
Variations in tail knob shape, thickness, and length are attributed to individual variation, taxonomy, or representation of different growth phases. There are difficulties with this last aspect, however, in that known clubs do not conform to a single growth series, yet some differences must be ontogenetic and allometric.
Most ankylosaurid teeth were leaf-shaped, implying a mainly herbivorous diet. Their teeth could be smooth or fluted, or may differ on labial and lingual surfaces.[18] Euoplocephalus tutus possess ridges and grooves on their teeth that have no relation to their marginal cusps. With their downward-facing neck and head, it is plausible for ankylosaurids to feed in a grazing pattern.
Non-herbivorous habits have been implicated for some species, however. Pinacosaurus has been speculated as being an ant-eater-like long tongued insectivore,[19] while Liaoningosaurus has been proposed to be a piscivore. Either would be exceptional evidence of carnivory among ornithischians.There are a few prevailing theories for ankylosaurid tail club function. The first is agonistic behaviour within a species. In most vertebrates, including dinosaurs, this behaviour is accompanied by structures for display or combat. Some researchers believe this phenomenon would have been implausible considering there is no modern tetrapod analogue that uses the tail for this purpose. These paleontologists instead propose that ankylosaurids made use of their broad, flat skull for head-butting between individuals.
The second theory for tail club function is for defense against predators. It has been postulated that the club would be most effective against the metatarsals of an attacking theropod.
The bones that form cranial ornamentation have physiological costs, and so would be inefficient to produce merely for protection against predation. The theory has therefore been posed that these wedge-shaped osteoderms could support a partly sexually selected interpretation.
Period = from:-201 till:-45TimeAxis = orientation:horizontalScaleMajor = unit:year increment:10 start:-200ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:1 start:-201TimeAxis = orientation:horAlignBars = justify
Colors = #legends id:CAR value:claret id:ANK value:rgb(0.4,0.3,0.196) id:HER value:teal id:HAD value:green id:OMN value:blue id:black value:black id:white value:white id:jurassic value:rgb(0.2,0.7,0.79) id:earlyjurassic value:rgb(0,0.69,0.89) id:middlejurassic value:rgb(0.52,0.81,0.91) id:latejurassic value:rgb(0.74,0.89,0.97) id:cretaceous value:rgb(0.5,0.78,0.31) id:earlycretaceous value:rgb(0.63,0.78,0.65) id:latecretaceous value:rgb(0.74,0.82,0.37) BarData= bar:eratop bar:space bar:periodtop bar:space bar:NAM1 bar:NAM2 bar:NAM3 bar:NAM4 bar:NAM5 bar:NAM6 bar:NAM7 bar:NAM8 bar:NAM9 bar:NAM10 bar:NAM11 bar:NAM12 bar:NAM13 bar:NAM14 bar:NAM15 bar:NAM16 bar:NAM17 bar:NAM18 bar:NAM19 bar:NAM20 bar:NAM21 bar:NAM22 bar:NAM23 bar:NAM24 bar:space bar:period bar:space bar:era
PlotData= align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark:(line,black) width:25 shift:(7,-4) bar:periodtop from: -201 till: -174 color:earlyjurassic text:Early from: -174 till: -163 color:middlejurassic text:Middle from: -163 till: -145 color:latejurassic text:Late from: -145 till: -100 color:earlycretaceous text:Early from: -100 till: -66 color:latecretaceous text:Late
bar:eratop from: -201 till: -145 color:jurassic text:Jurassic from: -145 till: -66 color:cretaceous text:Cretaceous
PlotData= align:left fontsize:M mark:(line,white) width:5 anchor:till align:left
color:cretaceous bar:NAM1 from:-122 till:-120 text:Liaoningosaurus color:cretaceous bar:NAM2 from:-119 till:-113 text:Minmi color:cretaceous bar:NAM3 from:-113 till:-110 text:Shamosaurus color:cretaceous bar:NAM4 from:-108.5 till:-108 text:Cedarpelta color:cretaceous bar:NAM5 from:-105 till:-100 text:Zhongyuansaurus color:cretaceous bar:NAM6 from:-98 till:-83 text:Talarurus color:cretaceous bar:NAM7 from:-98 till:-83 text:Tsagantegia color:cretaceous bar:NAM8 from:-92 till:-90 text:Gobisaurus color:cretaceous bar:NAM9 from:-80 till:-79 text:Minotaurasaurus color:cretaceous bar:NAM10 from:-80 till:-75 text:Pinacosaurus color:cretaceous bar:NAM11 from:-76.5 till:-76 text:Scolosaurus color:cretaceous bar:NAM12 from:-76.5 till:-76 text:Dyoplosaurus color:cretaceous bar:NAM13 from:-76.4 till:-75.5 text:Euoplocephalus color:cretaceous bar:NAM14 from:-76.2 till:-75.2 text:Zuul color:cretaceous bar:NAM15 from:-76 till:-75 text:Nodocephalosaurus color:cretaceous bar:NAM16 from:-76 till:-74 text:Ahshislepelta color:cretaceous bar:NAM17 from:-75 till:-74 text:Aletopelta color:cretaceous bar:NAM18 from:-75 till:-74 text:Tianzhenosaurus color:cretaceous bar:NAM19 from:-75 till:-74 text:Shanxia color:cretaceous bar:NAM20 from:-74 till:-73 text:Oohkotokia color:cretaceous bar:NAM21 from:-72.8 till:-67 text:Anodontosaurus color:cretaceous bar:NAM22 from:-70 till:-69 text:Saichania color:cretaceous bar:NAM23 from:-70 till:-69 text:Tarchia color:cretaceous bar:NAM24 from:-66.5 till:-66 text:Ankylosaurus
PlotData= align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark:(line,black) width:25
bar:period from: -201 till: -174 color:earlyjurassic text:Early from: -174 till: -163 color:middlejurassic text:Middle from: -163 till: -145 color:latejurassic text:Late from: -145 till: -100 color:earlycretaceous text:Early from: -100 till: -66 color:latecretaceous text:Late
bar:era from: -201 till: -145 color:jurassic text:Jurassic from: -145 till: -66 color:cretaceous text:Cretaceous