A Widlar current source is a modification of the basic two-transistor current mirror that incorporates an emitter degeneration resistor for only the output transistor, enabling the current source to generate low currents using only moderate resistor values.[1] [2] [3]
The Widlar circuit may be used with bipolar transistors, MOS transistors, and even vacuum tubes. An example application is the 741 operational amplifier,[4] and Widlar used the circuit as a part in many designs.[5]
This circuit is named after its inventor, Bob Widlar, and was patented in 1967.[6] [7]
Figure 1 is an example Widlar current source using bipolar transistors, where the emitter resistance R2 is connected to the output transistor Q2, and has the effect of reducing the current in Q2 relative to Q1. The key to this circuit is that the voltage drop across the resistance R2 subtracts from the base-emitter voltage of transistor Q2, thereby turning this transistor off compared to transistor Q1. This observation is expressed by equating the base voltage expressions found on either side of the circuit in Figure 1 as:
\begin{align} &VB=VBE1=VBE2+(\beta2+1)IB2R2\\ ⇒ {}&
1 | |
R2 |
\left(VBE1-VBE2\right)=(\beta2+1)IB2 , \end{align}
Eq. 1
\begin{align} (\beta2+1)IB2&=\left(1+
1 | |
\beta2 |
\right)IC2=
1 | |
R2 |
\left(VBE1-VBE2\right)\\ &=
VT | |
R2 |
\left[ln\left(IC1/IS1\right)-ln\left(IC2/IS2\right)\right]=
VT | |
R2 |
ln\left(
IC1IS2 | |
IC2IS1 |
\right) , \end{align}
This equation makes the approximation that the currents are both much larger than the scale currents, IS1 and IS2; an approximation valid except for current levels near cut off. In the following, the scale currents are assumed to be identical; in practice, this needs to be specifically arranged.
To design the mirror, the output current must be related to the two resistor values R1 and R2. A basic observation is that the output transistor is in active mode only so long as its collector-base voltage is non-zero. Thus, the simplest bias condition for design of the mirror sets the applied voltage VA to equal the base voltage VB. This minimum useful value of VA is called the compliance voltage of the current source. With that bias condition, the Early effect plays no role in the design.[9]
These considerations suggest the following design procedure:
IC1=
\beta1 | |
\beta1+1 |
\left(IR1-
IC2 | |
\beta2 |
\right) .
VBE1=VTln\left(
IC1 | |
IS |
\right)=VA .
where IS is a device parameter sometimes called the scale current.
The value of base voltage also sets the compliance voltage VA = VBE1. This voltage is the lowest voltage for which the mirror works properly.
R1=
VCC-VA | |
IR1 |
.
R2=
VT | |||||
|
ln\left(
IC1 | |
IC2 |
\right) .
The inverse of the design problem is finding the current when the resistor values are known. An iterative method is described next. Assume the current source is biased so the collector-base voltage of the output transistor Q2 is zero. The current through R1 is the input or reference current given as,
\begin{align} IR1&=IC1+IB1+IB2\\ &=IC1+
IC1 | |
\beta1 |
+
IC2 | |
\beta2 |
\\ &=
1 | |
R1 |
\left(VCC-VBE1\right) \end{align}
Eq. 2
IC1=
\beta1 | |
\beta1+1 |
\left(
VCC-VBE1 | |
R1 |
-
IC2 | |
\beta2 |
\right)
The diode equation provides:
Eq. 3
VBE1=VTln\left(
IC1 | |
IS1 |
\right) .
Eq.1 provides:
IC2=
VT | |||||
|
ln\left(
IC1 | |
IC2 |
\right) .
These three relations are a nonlinear, implicit determination for the currents that can be solved by iteration.
VBE1=VTln\left(
IC1 | |
IS1 |
\right) .
IC1=
\beta1 | |
\beta1+1 |
\left(
VCC-VBE1 | |
R1 |
-
IC2 | |
\beta2 |
\right)
IC2=
VT | |||||
|
ln\left(
IC1 | |
IC2 |
\right) .
