Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif explained

Litigants:Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif
Decidedate:May 26
Decideyear:2015
Usvol:575
Uspage:665
Holding:Bankruptcy courts may adjudicate Stern claims with the parties' knowing and voluntary consent.
Majority:Sotomayor
Concurrence:Alito (in part)
Dissent:Roberts
Joindissent:Scalia; Thomas (Part I only)
Dissent2:Thomas
Lawsapplied:U.S. Const. art. III

Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif, 575 U.S. 665 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that bankruptcy courts may adjudicate Stern claims with the parties' knowing and voluntary consent.[1] [2] [3]

Notes and References

  1. .
  2. Web site: 2015-05-27 . Opinion analysis: Justices reaffirm authority of bankruptcy judges based on parties’ consent . 2024-12-04 . SCOTUSblog . en-US.
  3. Web site: 2015-05-28 . Commentary: Wellness after Stern . 2024-12-04 . SCOTUSblog . en-US.