Youth-adult partnership explained

Youth-adult partnership is a conscious relationship that establishes and sustains intergenerational equity between young people and adults. Youth-adult partnerships often display a high degree of youth rights and autonomy, and is often synonymous with meaningful youth participation. Typically seen with adults acting in a mentor capacity, providing scaffolding to the youth. Unlike traditional mentoring, youth-adult partnerships are categorized by multiple adults and multiple youth[1] and there must also be a mutuality where adults and youth teach and learn from one another, working together in their community.

Factors for Success

The success of these partnerships rely on a variety of factors. In addition to concrete outcomes, youth/adult partnerships require specific cultural and structural supports within organizations and communities in order to succeed.[2]

There needs to be mutual respect and cohesiveness within members of the partnership.

Common Settings

These relationships usually occur within youth organizations, where they are typified by youth voice. Youth voice is commonly recognized as an essential element of effective youth-adult partnerships.

Schools

In democratic schools, they are typified by student voice. One of the expectations from these youth-adult partnerships is that the student-led groups can represent the student body to the administration and school boards. [3] This can be done in a variety of different ways, such as planning activities, cocreating curriculum, and assessing progress and current effectiveness of programs within the school.

Communities

Youth-adult partnerships can empower youth and adults as they educate their peers and advocate for the promotion of health and active engagement in the community.[4]

Outcomes

Youth-adult partnerships allow young people to:

The relationships formed by youth-adult partnerships combat ephebiphobia and adultism by elevating the role of youth voice. [6]

A broad number of parties benefit from said partnerships, including the organizations where the partnerships occur, and the adults and youth who are involved. Actual benefits range from increased commitment, to higher feelings of self-efficacy,[7] as well as increased organizational effectiveness and civic engagement.[8] Youth-adult partnerships have been found to be particularly effective in addressing school improvement,[9] promoting Global Health Initiatives,[10] and integrating technology in the classroom.[11]

According to the State of Texas, youth-adult partnerships have allowed young people to assume the roles of advisors and consultants to youth organizations, political lobbyists, community organizers, grant (money) decision-makers, nonprofit board directors, and as direct youth service providers.[12] Additional practice has identified significant roles for youth-adult partnerships in rural civic engagement projects[13] and in creating effective outreach for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning youth.[14]

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Zeldin, S., McDaniel, A., Topitzes, D., & Lorens, M.B. (2001). "Bringing young people to the table: Effects on adults and youth organizations," CYD Journal, 2(2) p. 20-27.
  2. Zeldin, S. and Petrokubi, J. (2006) "Understanding Innovation: Youth-Adult Partnerships in Decision Making," The Prevention Researcher. 131. Pages 11-15.
  3. Mitra . Dana L. . May 2009 . Collaborating with Students: Building Youth-Adult Partnerships in Schools . American Journal of Education . en . 115 . 3 . 407–436 . 10.1086/597488 . 145602508 . 0195-6744.
  4. Brown . Louis D. . Redelfs . Alisha H. . Taylor . Thomas J. . Messer . Reanna L. . September 2015 . Comparing the Functioning of Youth and Adult Partnerships for Health Promotion . American Journal of Community Psychology . en . 56 . 1–2 . 25–35 . 10.1007/s10464-015-9730-2 . 4620943 . 26066568.
  5. (n.d.)Dialogues Across Nebraska: Youth Adult Partnerships University of Nebraska Rural Initiative.
  6. Fletcher, A. (2006) Washington Youth Voice Handbook. Olympia, WA: CommonAction.
  7. To . Siu-ming . Chun-Sing Cheung . Johnson . Liu . Xiaoyu . Lau . Cheryl Danielle . Zeng . Hera Junfei . Chan . Adam Man-yuk . 2020-06-10 . Youth Empowerment in the Community and Young People's Creative Self-Efficacy: The Moderating Role of Youth–Adult Partnerships in Youth Service . Youth & Society . 53 . 6 . 1021–1043 . 10.1177/0044118x20930890 . 225757865 . 0044-118X.
  8. Norman, J. (2001) "Building Effective Youth-Adult Partnerships", Transitions. 141, October 2001. Advocates for Youth.
  9. Fletcher, A. (2005) Meaningful student involvement guide to students as school partners. Bothell, WA: HumanLinks Foundation.
  10. Family Health International. (2002) YouthLens: Youth-Adult Partnerships Network. 222. Author.
  11. Goldman, G. & McCombs, B. (n.d.) Using New Educational Technologies to Empower Youth: The Power of Youth-Adult Partnerships in e-Learning . Seattle, WA: New Horizons for Learning.
  12. (2002) Youth/Adult Partnerships Guide Texas Network of Youth Services and Prevention and Early Intervention/Community Youth Development, Division of the Texas, Department of Protective and Regulatory Services.
  13. (n.d.)Civic Engagement and Youth/Adult Partnerships Arlington, VA: Rural School and Community Trust.
  14. (n.d.) GLSEN Jump Start: Youth Adult Partnerships New York, NY: GLSEN.