Zeldovich–Liñán model explained

In combustion, Zeldovich–Liñán model is a two-step reaction model for the combustion processes, named after Yakov Borisovich Zeldovich and Amable Liñán. The model includes a chain-branching and a chain-breaking (or radical recombination) reaction. The model was first introduced by Zeldovich in 1948^[1] and later analysed by Liñán using activation energy asymptotics in 1971.^[2] The mechanism with a quadratic or second-order recombination that were originally studied reads as

\begin{align} \rm{Branching (I):} & \rm{F} + \rm{Z} → 2 \rm{Z} \\ \rm{Recombination (II):} & \rm{Z} + \rm{Z} + \rm{M} → 2 \rm{P} + \rm{M} + \rm{Heat} \end{align}

where

\rm{F} is the fuel, \rm{Z} is an intermediate radical, \rm{M} is the third body and \rm{P} is the product. The mechanism with a linear or first-order recombination is known as Zeldovich–Liñán–Dold model which was introduced by John W. Dold.^{[3] [4]} This mechanism reads as\begin{align} \rm{Branching (I):} & \rm{F} + \rm{Z} → 2 \rm{Z} \\ \rm{Recombination (II):} & \rm{Z} + \rm{M} → \rm{P} + \rm{M} + \rm{Heat} \end{align}

In both models, the first reaction is the chain-branching reaction (it produces two radicals by consuming one radical), which is considered to be auto-catalytic (consumes no heat and releases no heat), with very large activation energy and the second reaction is the chain-breaking (or radical-recombination) reaction (it consumes radicals), where all of the heat in the combustion is released, with almost negligible activation energy.^{[5] [6] [7]} Therefore, the rate constants are written as^[8]

k _{\rm{I} } = A_ e^, \quad k_ = A_

where

A _{\rm} and A _{\rm} are the pre-exponential factors, E _{\rm} is the activation energy for chain-branching reaction which is much larger than the thermal energy and T is the temperature.

Crossover temperature

Albeit, there are two fundamental aspects that differentiate Zeldovich–Liñán–Dold (ZLD) model from the Zeldovich–Liñán (ZL) model. First of all, the so-called cold-boundary difficulty in premixed flames does not occur in the ZLD model and secondly the so-called crossover temperature exist in the ZLD, but not in the ZL model.

For simplicity, consider a spatially homogeneous system, then the concentration

C _{Z} (t) of the radical in the ZLD model evolves according to(dC _{Z})/(dt) = C _{Z} \left(A _{I} C _{F} e ^{- E _{I} /RT} - A _{II} \right).

It is clear from this equation that the radical concentration will grow in time if the righthand side term is positive. More preceisley, the initial equilibrium state

C _{Z} ( 0 ) =0 is unstable if the right-side term is positive. If C _{F} ( 0 ) = C _{F,0} denotes the initial fuel concentration, a crossover temperature T ^{*} as a temperature at which the branching and recombination rates are equal can be defined, i.e.,e ^{E _{I} /RT ^{*}} = (A _{I})/(A _{II}) C _{F,0} .

When

T>T ^{*} , branching dominates over recombination and therefore the radial concentration will grow in time, whereas if T<T ^{*} , recombination dominates over branching and therefore the radial concentration will disappear in time.

In a more general setup, where the system is non-homogeneous, evaluation of crossover temperature is complicated because of the presence of convective and diffusive transport.

In the ZL model, one would have obtained

e ^{E _{I} /RT ^{*}} = (A _{I} /A _{II} ) C _{F,0} C _{Z} ( 0 ) , but since C _{Z} ( 0 ) is zero or vanishingly small in the perturbed state, there is no crossover temperature.

Three regimes

In his analysis, Liñán showed that there exists three types of regimes, namely, slow recombination regime, intermediate recombination regime and fast recombination regime.^[9] These regimes exist in both aforementioned models.