Note that with the circuit as shown, if VCC changes, the output current will change. Hence, to keep the output current constant despite fluctuations in VCC, the circuit should be driven by a constant current source rather than using the resistor R1.
The transcendental equations above can be solved exactly in terms of the Lambert W function.
An important property of a current source is its small signal incremental output impedance, which should ideally be infinite. The Widlar circuit introduces local current feedback for transistor
\scriptstyleQ2
Output resistance is found using a small-signal model for the circuit, shown in Figure 2. Transistor Q1 is replaced by its small-signal emitter resistance rE because it is diode connected.[10] Transistor Q2 is replaced with its hybrid-pi model. A test current Ix is attached at the output.
Using the figure, the output resistance is determined using Kirchhoff's laws. Using Kirchhoff's voltage law from the ground on the left to the ground connection of R2:
Ib\left[(R1\parallelrE)+r\pi\right]+[Ix+Ib]R2=0 .
Rearranging:
Ib=-Ix
R2 | |
(R1\parallelrE)+r\pi+R2 |
.
Using Kirchhoff's voltage law from the ground connection of R2 to the ground of the test current:
Vx=Ix(R2+rO)+Ib(R2-\betarO) ,
Eq. 4
RO=
Vx | |
Ix |
=rO\left[1+
\betaR2 | |
(R1\parallelrE)+r\pi+R2 |
\right]
+ R2\left[
(R1\parallelrE)+r\pi | |
(R1\parallelrE)+r\pi+R2 |
\right] .
According to Eq. 4, the output resistance of the Widlar current source is increased over that of the output transistor itself (which is rO) so long as R2 is large enough compared to the rπ of the output transistor (large resistances R2 make the factor multiplying rO approach the value (β + 1)). The output transistor carries a low current, making rπ large, and increase in R2 tends to reduce this current further, causing a correlated increase in rπ. Therefore, a goal of R2 ≫ rπ can be unrealistic, and further discussion is provided below. The resistance R1∥rE usually is small because the emitter resistance rE usually is only a few ohms.
The current dependence of the resistances rπ and rO is discussed in the article hybrid-pi model. The current dependence of the resistor values is:
r\pi=
vbe | |
ib |
| | |
vce=0 |
=
VT | |
IB2 |
=
\beta | ||||
|
,
rO=
vce | |
ic |
| | |
vbe=0 |
=
VA | |
IC2 |
From earlier in this article (setting the scale currents equal for convenience):Eq. 5
R2=
VT | |||||
|
ln\left(
IC1 | |
IC2 |
\right) .
Consequently, for the usual case of small rE, and neglecting the second term in RO with the expectation that the leading term involving rO is much larger:Eq. 6
\begin{align} RO& ≈ rO\left(1+
\beta2R2 | |
r\pi+R2 |
\right)\\ &=rO\left(1+
| ||||||||||
|
\right) \end{align}
Increase of IC1 to increase the feedback factor also results in increased compliance voltage, not a good thing as that means the current source operates over a more restricted voltage range. So, for example, with a goal for compliance voltage set, placing an upper limit upon IC1, and with a goal for output resistance to be met, the maximum value of output current IC2 is limited.
The center panel in Figure 3 shows the design trade-off between emitter leg resistance and the output current: a lower output current requires a larger leg resistor, and hence a larger area for the design. An upper bound on area therefore sets a lower bound on the output current and an upper bound on the circuit output resistance.
Eq. 6 for RO depends upon selecting a value of R2 according to Eq. 5. That means Eq. 6 is not a circuit behavior formula, but a design value equation. Once R2 is selected for a particular design objective using Eq. 5, thereafter its value is fixed. If circuit operation causes currents, voltages or temperatures to deviate from the designed-for values; then to predict changes in RO caused by such deviations, Eq. 4 should be used, not Eq. 6.