k[X1,\ldots,Xn].
Some texts use the term variety for any algebraic set, and irreducible variety an algebraic set whose defining ideal is prime (affine variety in the above sense).
In some contexts (see, for example, Hilbert's Nullstellensatz), it is useful to distinguish the field in which the coefficients are considered, from the algebraically closed field (containing) over which the common zeros are considered (that is, the points of the affine algebraic set are in). In this case, the variety is said defined over, and the points of the variety that belong to are said -rational or rational over . In the common case where is the field of real numbers, a -rational point is called a real point. When the field is not specified, a rational point is a point that is rational over the rational numbers. For example, Fermat's Last Theorem asserts that the affine algebraic variety (it is a curve) defined by has no rational points for any integer greater than two.
An affine algebraic set is the set of solutions in an algebraically closed field of a system of polynomial equations with coefficients in . More precisely, if
f1,\ldots,fm
V(f1,\ldots,fm)=\left\{(a1,\ldots,an)\inkn | f1(a1,\ldots,an)=\ldots=fm(a1,\ldots,an)=0\right\}.
R=k[x1,\ldots,xn]/I
The dimension of a variety is an integer associated to every variety, and even to every algebraic set, whose importance relies on the large number of its equivalent definitions (see Dimension of an algebraic variety).
k[X][f-1]
C-0
C2-0
kn
See main article: rational point.
For an affine variety
V\subseteqKn
p\inV\capkn.
V(k).
For instance, is a -rational and an -rational point of the variety
V=V(x2+y2-1)\subseteqC2,
(i,\sqrt{2})
\left( | 1-t2 | , |
1+t2 |
2t | |
1+t2 |
\right)
The circle
V(x2+y2-3)\subseteqC2
It can be proved that an algebraic curve of degree two with a -rational point has infinitely many other -rational points; each such point is the second intersection point of the curve and a line with a rational slope passing through the rational point.
The complex variety
V(x2+y2+1)\subseteqC2
If is an affine variety in defined over the complex numbers, the -rational points of can be drawn on a piece of paper or by graphing software. The figure on the right shows the -rational points of
V(y2-x3+x2+16x)\subseteqC2.
Let be an affine variety defined by the polynomials
f1,...,fr\ink[x1,...,xn],
a=(a1,...,an)
The Jacobian matrix of at is the matrix of the partial derivatives
\partialfj | |
\partial{xi |
The point is regular if the rank of equals the codimension of, and singular otherwise.
If is regular, the tangent space to at is the affine subspace of
kn
n | |
\sum | |
i=1 |
\partialfj | |
\partial{xi |
If the point is singular, the affine subspace defined by these equations is also called a tangent space by some authors, while other authors say that there is no tangent space at a singular point.[1] A more intrinsic definition, which does not use coordinates is given by Zariski tangent space.
See main article: Zariski topology. The affine algebraic sets of kn form the closed sets of a topology on kn, called the Zariski topology. This follows from the fact that
V(0)=kn,
V(1)=\emptyset,
V(S)\cupV(T)=V(ST),
V(S)\capV(T)=V(S,T)
The Zariski topology can also be described by way of basic open sets, where Zariski-open sets are countable unions of sets of the form
Uf=\{p\inkn:f(p) ≠ 0\}
f\ink[x1,\ldots,xn].
V(f)=Df=\{p\inkn:f(p)=0\},
If V is an affine subvariety of kn the Zariski topology on V is simply the subspace topology inherited from the Zariski topology on kn.
The geometric structure of an affine variety is linked in a deep way to the algebraic structure of its coordinate ring. Let I and J be ideals of k[V], the coordinate ring of an affine variety V. Let I(V) be the set of all polynomials in
k[x1,\ldots,xn],
\sqrt{I}
k[x1,\ldots,xn],
I(V(J))=\sqrt{J}.
Radical ideals (ideals that are their own radical) of k[V] correspond to algebraic subsets of V. Indeed, for radical ideals I and J,
I\subseteqJ
V(J)\subseteqV(I).
Prime ideals of the coordinate ring correspond to affine subvarieties. An affine algebraic set V(I) can be written as the union of two other algebraic sets if and only if I=JK for proper ideals J and K not equal to I (in which case
V(I)=V(J)\cupV(K)
Maximal ideals of k[V] correspond to points of V. If I and J are radical ideals, then
V(J)\subseteqV(I)
I\subseteqJ.
R=k[x1,\ldots,xn]/\langlef1,\ldots,fm\rangle,
(a1,\ldots,an)\mapsto\langle\overline{x1-a1},\ldots,\overline{xn-an}\rangle,
\overline{xi-ai}
xi-ai.
