In the study of combustion, the adiabatic flame temperature is the temperature reached by a flame under ideal conditions. It is an upper bound of the temperature that is reached in actual processes.
There are two types of adiabatic flame temperature: constant volume and constant pressure, depending on how the process is completed. The constant volume adiabatic flame temperature is the temperature that results from a complete combustion process that occurs without any work, heat transfer or changes in kinetic or potential energy. Its temperature is higher than in the constant pressure process because no energy is utilized to change the volume of the system (i.e., generate work).
In daily life, the vast majority of flames one encounters are those caused by rapid oxidation of hydrocarbons in materials such as wood, wax, fat, plastics, propane, and gasoline. The constant-pressure adiabatic flame temperature of such substances in air is in a relatively narrow range around . This is mostly because the heat of combustion of these compounds is roughly proportional to the amount of oxygen consumed, which proportionally increases the amount of air that has to be heated, so the effect of a larger heat of combustion on the flame temperature is offset. Incomplete reaction at higher temperature further curtails the effect of a larger heat of combustion.
Because most combustion processes that happen naturally occur in the open air, there is nothing that confines the gas to a particular volume like the cylinder in an engine. As a result, these substances will burn at a constant pressure, which allows the gas to expand during the process.
Assuming initial atmospheric conditions (1bar and 20 °C), the following table[1] lists the flame temperature for various fuels under constant pressure conditions. The temperatures mentioned here are for a stoichiometric fuel-oxidizer mixture (i.e. equivalence ratio φ = 1).
Note that these are theoretical, not actual, flame temperatures produced by a flame that loses no heat. The closest will be the hottest part of a flame, where the combustion reaction is most efficient. This also assumes complete combustion (e.g. perfectly balanced, non-smoky, usually bluish flame). Several values in the table significantly disagree with the literature or predictions by online calculators.
| Fuel | Oxidizer 1 bar 20 °C | Tad | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (°C) | (°F) | |||
| Acetylene | 2,500 | 4,532 | ||
| 3,480 | 6,296 | |||
| Butane | Air | 2,231 | 4,074[2] | |
| Cyanogen | Oxygen | 4,525 | 8,177 | |
| Dicyanoacetylene | Oxygen | 4,990 | 9,010 | |
| Ethane | Air | 1,955 | 3,551 | |
| Ethanol | Air | 2,082 | 3,779[3] | |
| Air | 2,138 | 3,880 | ||
| Hydrogen | Air | 2,254 | 4,089 | |
| Magnesium (Mg) | Air | 1,982 | 3,600[4] | |
| Methane | Air | 1,963 | 3,565[5] | |
| Methanol | Air | 1,949 | 3,540 | |
| Air | 2,533 | 4,591 | ||
| Air | 1,960 | 3,562[6] | ||
| Pentane | Air | 1,977 | 3,591 | |
| Propane | Air | 1,980 | 3,596[7] | |
| Methylacetylene | Air | 2,010 | 3,650 | |
| Oxygen | 2,927 | 5,301 | ||
| Toluene | Air | 2,071 | 3,760 | |
| Air | 1,980 | 3,596 | ||
| Air | 2,093[8] | 3,801 | ||
| Air | 2,104 | 3,820 | ||
| Air | 2,101 | 3,815 | ||
| Air | 2,102 | 3,817 | ||
| Air | 2,172 | 3,943 | ||
| Anthracite | Air | 2,180 | 3,957 | |
| Oxygen | data-sort-value="3,500" | ≈3,500[9] | data-sort-value="6332" | ≈6,332 |
| Oxygen | 3,732 | 6,750 | ||
| Oxygen | 2,438 | 4,420 | ||
| Phosphorus (white) | Oxygen | 2,969 | 5,376 | |
| Oxygen | 4,005 | 7,241 | ||
From the first law of thermodynamics for a closed reacting system we have
{}RQP-{}RWP=UP-UR
{}RQP
{}RWP
UR
UP
{}RWP=
| P | |
| \int\limits | |
| R |
{pdV}=0
{}RQP=0
UP=UR
UP=UR ⇒ mPuP=mRuR ⇒ uP=uR
In the case of the constant pressure adiabatic flame temperature, the pressure of the system is held constant, which results in the following equation for the work:
{}RWP=
| P | |
| \int\limits | |
| R |
{pdV}=p\left({VP-VR}\right)
{}RQP=0
-p\left({VP-VR}\right)=UP-UR ⇒ UP+pVP=UR+pVR
HP=HR
HP=HR ⇒ mPhP=mRhR ⇒ hP=hR
We see that the adiabatic flame temperature of the constant pressure process is lower than that of the constant volume process. This is because some of the energy released during combustion goes, as work, into changing the volume of the control system.
If we make the assumption that combustion goes to completion (i.e. forming only and), we can calculate the adiabatic flame temperature by hand either at stoichiometric conditions or lean of stoichiometry (excess air). This is because there are enough variables and molar equations to balance the left and right hand sides,
{\rm{C}}\alpha{\rm{H}}\beta{\rm{O}}\gamma{\rm{N}}\delta+\left({a{\rm{O}}\rm{2
Rich of stoichiometry there are not enough variables because combustion cannot go to completion with at least and needed for the molar balance (these are the most common products of incomplete combustion),
{\rm{C}}\alpha{\rm{H}}\beta{\rm{O}}\gamma{\rm{N}}\delta+\left({a{\rm{O}}\rm{2
However, if we include the water gas shift reaction,
{\rm{CO}}\rm{2
Different fuels with different levels of energy and molar constituents will have different adiabatic flame temperatures.
We can see by the following figure why nitromethane (CH3NO2) is often used as a power boost for cars. Since each molecule of nitromethane contains an oxidant with relatively high-energy bonds between nitrogen and oxygen, it can burn much hotter than hydrocarbons or oxygen-containing methanol. This is analogous to adding pure oxygen, which also raises the adiabatic flame temperature. This in turn allows it to build up more pressure during a constant volume process. The higher the pressure, the more force upon the piston creating more work and more power in the engine. It stays relatively hot rich of stoichiometry because it contains its own oxidant. However, continual running of an engine on nitromethane will eventually melt the piston and/or cylinder because of this higher temperature.
In real world applications, complete combustion does not typically occur. Chemistry dictates that dissociation and kinetics will change the composition of the products. There are a number of programs available that can calculate the adiabatic flame temperature taking into account dissociation through equilibrium constants (Stanjan, NASA CEA, AFTP). The following figure illustrates that the effects of dissociation tend to lower the adiabatic flame temperature. This result can be explained through Le Chatelier's principle.