Whangamata fault zone explained

Whangamata fault zone
Other Name:Whangamata Fault, Haukari/West Whangamata Fault [1]
Named For:Whangamata Bay, Lake Taupō
Pushpin Relief:1
Country:New Zealand
Region:Waikato Region
Coordinates:-38.588°N 175.962°W
Plate:Indo-Australian
Status:Active
Earthquakes:June - July 1922, 2001
Type:Normal fault
Movement:5 MW+ in 1922 with 1.8m (05.9feet) displacement[2]
Age:Quaternary
Volcanic Arc/Belt:Taupō Volcanic Zone
Embed:New Zealand geology database (includes faults)

The Whangamata fault zone is part of the seismically active western Taupō rift-bounding normal wall faults [1] and is associated with the major active Whangamata Fault and Haukari/West Whangamata Fault and several unnamed active faults. Obsidian used by the Māori is exposed along these faults.[3]

Geography

The known active faults in the zone extend north east from Kinloch on the north west shore of Lake Taupō approximately through the rhyolytic volcanic dome of Ben Lomond[4] to the region of the Mokai Power Station.

Geology

The present western wall faults of the Taupō Fault Belt in this region of active extension by 8mm/year ± 2mm[1] of the modern Taupō Volcanic Zone have been defined by earthquake swarms such as occurred in 1922 which resulted in a 1.8m (05.9feet) displacement of the Whangamata Fault[2] and the swarm of 2001.[5] To the north the zone continues as the Thorpe - Poplar Fault and to the south has its structure disturbed and hidden by the Taupō Volcano. The 2001 earthquake swarm is best explained by intrusion into a volcanic dyke.[5]

Risks

These are typical for a fault structure adjacent to an active volcanic caldera filled with a lake, being both tectonic and any associated volcanism and so could be significant. The 1922 earthquake swarm was associated with several earthquakes in the range of 5 to 5.4 MW which caused chimney collapse, land slips, as well as both local and international concern sufficient to impact the tourist industry given the manifest lake shore subsidence and fault displacements.[2] The swarm lasted nine months with total displacement of up to on the northern shore of Lake Taupō (not just the Whangamata fault zone was involved).[2] As the magma-tectonic interaction of the 2001 swarm may have been from a magma source independent of the Taupō Volcano, relatively small scale eruption associated with the faults would be possible, if a dyke reaches the surface.[5]

Mineral Resources

The extensive and used obsidian outcrops near Kinloch were accessible to the Māori as they were exposed by the Whangamata Fault.[3]

Notes and References

  1. Desmond J. . Darby . Kathleen M. . Hodgkinson . Graeme H. . Blick . 2000 . Geodetic measurement of deformation in the Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand: The north Taupo network revisited . New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics . 43 . 2 . 157–170 . 10.1080/00288306.2000.9514878 .
  2. 10.5459/bnzsee.35.4.215-230 . Social and economic consequences of historic caldera unrest at the Taupo volcano, New Zealand and the management of future episodes of unrest. 2002 . Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering . 35 . 4 . 215–230. David . Johnston. Brad . Scott. Bruce . Houghton . Douglas . Paton . David . Dowrick . Pilar . Villamor . John . Savage.
  3. PR . Moore . 2011 . The Taupo obsidian source, central North Island, New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand . 41. 2. 205–215 . 10.1080/03036758.2010.529919 . free .
  4. R. J. . Stevenson . R. M. . Briggs . A. P. W. . Hodder . 1994 . Physical volcanology and emplacement history of the Ben Lomond rhyolite lava flow, Taupo Volcanic Centre, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics . 37 . 3 . 345–358 . 10.1080/00288306.1994.9514625 .
  5. McGregor . R. F. D. . Illsley-Kemp . F. . Townend . J. . 2022 . The 2001 Taupō Fault Belt seismicity as evidence of magma-tectonic interaction at Taupō volcano . Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems . 23 . e2022GC010625 . 10.1029/2022GC010625 . free .