The following table summarises this correspondence, for algebraic subsets of an affine variety and ideals of the corresponding coordinate ring:
Type of algebraic set | Type of ideal | Type of coordinate ring | |
---|---|---|---|
affine algebraic subset | radical ideal | reduced ring | |
affine subvariety | prime ideal | integral domain | |
point | maximal ideal | field |
A product of affine varieties can be defined using the isomorphism then embedding the product in this new affine space. Let and have coordinate rings and respectively, so that their product has coordinate ring . Let be an algebraic subset of and an algebraic subset of Then each is a polynomial in, and each is in . The product of and is defined as the algebraic set in The product is irreducible if each, is irreducible.[2]
The Zariski topology on is not the topological product of the Zariski topologies on the two spaces. Indeed, the product topology is generated by products of the basic open sets and Hence, polynomials that are in but cannot be obtained as a product of a polynomial in with a polynomial in will define algebraic sets that are in the Zariski topology on but not in the product topology.
See main article: Morphism of algebraic varieties.
A morphism, or regular map, of affine varieties is a function between affine varieties that is polynomial in each coordinate: more precisely, for affine varieties and, a morphism from to is a map of the form where for each These are the morphisms in the category of affine varieties.
There is a one-to-one correspondence between morphisms of affine varieties over an algebraically closed field and homomorphisms of coordinate rings of affine varieties over going in the opposite direction. Because of this, along with the fact that there is a one-to-one correspondence between affine varieties over and their coordinate rings, the category of affine varieties over is dual to the category of coordinate rings of affine varieties over The category of coordinate rings of affine varieties over is precisely the category of finitely-generated, nilpotent-free algebras over
More precisely, for each morphism of affine varieties, there is a homomorphism between the coordinate rings (going in the opposite direction), and for each such homomorphism, there is a morphism of the varieties associated to the coordinate rings. This can be shown explicitly: let and be affine varieties with coordinate rings and respectively. Let be a morphism. Indeed, a homomorphism between polynomial rings factors uniquely through the ring and a homomorphism is determined uniquely by the images of Hence, each homomorphism corresponds uniquely to a choice of image for each . Then given any morphism from to a homomorphism can be constructed that sends to
\overline{fi},
\overline{fi}
Similarly, for each homomorphism of the coordinate rings, a morphism of the affine varieties can be constructed in the opposite direction. Mirroring the paragraph above, a homomorphism sends to a polynomial
fi(X1,...,Xn)
Equipped with the structure sheaf described below, an affine variety is a locally ringed space.
Given an affine variety X with coordinate ring A, the sheaf of k-algebras
l{O}X
l{O}X(U)=\Gamma(U,l{O}X)
Let D(f) = for each f in A. They form a base for the topology of X and so
l{O}X
The key fact, which relies on Hilbert nullstellensatz in the essential way, is the following:Proof: The inclusion ⊃ is clear. For the opposite, let g be in the left-hand side and
J=\{h\inA|hg\inA\}
g\ink[D(h)]=A[h-1]
V(J)\subset\{x|f(x)=0\}
fng\inA
\square
The claim, first of all, implies that X is a "locally ringed" space since
l{O}X,=\varinjlimf(x)A[f-1]=Aak{mx}
ak{m}x=\{f\inA|f(x)=0\}
l{O}X
Hence,
(X,l{O}X)
See main article: Serre's theorem on affineness. A theorem of Serre gives a cohomological characterization of an affine variety; it says an algebraic variety is affine if and only if
Hi(X,F)=0
i>0
An affine variety over an algebraically closed field is called an affine algebraic group if it has:
Together, these define a group structure on the variety. The above morphisms are often written using ordinary group notation: can be written as, or ; the inverse can be written as or Using the multiplicative notation, the associativity, identity and inverse laws can be rewritten as:, and .
The most prominent example of an affine algebraic group is the general linear group of degree This is the group of linear transformations of the vector space if a basis of is fixed, this is equivalent to the group of invertible matrices with entries in It can be shown that any affine algebraic group is isomorphic to a subgroup of . For this reason, affine algebraic groups are often called linear algebraic groups.
Affine algebraic groups play an important role in the classification of finite simple groups, as the groups of Lie type are all sets of -rational points of an affine algebraic group, where is a finite field.
The original article was written as a partial human translation of the corresponding French article.
. William Fulton (mathematician) . 1969 . Algebraic Curves . Addison-Wesley . 0-201-510103 .
. David Mumford . 1999 . The Red Book of Varieties and Schemes: Includes the Michigan Lectures (1974) on Curves and Their Jacobians . Lecture Notes in Mathematics . 1358 . 2nd . . 10.1007/b62130 . 354063293X .
. Miles Reid . Undergraduate Algebraic Geometry . 1988 . Cambridge University Press . 0-521-35662-8 . registration .