| Genre: | Drama |
| Director: | John Gray |
| Executive Producer: | Don Ohlmeyer |
| Producer: | Karen Danaher-Dorr Ian Sander |
| Story: | Josephine Cummings Richard Yalem Beth Sullivan |
| Teleplay: | John Gray Beth Sullivan |
| Starring: | Annabeth Gish John Terlesky Kevin Dillon |
| Location: | California |
| Music: | Mark Snow |
| Cinematography: | Mike Fash |
| Editor: | Edward R. Abroms |
| Company: | Ohlmeyer Communications Company World International Network |
| Network: | CBS |
| Runtime: | 100 minutes |
| Country: | United States |
| Language: | English |
When He's Not a Stranger is a 1989 American made-for-TV crime drama film directed by John Gray and starring Annabeth Gish and John Terlesky. The story, a stark dramatization of "acquaintance rape," is about a college freshman who is physically and sexually assaulted by a controlling football jock, and addresses the ordeal that rape victims experience.[1]
When He's Not a Stranger was released amid a wave of TV shows and movies addressing rape.[2] Specifically, the film addressed acquaintance rape, a depiction that scholars Carol Bohmer and Andrea Parrott called a "landmark."
The movie was originally to be broadcast on October 17, 1989 but was pushed to November 6th of that year because of coverage surrounding the earthquakes in Northern California.[3]
At Woodward University, a football-oriented California school, Lyn McKenna is raped by her best friend's abusive, controlling boyfriend, football star Ron Cooper. Lyn is hesitant to reveal this information as she fears that doing so will create social backlash and worsen the aftermath of her experience. However, continued threats from Ron and his fellow football teammates drive Lyn to desperate action. She requests that the school hold a disciplinary hearing against Ron and ultimately demands that a district attorney prosecute.
When He's Not a Stranger received mixed reviews. USA Today called the film "schlock" composed of "hokey us-against-them scenarios."[4] The Los Angeles Times, while acknowledging the serious subject matter, "criticized the film's "simple-minded characterizations and elementary insights."[5] More positive were The New York Times, which said the film "maintains a surprisingly hard edge" and noted its treatment of class issues, and The Washington Post, which praised Gish's performance especially.[6] New York also praised the performances.[7]
Some reviewers found the film exploitative. A Philadelphia Inquirer op-ed wrote that the graphic scenes leading up to Lyn's assault "hardly serve an educational function," and argued that they were intended to boost ratings with salacious content rather than to raise awareness.[8]