Let us consider a premixed flame in the ZLD model. Based on the thermal diffusivity

D _{T} and the flame burning speed S _{L} , one can define the flame thickness (or the thermal thickness) as \delta _{L=D} _{T/S} _{L} . Since the activation energy of the branching is much greater than thermal energy, the chracteristic thickness \delta _{B} of the branching layer will be \delta _{B/\delta} _{L} \sim O( 1 /\beta) , where \beta is the Zeldovich number based on E _{I} . The recombination reaction does not have the activation energy and its thickness \delta _{R} will characterised by its Damköhler number Da _{II} = (D _{T/S} ^{2 )/(W} ^{Z} A ^{-1} _{II} ) , where W _{Z} is the molecular weight of the intermediate species. Specifically, from a diffusive-reactive balance, we obtain \delta _{R/\delta} _{L} \sim O(Da ^{-1 / 2} _{II} ) (in the ZL model, this would have been \delta _{R/\delta} _{L} \sim O(Da ^{-1 / 3} _{II} ) ).

By comparing the thicknesses of the different layers, the three regimes are classified:

• Slow Recombination Regime (SRR):
  Da _{II} = O( 1 ) and O(\delta _{B)\ll} O(\delta _{R)=O(\delta} _{L).}
• Intermediate Recombination Regime (IRR): Da _{II} = O(\beta) and O(\delta _{B)\ll} O(\delta _{R)\ll} O(\delta _{L).}
• Fast Recombination Regime (FRR): Da _{II} = O(\beta ^{2)} and O(\delta _{B)=} O(\delta _{R)\ll} O(\delta _{L).}

The fast recombination represents siturations near the flammability limits. As can be seen, the recombination layer becomes comprable to the brnaching layer. The criticality is achieved when the branching is unable to cope up with the recombination. Such criticality exists in the ZLD model. Su-Ryong Lee and Jong S. Kim showed that as

\Delta \equiv Da _{II} /\beta ^{2} becomes large, the critical condition is reached,r = e\left( 1+ (0 . 4162)/(\sqrt{\Delta) }\right)

where

r = (Da _{I})/(\beta Da _{II}) e ^{-\beta(1+q)/q} , Da _{I} = (D _{T/S} ^{2} ^{L})/((A _{IY} _{F,0} /W _{F} ) ^{-1}) .

Here

q is the heat release parameter, Y _{F,0} is the unburnt fuel mass fraction and W _{F} is the molecular weight of the fuel.

See also

• Zel'dovich mechanism
• Peters four-step chemistry

Notes and References

1. Zeldovich, Y. B. (1948). K teorii rasprostraneniya plameni. Zhurnal Fizicheskoi Khimii, 22(1), 27-48.
2. Liñán, A. (1971). A theoretical analysis of premixed flame propagation with an isothermal chain reaction. AFOSR Contract No. E00AR68-0031, 1.
3. Dold, J. W., Thatcher, R. W., Omon-Arancibia, A., & Redman, J. (2002). From one-step to chain-branching premixed flame asymptotics. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 29(2), 1519-1526.
4. Dold, J. W. (2007). Premixed flames modelled with thermally sensitive intermediate branching kinetics. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 11(6), 909-948.
5. Gubernov, V. V., Kolobov, A. V., Polezhaev, A. A., & Sidhu, H. S. (2011). Pulsating instabilities in the Zeldovich–Liñán model. Journal of mathematical chemistry, 49(5), 1054-1070.
6. Tam, R. Y. (1988). Damköhler-number ratio asymptotics of the Zeldovich-Liñán model. Combustion science and technology, 62(4-6), 297-309.
7. Dold, J., Daou, J., & Weber, R. (2004). Reactive-diffusive stability of premixed flames with modified Zeldovich-Linán kinetics. Simplicity, Rigor and Relevance in Fluid Mechanics, 47-60.
8. Lee, S. R., & Kim, J. S. (2024). The Asymptotic Structure of Strained Chain-Branching Premixed Flames Under Nonadiabatic Conditions. Combustion Science and Technology, 1-27.
9. Lee, S. R., & Kim, J. S. (2024). The asymptotic solution of near-limit chain-branching premixed flames with the Zel’dovich–Liñán two-step mechanism in the linear and fast recombination regime. Combustion and Flame, 265, 113441.