Willam–Warnke yield criterion explained

The Willam–Warnke yield criterion [1] is a function that is used to predict when failure will occur in concrete and other cohesive-frictional materials such as rock, soil, and ceramics. This yield criterion has the functional form

f(I1,J2,J3)=0

where

I1

is the first invariant of the Cauchy stress tensor, and

J2,J3

are the second and third invariants of the deviatoric part of the Cauchy stress tensor. There are three material parameters (

\sigmac

- the uniaxial compressive strength,

\sigmat

– the uniaxial tensile strength,

\sigmab

- the equibiaxial compressive strength) that have to be determined before the Willam-Warnke yield criterion may be applied to predict failure.

In terms of

I1,J2,J3

, the Willam-Warnke yield criterion can be expressed as

f:=\sqrt{J2}+λ(J2,J3)~(\tfrac{I1}{3}-B)=0

where

λ

is a function that depends on

J2,J3

and the three material parameters and

B

depends only on the material parameters. The function

λ

can be interpreted as the friction angle which depends on the Lode angle (

\theta

). The quantity

B

is interpreted as a cohesion pressure. The Willam-Warnke yield criterion may therefore be viewed as a combination of the Mohr–Coulomb and the Drucker–Prager yield criteria.

Willam-Warnke yield function

In the original paper, the three-parameter Willam-Warnke yield function was expressed as

f=\cfrac{1}{3z}~\cfrac{I1}{\sigmac}+\sqrt{\cfrac{2}{5}}~\cfrac{1}{r(\theta)}\cfrac{\sqrt{J2}}{\sigmac}-1\le0

where

I1

is the first invariant of the stress tensor,

J2

is the second invariant of the deviatoric part of the stress tensor,

\sigmac

is the yield stress in uniaxial compression, and

\theta

is the Lode angle given by

\theta=\tfrac{1}{3}\cos-1\left(\cfrac{3\sqrt{3}}{2}~\cfrac{J3}{J

3/2
2
}\right) ~. The locus of the boundary of the stress surface in the deviatoric stress plane is expressed in polar coordinates by the quantity

r(\theta)

which is given by

r(\theta):=\cfrac{u(\theta)+v(\theta)}{w(\theta)}

where

\begin{align} u(\theta):=&2~rc~(r

2)~\cos\theta
t

\\ v(\theta):=&rc~(2~rt-rc)\sqrt{4~(r

2
c

-

2)~\cos
r
t

2\theta+

2
5~r
t

-4~rt~rc}\\ w(\theta):=&

2
4(r
c

-

2)\cos
r
t

2\theta+(rc-2~r

2
t)

\end{align}

The quantities

rt

and

rc

describe the position vectors at the locations

\theta=0\circ,60\circ

and can be expressed in terms of

\sigmac,\sigmab,\sigmat

as (here

\sigmab

is the failure stress under equi-biaxial compression and

\sigmat

is the failure stress under uniaxial tension)

rc:=\sqrt{\cfrac{6}{5}}\left[\cfrac{\sigmab\sigmat}{3\sigmab\sigmat+\sigmac(\sigmab-\sigmat)}\right]~;~~ rt:=\sqrt{\cfrac{6}{5}}\left[\cfrac{\sigmab\sigmat}{\sigmac(2\sigmab+\sigmat)}\right]

The parameter

z

in the model is given by

z:=\cfrac{\sigmab\sigmat}{\sigmac(\sigmab-\sigmat)}~.

The Haigh-Westergaard representation of the Willam-Warnke yield condition can bewritten as

f(\xi,\rho,\theta)=0\equiv f:=\bar{λ}(\theta)~\rho+\bar{B}~\xi-\sigmac\le0

where

\bar{B}:=\cfrac{1}{\sqrt{3}~z}~;~~\bar{λ}:=\cfrac{1}{\sqrt{5}~r(\theta)}~.

Modified forms of the Willam-Warnke yield criterion

An alternative form of the Willam-Warnke yield criterion in Haigh-Westergaard coordinates is the Ulm-Coussy-Bazant form:[2]

f(\xi,\rho,\theta)=0or f:=\rho+\bar{λ}(\theta)~\left(\xi-\bar{B}\right)=0

where

\bar{λ}:=\sqrt{\tfrac{2}{3}}~\cfrac{u(\theta)+v(\theta)}{w(\theta)}~;~~ \bar{B}:=\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{3}}~\left[\cfrac{\sigmab\sigmat}{\sigmab-\sigmat}\right]

and

\begin{align} rt:=&\cfrac{\sqrt{3}~(\sigmab-\sigmat)}{2\sigmab-\sigmat}\\ rc:=&\cfrac{\sqrt{3}~\sigmac~(\sigmab-\sigmat)}{(\sigmac+\sigmat)\sigmab-\sigmac\sigmat} \end{align}

The quantities

rc,rt

are interpreted as friction coefficients. For the yield surface to be convex, the Willam-Warnke yield criterion requires that

2~rt\gerc\gert/2

and

0\le\theta\le\cfrac{\pi}{3}

.

See also

References

  1. Willam, K. J. and Warnke, E. P. (1975). "Constitutive models for the triaxial behavior of concrete." Proceedings of the International Assoc. for Bridge and Structural Engineering, vol 19, pp. 1–30.
  2. Ulm, F-J., Coussy, O., Bazant, Z. (1999) The ‘‘Chunnel’’ Fire. I: Chemoplastic softening in rapidly heated concrete. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 272-282.

External links